
IMAX Corporation and AMC Entertainment have just announced an expansion of their 2007 joint venture deal, and they will add between 15 and 25 new IMAX theatres in the U.S. And IMAX Corp CEO Richard L. Gelfond says they are thinking beyond that. AMC and IMAX already had 104 IMAX joint venture theatres in the works, 79 of which already opened, with the other 25 expected to be in business by end of 2010 in the U.S. and Canada. The theatres announced this morning will open in 2011.
With an increasingly voracious appetite for 3D capable screens, IMAX has turned into a real battleground for film companies looking to lock down those screens early for their product. There are currently 316 IMAX commercial theatres and 121 institutional in 47 countries. You can just smell a gold rush here as studios rush to either shoot films in 3D or convert after the fact. The $500 million worldwide gross turned in by Clash of the Titans despite subpar reviews showed both audience demand for 3D and the power of higher ticket prices. And when you consider that Avatar and Alice in Wonderland surpassed the $1 billion worldwide gross mark since last fall after only four other films reached that number in history, who can blame studios for trying to offset the DVD slump and piracy by chasing the 3D buck? I just hope the conversion technology gets better. While true 3D films like Avatar or Shrek Forever After made the glasses worth wearing, did anybody really feel that the viewing experience was enhanced that much by the 3D conversions on Clash of the Titans or Alice in Wonderland?


Ten years ago this might have generated some huge buzz, but ever since Imax copped out with new smaller screens and digital projection, I just don’t see the point of it any more…
IMAX will save exhibitors, not 3d.
only 3d movie i thought was good was beowulf. avatar was blah. good luck on opening more screens when we just had the lowest box office in 17 years. people are wising up to the exorbitant ticket prices and are not gonna take it anymore. last year was a record breaking year at the box office and what do theaters do? raise prices TWICE. ive just a thousand other things to do with my money than watching another dud.
great news
but they mean those “fake” IMAX screens, right? Like the one at the Century City mall.
You mean the liemax?
They better start saying whether it’s “in” IMAX or just “brand” IMAX before they blow their trademark all to hell like Panavision and Technicolor almost did. It was bad enough when these scoundrels used to stretch IMAX films into OMNIMAX. Me, I’m gonna save the extra money and just sit in the front row…if I go at all.
Great! Another way the theaters can rip off people with small IMAX screens. It’s inevitable that the greed of the exhibitioners like AMC will lead to people staying home and waiting the 3 months for movies to come out on video. Way to think forward!
I will never watch another IMAX film again. I saw Star Trek in fake IMAX at Universal Studios. It cost $6 extra, the projector was shaky, the screen was small, and the projector broke halfway in. After a twenty minute delay I did get to finish the film, but I was less than happy. I understand that Universal doesn’t own the movie theater on their property, but I am watching a Studio Movie, at a Studio, and it still sucked. Also, if you advertise a movie in IMAX, and then show it to me on a new screen in the first row of seats, you had better give me my 6 bucks back when I call you out, and not pretend like you didn’t know the difference.
Have you heard about this? AMC Enhanced Theatre Experience?
“ETX includes a 20-percent larger screen, 3D technology, digital projection and an upgraded sound system. Specifically, the digital projection system produces images at a higher resolution than HD and there are nearly twice as many audio channels compared to typical auditoriums. As a result of this improved experience, guests will not simply watch a movie. They will live it in ETX.” “Movies shown in these auditoriums will cost $3 more, while 3D titles will cost $5 more.”
So let me get this straight:
1)A larger screen? (Advertised in the theatre as “wall to wall”) Shouldn’t the screen be as large as possible to begin with?
2)Digital projection with a higher resolution than HD. So… higher than what I can get at home?
3)Nearly twice as many audio channels. Does this mean the studios and sound engineers are generating a brand new “ETX” specific mix for the 2 screens that offer this now? – OR – does it mean that some computer component is doing a logarithm of some sort and sending the audio to channels that they weren’t designed for?
I’m sorry, but I thought these qualities: 1) Big screen 2) higher resolution images and 3) great sound, was what was supposed to entice me to leave my big screen HD at home and come to a theatre. I’m okay paying the crazy prices of movies today. That’s my choice. But an EXTRA charge one top of it for… Exactly what I’m supposed to be getting in the first place?! Movie theatres are the new airlines. Charging for a non-IMAX “big screen” is the new “charging for baggage.”
And how does this differ (at least in a way that most people would appreciate) from the faux-IMAX? Too bad IMAX and AMC didn’t team up to begin with. IMAX could have called their BS-IMAX “ETX” and they wouldn’t have sullied their good name.
We have one of the originals here in Winnipeg. They just started showing Avatar two weeks ago. What’s the point?
What crap is this? Everyone knows they are going to build those smaller screens for the same price. Why even build them if they aren’t the big screens?
Yes, those IMAX LITE screens should really be renamed something else? I still don’t understand why IMAX would risk losing their image as the biggest screen –7 stories tall with these smaller screens. So, if that’s the case, not that excited.
So far Wilcox Theaters here in Vicksburg hasn’t upgraded to 3D projection tech to keep thier audence at the local old mall cinema. Now with more screens for 3d being added independent cinema operators like wilcox will be push out of the marketplace. With more films released in 3d this means smaller markets like Vicksburg ms are going to lose thier audence to once more. But Wilcox has to comepete anyway becouse with Jackson/Clinton metro markets having 3d tech the teen audiance here is going to see them their than here. Now could this 3d tech too push some cinema independent operators to close?