
Guillermo del Toro announced today on the OneRing.net — the official Middle Earth sounding board — that he’s stepped out of the directing assignment on the two film versions of JRR Tolkien’s The Hobbit, though he will continue to collaborate as a writer. I would have bet that Peter Jackson would be the one to step back into the director’s chair because there have been rumblings about this lately. But his manager, Ken Kamins, tells me this is absolutely not a possibility. It seems a sad ending to the dream job that prompted del Toro to suspend his whopping overall deal at Universal — and a slate full of epic-sized projects — to take on The Hobbit after he got the offer instead of Sam Raimi (who wanted it badly). And after the imagination del Toro displayed onscreen in Pan’s Labyrinth, who better to join Jackson and his original Lord of the Rings creative team?
Jackson, who is coming off the disappointing Oscar season entry The Lovely Bones, would seem the perfect person to retake the directing reins after del Toro’s exit. They’ve worked closely on the script, so there would be no interruption in creative continuity. Whether they bring back Raimi (who is working on World of Warcraft but hasn’t committed to his next film) or give the job to a filmmaker like Jackson’s District 9 protege Neill Blomkamp (he’s committed to do his next project for Media Rights Capital) there would be a steep learning curve to bring Middle Earth to life. Jackson translated Tolkien’s creation masterfully in the Oscar-winning Lord of the Rings trilogy. According to Kamins, it’s not going to happen.
“Peter has and has had obligations and commitments to other films that would make it impossible for him to direct The Hobbit at this time, even if it was offered, which it hasn’t been,” Kamins told me. “I’ve been quietly working on setting up a film for him to direct while Guillermo would have been directing The Hobbit. What you saw in their respective statements must be taken at face value. All of that said, Peter and Fran’s commitment to The Hobbit is total and they will do everything necessary to protect the franchise and the investment made by New Line, Warners and MGM.”
Here is what del Toro announced:
“In light of ongoing delays in the setting of a start date for filming The Hobbit, I am faced with the hardest decision of my life. After nearly two years of living, breathing and designing a world as rich as Tolkien’s Middle Earth, I must, with great regret, take leave from helming these wonderful pictures. I remain grateful to Peter, Fran and Philippa Boyens, New Line and Warner Brothers and to all my crew in New Zealand. I’ve been privileged to work in one of the greatest countries on earth with some of the best people ever in our craft and my life will be forever changed. The blessings have been plenty, but the mounting pressures of conflicting schedules have overwhelmed the time slot originally allocated for the project. Both as a cowriter and as a director, I wish the production nothing but the very best of luck and I will be first in line to see the finished product. I remain an ally to it and its makers, present and future, and fully support a smooth transition to a new director.”
Said Jackson:
“We feel very sad to see Guillermo leave The Hobbit, but he has kept us fully in the loop and we understand how the protracted development time on these two films, due to reasons beyond anyone’s control, has compromised his commitment to other long term projects. The bottom line is that Guillermo just didn’t feel he could commit six years to living in New Zealand, exclusively making these films, when his original commitment was for three years… New Line and Warner Bros will sit down with us this week, to ensure a smooth and uneventful transition, as we secure a new director for The Hobbit. We do not anticipate any delay or disruption to ongoing pre-production work.”
It seems particularly unfortunate that after putting years into writing scripts and making endless trips to New Zealand, del Toro would depart solely because of the MGM situation. That rationale only came up recently, after del Toro completed two scripts with the original Lord of the Rings writing team of Jackson, Philippa Boyens, and Fran Walsh. They’d just begun talking about shooting in 3D. If MGM is really the sole reason, that’s too bad because there are signs that things are going to happen soon to decide the ultimate ownership of The Hobbit and other assets. Clearly the fact that the studio — and a talented production and marketing team — has been frozen in suspended animation has been as much an albatross around The Hobbit as it has been for the James Bond series. But everybody is happy with the two Hobbit scripts and all involved still expect production to start late this year or early next year–it will have to, if New Line and MGM are to get the pictures in theaters December, 2012 and December, 2013. This franchise is too valuable to let languish much longer and the debt holders of MGM won’t be happy when they realize that the director has walked because they’ve allowed things to fester so long and handcuffed the executives brought in under Harry Sloan to turn things around.
Though under financial duress, MGM has continued to meet its rights payment obligations on The Hobbit, but hasn’t been able to do any more than that. Warner Bros is the lead studio on the project, and has ultimate say on green light, but perhaps the films are too large an investment to front alone, or that prospect doesn’t benefit the leverage Warner Bros has in a potential buyout of MGM’s assets. Rumblings are that there may well be a new player entering the fray shortly, bringing equity and new experienced management. Summit Entertainment and Spyglass are the names most often mentioned, though we also hear Terry Semel and Peter Chernin, the latter of whom reportedly doesn’t want it.
The development is good news for Universal, whose executives were initially fuming after they made a deal to establish del Toro as a major supplier of tent poles, only to watch him commit five years to The Hobbit. Del Toro can return to such projects as Frankenstein, HP Lovecraft’s At the Mountains of Madness, Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse-Five and the Dan Simmons novel Drood. In addition, del Toro is working on the second and third installments of The Strain, a terrific series of vampire novels he’s writing with Chuck Hogan, which absolutely begs for a movie transfer.


I feel bad for Del Toro…to spend all that time developing a project all for naught. He’s so talented and in the prime of his career so I’m sure he will bounce back.
The film biz has a way of breaking hearts…even the best directors get stung occasionally. (I feel bad for Jeunet also, spending a couple years developing Life of Pi…only to see his incredible efforts wasted in development hell)
Del Toro is one of my favorite directors working. Thank god he’s moving on from this. Regular moviegoers won’t miss the film version of Hobbit and the Tolkeinite bores would never be happy with the finished version anyway.
I look forward to any film he makes. The less reliant on dusty old material the better.
We get it. The ring is important. Enough.
i’m aghast at the level of intellect posessed by the many of the people who posted here.
it’s disturbing to see people talk about Del Toro’s feelings toward communists, facists and white westerners.
the man’s character and personality are not in question here.
i’m 22 and work in the mail room and many of you people are acting like a bunch of moody high school students.
this is why i don’t take any of my 16 bosses at the agency seriously.
none of you know shit, nor are you as wise as you think you are.
so pathetic and boring… at least joblo.com has better pictures.
Another Ari from Entourage
But kid remember this we don’t want to know anything.
We just want the money.
“this is why i don’t take any of my 16 bosses at the agency seriously. ( but that’s how they got out the mail room)
none of you know shit, nor are you as wise as you think you are.
( another Thalberg)
thanks old man… you made my point.
-kid
We could do this till eternity.
Let me clarify my attempt at satire.
Old people die, get replaced etc.
You made it into the mail room. So you must have some connections.
Don’t piss off your elders or like in entourage or if you prefer real life Megan Fox, L. Lohan the list to long.
Bide your time, get in early stay latter then everybody.
Bring in some treats for your boss, caviar would be nice but not on mail room salary.
Give it five to ten years and well that’s how you make it in Hollywood.
PS kid,
buy my script.
Glad del Toro is out. He’s got talent, but his being attached to Hobbit just seemed wrong.
What is Jackson thinking to not finish these movies off himself? The Tolkien movies MADE him. I think he owes it to the fans to bring the same tone and feel to the Hobbit that he did to LOTR so that the entire series feels complete.
Bringing in another director could produce a drastically different feel to the Hobbit which would be a shame.
Oh, Peter Jackson would be well advised to take on the task of directing these movies. Why, you ask? Let’s just assume the money people will do their thing and the film will be ready to roll this winter, probably for Warner’s.
Each and every possible directorial replacement would not be in tune with what has been developed thus far, so your best choice is one of those shooters like Ratner or Weitz, available by the dozen and stylistically not right (same goes for Blomkamp). Those you do not want. But a real director with substance and style will want a complete new prep – doesn’t make sense. Thus Jackson is the only possible choice.
And Ian McKellen is 71 since last week. 71, and the dear Sir is mortal. Any further delay is dangerous for the artistic integrity of these films. There is no other Gandalf.
Save your achievement, Mr. Jackson, before it’s gone to ruin.
I just experienced a situation like this on one of my projects. No fun, but that’s what happens.
There’s SO much wrongness and tomfoolery happening in this article, I feel behooved to point some of it out…
*With today’s technology and Jackson/WETA’s established work process with the LOTR trilogy, there’s NO reason whatsoever to need more than 3 years to shoot, edit and vfx two films. None. It’s Jackson up to his old tricks; remember how WETA *needed* to model all of New York City for one sequence in King Kong? How much did that cost?
*Del Toro’s supposed “tentpole” projects are all ticking time bombs. They’re all pure horror movies, which have never been event films. Anyone notice how well The Wolfman went down? You can all tell yourselves it was because it didn’t have a director that the fanboys respected, but at the end of the day the public doesn’t care who directs a movie. And at the end of the day, Frankenstein, The Mummy and The Wolfman are NOT record-breakers UNLESS they’re made into an action movie (a la the abominations known as the Brendan Fraser Mummy movies, which of course are not related to the classic Universal monster, at all).
Sorry, but if you think a Cthulhu movie has the potential to be a major studio TENTPOLE then you know nothing about the box-office.
So for me, it’s not about Del Toro’s slate that he’s missing out on, it’s gotta be about money. Which means it’s all about PJ, whom we KNOW has become a giant ego-maniac since LOTR ended who thinks he’s Spielberg and yet isn’t even close.
Jackson isn’t paying him the money he deserves. So Del Toro’s out. Gotta be the reason.
Prediction: the film will languish another year; PJ will leave or somehow be kicked off and Del Toro will return. But we won’t get a Hobbit movie for another 3 years, and…it will not even come close to doing what the LOTR trilogy did. Not…even…close. For the same reason why Sex and the City 2 and Prince of Persia and Shrek 4 and umpteen other movies aren’t performing: they’re just not fresh any more. They’re not the new hotness that audiences want.
And I say all this as a HUGE Lotr fan and a BIG-TIME supporter of Del Toro, who’s done amazing work and is by all accounts a super nice guy. So it pains me to have these positions.
Word.
Stormbringer brings the word. You’re bang on the money. The studios need to focus on hot and fresh. Reboots, remakes and sequels just make Hollywood seem tired and boring.
too bad that Mgm mess money wise has cost the hobbit the magic it could have had with Del torro on board calling the shots and also sad that Peter also is unable to direct the hobbit since he did the lord of the rings. Warners and new lone should just say the hades with it and buy out mgm rights to the hobbit and then get going.
SO fucking glad Raimi isn’t doing it. That would have completely RUINED this film. And this film deserves greatness, not the campy, terrible, insulting bullshit Raimi never fails to produce. Why was he ever considered in the first place? Really? Wow. He’s no where NEAR on the level of Del Toro.
Don’t get me wrong. Raimi’s films have their place. Just not here.
It’s gonna be Joe Johnston.
Sam Rami should direct this film franchise. He knows sword and sorcery better than anyone, that is his genius.
Wow…I did not know that Sam Raimi was in the running for this movie franchise until now, having only just read parts of the article? Look, Pan’s Labrynth was okay, but it was very depressing and slow. Sam should have been picked here, although I am not a fan of the Spiderman films, Legend of The Seeker is a great series and quite frankly puts the Lord of The Rings franchise to shame when it comes to sheer entertainment value and brashness. Watch the series ending episode of Seeker, and I know you will all agree.
“Legend of The Seeker is a great series and quite frankly puts the Lord of The Rings franchise to shame…”
Wow. And we wonder why the fantasy genre can’t get any respect. Unless we want “Spartacus” or more “Xena” please keep Raimi the hell away from Tolkien.
David Lynch.
Holy crap. While my instant reaction as a Tolkien lover revolts at the thought of David Lynch, the film lover in me wouldn’t mind a peek at the total mind-$&*# that he could bring. Of course, “The Hobbit” would be completely unrecognizable. But it would be a movie to talk about!
Don’t forget, Lynch was Lucas’ first choice to direct Jedi, but Lynch turned him down.
Turned off Pan’s Lab when the sadistic dad crushed the suspect’s eye with a flashlight in the opening minutes. YIKES! And all the critics who called this film a triumph…they must have not been paying attention early on.
Are you serious? Trywatching it before you can’t figure out why critics laud a film. If you can’t handle a horror film, you should have looked into it (re: look at the genre categories, plebe) before you rented the DVD. And no, it was never meant or marketed as a family friendly piece, it was meant to be a dark exploration of a horrible time in a country’s history, and what the mind of an imaginative child does with it. That’s why critics and indeed anyone who can view fantasy movies in abstract terms call Pan’s Labyrinth a triumph.
A film can’t be a triumph because the villain is sadistic?
Peter Jackson said he’d step up and direct the movie if need be:
“If [directing the films is] what I have to do to protect Warner Bros’ investment, then obviously that’s one angle which I’ll explore…The other studios may not let me out of the contracts.”
http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/national/3760135/Sir-Peter-Jackson-says-he-may-step-in/
@Gross Out: You got it right!!! “Pan’s Labrynth” was just mean. Spoiler Alert Warning for anyone who didn’t see the film–the girl who is our heroine has a horrible life during the movie, and the girl is killed by her Nazi like step-dad (a top Spanish military officer) in the end–but has a fantasy that she has become a princess from a fantasy underground world, her way of distracting herself from the real world cruelty that surrounds her, and what eventually leads to her death in the real world. It was just mean, and a riff on Roberto Benigni’s “It’s A Beautiful Life”, another sad movie about oppression during World War II where a child is given to fantasy…fueled by his father who doesn’t want him to know that they are in death camps, but I digress.
Pan’s Labrynth is boring, slow, and morose. What happened to entertaining audiences, or giving us a story with hope, where hope is fulfilled? I want a “Hobbit” film with a sense of epic adventure, one with great spirit, humor, romance, wonder, and heroism…where we are treated to wish fulfillment. We need that now, more than ever…in this cold and cruel world–not more works to remind us how actively mean-spirited this world of ours…really is. To escapism!!!
why did u sell u company to worst company
Why not a female director? Hollywood thought well enough of Bigelow’s directorial skills,so why not Bigelow?
My friend is a pilot… does this mean he can fly every plane? No.
The Hobbit is waaaaay shorter than any of the books in the Lord of the Rings trilogy.
Can someone explain to me the why and how they are going to wring two movies out of it?
The first film will adapt THE HOBBIT; the second film will fill in the period between it and the “RINGS” trilogy.
Yeah, it’s a blatant cash grab.
This is sad news. I would like to see Peter Jackson get Michael Bay to step in.
This is clearly a job for the uniquely gifted and multi-talented Betty White.
Enough with hobbits already. Give us something new.
This starting to sound like what happened to Kubrick’s “Napoleon,” one of the best films never made.
Hopefully we’ll all be able to see this film, regardless of who ends up making it, rather than decades later read the sad story behind it.
Pan’s Labyrinth… overrated.
Just because Del Toro looks like a hobbit doesn’t mean he needs to direct the movie.
Thank goodness he’s leaving.
Del Toro also said he preferred the voice over version of Blade Runner.
So with his very poor directorial judgement be glad we won’t be bored to death by his version of the Hobbit. Better to have no version at all than a bad one.