
EXCLUSIVE: The best way to get Cannes buyers hot and bothered is to come to market with a branded property that has potentially big commercial appeal, cool elements and a reasonable budget. Here’s one that fits that bill: Andrew Macdonald’s DNA Films has made a deal with India-based Reliance Big Entertainment and IM Global to finance Judge Dredd, a 3D film that was scripted by Alex Garland, and will be directed by Pete Travis, best known for Vantage Point and Omagh. The film will be shopped at the festival by IM Global, in the first collaboration since Reliance bought a majority stake in Stuart Ford’s foreign sales company. While Judge Dredd is perhaps best remembered for the forgettable 1995 action film that starred Sylvester Stallone, Macdonald went back to the franchise’s DNA to completely overhaul the film and bring it back to its origins as the UK comic created by John Wagner and illustrated by Carlos Ezquerra. Dredd is set in a futuristic world filled with violence, and the character is empowered to act as judge, jury and executioner. Garland’s best known for writing the novel The Beach, and scripting the Danny Boyle-directed scifi film Sunshine and 28 Days Later. He also wrote the script for a movie version of the Microsoft game Halo that was scrapped by Universal and Fox. The budget’s under $50 million, I’m told. This is the kind of project that you would normally find at a studio. This one looked like it would be done under DNA’s deal at Fox, but that deal’s going away, and Fox let this one loose.


NO ONE liked the Judge Dredd movie. No one. Because it was awful.
No one has any fond memories of it, at all.
No one still reads the comic book. It’s horribly dated to the 80s era of ‘edgy’ comic books that today read like kiddy fare.
So…why not remake it?
Fox was soooo right to cut this turd loose.
still a stalone fan is incredibly wrong
2000ad is still “edgy”, he obviously has never read it himself.
sly ruined the last attempt at dredd
2000ad is ******* amazing – go buy it now tharg demands it
I actually liked the movie… Stallone wasn’t the greatest in it and the Rob Schneider’s character was awful, but the story was decent, the effects were good for the time, the villains were great, oh yeah and Diane Lane (no explanation needed).
No one reads the comic book? Judging by the comment YOU don’t read it and don’t expect anyone else too. 2000AD / Rebellion have a strong following in many forms of media. Thankfully they didn’t have anything to do with the turd that was plopped into the cinema bowl all those years ago, still, it’s a franchise that I think could do without being made, the scope of the universe and stories told in it are just too big to be contained in a movie. Besides Johnny Alpha’d kick Dredds ass.
Sorry Stallone fan, you’re clearly talking out of your A-Hole!
You obviously haven’t read any Judge Dredd material.
Yes the Stallone film was not a faithful adaptation, but he’s done far worse, ‘Stop Or My Mom will shoot’, or do you consider that a cinematic masterpiece?
Pull your head out of your arse!
If this new film replicates the gritty, satirical edge of the comic, it’ll be a sure fire winner.
Awesome – Dredd was such a great comic book character: if they stay true to the original dystopic future of Wagner, it will be a good movie…
If anyone can do this, it’s Garland. I’d argue he’s actually best known for “28 Days Later…,” so he’s the guy for dystopian futures. Also, the guy’s book, “Coma,” was pretty intense sci-fi. I thought “The Beach” sucked as a movie, but his novel of it was great.
Judge Dredd is DEAD!
There are better branded properties.
Remake ROBOCOP and let BLOMKAMP direct.
The reason that you consider Robocop a better “Dredd’ film is that Ed Neumieur wrote an original treatment for a Dredd film and when it stalled , went on to write Robocop and took all the Dreddisms with him!!!
Dont see his face – check
“Dead or alive youre coming with me”
“Stop … or there will be trouble ”
Plus …… A man that is more machine is allegorical to Ole Stony Face’s complete lack of emotion!!!
Robocop WAS Judge Dredd with a different spin!!!
It was brilliant though!!!
I don’t know about Dredd, or the Robocop remake. Both are from a different era.
It’s amazing that Detroit is practically identical to what was presented in the original Robocop as the template to the future.
What was edgy and cool almost 30 years ago is old hat today. What’s so special about Dredd today? “Kick Ass” is more along the lines of what audiences expect out of such movies.
Hollywood is going to have to learn sooner or later that not EVERY superhero movie needs to be resurrected.
I think I would trust Alex Garland least of all to understand the humor and satire in the material they have to adapt. He’ll probably just try to interpret it by copying chunks of movies it reminds him of: Robocop, etc. This is going to be as much of a non-starter as Judge Dredd ’95. At least THAT movie had cool, faithful production design.
Does anyone remember Sandra Bullock was in that… She made the movie for me.
That was “Demolition Man”
You’re thinking of Demolition Man. Diane Lane was in Judge Dredd.
Dredd is an icon in UK comics, but pretty niche elsewhere. As long as the budget is kept modest, it might do for a remake. Wouldn’t have to try too hard to make it better and more faithful than the Stallone flick.
You’re thinking of “Demolition Man.”
Demolition Man was more like a Judge Dredd movie than Judge Dredd was.
Still a Stallone Fan — do you have any freaking idea of what you’re talking about? This was a well-regarded and very popular comic book long before it was a mediocre movie, though I’ve certainly seen worse.
Why do you think it’s impossible to make a good movie of it, simply because the last try wasn’t? Doesn’t that actually make MORE sense to remake? I’m sure you’re unaware of the fact that the classic version version of “The Maltese Falcon” with Humphrey Bogart and Mary Astor was the THIRD attempt at filming the book in just a few years. Of course, that last version was so great and definitive that no one has since dared to take a stab at it.
“Judge Dredd” is, obviously, a very different case.
Greg–
Sandra Bullock was in DEMOLITION MAN… Not Judge Dredd. (A film far superior to Stallone’s Dredd by the way.)
Rob Schneider was in Judge Dredd.
Actually, Schnieder was in both.
And, yes,DEMOLITION MAN is the REAL Judge Dredd movie; I’ve wondered if Stallone did the film thinking that himself…
Stallone Fan, simply put: You are CRAZY.
Judge Dredd doesn’t suck! Judge Dredd is ripe to be remade– and with all the material– could easily become the James Bond of Sci-Fi film franchises.
Imagine Judge Death as a villain in Part 2 or 3. That would be exquisite.
And this is EXACTLY how the film should be handled. An American studio full of sweaty chimps would just screw the concept. (See your idol’s version for confirmation.)
Anybody that bases their view of Dredd on Stallone’s piss poor effort has NO CLUE what they are missing.
An if the UK Judge Dredd material is so dated and so FOUL, why is Simon & Schuster releasing American versions of the Classic Dredd Collections (through Rebellion Publishing)?
Here’s part of the Press Release nitwit (reprinted here for the curious or fans– I don’t work for any of these people):
“The new North America-only publishing list includes classic collections, outstanding new work from the hottest up-and-coming talents as well as thematic compilations, which collect the work of some of the biggest names in comics, such as Alan Moore, Dave Gibbons, Garth Ennis, Grant Morrison, Alan Davis, John Wagner, Brian Bolland, Pat Mills, Mark Millar and many others.
2000 AD will be releasing two books a month, with the first two books going on sale 15 June 2010. The first release is:
Judge Dredd Case Files 01: a 400-page collection of John Wagner and Carlos Ezquerra’s iconic creation Judge Dredd – this starts an ongoing series of Judge Dredd collections, which are already European bestsellers.”
You could NOT ask for a better list of comic creators!
Feel free to stay home when this movie comes out too– it’ll leave me extra room to put down my popcorn when I am struck by the film’s AWESOMENESS.
garland’s genius is a weapon; aim and fire it at “j dredd” and this thing will E*X*P*L*O*D*E for kids + gamers. he + dna + travis’ll kill with this film and they’ll churn-out a 200 mil movie for the 50. le festival commence.
Wagner wrote both History of Violence and Button Man what more could you ask for? I think it’s a great idea. The Judge Dredd comic may be a little dated but Wagner is a great writer and the blueprint is there to make something great out of it. Whatever happened to Button Man by the way?
Why would anyone reboot this “turd?” Because the story and the character afford the studio and filmmakers to shoot a cheap flick that could potentially double down for them. The Graphic violence and over the top art of that Comic’s original world affords the opportunity for a big dumb rain of violence Rich with deliberately hokey dialogue.
I think a lot of people who read “Dread” failed to understand the humor and social commentary in it.
This is a world where sick twisted humor is the only way to cope, and which exposes the very real nastiness inside people.
The Stallone movie completely missed the mark by trying to have bad guys as the minority – whereas the comic was very much based in the reality that bad people are by far the majority, and people are only good if they fear the consequences of breaking the law.
I doubt any of the directors around at the moment have a good enough understanding of humanity to show this on film.
But who knows – I could be wrong. I guess time will tell.
you are absolutely correct, sir!
I wish more people could understand that this isn’t a remake of the Stallone movie any more than Batman Begins was a remake of the 1960s TV show.
The Stallone movie took a small handful of elements from the comic, roughly hammered them into the shape of a movie and ran the result through the Hollywoodiser (must have useless comedy sidekick and pointless love-interest).
The final product was a movie that only superficially resembled the Judge Dredd comics. The opening sequence – the block war – was about the closest it came, if you ignore the “Court’s adjourned” line and the implausible “double-whammy” bullet (oh, why couldn’t Dredd have fired heatseeker bullets instead?). After that, it turned into a fairly standard Stallone movie, no better or worse than most of them.
I do have high hopes for this new Dredd movie: there are people who worked on the comic actually involved in shaping the film. If everyone can stick to what makes the comic so good – it’s not about Dredd; it’s about a world that needs someone like Dredd – then I can see this really working.
That said, I’m a little concerned by the article referring to it as “a 3D film”.
Let’s face it guys. Dredd, the REAL Dredd would make a superb movie. I bought the comic from 1981 until 2002 and Dredd only got better with age. If the same writers are involved I’m certain they wouldn’t allow such an excellent creation to be destroyed. Again! As for the actor to play him I reckon an unknown would be best as please please please don’t let him remove his helmet. Who can ever forget Sly Stallone shouting “I am the law.” Still gives me nightmares
judge dreed is the man he has no super powers no special abilitys he is just a hard ass mo fo that is judge jury and executioneer in a world where no rules apply a man with a gun and a bike and an iron will that can not be bent or bought JUDGE DREED IS THE LAW AND NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW he kicks the ass of most comic book characters for the simple reason take all superman or the X-MENS abiltys away and there charater then has no substance i mean come on superman with out any abilitys is just clark kent i mean come on CK TAKING ON THE WORLD please where as JUDGE DREED does it and does it well
The character of Dredd is basically a blank canvas to wrap a world of twisted extremes around. He is the rock to which all things unsavory end up splattered against.
Really, you can’t compare Robocop or any other action hero to him because firstly he’s an utter horror himself, like Mr Spock with a big gun and a insanely blinkered rationalisation process.
basically if you take Man Bites Dog, Idiocracy, Dirty Harry & Soylent Green and blend them all together you’d have a Dredd film. If i could be bothered worrying,, i’d be worried that the real story is in the world that surrounds Dredd not the character, and creating believable worlds cost lots of cash.
At least if they make this movie it (may) be better than the original. I’m so tired of remakes of classic films which were great the first time around. Remakes should only exist to revamp horrible films, not good ones.
It’s been done. Badly. Like every other f*cking “reboot”.
At least have the decency to steal the idea and change the name, like they should have done with “Tank Girl”. Oh, yeah – remember that exercise in stupidity? Both characters originated from Deadline originally, I believe, and at least “Tank Girl” went on to be somewhat of a cult fave with the ‘tween to be riot grrrl world. I know of hundreds of young angry ladies and tuff dykes and Birls that used her as inspiration (I guess). Ask the average non-fanboy about Dredd (not Dreed, Terry) and they will (like people on this site) probably think of Demolition Man.
For chrissakes remake “Manos The Hands of Fate” or do another frigging movie about parents addicted to something. Leave the British comics alone!
It seems that just for being an 80′s comics many of you are eager to label it as a potential failure.
It comes from the same style of V of Vendetta and the Wachosky Brothers managed it to a very nice movie and Natalie Portman’s character had nothing to do with the original dumb blonde she was. They update it.
I don’t see why that couldn’t be done with Dredd, if even Batman himslef, a character from the 30′s (and who used his underwear by outside the pants) have been updated and redefined many times, even surviving the awful Joel Schumacher’s versions, and to the blockbusting mogul he became now.
I guess it isn’t just about the character but the scrip they made. Spawn is a interesting take on the duality of the antihero and still his movie was truly a waste of time.
At least, Stallone’s version of Dredd had Diane Lane with one of the coolest quote of the film while fighting Joan Chen: “Bitch!” “JUDGE Bitch!” Haha.
Heck, Stallone’s Dred was an excellent flick! Lots of action, lots of explosions; what more do you want?
@Danger Jones. Judge Dredd didn’t originate in Deadline, he first appeared in 2000AD issue 2 over 30 years ago and is still going strong. In fact, Tank Girl, who DID start in Deadline, recently made a comeback in the pages of the Judge Dredd Megazine.
Personally, I am cautiously looking forward to the film, too many people were angry about the Stallone abortion to get it wrong again. Surely? Even if the film is crap, I, and many others will continue to keep the faith reading 2000AD and the Judge Dredd Megazine. All you other nonscrots don’t know what your missing!
The naysayers are SOOOOO WRONG!!!! A proper DREDD movie could be incredible!
Anyone basing such negativity based soley off Slys version is stupidity incarnate! Its like saying Dont make Batman Begins/TDK because Batman and Robin sucked!
Dont forget, Batman was killed off once then came back better than ever!
For fans of DREDD. Google JUDGE MINTY, a 2000ad produced film also coming out.
Also, RON PERLMAN for Dredd !