For almost two decades, Hollywood has tried unsuccessfully to turn Ayn Rand’s 1100 page classic Atlas Shrugged into a feature film with actresses ranging from Angelina Jolie to Charlize Theron to Faye Dunaway. John Aglialoro, the entrepreneur who 17 years ago paid $1 million to option the book rights, is tired of the futility and is taking matters into his own hands. He’s announced that he is financing a June 11 production start in Los Angeles for the first of what he said will be four films made from the book.
Aglialoro, who had a hand in writing the script by Brian O’Tool, is taking on this ambitious plan with an unproven director, and is weeks away from production without stars to play Dagny Taggart, Hank Rearden, John Galt and the other roles. He’s moving forward despite the conventional wisdom that without stars, it could ultimately be the audience that shrugged.
Aglialoro, CEO of exercise equipment manufacturer Cybex International and UM Holdings, would hardly be the only entrepreneur who uses his resources to make a picture happen, one in which he took on a creative role. David Ellison, son of Oracle’s Larry Ellison, made a co-financing deal with Paramount, and one of the first projects from his Skydance slate is the aviation thriller Northern Lights, which casts him as co-star. Dan Pritzker, the billionaire son of Hyatt Hotels chain magnate Jay Pritzker, financed and directed a pair of jazz films: Bolden stars The Hurt Locker‘s Anthony Mackie as pioneering horn player Buddy Bolden; Louis is an honest to goodness silent film–with dialogue title cards and musical accompaniment–about the childhood of Louis Armstrong. Pritzker is working on a plan to show the latter in venues with a live orchestra. I saw the silent film and thought it was well made, but I have doubts Pritzker will sway the business from its 80 year infatuation with “talkies.”
Atlas Shrugged will be directed by Stephen Polk, an actor/producer whose father, Louis Polk, was once MGM chairman. He considers Atlas Shrugged to be his feature directing debut, though Polk acknowledges he stepped in and helmed the 2008 indie Baggage. Aglialoro was unavailable to speak directly, but sent a missive indicating that he’s courting actresses like Theron and Maggie Gyllenhaal to play Taggart. Sources in the camps of both actresses were aware of the project, but neither is planning to go to work on Atlas Shrugged next month.
Normally, when there is such a rush to begin production, it’s to keep an option on material from expiring.
Polk said they are not intimidated to film a storied book even if stars don’t align. “For more than 15 years, this has been at studios and there has been a whole dance around who’ll play the iconic roles,” Polk said. “Making it an independent film was the game-changer. Everybody is saying, how can you shoot this movie without a star? We’re shooting it because it’s a good movie with great characters. We’ve been in pre-production for months, but kept it a mystery. Part of the reason is because there’s so much crap about how you need a great big budget and stars. We aren’t looking for big names to trigger press or financing.”
Polk said that the idea of cutting through the bureaucracy and just getting started is consistent with the book’s themes of capitalism and taking entrepreneurial risk. The story centers around Taggart, a railroad executive who watches society crumble around her as government takes control over industry and innovators begin to disappear.




I will go see the movie as long as it is true to the novel.
I never go to the movies anymore. Nothing worth seeing.
“Masterpiece?” “Classic novel?” Ayn Rand was a terrible writer whose adherents are a big part of the reason the economy tanked (I’m looking at you, Alan Greenspan).
Know what this project reminds me of? Battlefield Earth. ‘Nuff said.
You are indeed a writer of comedy!
Harmonica, blow it out your…nah, too easy.
Greenspan was indeed a factor by over capitalization but let us keep in mind that he completely betrayed his principles when he did these things. It wasn’t the principles that failed, it was Greenspan becoming another broken cog in a sputtering machine.
Please… Enough with the Greenspan = Rand… It is BS. Greenspan dropped her principles when he took the FED job.
If you knew the philosophy of Objectivism, that would be apparent. This is the 3rd time someone has used the lame attempt at bringing Rand down by Greenspan’s actions. It is BS
Comedy Writer must love arguing with trolls on lefty websites, so he reciprocates here. Personally, I find it tedious.
Perfect, a film about the totally self-absorbed society, purified through ‘objectivism’. When the aliens finally arrive here and find our bony remains, our ghost cities, they will take back with them our religious texts and this megabook and laugh about our endless folly. Oh those humans, they fought over resources and egomania and fantasized about perfect inventions and phantom deities.
Egomania? Is it not progressives that believe mankind can be perfected via his institutions? Now that’s what I call hubris.
Egomania? Is it not progressives that believe mankind can be perfected via his institutions? Now that’s what I call hubris.
jon hamm? um.. no. John Galt is (according to the book) a young handsome blond god.
John Hamm is NONE of those things.
I’m not sure what actor out there brings to the table the likable arrogance that John Galt needs.. and has the looks to bring it off..
but.. for starters.. perhaps hmmm.. i’m not sure.
Who knows what the climate will be 10 months from now. If they keep the budget reasonable it could do well. They did say it’s been in pre-pro for months and they’re talking to some names.
But I WANNA BE DAGNY!!!
Seriously, if they cast a stupid socialist like Charlize Theron, there goes the film.
I can’t help but associate the public life of an actor and the role. Any movie with Jane Fonda will still make me think of her on the anti-aircraft guns in North Vietnam.
The Coen brothers are re-making TRUE GRIT with Jeff Bridges and *Matt Damon the Idiot” playing La Beouf, an honest Texas Ranger. John Wayne is spinning in his grave.
given how long it took watchman to get made. not surprised the rights holder to atlas shrug is finaly saying enough time to try it myself wish the guy luck. if holly wood has not been able to crack the thing for film. then let Aligero try maybe he will succeed.
Pro capitalism movies do well and not just with “teabaggers”. Guess no one saw Iron Man 2. Or saw and missed the point. Should be an interesting movie and I’ll be happy to see it. We’ll always have the book if that doesn’t work out.
They should be shooting this in New York and Connecticut, where many of the major scenes in the novel take place.
Over the past few years, I have been also frustrated by the lack of action on the production side of this project and seriously considering offering to shoot the film myself. And my offer STILL stands, if it’s an east coast shoot. Too bad it’s an LA-based company.
I’m going to hazard a guess here and say that the script is probably a piece of junk. If Aglialoro really wanted to make a sound investment, why didn’t he spend $500k on a great writer (and by association their representation) and then go directly to stars to package the film to bring to the studio. The last 15 years has seen so many Hollywood boom years that the only reason they wouldn’t want to play on a property like this is if the “producer” here didn’t know what he was doing, had too many demands and himself wrote a terrible script.
Don’t blame this on the studios or stars, hire somebody who knows what they are doing and it could have all unfolded in a much different manner… and Aglialoro would have only been in the hole for $1.5m because the studio would have financed the film. Now, not so much.
Between DoubleOSeven and Todd, the producer could learn all he needs to know about filmmaking. Which is to take his money and invest it in other people who have some experience making difficult projects. If he want to learn, he should waste his dough it on a $3 indie and find out what reality is.
Please. Do not ruin this novel. Keep “Atlas Shrugged” the way it is, NOT in movie form.
If a book is popular enough (Twilight, Harry Potter, etc.) fans don’t care if the actors are names or not.
What makes these characters in the novel effective is how they behave. I’d actually prefer the story to be the main character and not have some Hollywood drips with their names all over this movie out there pretending it’s a “big star” movie, when it in fact it is supposed to be an intelligence workout. It requires capable acting, not famous acting, and if you ask me, Hollywood SUCKS in general. Hollywood can’t think, it’s out of ideas, the acting and directing are lame, the standards are very low. Atlas Shrugged needs immense amounts of composure in the storytelling. Give it the Hollywood treatment and it will be just another trash production. Go for it and leave the “big stars” out of it.
The fact that these people understand that it will take four films to tell this great story on screen bodes very well for the project. And the understanding that Hollywood would never be able to ‘get it’ bodes well too. Great book, great authoress, great story. Could be great movies. I would not cast judgement until there is something to judge.
It will sort the creators/producers out from the moochers and looters anyway.
Ayn Rand is usually misquoted by the far-right. Her non-fiction is the best way to find out what her philosophy was. Her ideas need to be carefully thought through, as any short-cut for convenience has shown to produce destructive extremes of selfishness and not a balanced, healthy respect for individual rights. I’ve read most of Ayn Rand’s non-fiction and find her to be much less of an extreme thinker than many of her critics insinuate. She is however, not perfect and she had quite a chip on her shoulder, an anger from eastern Europe and the Soviet experience. Fine, but she got that a little confused with the American experience sometimes, creating an over-reaction. I’d recommend letting Ayn Rand talk through her points on Capitalism, Selfishness, democracy, ingenuity, freedom, liberty, government, etc, as she has good points. She’s just incomplete. She’s not an entire world-view. Economic policy is not an entire world-view. Milton Friedman and Keynes could not present holistic world-views in their economic policy. Philosophy based on one economic philosophy is not an entire world-view. Ayn Rand wrong? I don’t think so. I think she was incomplete and dealing with very complex issues.
Ayn Rand is incomplete? True, she didn’t know the importance of English history and political thought and how it’s a major source for the Founding Fathers, (among other things) but please name me a more complete thinker. She emphasizes reason and self-interest and individualism and the free market. What other political thinker does this? Please tell me, because I would like to read him/her. Thanks!
Well if Jolie is out for the role of Dagny, John Voight would make a good Rearden even if he is a little old.
The quality of the film doesn’t matter. Given our lousy polarized condition, the finished product will be nothing more than a political Rorscach test in which everyone can see whatever they want to see.
America’s obsession with politicizing everything is getting so unbelievably boring and dreary.
Sigh -> that’s the best post in this thread. Why the hell is everything so polarizing these days? Why are tea-partiers looked at as fascists by so many? We need to settle down a little bit.
How does an argument go from the start-up of a film to a debate over the quality of the book to Alan Greenspan and objectvism and greedy capitalism leading to America’s downfall and the BP oil leak disaster? How?
I object… to this ever being made into a movie.
It may be okay to wax philosophically for 1100 pages in a novel — in a film, not so much.
Actual plotlines with direct (and relatable!) stakes for the characters involved are necessary elements in film.
Should have left this on the book shelf where it belongs. A fact that all of the actual film-makers know, which is why this guy is running off on his own to make it without any help from anybody who actually knows what they are doing!
Hmmm. Considering that the book is filled with great dialogue why is it so hard to write a script, if you have the time to develop the plot? Ayn Rand was a screen-writer for cryingoutloud. She worked in the movies for three decades, and wrote screenplays or adaptions for successful movies. She knew more about writing than anybody in Hollywood today. Bye
I’ve never read this book. Who are these characters you keep mentioning? Who is John Galt?
I’ve been casting Atlas in my head for 30 years and here is who I would have loved to see:
John Galt:-Gary Cooper
Dagney Taggart-Lauren Bacall(Think To Have and Have Not)
James Taggart-Charles Laughton
Hank Rearden-Henry Fonda
Francisco D’Anconia-Tyrone Power
Lillian Rearden-Bette Davis/or Joan Crawford
Wesley Mouch-Peter Lorre.
Of course I’m talking about real movie stars with real talent. Not the wannabes with nothing but bad manners and less talent that we have today.
The time is right for the movie to be made, if it’s made correctly. It must stay true to the book.
I think it would be done better with unknowns at this point.
I wish someone would make State Of Fear
I think Kevin McKidd of HBO’s Rome would be an ideal John Galt.
That said, I doubt this movie will ever get made, or will be any good if it does get made. Rand’s fiction doesn’t translate well to the screen.
I don’t care what they say, this is going to be a disaster. So much of the novel will be lost. This is one of those books, like Catcher in the Rye, that should NOT be adapted into a movie.
How are they going to film the John Galt speech, and how much of it will be ‘sanitized’ for ‘regular’ audiences, losing so much.
A film adaptation will be a massive undertaking, not only to set all moving parts into place, but to make them move as well, and to do it justice depicting the apocalyptic feel of a crumbling world, the mystery of the pirate no newspaper dares to talk about, the dread people feel every time an industrialist disappears, the awesome revelation of that worldwide broadcast interruption… there is so much in there, I would hate to see this level of literary complexity become a shallow excuse.
For those of us who retain the context of Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged- the withdrawn sanction of the victims (persons of ability) from their tormentors (the moochers)- let us hope they get it right; how ever many films it takes!
I’m keeping my fingers crossed… um, rationally speaking.