There will be 15,300 digital 3D screens worldwide by the end of this year. This compares with 8,989 3D screens at the end of 2009. So says Screen Digest in its latest report, Digital Cinema Moves Into the Mainstream. Sixty per cent of the world’s digital screens will be 3D by Christmas. There will be 25,600 digital screens compared with 16,335 in 2009 – a rise of 57%.
Frantic building of 3D will come too late for distributors this summer though. I predict sharp elbows in the UK this August, with Hollywood releases pushing each other out of the way for precious 3D screen space.
August 6-8 is the crunch weekend. Warner Bros will have just released Cats and Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore, while Universal debuts Step Up 3D. But Disney’s Toy Story 3 will still only be on its third weekend. One exhibitor tells me studios should brace themselves for sharp drop-offs.
With all the 3D screen building going on, too few screens will not be an issue next summer. Odeon and Cineworld both say 40-45% of their screens will have gone digital 3D. But will audiences have grown bored of the gimmick by then?


Studio Meeting:
Let’s see… Avatar, biggest grossing movie of all time…Hey it’s 3D… yeah, that must be why… yeah, that’s the ticket… Let’s convert every piece of crap we have to 3D so WE can have the next Avatar… Who cares if the stupid people that buy tickets are going to feel disgusted each time they pay $3 or $4 more to see one of our movies that should go straight to cable…By time they decide not to pay the ridiculous prices to see crappy 3D, we’ll be flyin’ high… Yeah, you got it babe.
National Association of Theater Owners Meeting:
Ditto….
If 3D screens end up multiplying more and more, they should have the common curtosy of lowering the friggin price down. 3D charges an arm and a leg nowadays. Back when 3D was in very little screens, and was more of an option than an obligation, the price change made sense, but if they’re going to make it the norm, then theaters should lower the price down. I like how Hollywood is whining about low attendance, well maybe if tickets weren’t so high, more people would be going.
Wasted money. Just like when they converted 35 MM to that grainy-ass piece of shit DV.
I don’t think all movies look best in 3D. I am wiling to pay more for a good 3D movie- like Avatar. But I am not willing to pay extra to watch Shrec in 3D. I think that many others share my opinion and many of the 3D theaters will end up closing for lack of interest.
When colour was first introduced into the film making process back in the late 1920′s and early 1930′s, (What? Colour In The Movies Again? Fortune Magazine Cover Story, October 1934) it caused the same skepticism and negativity in the studio board rooms as 3D is doing today! Thankfully 70 years later most films are now in colour! I, like James Cameron, believe 3D is that next technical breakthrough (after sound and colour) to fundamentally change the viewing experience.
As for quality – hands up those who believe every film created in colour is a masterpiece? And Box Office results not withstanding, hands up those who think Avatar is a mind-numbing, paint by numbers story but with incredible visual effects in 3D! It ain’t no Chinatown!