WGAE president Michael Winship and WGAW president John Wells announced that members overwhelmingly approved amendments to the Screen and Television Credits Manuals that make it easier for hyphenates to get screen credit. On the movie side, 85.7% of membership (1237 yes votes, 197 no votes) approved a change where writers who are also on the project in directing or producing capacities and subsequently get involved in rewriting, need to be judged responsible for a 33% contribution to receive credit on a non-original screenplay. The former standard was 50%. There is potential for good and bad in this one for writers. The upside: as more screenwriters become producers, they won’t be penalized for become entrepreneurial. The challenge: directors who run a script through their typewriter are now more likely to get shared screenwriting credits. There is a lot of residuals money on the line here, particularly on big hits. If more directors take it upon themselves to write, this is a potentially important issue.
A whopping 91.4% of membership approved a proposal that calls for a teleconference between arbitrators on decision where they have reviewed credit appeals but did not come to a unanimous arbitration decision. The identity of the arbitrators is always kept secret, and that would remain so in the teleconference, but it is an opportunity to discuss and perhaps come to a consensus. If no unanimous decision is reached, the majority will win out. A total of 1310 voted yes and 86 voted no. Previously, there was no conference. A final proposal to consolidate, reformat and clarify the Television Credits Manual and Separation or Rights Manual was approved by a 92.9% margin, with 1341 voting yes and 64 voting no.



How is a director who contributes more than 33% of the script and then getting a writing credit a downside?
V
Ask the original writer, the one who loses that 33%.
Our back end deals are tied to credit. This potentially means a writer will have to split their bonus in half if they don’t get sole writing credit. I voted against the amendment. Very surprised at the results.
This deal makes it easy for writer/directors to steal credit, reduce your bonus, your pension/health payments and your residuals. More money now goes into the pocket of the director.
Shame on the WGA for this.
They are shooting the majority of their membership in the foot to protect and advance a vocal few.
I am disgusted with the WGA.
This is the agenda of a handful of members who organized and shouted loud. They prey on the scripts of other members and with a little reworking get a credit and steal money from the pocket of that member.
The WGA is not for all it’s members. Just some.
The WGA — they eat their young.
If writers contribute 33 percent of stage directions and scenery descriptions, can we get a directing credig?
as a writer, i will never understand why so many writers vote against their own best interests. first the strike, which has sidelined half the middle-class writers in town and now this. it reminds me of low-income, uneducated, tea-partiers who think that big-business republicans have their best interests at heart… so fucking stupid. now every powerful producer and director will be trying to rewrite every good script ever written… the writer will get screwed once again.
“…approved amendments the toe Screen and Television Credits Manuals…”?
“…won’t be penalized for become entrepreneurial.”?
(Otherwise, great reporting. This is a big, scary deal.)
THE WRITERS HAVE JUST CUT THEIR OWN THROATS! WHY EVEN BOTHER HAVING A GUILD IF IT DOESN’T PROTECT YOUR WORK AND CREDIT? AREN’T DIRECTORS AND EXECS SUPPOSED TO DO DEVELOPMENT ON PROJECTS. ISN’T THAT PART OF THEIR JOB? AND NOW THEY’RE GOING TO GET CREDIT FOR IT. OH. WRITERS! EVERY MOVE YOU MAKE IS WRONG. SIGH…
I didn’t vote for this crap. Probably a lot of writers didn’t. Only those in the guild who are already hyphenates, or those who have set their sights on being hyphenates (because, what they really want to do is direct) voted for this.
As mentioned above, I voted against the amendment. I see no upside to it. So I’d be very interested to hear from WGA members who did vote for it (not just writer/producers or writer/directors who will obviously directly benefit). Why did you vote for this? Why encourage the rewriting of your own scripts, and why risk losing your credit bonus? The lopsided win on this completely baffles me.
Any ‘yes’ votes care to comment?
Where is Billy Ray on all this? Wasn’t this his personal agenda? Isn’t this why he ran for the board?
Where are the writers that voted yes and pushed for this?
Why are they so quiet…
Too busy stealing credit to advance their careers.
How did this slip through?
I voted against it, too. I guess not enough of the membership has lost half of their bonus to a director running the script through their typewriter. And too many low to mid-level members don’t think about their own interests, but only follow the lead of the high level members who will benefit. Next time, maybe people will think about the ramifications, instead of just following a John August blog post.
This is the fourth time over the last two decades the WGA membership was asked to vote to make it easier for directors to steal credit. Each time it was rejected (in even worse forms). The WGA credits committee (which is unelected and meets in secret) kept rewording the proposal and sending it to a vote until it finally passed. Meanwhile, they never considered any proposals to protect first writers or for end credits to help all writers.
I guess the membership just gave up fighting, especially after a pointless strike. It’s clear the WGA leadership doesn’t care for the average writer. The WGA is now just a minor leagues for the DGA.
Agrees with “WGA blues”..
In anycase, I wonder what use the is WGA anymore…
Their not really effective are they? Not looking after the writer.
What good are those dues?
How are the arbitrators going to be anonymous if they are teleconferencing?
These changes don’t make it “easier for directors to steal credit.”
Rather, they make it more difficult for others to take credit from writers who want to also produce and/or direct their own work.
More and more writers want to exercise more control over the production process, which is why these measures passed by such overwhelming margins.
ShowbizNsider is full of crap. How does the protect the writer against directors who have rewritten their script? The WGA was very underhanded with all of this from start to finish.
Don’t EVER trust the WGA. They are only out for a small, collective group of individuals out to advance their own careers on the scripts of other writers.
Well…. this suxs!! WTF! directors getting writing credit, even if they didnt do the majority of the writing.
Also, what happend to the WGA rule that the screenwriter gets first crack at all rewrites?
The writer gets screwed 10x over (AGAIN)
This bites!