
He’s the country’s top-rated talk radio host, beacon of conservatives, a lightning rod for controversy. Is Rush Limbaugh movie material?
Writer/producer James Sclafani thinks so, and has written a feature film about Limbaugh’s life that is in the process of being packaged and shopped for financing. Sclafani, who recently sold his script Counter Kid to Bill Murray’s Devoted Pictures, optioned The Rush Limbaugh Story: Talent on Loan from God, an unauthorized biography by longtime Gotham-based journalist Paul Colford, who currently heads media relations for the AP. The book served as the basis for the script.
Sclafani said the script he’s written is a close cousin to the Oliver Stone-directed George W. Bush feature W, in that he tries to get beneath the surface politics and controversies and down to the ambition and demons that drove Limbaugh’s success. The film will include contradictions that have gone against his radio diatribes, from the dubious 4-F draft status during Vietnam (unearthed in Colford’s book) to a get-tough stance against drug abusers that was contradicted by the revelation that he himself was addicted to prescription painkillers and got them illegally.
“This is Citizen Kane meets Private Parts, where you have a man who always had trouble relating to people in the outside world, but does it effortlessly in the booth,” said Sclafani, adding that Limbaugh is the proverbial fat kid, ignored in high school, and determined to prove everyone they were wrong about him. “There’s this anecdote about a game of spin the bottle in high school. The bottle pointed at him, and the pretty girl who was supposed to kiss him ran away, and that stayed with him,” Sclafani said. “When he came up in radio, he was culturally opposed to everything happening in the 60s and 70s, and all this left him with something to prove. He is an underdog, and became an extremely determined person with something to prove.”
Sclafani–who by the way is a registered Democrat–is producing with Renee Tab, the former ICM agent who will soon circulate the script to attract a director and financing. Sclafani and Tab are teamed on another fact-based film, Show of the Bull, with Taken director Pierre Morel attached to a drama about mob turncoat Sammy “The Bull” Gravano and his children as they led a not so quiet life in the federal witness protection program in Arizona.
Not surprisingly, Limbaugh isn’t involved. Limbaugh did not stand in the way of Colford when he wrote the book –Limbaugh’s brother, mother and ex-wives were interviewed–and Sclafani said he will approach Limbaugh “when the time is right.” ICM and Artist Talent Mgmt rep Sclafani.


Hope they don’t leave out the part about his dodging the Vietnam draft and then calling our troops in Iraq who dared to speak out against the war “phony solders.”
Hey “Flush Rush” (who probably dodged the draft himself), Rush didn’t dodge the draft – he was labeled 4F – and he didn’t use that term “phony soldiers.” You should really post rumors like that at Daily Kos, they like your kind there –
Keep on spreading lies pal. The “phony” soldier you speak of was exactly that. He never served.
He didn’t “dodge” Vietnam pal, he had a medical reason and it was the same reason my Father was denied entry into the Navy back then when he volunteered, after 3 years and tons of medical treatment later… my Father was able to join, but Rush didn’t get medical clearance from the Dept. of the Navy in order to be drafted, it wasn’t his choice.
Wow, this won’t even be good enough to go “Direct-to-Video”; directly to the toilet, yes.
Rush is an oxygen-thief. Please don’t make this movie, just ignore him like every other intelligent person does.
You got it…Scary is his large listening audience. Shows what is out there and what we have against us…
Go Rushbo!!
As a Stern fan, I think Limbaugh is terrific and deserves a film. Anyone who can stand up for what they believe, whether I believe they are right or wrong, is a special person. Very few can really do this…Bill Mahr, Joe Mortenstern, George W. Bush…
Lots of people stand up for what they believe in. What separates those people from the people you mention is ambition and the ability to entertain. Neither of those makes a person special.
I appreciate what you’re saying but I often wonder if it’s what he believes or the shtick that he thinks will sell to his listeners. What bothers me about Limbaugh is that (unlike O’Reilly) he always toes the conservative line. If he would depart once in a while on certain issues, I’d believe him more.
About time, especially since the Republican neo-cons are allowed to malign anyone whose opinions run even a centimeter to the left of the extreme right (like McCarthyism all over again) without any accountability.. and this shlub is the spokesperson for their movement. From what I’ve read about him, he’s a Dickens like character who went from bullied to bully, bringing hurt to himself and others along the way… I will def see it when it comes out.
What you mean is that Hollywood has its own anti-Conservative blacklist. Where only a tiny few Big Stars are allowed to voice anything to the right of Communism.
Meanwhile Hollywood gives a huge hard left lecture on pretty much everything, from a Blacklist for speaking out against poster-boy Polanski (half of Hollywood does not think it rape-rape to quote Whoopi) to the usual anti-American diatribes and censorship of anything remotely pro-American (it’s “and all that” instead of “the American Way” in Superman Returns).
By neo-cons of course you mean … Jews. Like the Conservative, deeply patriotic, Jews who created Hollywood. Newsflash: Mayer, Goldwyn, Warner, they were all … conservative. They actually loved America, thought it the finest nation on earth, and were not fans of hereditary communism either. When they ran things, people did not have to hide their love of country, or hide that they viewed child rape an abomination.
Glad to see this article. I’ve done some of the research and editing on this script, and I was immediately struck by the balanced view Jimmy achieved. I think the insight into Rush’s rise as a political influence is fantastic. The audience will either leave the theater loving him even more, or disagreeing with him even more wildly.
It promises to be a great ride. Ironically, I actually think Rush himself would enjoy many beats in this film.
Its a stupid idea. The anti-Rush people just are not that numerous. It shows how idiotic, anti-populist, anti-money making Hollywood is.
Where’s the movie about Barack Hussein Obama’s early years as a Muslim, his trip as a College kid to Pakistan, his shady Muslim room-mate in Columbia, his admitted drug use (including cocaine), his connections with Farrakhan and of course, Wright?
It would be interesting to know these things about a man who is a mystery and the President. But Hollywood worships him as “the Magical Negro” as Spike Lee dubbed the characters in the Green Mile, Radio, Shawshank Redemption, etc. So instead a hit piece on a guy who is marginal at best.
Rush Limbaugh is not interesting for who he is but what he does. Which, is provide conservative (i.e. suppressed / not reported by the hard left media) news, commentary, and humor aimed at an underserved audience: middle aged, conservative White guys.
After the end of the Fairness Doctrine, Talk Radio went from unprofitable Farm Reports to conservative talk, making lots of money. Because no one served that audience. Limbaugh was the pioneer and did it better than most. He’s not to my taste, but he has 20 million listeners daily. He makes more money than Stern, who sort-of caters to a slightly younger variation of the same audience.
If you’ve listened to Stern, and his schtick of sending out folks to ask questions of semi-literate (at best) Black guys on the street, where Stern makes fun of him, you can see how Stern plays things and who he plays it to: Blue Collar to Working Class to lower-middle class White guys on the East Coast who find that funny (and true). Because they’re not PC.
Limbaugh doesn’t go as far as Stern that way, though he does in other ways (mostly quoting radical hard left statements folks like Van Jones thought would never escape a particular setting). Regardless, it works. Mostly because ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox Broadcasting, half of Fox News, all print media, and Entertainment is both deeply feminized and very left wing (they are the same in fact).
Air America tried to copy Limbaugh, and went Bankrupt. Because NPR, and pretty much every other outlet already provides that.
Limbaugh is a force the same reason Stern (before he went Satellite) was a force: they have no real competition for a male audience. Which outside feminized/gay Hollywood, has little patience for PC, Diversity Dogma, Multiculturalism, SWPL trendiness, and other concerns of feminized folks. If Stern makes fun of the average Black guy’s stupidity, Limbaugh makes fun of liberal stupidity. [Yes there is plenty of conservative stupidity, but no one other than the talkers on AM radio make fun of the liberals. Bill Maher will never ridicule Obama's Black Nationalism and hatred of White people, or Michelle Obama's statement that she never becomes "part of White society." That's up to Limbaugh.]
—————
A movie about why Talk Radio is conservative (basically the media abandoned White guys) would be interesting. This sounds like a stupid hit piece about a guy who is on the air. If you don’t like him, listen to National Palestinian Radio (as Mamet dubbed it).
This IS a comedy, right?
This talkback will NOT end well.
If they don’t get Rush on board, and instead do the liberal hit the media usually does of Rush, this will be a bomb. A true biographical pic will do great because of the millions who love him will flock to the theaters, but I doubt that will happen while he is an ememy of Obama’s legion in Hollywood and the media.
A “true biographical pic” will also include lots of unsavory bits which your people won’t be able to handle.
Get Rush on board so he can “correct” the facts? Great, just what I’d want to see . . . the blowhard blowing smoke up his own a$$.
And what did “W” make after all? Good business model.
I’ll only go see this film if he dies in a fireball at the end of the car chase.
And it better be one hell of a car chase.
AnotherWGAmember – how sad are you?? Wishing that someone would die – oh, I guess you will get your own talk show now.
Repeat after me, Amelia: “It’s just a MOVIE.”
Let me guess – 23 year old male with a degree in arts and humanities.
Glad to see this article. I’ve done some of the research and editing on this script, and I was immediately struck by the balanced view Jimmy achieved. I think the insight into Rush’s rise as a political influence is fantastic. The audience will either leave the theater loving him even more, or disagreeing with him even more wildly.
It promises to be a great ride. Ironically, I actually think Rush himself would enjoy many beats in this film.
A “Sammy the Bull” movie with Pierre Morel? A very hot combo…
Put in some sex and a car chase and I may go see it
I could be trite and say Rush Limbaugh is a big fat blah blah blah… but the fact of the matter remains that regardless of what political figure it is they’re doing a biopic of… I and the movie-going public at large probably don’t give a s*&^. I get angry enough at politicians in life that I certainly don’t want to use the movies (which are supposed to be a form of escapism) to remind me how f’d we are as country. I’m not the only one who thinks it, check this out: Democrats with Spine
Do we really need another movie about a disease!
If there was a show “Fat Actor”, the star of that could play Rush.
Trying to put politics aside here – I think this will be a very difficult film to pull off without the participation of Rush Limbaugh. If he doesn’t buy in, why would his legion of listeners? Put another way, would an Oprah movie work? Maybe, but it most certainly wouldn’t without Oprah driving the awareness.
Private Parts worked (and was so good) becuase of Stern’s willingness to reveal himself warts and all, and his relentless self-promotion. If Limbaugh doesn’t do the same, this will most surely fail.
This can make serious amounts of money if the script’s written with Rush onboard, and his life’s story and it’s inconsistencies are shown as integral to his humanity and continued success. Hollywood is a business first, and Rush has 20-40 million listeners per week who will buy a ticket to this movie if it isn’t just a one-sided hit-job.
If it’s a good script (which I hear it is), then it should make a compelling film… let’s stop all this OTX style dribble about what sells and what doesn’t. Any story about the man with the biggest following on radio and who shapes U.S. policy while hopped up on pharmaceuticals much have more dimensions than any of us know. I for one would be intrigued to learn more (and I am a die hard Democrat). As they say, know your enemy.
There’s already a Limbaugh movie. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092285/
I want this movie badly… especially so I can throw tomatoes at his big, goofy head.
I think it’s a great idea, but who plays him? He’s kind of fat (or was really fat). For Sammy the Bull I’d cast DeNiro of course (or Mickey Rourke if you go younger). I’d see both of those movies.
He got fat again after he went off the drugs.
I highly admire Rush and listen to him daily. I only agree with him about 99% of the time, but then again he is only human. More often than not, I have found that the loud mouths who excoriate him have never actually listened to the show. They simply parrot the talking points, and outright lies perpetrated by the usual suspects: “progressives,” liberals, left-wing blogs and their willing accomplices in the media. Rush’s comments are frequently taken out of context and many liberal journalists eagerly reprint this misinformation before checking the veracity of what they print or repeat. Being a frequent listener, their lies are glaringly apparent to me. Rush’s success lies in the fact that those of us who have listened faithfully realize he speaks the truth and the opposition continues to perpetrate lies about him. He is a terrific entertainer who is educating a growing base of listeners—this reality is what his enemies fear. He is the great communicator of conservative political thought and they hate him for it. They only wish that blithering idiot Obama had half of Rush’s intelligence. Over the years the liberal point-of-view has been blasted across the airwaves through MSNBC, NPR, PBS, CNN, HLN, NBC, ABC, CBS as well as the now defunct Air America. Their audiences are disappearing while the Rush Limbaugh show and Fox News audiences continue to grow. It would be interesting to hear a liberal honestly debate conservatives on an issue by issue basis rather than their continued strategy of character assassination. That isn’t going to happen because they are quite aware that they would lose with the American people. Democrats win when they sound conservative and lose when it is revealed that they are actually liberals. For the record, I am gay, jewish and a proud conservative.