
EXCLUSIVE: My recent scoop that Peter Jackson is negotiating to direct the two installments of The Hobbit is probably the best news for debt-laden MGM in years. But the development has put extra pressures on the beleaguered studio backers. Because making a 2-picture directing deal with the Lord Of The Rings director is no easy feat. I’m told that 30% of the gross is already committed to various participants, including Jackson (just for writing and producing!).
He and Fran Walsh don’t work cheap, and they once got $20 million against 20% of gross from Universal to direct King Kong (Jackson, who can’t get enough of Kong and just oversaw the renovation of the ape attraction on the Universal backlot). Insiders tell me that gross participants are right now being asked to make adjustments so that MGM and its partner, Warner Bros, can finance the film and make money. Creative deals are becoming routine on sequels like Men in Black, but they aren’t easy. There’s no certainty that MGM creditors will respond to the urgency that Jackson’s reps are ready to make a deal.
After all, this is the same group that reacted to its debt stranglehold by benching its production and marketing executive teams, halting progress on a promising homegrown slate of films, and staging a desperate auction that resulted in a predictable batch of bottom-feeder bids that were too low to be seriously considered. The result is it’s brought MGM to a screeching halt and allowed the library to languish.
Now the MGM creditors also must decide either to commit MGM’s half of the production costs for the two films or take available outside funding, all before the studio works out its future ownership strategy. If the creditors don’t seize on the momentum, MGM risks losing its chance to release the first film in December 2012. (The second film would follow a year later.) And there is a good chance that Jackson will change his mind, meaning that inaction costs the studio an enormous opportunity.
Whatever course of action the creditors take, execs like Parent and Vollman will certainly move on as MGM goes through the pre-packaged bankruptcy proceeding necessary to keep in place existing rights deals on franchises like James Bond. That process isn’t expected until late July at the earliest. But decisions on The Hobbit cannot wait that long.


For all the creative carping, the truth is that real MBAs (the kind of Wall St types who rape their clients but serve their investors) never really overtook the Hollywood asylum. If they had, gross deals like those that studios grovel for with the likes of Jackson, Scorsese etc would not have been tolerated.
It’s amazing how people check their financial brains at the door when they agree to “manage” Hollywood filmmaking. Jackson deserves a big payday if the movie hits, but it should come from a verifiable backend. The only sure thing in Hollywood is Pixar, itself run like a studio with smart financial and creative types. For them, I understand groveling like DIsney for the right to distribute them.
Yeah, but don’t studios always rip people off on back end deals?
Why trust them? Get big money up front and nebulous big money later. Talent is rare. The Hobbit is a license to print money.
You mean like sports stars, big business execs, and the like, who also get millions. At least directing/producing/writing is a creative venture, and many times the final sum they receive is based on how much the end product makes.
Just to be clear… Disney OWNS Pixar.
These are the only future movies I care about. MGM needs to pull it’s head out or sell the rights.
Despite the chaos, wouldn’t the best move for the creditors be to get “The Hobbit” and a James Bond film up and running?
Creditors want to get paid now. They usually could care less about the long term future of a company post bankruptcy. They usually want to cut their losses and get out.
Leap Year, Balls of Fury, The Hobbit…which of these things is not like the other?
no wonder the creditors are being slow – they’re about to hand over production to spyglass, who have never prodcued a successful film on their own. those guys even getting close to something as massive as The Hobbit must be terryifying for all involved.
yeah, that is assumming Peter would even take barber or birnbaum’s call. my guess is he’d meet them at the premiere, assumming they got an invite.
I think they handled Rush Hour series just fine, which were New Line’s biggest grossing films prior to LOTR.
The fact that Hobbit and Bond are effective shelved signals that the backers don’t have any backing left. They’ll bleed all the equity out of these two sure-fire properties and water them down so that nobody gets a good deal, starting with the audience.
MGM is going to screw any chances for the hobbit getting made just wait and see.
Which is why Jackson is stepping up (reply to last comment). By placing himself front and center, he makes the property look viable once again, meaning, they either have to pay up and play, or sell it off so that someone else can do it. I would doubt that Jackson really wants to do this, and if the properties are finally sold off, then he will declare a hiatus, and look for a new director.
And Jackson has other properties he wants to develop too. My guess is, if he does do a deal with them, it will include a promise on their part to develop, say, The Dam Busters, which has been stalled for years now.
i dont understand why jackson needs to charge so much…its not like he needs the money. Maybe he just hates the movie =P surely by now you would be able to make movies for the fun of it…not to make a living lol