Film director Roman Polanski today broke his silence first the time about his Swiss arrest and pending extradition back to Los Angeles. He released this statement to the news media through his Paris friend and author Bernard-Henri Lévy, director of the French magazine La Règle du Jeu:
Throughout my seven months since September 26, 2009, the date of my arrest at Zurich Airport, where I had landed with a view to receiving a lifetime award for my work from the representative of the Swiss Minister of Culture, I have refrained from making any public statements and have requested my lawyers to confine their comments to a bare minimum.
I wanted the legal authorities of Switzerland and the United States, as well as my lawyers, to do their work without any polemics on my part. I have decided to break my silence in order to address myself directly to you without any intermediaries and in my own words.
I have had my share of dramas and joys, as we all have, and I am not going to try to ask you to pity my lot in life. I ask only to be treated fairly like anyone else.
It is true: 33 years ago I pleaded guilty, and I served time at the prison for common law crimes at Chino, not in a VIP prison. That period was to have covered the totality of my sentence. By the time I left prison, the judge had changed his mind and claimed that the time served at Chino did not fulfil te entire sentence, and it is this reversal that justified my leaving the United States.
This affair was roused from its slumbers of over three decades by a documentary film-maker who gathered evidence from persons involved at the time. I took no part in that project, either directly or indirectly.
The resulting documentary not only highlighted the fact that I left the United States because I had been treated unjustly; it also drew the ire of the Los Angeles authorities, who felt that they had been attacked and decided to request my extradition from Switzerland, a country I have been visiting regularly for over 30 years without let or hindrance.
I can now remain silent no longer!
I can remain silent no longer because the American authorities have just decided, in defiance of all the arguments and depositions submitted by third parties, not to agree to sentence me in absentia even though the same Court of Appeal recommended the contrary.
I can remain silent no longer because the California court has dismissed the victim’s numerous requests that proceedings against me be dropped, once and for all, to spare her from further harassment every time this affair is raised once more.
I can remain silent no longer because there has just been a new development of immense significance.
On February 26 last, Roger Gunson, the deputy district attorney in charge of the case in 1977, now retired, testified under oath before Judge Mary Lou Villar in the presence of David Walgren, the present deputy district attorney in charge of the case, who was at liberty to contradict and question him, that on September 16, 1977, Judge Rittenband stated to all the parties concerned that my term of imprisonment in Chino constituted the totality of the sentence I would have to serve.
I can remain silent no longer because the request for my extradition addressed to the Swiss authorities is founded on a lie. In the same statement, retired deputy district attorney Roger Gunson added that it was false to claim, as the present district attorney’s office does in their request for my extradition, that the time I spent in Chino was for the purpose of a diagnostic study.
The said request asserts that I fled in order to escape sentencing by the U.S. judicial authorities, but under the plea-bargaining process I had acknowledged the facts and returned to the United States in order to serve my sentence. All that remained was for the court to confirm this agreement, but the judge decided to repudiate it in order to gain himself some publicity at my expense.
I can remain silent no longer because for over 30 years my lawyers have never ceased to insist that I was betrayed by the judge, that the judge perjured himself, and that I served my sentence.
Today it is the deputy district attorney who handled the case in the 1970s, a man of irreproachable reputation, who has confirmed all my statements under oath, and this has shed a whole new light on the matter.
I can remain silent no longer because the same causes are now producing the same effects. The new District Attorney, who is handling this case and has requested my extradition, is himself campaigning for election and needs media publicity!
I can no longer remain silent because the United States continues to demand my extradition more to serve me on a platter to the media of the world than to pronounce a judgment concerning which an agreement was reached 33 years ago.
I can remain silent no longer because I have been placed under house arrest in Gstaad and bailed in very large sum of money which I have managed to raise only by mortgaging the apartment that has been my home for over 30 years, and because I am far from my family and unable to work.
Such are the facts I wished to put before you in the hope that Switzerland will recognize that there are no grounds for extradition, and that I shall be able to find peace, be reunited with my family, and live in freedom in my native land.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.
R.I.P. Lee Rich
Throughout my seven months since September 26, 2009, the date of my arrest at Zurich Airport, where I had landed with a view to receiving a lifetime award for my work from the representative of the Swiss Minister of Culture, I have refrained from making any public statements and have requested my lawyers to confine their comments to a bare minimum.




Wait a second, Roman.
When you pleaded guilty, you knew that the sentence could be up to 20 years. You served only 42 days for drugging and sodomizing a 13-year-old girl. Let’s see, at that time, she would have been just out of sixth grade and YOU were 43 years old.
You justify fleeing the country and our laws because you claim that the judge changed his mind. You say you want to be treated fairly like everyone else. Anyone who flees the law, can be expected to be treated the same, Roman.
You had other options at that time, including appealing to the District Attorney who you yourself calls a man of “irreproachable reputation.” You didn’t choose to do that.
Instead, you let panic be your inspiration and you fled. It was panic. Nothing more, nothing less.
Now, you are an old man, still fighting the sins of your younger self. There is only one reason for that …
I don’t understand all this thrashing about “the judge changed his mind”. The plea bargain agreement was between the prosecution and the defense. Such agreements are not binding on the judge when he passes sentencing. This judge decided that forty two days was not an appropriate punishment for this crime. Frankly it seems to me the judge was right. I would think there would be more outcry from the public and the media had the judge approved that deal. Then the cry of judges soft on crime would have been raised once again, and rightfully so.
It wasn’t merely panic. He was being railroaded. And, having been railroaded myself, I get why he split. You can’t fight it.
Wow! Harrison Ford, Natalie Portman, all the Hollywood big-shots, including of course Whoopi, will get out in support of Polanski. Whoopi famously opined it was not “rape-rape” because … it was Roman Polanski! Big Shot.
Along with Charlie Sheen (nothing says the Holidays like putting a knife to your wife’s throat on Christmas Day), Hollywood is simply decadent. Debauched.
Polanski’s native land is the Penitentiary. Where he belongs. I know, I know. Hollywood, deeply feminized, holds Big Shots ought to get special treatment. Its one thing for a guy out of nowhere to rape a 13 year old, but for a Big Shot, it’s OK! America is just a bunch of prudes, fly-over rubes who think drugging and anally raping a 13 year old is a crime!
On this very site, Ed Bernero pointed out the cost, to everyone in Hollywood, when Ford and other idiots like Martin Scorsese push for Polanski. People think everyone in Hollywood is a decadent idiot.
You’ve said it a million times, but I still don’t understand. How is the so-called-by-you “feminization” of Hollywood responsible for this? While you’re at it, please explain wtf the “feminization” of Hollywood means. From your numerous posts, all I know is that somehow the women and gays are responsible for lots of bad stuff.
If Hollywood was instead “masculinized”, what would be different? Would he still be in jail? Would he have died a mysterious prison death? Would the crime not have happened at all (because nasty stuff like that only happens in the world of the decadent gays)?
More to the point, why do you care what happened to a 13 year-old girl? You hate women. It’s in every post you write. Hollywood is “feminized”, so Hollywood is debauched…weak…perverse…stupid.
@Jesse – You might want to rethink your position home-skillet.
You start by admirably debunking the notion that perverseness and debauchery are as a result of Hollywood “feminization”, but you cast aside the factual ordeal of a 13 year old little girl. Very, very, very wak on your part.
Somehow, I thought you find a way to claim Avatar isn’t profitable in this post. Guess we’ll all just have to wait until the next one.
Oh, and I second Jesse’s question: what do you mean when you say Hollywood is “feminized?” You throw around a lot words, but I wonder if you even know what they mean.
How do I know you’re talking out of your ass? Because everything you say smells like shit.
I work in Hollywood and I would love to see Polanski serve time for the crime he committed. Go back to burying your nose in Fox News’ ass.
I hesitate to even post anything here among the haters but I can’t help but point out the fact that HER MOTHER BROUGHT HER TO THE HOUSE AND LEFT HER THERE ALONE WITH A GROWN MAN. He didn’t kidnap the girl, he didn’t seduce her out of the local candy shop. SHE wanted to be an actress and HER MOTHER hooked her up. Obviously they were willing to do anything for that stardom. Would you leave your 13 year old child alone with a grown man? That is why Whoopi said it wasn’t “Rape-Rape”
Yes, he did what he did but he certainly wasn’t acting alone. As a mother of a child who was molested, I see this very differently. The mother wasn’t a stranger to Polanski either. She knew him and offered her child up to him…in exchange for what? Fame? check. Fortune? who knows. But as far as I’m concerned this crime wouldn’t have happened if the mother hadn’t served her up on a platter. Period.
I think Polanski would be better off if he asked for mercy and showed some contrition. I think he’s hurting himself more than helping himself.
I agree that this is no more than a District Attorney trying to make a name for himself. Why did they wait 30 years to extradite Polanski when they have known all along where he has been & when?!
So you’re saying it’s a bad thing to have a DA that aggressively pursues cases of child rape that were wrongly dropped in the past? Los Angeles families should be thrilled they have a DA who isn’t soft on pedophiles. And of course the DA is ambitious. Name one DA anywhere that isn’t. There isn’t one single defense of Polanski here that shows any logic or sense whatsoever.
You raped a child. deal with it you sick motherfucker. rot in hell.
The basis on which the law, and its equal application to everyone, rests: Show up. Produce the body (you) and make your defense. If you don’t like the result, tough; those are the breaks when you break the law. But show up. Nothing pisses off judges or prosecutors more than someone who conducts his defense through pubilc forums, the safety of foreign borders, sympathetic media sycophants, and money. Defend yourself by showing up.
Waaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Cry me a river.
Tell me, Roman, about the therapy you went into to recognize and try to heal your pedophilia after that… what, none?
Instead you ran away to Europe, where it’s far easier to buy your way into 13-year-olds.
You’re lucky you’ve had 30 years of doing whatever you wanted before possibly paying for your crime (sorry, 42 days ain’t paying off any child-drugging-butt-f**king debt).
I weep for those girls in Europe who have been irreparably harmed by you.
This man is a monster and the academy should be ashamed for giving him a standing ovation at the oscars and defending him over the years. Despicable.
Thirteen-year-olds, Dude.
Polanski says he didn’t rape her. She said Polanski did not rape her. But the American Puritans don’t care what the two people involved say or think. The ‘victim’ says she thinks Polanski has paid in prison time and monetary fines and thinks justice was done.
Looks like Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck have linked to Deadline Hollywood by the comments above.
“Polanski says he didn’t rape her. She said Polanski did not rape her. But the American Puritans don’t care what the two people involved say or think.”
No, the LAW doesn’t care what the two people involved say or think. That’s not how it works in America; the victim and criminal don’t get to decide who gets charged and what the sentence is in a rape case. It’s the state bringing the charges, not the girl. If you don’t like it then I suggest you look for justice system elsewhere that doesn’t frown on underage sodomy.
Okay law professor. What does the law say about a judge who illegally reneges on a plea deal? You do realize that he plead guilty under a condition of lowered sentence which he already served, right? I’m not defending or attacking the guy. I’m just tired of all these people chiming in who don’t even know the effing story behind it.
She was 13. It’s statutory rape. Even he hadn’t given her champagne, drugged her and sodomized her, it would still be legal rape.
Really nyguy? This is simple politics? Its Republicans vs Democrats and you claim its the Republicans against this child rapist? Are you trying to say that Liberals are all for child rape? I bet your liberal buddies would like to kick your ass for saying that.
‘Polanski said he didn’t rape her. She said Polanski didn’t rape her.’ ??? He drugged her – was she even conscious? – and sodomised her. Had she even had sex before? 13…Jesus.
Polanski’s star status no doubt meant she was put under even more pressure during the trial than horrific pressure a rape trial would anyway entail. His then fleeing so the case had to be aborted can only have added to that. If he really had any remorse or concern, he would have done the time.
There are a lot of people unfairly imprisoned in the U.S. He would not have been one of them.
Shame on the celebs who’ve spoken out on his behalf.
Umm. A minor (especially a 13 year old) cannot consent to anything.
You can not consent to sex at the age of 13. It was rape.
I agree. You should remain silent no longer — and answer these charges in an open court of law. If you are innocent, come back and defend your actions to a jury of your peers.
Your evasion and fight to avoid extradition only reflects that you know what everyone has known all along — you have committed a heinous crime and will be sentenced to prison.
Shame on you for all of your deception and using a victims statement, which you bought and paid for, as an excuse to dismiss your transgressions. Shame on you for your sickness and crime. Shame on you for your weakness in being unable to stand up and honestly defend yourself.
Perhaps now, in your loss of freedom and family, and the uncertainty of your future, and with the anticipation of long term incarceration, you can understand the loss and pain of your victim.
There is no expiration date on justice. Make no mistake, justice is coming for you.
Tell it to the judge.
LOL He’s not serious.
Oh Roman, it’s not like you were forced to give quaaludes and booze to a 13 year old girl before you decided to rape her. Like John Campea on Youtube said: You boozed up and drugged a 13 year old child. You just need to suck in your gut and take it like a man.
But look on the bright side, not a lot of fugitives have Oscars, a blonde wife, a lot of people for some silly reason defending them, and have a Chalet as a prison. Just come on back to the USA and take your slap on the wrist and be done with it.
Hey Roman, you’ll be lucky if the inmates are kind. Even in prison, they frown on sodomizing a 13 year old girl. Loser.
But it wasn’t Rape-Rape! C’MON!
He’s right.
In this matter, he is right.
He should receive nominal punishment for jumping bail
and fleeing the country.
Let’s evolve a bit and bring a just end to this crime
and stop feeding our media obsessed America.
The vitriolic comments herein are disturbing. Cries of “rot in hell, Pedophile!” for a guy who hasn’t been accused of anything similar before or since are, well, disturbing.
Maybe everyone here should take a long, hard look in the mirror before throwing stones.
Are you serious?
In 1976, Polanski started a romantic relationship with Nastassja Kinski, when she was 15 years old and he was 43 years old.
The man has always been like this. It is unacceptable behavior… whether you are plying the girls with drugs or not… it’s unacceptable to be engaging in sex with girls at the that young of an age.
I know losing Tate and his unborn baby in such a horrific way screwed him up, but what he did WAS (and still is) horrible and he deserved to be punished for it. But instead, he ran. Had he just handled it like a man and taken the full punishment for his crime, it would have been over long ago and none of this would be happening now. I think people (i.e. mentally stunted, morally debase Hollywood types) just assume because it’s been so long, everyone should just move on. Basically they want the rule to be “If you hide out long enough, eventually people will just let it go.”
What I would say to him is….”Polanski, dude. You really thought a month in jail was a enough punishment for anally raping a little girl? Really? No, I mean really? If that logic applied, then I guess Manson should’ve gotten out after a year right? You chose this path. Deal with it.”
Yeah, they’re treating this poor guy like he raped a child… Oh wait, he DID rape a child. No second chances for child rapists. Put him in jail where he can experience the wonders of rape and then he’ll have both perspectives… that of the rapist and that of the victim to compare. Might make a good movie someday.
I dont really care if he goes to prison or not – HOWEVER – if HE goes to prison, then the parents who allowed their 13 year old daughter to party at the house of Jack Nicholson because she wanted to be famous, need to go to jail too.
Maybe if parents stopped letting their oversexed, overdeveloped “children” go to hollywood parties, or using their webcams, the amount of girls raped would go down – at least in Los Angeles. What he did was gross and wrong, but the girl lied about her age and clearly shouldn’t have been there in the first place. Not that it makes it okay at all, but it’s time for parents to take some personal responsibility for what happens to their children!
Exactly what I was thinking..
The saddest part in all of this is that the US had the time,effort, and guidance to renew a decades old warrant to secure his arrest in 2005 but did NOT have any leads whatsoever on the Bernie Madoff pyramid scheme.. I’d say priorities are misguided but Im not condoning child rape.. it just is what we as Americans choose to focus on
A girl’s mother can bring her to a party late at night when she should be studying for school the next day to hang with a bunch of 40+ industry heavy weights but they cant catch Osama bin laden??
You know what’s creepy? Most of the posts supporting his point of view are by women. Why is that?
Simple. Remember high school?…
Girls hate girls.
I’m not sure of the “why”, but years ago I took a class at I.U. and a guest lecturer was a criminal prosecuter. He told us that in rape trials the prosecution always tried to get as many middle aged white men on the jury as possible. According to him, this was the most likely sort to convict a man of rape.
He said women were more likely to “blame the victim”. Go figure.
Probably because they’re smarter than most men and realize that there are shades of grey within the black and white. Just a guess.
I can’t imagine that he will ever come back here. I agree that he should stand trial, though the people of California surely have better places to put the time, energy and money of the state than this case. That said, look at how long and hard he’s fought extradition. He will do something drastic before he ever allows himself to be tried by courts in a country that he no longer trusts. The man understands power well, and if he senses there is event he slightest chance that he will go to prison–and he must feel that it’s a real possibility–he will do anything and everything in his power to avoid the experience, up to and including taking his own life.
To some of the people here calling out for his blood, and using his crime to vent their own rage at Hollywood, shame on you. Nothing in your outrage suggests actual concern for the victim. It smacks instead of rage addiction. You’re scoring an easy hit of Internet bile off a complete and utter tragedy.
Polanski is one of the most talented directors in the world. Yes, he committed a crime and pleaded guilty. However it is amusing to watch the United States, the country guilty in numerous crimes against humanity, to demand his head on the plate. Leave the man alone! And all you talentless wannabes, just go and die from jealousy. Because you will never accomplish anything that is remotely close to Polanski masterpieces.
Dmitry sums up most of the pathetic people who support a this child rapist. They think that because this guy is a big shot celebrity it doesnt matter what he did. If this was some random guy working construction, then it would be different.
I loved PIRATES.
Bingo.
Roman, you lost me at the first exclamation mark.
It pains me to say it but you never made another full realized masterpiece after you fled the country.
You fled and your art suffered. Anyone else see Bitter Moon or The Ninth Gate? Utter garbage. Even Tess is a massive bore. And the Ghost Writer is just plain ridiculous.
He’s more than repaid any perceived transgression by contributing many a fine cinematic artifact to our undeserving society, for perpetuity, including the pretty alright Ghost Writer just this year. Proportion is a quality lacking in many of the commentators’ worldviews. He may have plucked a blossoming lass a tad prematurely, but he likewise touches many a young mind in the form of his art which will continue to bear fruit for generations to come. Baby out with the bathwater, heavens forbid.
Yet another pathetic person who thinks because of this guys celebrity he is above the law. Who cares what he does, as long as he is allowed to continue making movies you like…
He’s admittedly committed this crime, but yet he’s a damn fine director. Probably one of the best. Ever. Does that put him above the law? No. But this case is no longer about the crime that happened long ago, it’s about the California court system seeking revenge. Bring him back, fine him, use his money to help those who are victims of other similar crimes and deport him for good if need be. Jail serves neither the victim nor the public in this case. Money will help everyone associated. I also agree with those above who’ve mentioned the guilty parents and other adults who are part of this and similar situations where powerful people have used their will to abuse children.