
ANALYSIS: The Tribeca Film Festival has ended, generating no major deals, but more announcements than any film festival I can remember. In the latest missive, the festival informs that it drew more than 410,000 to screenings, panels and free community events. Theater attendance for the 396 screenings reached 94,000. I’m trying to get a sense of how many participated in Tribeca’s virtual festival, an inaugural online subscription program godfathered by former longtime Sundance picture picker Geoff Gilmore. but those figures weren’t immediately made available. From an industry standpoint, the reaction from sellers and distributors I spoke with about the festival was complete indifference, and I think that hurts Tribeca’s growth potential. Am I placing too much emphasis on the non-existent marketplace at Tribeca, when co-founders Robert De Niro and Jane Rosenthal founded the fest to bring business back downtown after 9/11? I don’t think so. If the festival could get films which made distributors willing to commit minimum guarantees and P&A commitments, the excitement factor will rise significantly. The wanna-see at January’s Sundance Film Festival on premiere films like Buried, The Kids Are All Right, Catfish, Blue Valentine and numerous others lent a palpable excitement to the proceedings, and Gilmore was the guy who helped foster that quality level. There was little anybody had to see at Tribeca, beyond Jane and Bob calling in a favor and getting a big studio film like Shrek Forever After for a premiere at the Ziegfeld Theater. If Tribeca was a happening fest, wouldn’t Fox have premiered the inherently New York Oliver Stone-directed Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps here, days before its originally scheduled opening, rather than delay the release date four months so it could open at Cannes? The global platform makes Cannes hard to compete against, and Sundance has a big head start in cherry-picking films. I just think Tribeca could become more of an alternative for must-see films. This is New York, after all.


Did Sundance even generate that much excitement this year? Aside from some updates at DHD and the little controversy surrounding Catfish, I don’t recall reading very much about that one either.
“the festival informs that it drew more than 410,000 to screenings”
Really? Well if this is what they say it must be true. This reminds me of a major protest somewhere when the police say it drew 20,000 people but the protest organizers claim it drew 500,000.
See SPORK it was great. Heard it’s got several bids.
I went to two films this year. The Infidel and Get Low. The Infidel was a great comedy while Get Low was a little slow but it was acted very well. Other than that, there really was nothing I was too desperate to see.
I just think that if they get films that people are really dying to see or that people will know are big, then it will be a bigger festival. Why can’t Robert D. pull any strings? Wall street 2 would have been amazing as a festival opener but noooo……. WE GET SHREK 4! WTF!
Now if only they could get those “friends” to buy movies and talk up the fest vs down. That would be a feat!
My spouse has a decent IMDB entry, and we watched about 10 Tribeca films through the virtual festival service. Spork was our favorite.
After the first couple of days of the festival, the in-theater screenings were so crowded that my spouse couldn’t get into any of them.
There seems to be a disconnect between the bored distributors and the regular people who were enthusiastic enough to stand in line for hours to get into the screenings.
sorry Fred (aka producer of Spork) nobody thought Spork or any other film at Tribeca was GREAT and that’s the unfortunate truth. If there were bids on Spork (or for any other films at the festival for that matter) why haven’t we heard a single peep about them? The only film I heard anyone say was GREAT was My Trip to Al Qaeda. I went to see it because of such hyperbole. It was an excellent film but not GREAT because it was too damn long
I hate so say it but “Oops I Said It Again” when I asked two weeks ago why there was no news of Tribeca sales and there you have it folks… there we’re no sales. I wonder why? Maybe because Shrek 48,124 already has distribution.
Moving on to LA Film Fest. When I heard that Twilight was screening I almost threw up in my cup of noodle. I hope it’s at least in competition. Let’s let the tween fan-girls decide the fate of our so called high-brow festival cinema. First they came for the indies, then for studio indie-knockoffs, then for big budget popcorn fare and now for tired franchises. What’s next, an all Avatar festival?
every year they show hollywood junk like shrek 4, babymama, spider-man 3, etc JUST so they can claim HUGE audience numbers when in fact most screenings i went to weren’t even full.
that and the programmers for the festival are just terrible.
tribeca seems more like a cultural event. which is fine. but if the festival becomes a deal making center then they need to create deal making scenarios.
has a bonafide hit ever come out of sundance that played in competition? i remember when miramax (during the weinstein days) paid 8 figures for crap like happy texas and the castle.