Film director Roman Polanski today broke his silence first the time about his Swiss arrest and pending extradition back to Los Angeles. He released this statement to the news media through his Paris friend and author Bernard-Henri Lévy, director of the French magazine La Règle du Jeu:
Throughout my seven months since September 26, 2009, the date of my arrest at Zurich Airport, where I had landed with a view to receiving a lifetime award for my work from the representative of the Swiss Minister of Culture, I have refrained from making any public statements and have requested my lawyers to confine their comments to a bare minimum.
I wanted the legal authorities of Switzerland and the United States, as well as my lawyers, to do their work without any polemics on my part. I have decided to break my silence in order to address myself directly to you without any intermediaries and in my own words.
I have had my share of dramas and joys, as we all have, and I am not going to try to ask you to pity my lot in life. I ask only to be treated fairly like anyone else.
It is true: 33 years ago I pleaded guilty, and I served time at the prison for common law crimes at Chino, not in a VIP prison. That period was to have covered the totality of my sentence. By the time I left prison, the judge had changed his mind and claimed that the time served at Chino did not fulfil te entire sentence, and it is this reversal that justified my leaving the United States.
This affair was roused from its slumbers of over three decades by a documentary film-maker who gathered evidence from persons involved at the time. I took no part in that project, either directly or indirectly.
The resulting documentary not only highlighted the fact that I left the United States because I had been treated unjustly; it also drew the ire of the Los Angeles authorities, who felt that they had been attacked and decided to request my extradition from Switzerland, a country I have been visiting regularly for over 30 years without let or hindrance.
I can now remain silent no longer!
I can remain silent no longer because the American authorities have just decided, in defiance of all the arguments and depositions submitted by third parties, not to agree to sentence me in absentia even though the same Court of Appeal recommended the contrary.
I can remain silent no longer because the California court has dismissed the victim’s numerous requests that proceedings against me be dropped, once and for all, to spare her from further harassment every time this affair is raised once more.
I can remain silent no longer because there has just been a new development of immense significance.
On February 26 last, Roger Gunson, the deputy district attorney in charge of the case in 1977, now retired, testified under oath before Judge Mary Lou Villar in the presence of David Walgren, the present deputy district attorney in charge of the case, who was at liberty to contradict and question him, that on September 16, 1977, Judge Rittenband stated to all the parties concerned that my term of imprisonment in Chino constituted the totality of the sentence I would have to serve.
I can remain silent no longer because the request for my extradition addressed to the Swiss authorities is founded on a lie. In the same statement, retired deputy district attorney Roger Gunson added that it was false to claim, as the present district attorney’s office does in their request for my extradition, that the time I spent in Chino was for the purpose of a diagnostic study.
The said request asserts that I fled in order to escape sentencing by the U.S. judicial authorities, but under the plea-bargaining process I had acknowledged the facts and returned to the United States in order to serve my sentence. All that remained was for the court to confirm this agreement, but the judge decided to repudiate it in order to gain himself some publicity at my expense.
I can remain silent no longer because for over 30 years my lawyers have never ceased to insist that I was betrayed by the judge, that the judge perjured himself, and that I served my sentence.
Today it is the deputy district attorney who handled the case in the 1970s, a man of irreproachable reputation, who has confirmed all my statements under oath, and this has shed a whole new light on the matter.
I can remain silent no longer because the same causes are now producing the same effects. The new District Attorney, who is handling this case and has requested my extradition, is himself campaigning for election and needs media publicity!
I can no longer remain silent because the United States continues to demand my extradition more to serve me on a platter to the media of the world than to pronounce a judgment concerning which an agreement was reached 33 years ago.
I can remain silent no longer because I have been placed under house arrest in Gstaad and bailed in very large sum of money which I have managed to raise only by mortgaging the apartment that has been my home for over 30 years, and because I am far from my family and unable to work.
Such are the facts I wished to put before you in the hope that Switzerland will recognize that there are no grounds for extradition, and that I shall be able to find peace, be reunited with my family, and live in freedom in my native land.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.
Throughout my seven months since September 26, 2009, the date of my arrest at Zurich Airport, where I had landed with a view to receiving a lifetime award for my work from the representative of the Swiss Minister of Culture, I have refrained from making any public statements and have requested my lawyers to confine their comments to a bare minimum.

Gag me with a spoon! This degenerate was convicted in a court of law; his appeals failed and he jumped bail and fled. He belongs in the slammer; long past time!
You’re wrong. He was sentenced and served the time.
I got a better idea. Come to the U.S. and tell it to the judge and jury. Have your day in court instead of spending a lifetime like a sniveling coward running away from it. What was all that whining about people seeking media attention again?
Better said: ‘thirty-three years ago, I drugged and raped a thirteen year-old girl. I thought that, because of my vast money, power, influence and talent, that I would not have to go to face a full punishment for this crime. And now that I have been forced to face those consequences, my feelings can be summed up thusly: I DON’T WANNA!!!”
Bravo! I couldn’t have said it better myself.
Absolutely perfect between-the-lines translation of his French!
Well said!
A month’s worth new material for Big Hollywood in 4, 3, 2, 1…
Notice that he makes no mention at all of the fact that he drugged, raped and sodomized a 13 year old girl, and then he paid her off.
I think there may have been irregularities in the handling of the case that would result in his case being ultimately dropped, but I think he should be required to come back to the United States, and I do not understand why authorities waited this long to pursue him.
The real crime is that this rapist has been allowed to flourish and be free for so many years.
No one is above the law. He fled before his sentencing, judges have the authority to reject plea bargains. District attorney’s or not judges. Just because 33 years have elapsed does not make the fact he is evading justice any less severe.
In the United States people are not sentenced abestnia. Its time to come back and face the music.
“I can remain silent no longer because the California court has dismissed the victim’s numerous requests that proceedings against me be dropped, once and for all, to spare her from further harassment every time this affair is raised once more.”
Wow, really? He wants to play the “think about the victim” card in this press release? Ridiculous.
She’s the one who wants it dropped. Get your facts straight.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but the “sentence” Mr. Polanski served for raping a minor was 42 days. If that is indeed the case, Mr. Polanski has no problem remaining silent about this. Have your day in court, Sir.
It was the sentence they handed down and he served it. It’s not his fault that you don’t see it as “enough”.
Drug and rape only one 13 year girl and the whole judicial system turns against you. Poor Polanksi.
V
Waaaa… Men should not sleep with little girls. Cry me a river. Do the crime, do the time. Pedophile.
Newsflash to Roman Polanski … the lawyers don’t get to decide on the sentence when you plead guilty; the judge does. The District Attorney can make a recommendation and the prosecution and defense can come to an agreement, but the final decision belongs to the judge. So if “the judge had changed his mind and claimed that the time served at Chino did not fulfill the entire sentence”, that is well within the boundaries of his/her job description.
Luckily, there’s a way for people to get around this seemingly endless power of criminal judges – don’t rape a minor in the first place.
Maybe you shouldn’t sodomize 13 year old girls.
This is absolutely ridiculous. This man is not only lying, he has no remorse. This guy just doesn’t believe the law applies to him. Have fun in jail, Polanski, have fun.
I’m glad to have Polanski come forward and make this statement. I think it’s long past time he stood up for himself and the truth and time the media circus around all this is shut down. He has never denied his guilt, he has served his sentence and so has the unfortunate victim. Let Ms. Geimer and Mr. Polanski move forward with their lives and put this horrible chapter of their lives behind them.
But what would these self-righteous jackals do for entertainment then?
Shut up, you child-raping motherfucker. You deserve everything you have coming to you; and I hope you suffer and rot in Hell. Your victim is a better person than you will ever be (and I am). I wish you nothing but ill.
Anyone know how long he served in Chino? For drugging and raping a underaged girl? What was the time he felt and worse if true the court felt was enough time for his crime? ahh Google..
Yes, I posted it below. It was 42 days (under what is normally 90 days).
all I hear is some guy who thinks the rules don’t apply to him
you’re being extradited and you’re going to jail
it might not be as intricate as one of your films, but it works
You’re right. That’s all you hear.
It’s disgusting to hear Polanski use his victim’s wish that the whole thing be forgotten to spare her family more grief as a reason the Courts should exonerate him for his pedophilia. And he does this rather than taking any responsibility for being the sole cause of the suffering of his victim by choosing to drug and rape her when she was 13-year-old middle-schooler and he was a 43-year-old man.
The fact is if he faced the courts in 1977 this whole story would have largely gone away from a media perspective some 30 years ago. The more he protests facing the courts for his crime the more his victim is dragged into the press. That is a crime in itself.
There are those who run to Polanski’s defense citing vague untruths or distorted facts, many of which Polanski included in his letter. But the unfortunate truth is he drugged and anally raped a child against her will. If anyone cares to read the child’s court testimony it is horrifying and can be easily found on line.
The fact that Polanski insists he was duped by the courts is ludicrous. In short, the court did not accept his plea bargain which suggested the Court punish him only with time served prior to his court date. That is not an unusual stand for the court to take in any case.
Polanski is totally responsible for his choice to rape the little girl and to flee the country. As a result he constantlys drag his victim through the media every time he refuses the Court’s requirement that he return to face justice. Don’t believe his letter or it’s “facts” written by his high-cost public relations team.
Pedophiles, even if they make decent films, should face justice. And without question our judicial system will treat him much better than he or any other pedophile has treated their victim or victims. It’s hard to think of anything worse than to call a person than to call him a pedophile, but whatever that word is it applies to Polanski.
He is guilty of charges 33 years ago. The woman has forgiven him. If he was not so high profile the LA Courts would not care. They are trying make a name for themselves. Go after things in this city that really matter to the people of this care about… like job, budgets, corrupt politicians, put faith in the people in Los Angeles, not someone that doesn’t even live is this country. The victim wants this dropped. DROP IT and spend our money for good causes. Please get your 15 minutes of fame elsewhere.
Here, here.
If he was a normal person, he would have actually served the entire sentence – and not left the country.
What an annoying know-it-all tone in showing you know nothing. It’s not up to the victim. Who cares if she “forgives” him. U.S. courts don’t leave it up to the victim to decide whether to press charges against a pedophile. And yes actually, people who are not celebrities get much harsher treatment than this guy got. Mainly because they can’t afford the best lawyers money can buy. You’re saying a public defender does a better job than Polanski’s team? Uh right. Do a minimal amount of research before you open your mouth.
He should serve his time for the crimes he committed. He can say all he want but he is a criminal who is on the run and living in the lap of luxury, instead of in a cell, 4 by 4.
Shame to Hollywood for supporting this criminal and for giving him all these awards. Talented or not, he is a criminal and criminals should not be celebrated and adore
33 years and still not a syllable of remorse. Does he just not get it? He raped an 8th-grader. Most people are far more outraged by his “misconduct” than by whatever he claims the judge did. Anyway, since the guy he claims was out to get him has been dead for 17 years, what exactly is he afraid of now?
Cry me a river, skeevy pedophile!
A thirteen year old girl, Roman…. Come on.
Dear Roman:
You still committed rape. She was 13! Even if everything you said is true, rather than staying and fighting what you allege the judge was going to do like a man, you ran. Instead of taking it up on appeal, you ran. Instead of having your lawyer remind the judge in open court what had been promised, you ran. You don’t even truly know that the judge would have done what you allege because you ran. The only reason that this case has lingered for 30+ years is your cowardice. The only reason the victim continues to be tormented is your cowardice. The only reason you are sniveling now is your cowardice. You’re still a rapist, and I have no sympathy whatsoever.
Only in Hollywood can a pedophile be a victim.