
This just in: Anchorman 2 is not dead at Paramount Pictures. Not yet, anyway. But there is a budget gap of about $30 million to overcome.
Adam McKay’s Twitter late last week practically pronounced the project dead. And then Ben Stiller indicated that his Zoolander sequel wasn’t on the firmest ground at Paramount either when he Twittered: “Ron Burgundy and Derek Zoolander looking to appear in sequels. Both men destitute, without means or intellect to fund their own comebacks.”
What’s really going on? Paramount insiders said that the studio is eager to make both sequels, but only if each costs around $40 million. I’m not sure what the gross outlay will be, but it seems sure that it’s north of 20% on each film. Zoolander 2, which will also star Owen Wilson, has started development, with Tropic Thunder‘s Justin Theroux writing the script and directing. But the filmmakers behind Anchorman 2 won’t even start on a script unless Paramount moves the budget up to a range that is probably closer to $70 million.
All of the participants are bigger stars than when the originals came out, and they are always asked the same question during film junkets for other films: when is that sequel coming? And, from Anchorman‘s gang battle of rival news teams to the Zoolander gas station scene with horseplay between male models that culminates in a mass funeral, there is a plethora of memorable scenes and punchlines that stamp these as cult favorite comedies with established fan bases who want more.
So why is Paramount playing budget hardball when it just made a staggering deal on a Sacha Baron Cohen pitch that will pay him what amounts to $20 million against 20% of first dollar gross, with a gross outlay that rises to 30% after the studio recoups and earns its distribution fee? Paramount also paid writers Alec Berg, Jeff Schaffer and David Mandel between $3 million and $4 million, and gross as producers.
The studio was comfortable with the gross deal and a $65 million budget that includes the screenwriting fees, because Baron Cohen has proven himself a reliable overseas draw, studio insiders say. Borat grossed $128 million domestic, and $133 million overseas. While Bruno wasn’t viewed as a big success, the film’s domestic gross of $60 million was surpassed by its $78 million overseas take.
Contrast that to Anchorman. Made on a $25 million budget, the comedy about the local San Diego TV news team grossed $85 million domestic, but only $5 million foreign. Zoolander grossed $45 million domestic, and did $15 million foreign. Now, insiders on both films claim that is not necessarily indicative of sequel potential. Zoolander came out September 28, 2001, a time when the world was not in a laughing mood after the 9/11 terror attacks. Stiller’s movies generally perform strongly overseas: Meet the Fockers, for instance, grossed $279 million domestic and $237 million overseas. Anchorman‘s overseas distributor UIP doesn’t seem to have pushed the film overseas. There would be more for Paramount to sell this time around, since McKay, Will Ferrell, Judd Apatow, Steve Carell and Paul Rudd are more prominent than they were in 2004. All are prepared to return–but they aren’t cheap. 
Comedies with inherently American story-lines usually do most of their business domestically—Talladega Nights, a domestic blockbuster at $148 million, turned in $15 million in overseas ticket sales. The Hangover was the big anomaly, grossing $190 million foreign to go with its $277 million domestic gross.
It sounds to me like both films will be a struggle but could still happen, once the Twitter posturing is over. McKay’s subsequent Twitter message–doubting Paramount would allow the film to move elsewhere–is certainly true. Paramount is turnaround-shy after dropping Twilight and John Carter of Mars, the latter of which is being turned into a big Disney film. If Paramount let go of either, the studio would likely insist on a gross participation comparable to the 7.5% of first dollar gross New Line got when it let go of Dear John to be made by Relativity and distributed by Sony. That would certainly limit the suitor pool for both films.
No Go For Anchorman 2 For Paramount?
Justin Theroux Readying ‘Zoolander 2′ For Ben Stiller And Paramount: Where’s Owen?


If the above the line cut fees and take a bigger share in profits everyone wins. Both movies are all but guaranteed to open huge. 30 million (budget) + 30 Million (P&A) hell, they could easily take that in the opening weekend.
Someones being greedy and I doubt it’s the filmmakers
why would anyone want to see this? if paramount is smart, they will jump out.
Who wouldn’t want to see this? We Americans are a stupid, stupid people. We want our Paul Blart, and that’s why the rest of the world is kicking our ass.
Does anyone really want another Will Ferrell movie? maybe on a cable channel somewhere.
im from norway, and will ferrell is a f****** legend!
There’s just no way either of these films should cost over 30 million!!! Technology has brought the price of film producing down considerably!! These guys are all trying to make there quotes.
Paramount it right. You don’t need a huge budget? I don’t understand where all the money going? The big special effects? The 3d? If they really wanna make it then cut the budget.
And personally I don’t know anyone clamoring for an Anchorman sequel. And it will not do much more than the 1st one overseas. Hangover was an exception when it came to overseas and comedy because it was an easily understood and silly concept and everyone knows Vegas. Overseas audience are not gonna click with a 70′s satire of American culture via local network news. Scrap it.
But I do know some who would love to see more Zoolander. That could have more of a shot doing well overseas.
Paramount should jump out?! The 20-something sect regards these as the two best comedies of the last decade. They’re instant hits if they’re made.
For a second I thought we were all getting good news. No new FRIDAY THE 13th from New Line, no sequel to ANCHORMAN, no sequel to ZOOLANDER. Fucking HELL, enough with the unnecessary sequels. It’s OKAY to leave money on the table, especially when it’s only going to be a few domestic made coins.
That’s kind of a shame for Anchorman 2. It has had time to become a cult classic, and it will definitely have a big opening weekend. A Ron Burgundy story set in the 80s is an interesting concept and could work. 70 million is a bit steep for a budget I have to admit. A Zoolander sequel, is unnecessary though.
A $30m gap… when they could wrap it in 4 weeks for $40m??? What vanity/ego project has it become???
What a sad comment on our industry when sequels are being considered for two stinkers like this. It appears that the brain trust at Paramount have collectively had one too many shots of tequila and are now lacking the gray matter to properly comprehend their actions. Stiller and Ferrell are two talented guys, who should be in search of better material…crack the whip boys, and get your agents to rustle up something worthy of your talents.
People who I consider to have bad taste in movies absolutely love Anchorman. That’s why I will never see it and will never see part 2. Farrell is so over.
As a fan of both franchises, I would personally pledge money to get these movies made. Maybe that will be a new Marketing hook, and Paramount can ask the fans to contribute if they want to see the films get made. There have got to be 3 millions fans who’s be willing to contribute $10 each.
As an industry guy, I find it absurd that these films would need such a high budget to get made. Seems way out of line.
My thought exactly. It’s a silly comedy. There’s no reason it should cost $70 million, ESPECIALLY since they claim that’s the number WITH reduced cast salaries. So, what, if the guys hadn’t cut their salaries the production budget needed would be $100 million? What is McKay smoking? They need to cut down on the estimated production cost, and try to meet Paramount halfway. I think Paramount would pony up about $50-$55 million if McKay and company would at least drop it down to that. But $70? Ha. No way. That’s insane. $70 million production + $30 (or more) for P&A for a film with no international appeal whatsoever? No studio in their right mind would greenlight that.
I pledge $50 for Anchorman 2. Not a lot of love towards Zoolander, but definitely for A2!
An Anchorman sequel would be a huge hit – it’s a massive and oft-quoted fan favorite and anyone who doubts it is beyond ignorant or just a Will Ferrel hater. Granted his latest films haven’t been great, but this would be a slam dunk. Get a clue. They should just up the budget and get it done.
And trust me I have seen The Other Guys. Definitely Will Ferrell’s best comedy since Talladega Nights. It’s going to kill at the B.O. and give Ferrell a much needed boost after Land of the Lost.
“So why is Paramount playing budget hardball when it just made a staggering deal on a Sacha Baron Cohen pitch that will pay him what amounts to $20 million against 20% of first dollar gross, with a gross outlay that rises to 30% after the studio recoups and earns its distribution fee?”
What exactly is a gross outlay?
While I understand Paramount’s budgetary concerns (especially given the foreign grosses of the first Anchorman and Zoolander films), they really need to take a closer look at the DVD sales and rental figures. I have no knowledge of what they are in either case, but both movies have gained large fanbases in the years since being released. Both films have great potential to be another Austin Powers… in other words, Austin didn’t do big box office on the first film, but DVD sales/rental steadily built up a rabid fanbase, and the sequel made boffo box office.
Anchorman, by the way, has what is hands-down the funniest DVD commentary track ever.
No comedy should cost upwards of $70 million. Well, none that’s expected to be profitable anyway.
Why throw money at proven stars returning to popular brands with a built-in audience when you can spend it trying to cast Taylor Lautner as an outdated toy?
Neither ‘Zoolander’ nor ‘Anchorman’ is considered high-brow entertainment, but as the studios grow more and more out of touch with young audiences, it would be wise to commit cash into both films. They’re pretty much sure things for big opening weekend, high DVD sales and TV broadcasting rights.
Maybe filmmakers want more money up front because they know they’ll never see any on the other end. Besides, comedies are harder to make than dramas.
Stiller, Carell and Ferrell are talented guys and I for one would rather see Paramount invest in films more deserving of their talent.
At first I was so complimentary of their instincts not to make this idiotic sequel. Now that they are waffling and it might get made, Jesus move on develop something dont rehash. I was glad to see, but then again one never knows, Paramount pulled the plug on a remake of Footloose. Why in God’s name would they waste their time? Really who wants to see that…make movies develop properties high real directors Frickin Create..
Side Note: Did anyone see Harry Brown. The actor in the chair selling Michael Caine a gun was he acting. That was the most horrific scene in a movie in a long time. Comments appreiciated.
New Line has also gotten smaller since these movies came out, sucks for us. I would pay to see both in theatres.
Does the ANCHORMAN sequel take place on Saturn or something? If everybody’s doing it for love, why in the name of Odin’s beard is this priced at 70 million?
OMG I WILL GO SEE IT ONE MILLIONS TIMES AND WILL KNOW EVERY LINE LIKE I ALREADY DO FOR ANCHORMAN. I WILL ALSO LOVE ZOOLANDER THE SEQUEL AND WHO CARES ABOUT OVER SEAS DRAWS? THEY DONT GET THE HUMOR NOR THE NODS TO OUR CULTURE OR OUR PAST AKA 70′S
could it be the film studios are getting smart??? Ferrell has been on a slow decline and Stiller well his situation has just been stagnant…I mean the sun is setting on these to and I would imagine soon regulated to television or cable…Lets get some new blood in there!!!!
Sure hope they find a way to make both these sequels. These are top two of my most favorite movies every. I am a 32- year old married woman. I complete acknowledge the fact that both these movies are complete hilarious silliness and don’t know what that says about me but I can quote a gazillion lines out of either one and it makes me laugh every time. I also am baffled by the fact that a comedy without any crazy 3D or special effects would require that much $$ to make, but I can see how a cast with Will Ferrell, Paul Rudd and Steve Carrell would cost a pretty penny right there.