Independent producers have cancelled writing an open letter highlighting their plight for fear of upsetting UK broadcasters. Indie producers were about to publish a letter in the Times newspaper this Monday. A minority has intervened, killing the letter for fear of upsetting the BBC and Channel 4.
Pact, the producers’ association, recently called for state film funding to be reformed. Indie producers were about to take the argument to the government and wider general public.
I’ve been told that a handful of top-flight producers thought the letter was too provocative. Pact has spent weeks drafting the wording. Its signatories included pretty much every British film producer of note.
“They didn’t want to rock the boat,” one signatory tells me. “It was absolutely pathetic. They behaved as if their invitations to Chequers [prime minister’s country house] were about to be cancelled or something.”
Anyway, here is an earlier draft of the unsent letter:
Dear Sir
As the recent Palme d’Or success at the Cannes Film Festival show, the UK is home to a wealth of creative film making talent. However, as a group of some of the UK’s most established and successful independent film producers, we are concerned that, despite such creative success, sustainability of our businesses remains an elusive goal.
Over £100m is invested by public bodies into UK film each year, yet, thanks to the current business model where even for very successful films, producers are unable to retain a fair share of the income that the film generates, leaving them dependent on public subsidy with limited ability to create sustainable, investable companies. For instance, a recent UK Film Council report stated that over half of independent film production companies in the UK are loss making, despite their films being amongst the most popular with audiences, both here and around the world.
The current funding model for UK film production needs to evolve.
Independent trade body for producers, Pact, has put together a range of sensible proposals that look to break this cycle of dependency, without the need for more public money. They propose that if the current public money was used in a different way, film producers who make successful films will be able to share in that success and be less dependent on public funding in the future. This means more stable businesses, more jobs and ultimately, a sustainable film production sector.
We urge the government, and the public funders of UK film – the UK Film Council, BBC Films and Film Four – to adopt Pact’s proposals and move forward to a solution that works for all.





Name those who blocked the letter, please, Tim, then they can explain.
Phew! Incendiary stuff! Whoever pulled this needs to grow a pair.
Independent producers were proposing a plan to throw away the crutches and make their business financially self-sufficient. How was that going to annoy a government already looking for savings?
Looks like once again the story behind the story is the only story. Though reminds me of something I heard in a movie. I love money more than the things it can buy … but what I love more than money is other people’s money.
Brit fare might be popular with select audiences and merit over £100m a year from their public coffers on cultural grounds, but most indie product is at best only a creative, not commercial, success. These producers should count themselves lucky in a recession that their private businesses are being so heavily subsidised by the public purse.
Let’s face facts boys and girls movie making in economic terms is glorified gambling, which doesn’t make for a sustainable biz even before you factor in the digital meteor and DVD decline. The few UK movies that from time to time compete with the well distributed Hollywood product that dominates screens are lucky to make back their costs for backers, let alone turn a profit. The few home grown hits that do merely offset the losses suffered on the rest. Oh boy, even MGM with its library chucking off cash can’t keep rolling the dice and its peddling commercial not arthouse product.
If these wannabee Brit moguls want to earn the right to a fair share of the income, having no doubt already pocketed a fat fee from the off, then why don’t they put their money where their mouth is and help fund product with their own mulla, not recycled public handouts.
Sadly those that do will quickly learn the hard way that costs and failure are high in this game, margins low and even for legit investors profits have a habit of ending up in someone else’s pocket, usually on the other side of the pond. But surely the wise ones know deep down they aren’t genuinely asking for a licence to print money, just to spend more of it.