Luke Y Thompson covers the Con for Deadline:
By the time The Simpsons makes a joke about something, you know it’s out there. Last Sunday, when Comic Book Guy was mocked by Lisa for being a fat guy who didn’t conform to the “jolly” stereotype, he responded that nobody could be happy if they knew Comic-Con might move to Anaheim.
Certainly, few in the biz want that to happen either; even Comic-Con’s director of PR, David Glanzer, told me that “We were born in San Diego, we’d really like to stay in San Diego: we just have serious challenges.” But in fact, this talk isn’t new. For several years now, there has been talk of Comic-Con International using Anaheim as a negotiating tactic, feeling that the city of San Diego is taking the convention for granted; the lease expires after 2012. More recently, Los Angeles has stepped up a bid of its own to bring Comic-Con to the L.A. convention center, and comicsbeat.com has done a good job of covering the various offers and counter-offers out there.
Glanzer and others frame the issue as primarily one of space: he cites a waiting list of 400-600 exhibitors who want to get in but can’t, and the fact that 4-day passes for this years show sold out last September. But when pressed on the issue of the city’s appreciation, he replied, “I can’t say that they haven’t been supportive, but I can say that with this recent negotiation, the outpouring of support has been really dramatic… from the center, from hotels, from the mayor’s office, and it’s something we truly appreciate.”
But how do the professional attendees feel? My sources invariably see it as a battle between San Diego and Los Angeles, with Anaheim an irrelevant factor, despite the fact that it has the most hotel space. First of all, it’s Disney’s backyard, which could put the other movie studios ill at ease (Glanzer denies that this would be an issue, saying that it was originally a question they had, but that all parties involved have assured him it would not be a problem). And secondly, it’s enough of a commute from L.A. to be an annoyance, and not quite enough to be a vacation (though fans and exhibitors who actually live in OC are for it, nobody else seems to be).
Jeff Katz, a comic-book writer and former executive at Fox and New Line, sees the struggle this way: “Are you a fan show with trade elements, or are you a trade show that lets in fans…or is there a happy medium? They have to decide: if it’s about servicing the larger multimedia needs, as though Comic-Con is a piece of the pipeline as opposed to a destination event, then sure LA makes a lot more sense. If it’s a destination event that wants to reach out to families and keep that branding, that is San Diego.”
Though the general sense is that attendees who are already fans like the San Diego setting, while executives more concerned with the bottom line do not, Katz notes “There’s a whole group of us in the middle that like going down to San Diego, because it gives us a chance to get out of LA and see our friends from a host of mediums.”
Mark Evanier, a comic-book writer who has been attending the convention since the first one in 1970, agrees. “When we go to Comic-Con, we all go and stay down there, and it becomes like a retreat, we’re all together night and day, and when you pass people on the street, they’re people that are on the way to the convention. It’s a whole city of common interest, which it wouldn’t be in Anaheim or LA. There’s something nice to the vacation aspect of it.”
He also adds that he doesn’t think the convention organizers or attendees in general want to move, just that all options are being considered as a negotiating tactic, and a temporary one at that. “It’s not a question of never getting bigger – San Diego’s expanding that facility. It’s just a question of whether they wanna move for a few years and then move back to San Diego. If they could somehow magically speed up that development, I don’t think this would even be an issue.” Not that he’s unbiased: “I’ve MASTERED that place. I don’t wanna start over at the convention center.” If it goes to L.A., though, he says he has a plan. “I had to pay $50 in the parking lot across the street [for the E3 convention] and if Comic-Con moved it would be bigger than that, so I would buy that real estate.”
Evanier and Katz are also in agreement with most others about the pedestrian and family-friendly nature of San Diego — L.A. live and the Nokia Theater may be nice improvements, but they really aren’t for kids. Anaheim is, but it would be competing with Disneyland’s peak season for hotel space.
Recent offers by San Diego businesses to help shoulder the cost are seen by some as too little, too late…but those who attend regularly are overwhelmingly in the camp of keeping things as they are. Katz thinks this will come to a head soon, noting, “Every year we say that this is the year that might see the breaking point; it feels to me like this year might be it, between the frustration people had booking hotels, you have another convention down there…it seems to me that we’re now getting to that point where, coinciding with the lease coming up, decisions have to be made. Whatever they do, it’s gonna be unpopular with one segment of the audience.”






The space issue for Comic-Con can be solved with Petco Stadium. Put the major industry reveals that are in Hall H, and put them in the stadium. Capacity issue solved.
Use the exterior green space next to Hall H for overflow exhibitors. They could easily tent and create space stretching all the way to the Hilton.
Bottom line is, if Comic Con moved to L.A., that would mean that my family and I could take the $800 to $1,000 that we spend on travel expenses (hotel, food, gas, etc…) and use that money towards buying comics and things inside the convention center.
We could also take public transportation to and from the Convention Center (plenty of buses, trains and cabs).
We could then take the money that we are saving and perhaps take a vacation at another time, maybe even to San Diego.
And what about folks that don’t live in Los Angeles? They would still have to spend that money on expenses.
Maybe one good thing about all this competition is that San Diego will FINALLY clean up their Convention Center. Has anyone noticed how absolutely filthy its gotten lately? I’m talking about the concrete beams outside the lobby escalators and above the Sail Pavilion. Just black with grime. It’s completely disgusting. Given the obscene prices they charge anymore there’s just no excuse for it.
Fans bemoaning Hollywood’s expanded presence at the Con should remember that years ago they were bemoaning the fact that Hollywood wouldn’t make movies from their favorite comics… wish granted! Be thankful that comics have a mainstream profile now, it’s good for all of us!
I love having the Con in SD, by the way. Never have a problem getting a nice hotel room for a good rate, my family loves it, and I beat the hellacious drive by taking the train.
if the comic con does move mostly for more space another thing it would lose is no longer being called san digo comic con. not to mention if it does move espically to diseylands home turf it will wind up having to compete and get screwed for certain things like hotels if another convention in the other cities wanting it when the other cities only want it for the money it generates in vistor’s and those attending and like it or not comic con can not rely on comics any more given other media competing. for the same fan base.though if it moves now doubt the holly wood aspect will start to become less
Time for the ComicCon folks to consider a really radical notion: it’s time for the show to stop growing.
Vegas makes a lot more sense but common sense doesn’t always happen.
I’ve attended Comic-Con every year since I was 16 years old, in 1994. As a big comic book fan it was always the highlight of my year.
In the past few years, however, the Con as it currently exists has become an exercise in frustration. To get into any panel at all often requires hours of waiting in lines and in some cases staying up overnight. Other areas last year, like for example the Hasbro Toy Shop booth, were a mess because even though tickets were given out just to be in line, the convention organizers and security were vague about where to wait, causing even MORE confusion.
Hotels for the past 5 years or so have been a mess, which makes me nostalgic for only 10 years ago when you could book the night before. At times a hotel can cost more than a month’s rent or mortgage payment.
I think a big problem Comic-Con has had is with the convention itself. They keep trying to make it “bigger” and “bigger” with little to no consideration for the folks who actually attend the thing. I understand there’s the reputation and bragging rights of luring a certain amount of guests, but at the end of the day, this IS a non-profit convention, right? Then why try to make it bigger?
Yes, having, say, “Twilight” there keeps the studios happy and brings people to the convention who might not otherwise go, but what does it have to do with comics? It just makes it more of a mess.
Maybe a more ideal situation would be to extend the convention by a few days and spread events out a bit more – maybe even having some TV Days, Movie Days, and, yes, Comics Days. I really don’t know. What I do know, however, is even the social aspect of the convention has waned when you can barely even move around on the Con floor.
It’s a great concept, in theory, to reach out to potential audiences, but at the rate things have gone the last few years, it can and will only get worse, at least in San Diego. Which is sad; I agree with other posters who feel San Diego is a great excursion and a different feeling. But at the same time – it’s not welcoming, especially when there aren’t enough hotel rooms and nowhere to park downtown for those who stay out of town; and especially when it’s so jam-packed that you can’t see and do what you’d like.
I guess the point I was trying to make is, the simplest solution would be to “stop trying to make it bigger” and leave it in San Diego… but that’s probably naive, considering the con organizers seem to want to make it as much of a spectacle as possible, again making me question the whole “non-profit” aspect of it all.
There are lots of hotel rooms off the beaten path. Park at Fashion Valley mall and take the trolley. I do every year with NO problem or fee.
LA? Traffic.
Anaheim? Disney will eat it.
Las Vegas? Too far away.
This is all posturing by the SDCC. Comic-Con brings in 60 million a year for downtown San Diego, not to mention amazing exposure with a convention that brings in a huge amount of star power. The city of San Diego will move heaven and Earth – perhaps literally – to insure that the con stays put. All that’s happening right now is the Con creators are getting nice leverage with the overcrowding issue. Once they have a nice package from San Diego, they’ll run the con a full week until they find a second venue or build on to the center.
LA? Traffic.
Sure, but there is a blue line train stop, so you can take mass transit. The traffic is also a problem in San Diego.
Anaheim? Disney will eat it.
Not neccesarily. Remember, the hotel rooms would become available in March. Most Disneyland vacation aren’t planned that far in advance.
Las Vegas? Too far away.
From who? Vegas is 4 hours by car from Los Angeles. 1 hour by air from Southern California. Don’t assume everyone that attends comic-con is from So Cal.
“All that’s happening right now is the Con creators are getting nice leverage with the overcrowding issue.”
Really? Really! How? The W is currently 600/night. The weekend before its $200/night. Nice leverage.
i vote for vegas. you need to get out of LA and OC to make it more of an experience. I love SD, but they have been gouging on hotel prices for too long. The space is too small. But vegas could handle all that and it would be much more enjoyable for all the fanboys (and fangirls). i dont know why they dont consider vegas as a good alternative?
i think it is rather simple. the con is san diego. to move it would remove much of what makes it special.
i started going to the con in the mid 80s. and i remember the exact year when hollywood discovered the con. it was 2001, when a chunk of the exhibitor’s floor was taken up by a presentation for the movie, “the time machine”.
sure, hollywood had it presence there before, but it was always for movies or tv shows that had a direct connection the comics world.
i stopped attending in 2004 when the con ceased to be what it once was.
saying that, to move it based on outside pressures from hollywood, would be the final nail in its coffin.
i never understood the issue of hotel space. up the 8, there is a place called hotel circle….with multiple hotels and motels. and a trolley ride to the convention center. the convention could add a shuttle.
within sd itself, near sd state and ucsd, there are hotels, and the con could run shuttles from another central location
if the con were to move to los angeles, i highly doubt that people would want to stay near the convention center…downtown la at nite is downright scary. and forget affordable rooms.
wizard world tried to run their con in los angeles….they ended up moving to long beach and now i believe it is totally defunct (i could be wrong)
there is someone who is starting another smaller con…but it wont be the same.
yes, i wish we could go back to the glory years,when you could just show up and get a ticket,when fans could walk down the aisles of the floor in less than an hour, and one could spend time really talking to the creators, when hordes of screaming twilight fans who dont know or care know who jack kirby is,were still swimming in their dad’s ball sack…i also wish that i was 20 years younger, had all my hair and spent my nights with sherilyn fenn sitting on my face…but neither is gonna happen.
but the con needs to stay in san diego…moving it anywhere else would be sacrilege.
however, it would be nice if evanier had a little more empathy for the average attendee. he still doesnt get that the con experience is quite different for the pros than it is the geeks.
and i really think the con needs to step into the 21st century and begin live streaming the panels.
I never really gave much thought to that but it’d be a great idea – the “live streaming the panels” thing – even if it was just on closed circuit to other parts of the convention center or just to hotels that are affiliated with the Con. I know for example I’d love to see certain panels, but have no interest in standing in line for them, so that would probably solve a lot of overcrowding problems. Great suggestion.
Great idea!! They always shoot the panels and play them on big screens…why not stream that video to other rooms? The past few years I have missed out on many panels because of over-crowding. I would welcome the opportunity to sit in another room just to watch the video…usually when you’re in those large rooms, you have to watch the video screens…it’s too hard to see the actual stage! So SDCC promoters!! Please take this suggestion to heart!
And keep the Con in SD. It wouldn’t be the same anywhere else.
“i never understood the issue of hotel space. up the 8, there is a place called hotel circle….with multiple hotels and motels. and a trolley ride to the convention center. the convention could add a shuttle.”
All the hotels on Hotel Circle have been sold out for months. In fact, you probably won’t find a hotel available during Comic-Con until you reach Oceanside or San Clemente.
Live streaming the panels will just make it easier for people to bootleg the footage that they beg everyone to not record (but someone always does). If you can’t keep 6500 people from pointing their cameras at the screens to capture the Iron Man 2 footage, how can they stop various screens scattered through open areas and hotel conference rooms? And many say “so what? why can’t they let people just record it?” Well, if they did, why would the people who come for that stuff bother to come at all if they know they can just fire up their web browser at 1pm on Saturday a thousand miles away from Comic-Con, wherever it’s held? The studios would just stop bringing the exclusive clips and just pick another time and place to release the more official content on their own site, killing the need for a blurry, muffled cell phone capture from a 15 year old kid that posts it on youtube. Plus, the studios LOVE to be able to brag about the buzz, the hype, etc that swarms around a Comic-Con debut. “Hey, our new horror movie screened clips before 6500 fans who waited 12 hours in line and then gobbled up all of our exclusive keychains and posters! We can use that info to create more buzz (and money)!”
The moment they start streaming the big panel content, you’ll see the studios leave Comic-Con the following year.
In that case, streaming the panels sounds like a win-win to me!
I have no interest in 90% of the “big” Hollywood hype machine premieres. Even if I am interested in Iron Man 2 or Megamind, I ain’t gonna deal with the ordeal of getting into one of those halls, just to see the actors express halfhearted interest in the 2 or 3 “special” clips they run.
I have trouble getting into panels of moderate interest, ones that might contain NO special clips, but some special insights and discussions with creators who interest me. I wasn’t able to get into the “Princess and the Frog” panel at WonderCon OR the Ronnie del Carmen panel at Comic Con this year. Those aren’t ‘Hall H/Ballroom 20″ type events, bu they filled up the rooms they were in nonetheless. I want to see stuff like that, and if I had to settle for streaming video, that’s better than NEVER seeing it! To hell with Twilight and Glee Leverage and the rest of the non-geek Hollywood stuff. Make things fun and accessible again.
wizard left LA after 2008 and changed their name to ‘wizard world anaheim comic-con’.
City of San Diego cheats Comic Con attendees by tagging on a “transient occupancy tax” of 10.5% on all hotel/motel rooms. Waive that for the weekend of the Con and we’ll talk, thieves.
SO does LA and just about every city.
Los Angeles 14%
Anaheim 15%
San Diego 10.5%
Vegas Vegas Vegas
I agree that the only possible option of accommodating to everyone with a relocation outside of San Diego would be Las Vegas. Vegas can provide the hotel, exhibitor space, venue space, and the play space with catering to every fanboys imagination of being in an adult playground.
People asking for Vegas have obviously never been to Vegas in July.
Exactly. If you want a big convention hall and gambling, but less crowds, try Atlantic City. If you want a city desperate for money and again, less crowds, try Detroit. Of course, Detroit Comic Con would make people wistful for he days of “The Ol’ Pen in the Eye” once geeks start getting jacked walking to their hotels….
My point is, there are other cities with big convention spaces (and less congestion) than LA or Vegas. I suppose the preoccupation with those two cities is that they are in the southwest and within the Hollywood sphere of influence. If Hollywood really wants to do something like this, they ought to split it into two Cons, one for all this mainstream-appeal Hollywood stuff, and one that is uber-geeky and focused on comics and nothing with broader appeal than Batman or X-Men. Maybe have a weeklong Con, where they front-load all the Hollywood-only stuff in the first 3-4 days, and the tail end is gook-focused. The fickle norms will drift away, and the serious nerds will take their hotel rooms off their hands.
Geek Chic is only a good thing if it stays Geek. Comic Con is getting less geeky by the year.
mmmm… I can smell it now. Hurried fanboys rushing from their hotel to the hotel with the exhibition hall in 120 degree heat, sweating through their dripping wet Wookiee costume.
Vegas is awesome (hoping to go in a few weeks with the guys for a bachelor party), but not for families. Even Vegas gave up on that marketing track years ago. Now it’s “what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas…” And even though families are just one part of the crowd that goes to Comic-Con, it’s an important part, because it means that after a few years in Vegas, it won’t be a bunch of old single guys with boners for comics AND strippers. Making it kid friendly means that someday those kids might come to the show even after their parents stop coming. And then they might bring their kids. And so on.
If we want a Comic-Con in Vegas, I suggest that CCI create a smaller one there like they did with WonderCon in San Francisco (well, there they just bought out a successful, growing con that already existed). Schedule it in November or January and let it grow naturally. If there is an audience and great programming for that audience, there’s no reason why it can’t be just as successful as WonderCon, and eventually, San Diego Comic-Con.
I went to the perfect San Diego Comic Con this year…it was held in San Francisco and is called the Wonder Con. It’s a real comic book convention with a bit of media thrown in…just the right amount for this 62 year old comic fan.
WonderCon is just what Comic-Con was 10 years ago. If it continues to grow and the money is there (and it is), WonderCon will become Comic-Con 10 years from now. Well, maybe. The time of year it’s held prevents many from going. You’ll see that I’m right if WonderCon begins to take over the rest of the Moscone buildings in the coming years… and then moves out altogether for a bigger SF venue. But is there one?
Right you are. WonderCon is already getting pretty huge, though they don’t even utilize half of the available space at Moscone. They held it in the “new” Moscone wing about 3 years ago, and then went back to just half of the old building, anyone know why? It was nice having it in that new wing, though the best config would probably be half in the new above-ground building, and the other half in the half of the underground building they now use. If they used both underground wings, I would strongly suggest segregating it based on content. The hallways between the two wings are somewhat claustrophobic, so it would be good to reduce “cross appeal” between those two. As it stands, one of them is just vacant during WC, so the room to grow is there. But like in Jurassic Park, “just because we CAN do something doesn’t mean we SHOULD.”
Vegas makes the most sense.
But has the idea of floating it from city to city been brought up? It’s basically Comics Superbowl, maybe it’s time it acted like one as well. Let cities bid to host the event.
I say “nay” on the Wandering Comic Con idea. Part of what makes it even possible to get around Comic Con is that veterans know the SD Convention Center inside and out by now. We know the tricks, we know what will and won’t be blocked off, how far it is between A and B, and so on. If it’s in a different facility every year, it will be chaos, and the “security” will get even more gestapo than they already are. (What was up with all the “you can’t stand by this wall” BS this year?)
No, I say that, whatever city CCI ends up in, that they stay put there at least 4-5 years in a row. The Con is stressful enough as it is, at least SD is a constant in that equation.
Ah, David you continue this years long runaway bride routine. The con is never leaving even though they should if they seriously want to grow. The city has once again promised them the moon and their afraid of change board will continue to believe it. Get ready for another crowded con for the next decade. Until people get tired of it and stop coming…
I thought I read an article stating that Las Vegas did not bid for the Con…If that indeed is true I do not understand why they would not bid for it. They have the hotel space, they have the floor space, they have the ability to hold the capacity and the airport has flights from many locations. I have made the drive from the Bay Area in Northern California as well as from LA to Vegas. Fun? not really but you *can* make the drive. I was just recently in Vegas and there were multiple conferences going on and the space at City Center was not even being used yet.
Why do they even call this Comic-Con, it stoped being a Comic-Con Years ago and now a media-fest mecca for fanboys and the media companies that started it.
We have George Lucas to blame for this too! in 1976 he set up to promote the little film he was wokring on called (sic) The Star Wars … and Comic-Con has never been the same.
FRESNO BABY!!!!
Comic Con used to be the shit.
Porn stars, movie scripts, exploitation bootlegs, and movie posters galore.
I remember meeting Lou Ferrigno, Kevin Smith, Guillermo Del Toro, Quentin Tarantino, The Toxic Avenger, Leatherface, R2D2, and the entire cast of “Beyond The Valley of the Dolls” in one day just walking around being geek-like.
Those days are over!
Comic Con just plain sucks now. Who cares where it goes.
You should have it in my backyard. Think of all the money I would save on travel costs, hotels, restaurants.
The above comment is provided as a service to those from Los Angeles in hopes that you may realize how idiotic your complaints and reasoning behind them sound.
Hint Two: There are people that go to the convention that do not live in Los Angeles.
@ Bud: well said.
One bonus of the Con leaving San Diego is that we wouldn’t have to put up with Elite Security’s bonehead tactic of turning all the hallways outside the panels into one-way corridors. Gone are the days of just going directly from one panel to the next. I find that I now sometimes have to traverse 95% of the length of the hallways just to get to the room next door, something that’s virtually assured if I need to make a rest room pit stop in between.
Elite has demonstrated for many years now what complete imbeciles they are at crowd control but this latest maneuver has to generate far more ill will than all their previous fiascos combined.
Everyone whines about the overpriced hotel prices in San Diego. You know how that happens, right?
The hotels offer up a select block of rooms to CCI for the event to be sold via Travel Planners. Of course, that means in order to discourage people from going around the controlled block of rooms in a fit of panic, they have to jack up the prices for the non-block rooms. Some people are so desperate, they don’t care. And the hoteliers don’t mind either. Of course, the other hotels that don’t bother with CCI at all (Comfort Inn Gaslamp, for example) just know that they can jack up all of their rooms across the board to their legal maximum simply due to supply and demand and make out like bandits.
What makes you think that the same situation won’t repeat itself in LA, Anaheim, or Vegas? Anaheim’s abundant grungy little motor inns selling for $200-$300 a night? You bet. The few downtown LA hotels within sight of the convention center? What rooms aren’t taken up by staff and official guests will be blocked out somewhat inexpensively (likely the same prices you see in SD now), but that block will be relatively small, leaving everyone to book rooms around LA county from Hollywood to the beaches to Compton to Riverside, forcing them all to drive in, creating a bigger parking lot than what already exists. And even though Vegas isn’t even a serious consideration, its heat, location, non-kid-friendly atmosphere on top of the eventual price-gouging will make it just as bad as what people claim SD to be, just sweatier.
And remember, the point of all of this moving controversy comes from the desire to expand and allow more people and exhibitors to attend. What happens when the crowd grows from 126,000 people to 150,000 (or more)? The lines get longer, the crowds get bigger, the hotels get fuller faster, the demand goes up, the prices go higher, and we’re in the same place we were before… just with more people. I can see a 10,000 seat “Hall H” type room set aside in the Venetian with another 20,000 person room in the Wynn next door holding the line for that room. What? You didn’t get in? Too bad. You should have been at the Mirage that holds the line for the “Ballroom 20″ type room as Caesars Palace. That line had only 9,000 people in it. Luckily, the Exhibition Hall down at MGM holds 120,000 people. The line for that is in New York, New York and only 40,000 people are waiting to get in there… once 40,000 others leave anyway… thank god they don’t make anyone stand in line outside anymore, especially after all those stormtroopers melted…
Moving the show will change the perception of the event, leading to a change in purpose and a drop in attendance, because the event is bigger than what’s held within the convention center walls. It’s the surrounding area and no other city can match what San Diego is offering, even though they currently offer parts of versions of what San Diego is offering. I LIVE IN LA (south bay), but would rather pay for a hotel in San Diego than drive to LA or Anaheim and sit in traffic every day. I’d go to Vegas for another comic convention, but not the one and only original Comic-Con.
Great analysis, PCG. As a long time attendee (mid-90′s), I have personally seen SDCCI become the behemoth that it is today. I’d hate to see it move elsewhere, but there is the pesky issue of space. Time was I and my friends were able to walk into Hall H and there’d still be lots of empty seats. Not any longer. It seems that the Con higher-ups and Elite security should do a thorough analysis of crowd control. The debacle with the Twilight die-hards notwithstanding. As a local resident for many years, I don’t have to worry about expensive hotel rooms. I’d like to keep it that way.
@popculturegeek:
Bravo, my friend. Bravo. You have hit the nails on the head. I couldnt have put it better myself. I was stationed in SD when I went to my first con (06) and I loved it. Folks, dont water down the magic because of hotel worries and long lines. This is what we as geeks have waited for, worldwide recognition. There is a certain vibe and ambience that SD has that LA, Anaheim and LV dont have. Sorry folks, but I think the industry guys like leaving their own backyard to come somewhere to vibe, chill and reconnect with old friends and new. I will be there this year as a volunteer, I have a room on the naval base, I take the trolley and I have friends in SD. I guess it helps to be a former employee at the SD Convention center too…LOL..
Bottom line: Just because it seems broken doesnt mean it is. Leave the Con in SD and lets keep it movin’
What about the Las Vegas Convention Center? That’s the biggest convention center in town. It boasts 3.2 million square feet, including 144 meeting rooms. And since one doesn’t have to use the entire convention space, there is certainly plenty of room to grow for years to come. I’ve been there a couple of times, and that place is HUGE. Plenty of space to walk around that not even the most popular cons can overcrowd the place. It’s as if it were Las Vegas’s second airport. Although ff for some reason the convention space gets overcrowded (in fact it hardly ever does), there’s also the Sands Expo Convention Center next door, which is the second largest in town. Sands Expo Convention Center is 1.2 million-square-foot. so 1.2 million sq. ft + 3.2 million sq. ft = 4.5 million square footage of convention bliss.
Wait, isn’t this all moot? SDCC’s contract with the city is up after 2011, so if it is moved anywhere in CA- LA, Anaheim, wherever, I think the Mayans have predicted that Comic-Conifornia falls into the ocean in 2012. So there you go! Enjoy the next 2 Cons and then plan on going to the Idaho Con.
Each and every year, there is a Phoenix Comic-Con in Phoenix, Arizona. Why don’t they shift some of the San Diego Comic-Con there and keep some in San Diego? They would be a few months apart and control of the crowds would be much better. It would lighten the load for fans to enjoy San Diego more. Travel from LA to Phoenix is the same as LA to Las Vegas. Travel from San Diego is the same as travel to Phoenix. Phoenix has lots of room and can grow more if needed.