BREAKING NEWS… 2ND UPDATE: Is this the beginning of the end of another Hollywood agency era? My sources tell me that, after months and months of negotiations with potential financial partners pursued by CAA, the agency has focused on KKR – Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co, the NYC-based private equity firm. The deal being bargained is for KKR to invest a whopping $200M in Hollywood’s most powerful agency.
That’s a huge cash infusion considering that CAA’s revenues were around $300M in 2007 before the financial crisis struck. So why does CAA need so much money? This isn’t just for CAA’s sports business, despite the fact it’s a notoriously expensive enterprise (because of the size of upfront investments in players that don’t pay off for many years) and the powerhouse sports agents which the agency has assembled in recent years (who are already not-so-quietly complaining about their compensation packages). And this isn’t just an alternative to self-financing their growth into other businesses like sports production, video games, and other entertainment arenas. No, this is much more about CAA needing to raise additional cash as a liquidity event for its partners.
They say that CAA’s 2nd generation of owners — one-time Young Turks: Bryan Lourd, Kevin Huvane, Richard Lovett, Doc O’Connor – are upfront about their desires to cash out of the agency business. That doesn’t mean they are going to leave right away — because of my story CAA today was busy denying any exits are imminent — but they’ve expressed that desire often enough of late. Lourd has always said he wanted to move to NYC as soon as his daughter with Carrie Fisher turns
age 18, which she does this year, and to leave the agency biz for the corporate world. Huvane has always talked about wanting to put his own life before his clients’ in the not-so-distant future, and the ever-partying agent thinks that time is near. O’Connor has been complaining about how tired he is of the agency business and its constant demands. Lovett, whom many have thought might be a lifer in the tenpercent biz, has pressing financial needs because of his still-not-final divorce and is blamed by his partners for over-spending and thus over-extending CAA’s financial resources. (Expanding into the sports biz was his idea because he hero-worshipped IMG founder Mark McCormack.)
And there’s always the next generation of younger agents coming up through the ranks who want more of a stake in the agency than the partners want to give them. The same thing happened in 1995 when CAA founding partners Mike Ovitz, Ron Meyer and Bill Haber turned over the agency to Lourd, Huvane, Lovett, and O’Connor who were threatening to leave. Meanwhile, the four were once seven, but the partner ranks have been thinned by eliminating first Tom Ross (once head of music), then Lee Gabler (once head of television), and most recently Rick Nicita (senior talent agent). CAA has shown it can navigate the rough seas of the agency biz after principals exit.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


If they want to get out of the agency business, why would they sign new clients this year then?
anti-believer: it is simply a perception and valuation issue. if they intend on leaving the agency business, now is the time to inflate the so-called “value” and profile of the company. These are simple business school 101 moves…
You’re right. I was thinking that the agency part wasn’t being sold off but being discontinued all together.
Signing new clients keeps CAA viable and helps maintain or increase it’s value. Who’d want to invest in a stagnant, moribund company? This makes they seem vital, current, fresh. Guess this means a lot of the gofers and “assistants to assistants” will finally get a chance to move up.
Fact is, the success of the senior partners is based on long established, personal relationships. KKR is going to want something for their investment. A lot of the current back benchers at CAA will be thrown out the window.
They don’t have the relationships or the network to stay afloat. People won’t return their phonecalls or come to their house parties. Hell. They won’t even get invited to the parties they get invited to now, simply because they are part of someone’s team.
I guess they’re the “Old Turks.”
Yes – but will it happen in 3-D?
The business is totally different than what it was even five years ago.
Good honorable guys who transcended the Ovitz era and the malignant Hollywood community Ovitz touch. Attention must be paid.
An excellent investment for K.K.R. as well.
“An excellent investment for K.K.R. as well”
Bentley, I take it you didn’t major in finance, correct?
Yeah, count me as another person who sees this as a vanity investment rather than a serious business move. KKR does massive multi-multi-billion dollar brick and mortar deals. $200m is chump change to them AND they’re buying into a commission business which means unsteady cash flows. This isn’t an investment – this is about buying into the sports/entertainment celebrity world.
I guess I could understand wanting to leave CAA as a lifestyle choice – but financially, it makes no sense. Each of these partners earn enormous salaries and CAA is still generating big revenues. Even if each of the partners were to receive a $25M payout, they could probably earn that same amount in 3-4 years and maintain their ownership stake as well. Furthermore, this is a great management team and whereas Ovitz was no longer functioning as an agent really, and Ron Meyer clearly had one foot out the door when they left, Lovett, Huvane, DOC, and Lourd are still very much involved and engaged in CAA. It would be a shame if they left. They are terrific agents and have done an amazing job of taking CAA to the next level. I can’t imagine that KKR would be dumb enough to invest $200M and let these guys leave within the next 3 years.
there are plenty of capable agents who have learned the agency business well enough to help CAA continue on the path of agency domination. the other thought is that these agents, who are extremely smart and cunning, are watching the trends of this business and the corporate takeover/dismantling of the film business, and they realize that the writing is on the wall – the film business will never be what it was and in ten years, there may not be a film business at all. it is a very calculated move by Kevin, Bryan and Richard. i was at Bryan’s house last year for a fundraiser and even then, i could tell that they were getting burnt out. the business is getting frustrating and the buyers are more unscrupulous and duplicitous now than ever and the studio chiefs don’t give a fuck about anything other than their own inflated paychecks. there is no more integrity or creativity to filmmaking and if anyone is really paying attention and has other options, they are exploring them now before it is too late… my hats off the guys if they make a smart timely exit.
@ Incredulous
There will still be a film industry in ten years. We are towards the end of the second generation of the experiment of having the studios owned by congloms, an experiment which started in the 1970′s. Clearly, this experiment is failing. But this doesn’t mean that somebody won’t figure out a new way of doing business. I predict that in ten years, once the current financial meltdown is over, we will see a film industry comprised of many mini-majors supported by private equity.
agreed @Jonathan- mini studios, private equity.
and @Incredulous: really? 10 years? No one fucked up worse than the music industry and there is still a music industry (almost) 10yrs after Napster. decimated sure, but artists find a way to distribute, making $$ on shows and merch..
you guys are not taking my ten years comment literally are you? it was a figure of speech to emphasize the dramaturgy of the moment. jeez. needless to say, anyone who is paying attention, who is on the business affairs side like me, can clearly see the declining revenues in the business and the shrinking of the amount of films produced, which translates to fewer jobs. very few of us will survive the the next ten years. hell, it’s already eating itself alive. i can’t tell you how many friends of mine, who were seven-figure earners, are practically out of the business. yes, i know this is the second round of corporate ownership, but this one is streamlining the business in a way that it has never done so before. there is no more fat left. yes, there will be a business, just like the music business is still around, but if you have any friends who run music labels, they’ll tell you that there isn’t much of a music business left either…
I agree with you FWIW. KKR has got to be smarter than to allow the guys that make the agency just leave after a few years. In the agency business, it’s all based on these few individual people. Huvane and Lourd leave, and that is a huge hole to fill
If this article is correct in asserting that CAA has revenues in the neighborhood of $300M per year, and if the four partners own 100% of the company, then they each stand to make significantly more than $25M if they sell their entire ownership stake.
And by the way, $25M ain’t nuthin to sneeze at.
Time for new blood and fresh ideas. In this era of mediocrity too much emphasis is placed on brand exploitation rather than development. It’s easy to rep established talent. Where are the people who spot diamonds in the rough? For people like myself change is always good. We haven’t much to lose in the current system and even less to gain.
The desire to cash out of CAA could also be a result of the strategic and structural changes now occuring in the entertainment industry, including reduction of major films produced, reduced studio payment offers to talent and television show budgets, growth of reality programming, and a much more concentrated, competitive agency market.
—Thoughtful Person from the Producer Side
They should take the money, if they can get what they want… and run.
The agency business model is going through many changes on almost a daily basis to remain viable and competitive in today’s media marketplace.
Like everything else..it isn’t the fun slam dunk’ monopoly it once was.
Have you seen Lourd lately? He’s like 50 going on 80. One of the nicest people I’ve ever known, but even 10 years ago, he looked 40 going on 70. I don’t have sympathy for those guys, but the lifestyle can make you old very quickly, so wanting to move on once you’re set for life financially is quite understandable.
Additionally, CAA has lost some good agents because they didn’t want to give up a bigger piece of the pie. Most notably Whitesell, who has built the WME talent department from nothing (no, Adam Venit doesn’t count) into the #2 shop that it is. And Whitesell has been trying to poach other CAA guys for years, most often unsuccessfully, but he does get some (Brandt Joel). And I know he’s still after guys offering them boatloads of money, so if they don’t start getting more at CAA, they’d jump ship.
Props to Lourd and Huvane for thinking of enjoying their lives more…and the ones who take the place over will keep it going strong.
Great timing for the CAA partners… They have a super-strong bench that can come in and take over and they are more powerful than ever with WME in complete disarray.
Get off the computer and get back to the mailroom kid.
you are a complete idiot, first off CAA is losing is bggest agents, strong bench? like who?
The day has finally come where we can hang the SUCKER tag on KKR.
There is absolutely zero chance KKR would invest and allow partners to leave. The only asset in this business are the employees. So while the partner could cash out in some scenario, it is likely tied to hitting revenues (earn out), time spent at the agency (earn out) and continued growth based on very specific metrics (earn out). No investor would invest without those types of stipulations in this type of deal. More likely is some type of “fund” for CAA to accelerate businesses, which KKR and CAA would own pieces of.
good riddance, make room for agents who actually love and want to work with ARTISTS
This looks like what ICM did a few years back and that doesnt seem to have worked out well. There must be more going on there than it seems….this doesnt bode well for CAA or their clients. Get ready for a lot of change.
Difficult to say: recall that ICM both brought on Rizvi and merged with Broder in a very short timeframe. I believe it was the combination of the two that was the beginning of the end for that agency, not either one exclusively. Or maybe it was just one, but it’s very difficult to determine since both appear to have done their respective damage to ICM’s image and culture.
Huvane is horrible. That is all.
I predicted the death of the death star a long time ago. only a handful of alisters left for fat commissions. rest of celebs are hashed and rehashed. maybe this will be better and soon agents will actually find time to respond to things and offers
Maybe Ari Gold will buy/merge with them then he can finally represent Spielberg and Vinnie Chase. Just imagine how great the next Aquaman would be…
In mature industries insider selling is usually bearish.
I suppose it all boils down to the geometrically increasing rates of audience fragmentation and market saturation (all markets and products), Cuba Gooding’s now famous (or infamous) “show me the money!” being the only bridge between them.
Ben Silverman is that you.
Nikki,
There is not going to be a mass defection of senior CAA management. That’s just wishful thinking on your part. The agency is facing some debt challenges and this is nothing more than a simple cash infusion in exchange for a passive minority stake. They are bleeding money at CAA Sports, yes, but CAA is still the strongest company in town, top line AND bottom line.
Kevin, Doc, Richard and Brian each have taken salaries of up to $12 million per year and all four are very smart with their money. They’re not lining their pockets here–remember, there are other partners who would be entitled to payouts too–they’re building their war chest to hedge against current challenges. I wouldn’t be surprised if they go on an acquisition binge also. (Mosaic, here we come. Only this time Jimmy, we have a $25 million check for you).
real question is not why CAA would do this, it’s why KKR would. CAA is an extremely strong brand, but not guaranteed to grow at the typical IRR that a PE shop like KKR normally demands. seems like a bit of a vanity purchase.
Every one in Tinsel Town is replaceable.
Except Frank Wells.
Best post I’ve seen on here in eons; the guy truly was one of a kind……
Only thing on here that is 100% true. RIP Frank.
Sooner or later the agency business moves on without you. They wanna leave while they’re on top. Straightforward approach, graceful exit – you gotta respect it. Or do you need to call Arnold Rifkin, Sue Mengers, Sam Cohn? Do you wanna cash out crassly like Wiatt?
Plus – they’ve got tons and tons of leverage, great assets, and look a hell of a lot more prescient of the realities of the business than anyone else in town. The only thing that matters is a “done deal.” Everything else is speculation and/or gossip.
In the endgame K.K.R. might find themselves owning the paradigm of a streamlined 21st century entertainment conglomerate.
Let’s hope Ovitz doesn’t have Kravis’ ear. While whispering in Emanuel’s at the same time.
KKR will cut costs sharply and sell bits of the agency off…rent the HBO movie Barbarians at the Gate to get an idea how KKR makes money.
Time for CAA clients to be nervous, not just the agents. It is supposed to all be about the clients, right?
People are talking about this “next wave” of agents at CAA. Can we get names? Everyone seems to love Billy Hawkins, but who is going to run this show when/if the icons take off? These people are what everyone thinks of when they think CAA. Could be like chickens with their heads cut off if its a mass exodus…
I was wondering myself. I worked at CAA. Hawkins seemed nice but wouldn’t put him up as a next gen Young Turk just yet. My votes, even though I am just going off sheer cool kid rep (coupled with looks and charisma) would be Tracey Brennan and Jim Toth.
If your friends love Billy Hawkins get more powerful friends. Nice kid, but not the brightest. Reminds me, I’ve owed him a call since last Tuesday… Maybe tomorrow.
Billy Hawkins? Really? The guy is a class A douche and hasn’t done a thing in the biz yet. There are dozens of smarter, savvier and more experienced agents in the building.
just bc he won’t rep you doesn’t make him a “douche”. harvard law degree, great talker, hard worker…met him once (and turned me down for something) but still was pretty impressed.
might not be the type of guy they make shows about, but let’s not go overboard the other direction either.
Like who?
billy hawkins is a duplicitous, ineffectual, low-level idiot agent. whoever wrote that previous post should get off this site and go back to whatever corner they were in and put their dunce cap back on. there are 300 hundred agents that actually have a book of business at caa. we need to filter some of these ridiculous comments. it was probably billy himself trying to get some ink… this is a serious discussion that ultimately could affect hundreds of agents jobs. a reference to billy hawkins? really?? fucking retards…
you know more about what’s going in in 2000 Avenue of the Stars than a lot of the people in the building.