I asked Andrew Jay Schwartzman, the SVP and Policy Director of the Media Access Project in Washington DC (http://www.mediaaccess.org) to write up his thoughts on the proposed merger:
Why Hollywood Should Care About the Comcast/NBCU Deal
By Andrew Jay Schwartzman
Comcast’s proposed acquisition of NBCU is bad for Hollywood.
It is bad for America, too. There are lots of reasons why. Here are just a few:
– It will raise cable prices.
– It will reduce diversity in news and other programming, especially in the markets where Comcast would own TV stations and cable systems. (In Los Angeles, Comcast would own some cable systems and three TV stations.)
– It will make it much harder for telephone and satellite companies trying to compete with video offerings of their own.
Even if you don’t care about the future of democratic discourse in the age of the internet, if you’re reading this, you will probably care about the industry. And this transaction would have lasting and dangerous effect on Hollywood. It will further solidify cable’s bottleneck on the video distribution of TV and features and enable cable to pay less for such content. And, perhaps most importantly, it will kill off the emerging market for “over the top” distribution via the Internet, depriving producers of the opportunity to develop direct relationships with competing distributors and even with individual consumers.
Simply put, cable owns the customers, and it wants to keep it that way.
The Internet is making it possible to distribute programming directly to the customers without having to obtain carriage on a network or getting carriage for your own network. Such “over the top” distribution will permit Netflix, Roku and similar services to bid for programming. The technology can even eliminate middlemen (like cable) and allow direct sale sales to online customers.
The cable industry’s answer is “TV Everywhere.” While this scheme was originally cooked up by Time Warner, Comcast’s acquisition of NBCU would take it to a new level. If NBC programming (like The Office and SNL) and the Universal film library are withheld from Internet distribution except via TV Everywhere, or made exclusive to TV Everywhere (and perhaps to Hulu, which is one-third owned by NBC), Comcast can prevent these competitive services from ever getting off the ground.
Adding NBC’s cable nets to Comcast’s stable would also hurt the video programming markets. Here is what Jean Prewit of the Independent Film and Televison Alliance told the House Judiciary Committee:
“We know what is good for Comcast and NBC in this merger: the ‘cost savings’ and ‘synergies’, which they define clearly as the ability to self-source programming across their many platforms from free television to cable to video on demand to the internet, avoiding the ‘transaction costs’ involved in acquiring independent content and extending the reach of these channels and the self-sourced content to a wider audience.”
In other words, if this deal goes through, you’ll need to give Comcast a piece of the action to get carriage on its systems and Comcast may prohibit you from selling your product to other distributors. And, by “bundling” its cable nets with the NBC network, Comcast will make it harder for competing networks to get carriage there will be less room for competiting networks on all cable.
The FCC and the Department of Justice have been reviewing the Comcast deal over recent months. Small cable an satellite companies along with independent programmers oppose it. And the rest of Hollywood should be joining them.
Comcast’s proposed acquisition of NBCU is bad for Hollywood.





If this deal goes through studios should be allowed to own theater chains again.
That way everyone gets f**ked in the a$$.
Thanks to Nikki and to Jay and the Media Access Project for shining the light. As another class of Film/TV/Media/Digital/Design/Marketing students graduates from college only to find that there are almost zero entry-level positions in ANY of the creative industries – and add them to the thousands of experienced pros in the creative industries out of work – the fight against consolidation is one of the most important in the battle to preserve good paying jobs. Fewer employers always equal fewer jobs.
Schwarzman is 100% correct. Let me add, that without the ability to “end-around” through non-cable outlets via the internet, Hollywood is doomed.
Already piracy is rampant, and getting worse. Three D is not the savior people thought it would be, it takes huge effort to produce a film that folks will see in large numbers in Three D, at best its a marginal increase. Measured against Music Industry like declines in DVD sales and rentals, declining ticket admissions, and worst of all, films that suck.
The music industry got hammered by Napster, Itunes, and piracy, but the biggest problem was that not many care about Lady Gaga, Miley Cyrus, or the latest American Idol singer. Jimmy Iovine believes its bad headphones, but tinny speakers and crummy AM radio did not stop Elvis, the Beach Boys, or the Beatles. The problem was crummy music. Just as piracy, Redbox, Netflix, and hammered consumer wallets are hurting Hollywood, but the core problem is crummy films.
Distribution over the Internet allows film-makers to make stuff folks will pay for, cheaper, with an “indie band” approach circa 1979-1985. The “College Radio” ability to try out new talent, writers, and directors and producers, with the ability to break out into mass popularity?
Lady Gaga is never going to be mass-popular, not the way U2 or the Police were in the 1980′s. That’s why the music business is losing money. You’ll never see profitability if Hollywood just keeps pumping out more “American Beauty” niche stuff from Sam Mendes through Comcast. Heck the Office is not that broadly popular compared to stuff a half century ago like Get Smart.
Having a low-cost, low-risk, distribution channel is the only way Hollywood can break out of the big budget, “arty” creative rut that has produced tons of Lady Gagas but not a single U2.
Need I add that “synergy” has been a total failure, in media companies? Time-Warner has DC Comics, iconic characters beloved around the world, and cannot even put on TV shows to movies to comic books featuring the same team-ups and characters and situations, which is the whole point of an integrated media company?
The bigger the company, the more horrific the political infighting over who gets to do what, with whom, and for how much. Leading to creative paralysis.
Your comments on the music industry do nothing but illustrate once again that you only find value in things that appeal to you. Lady Gaga and Miley Cyrus aren’t mass popular? Just because you and your buds disparage them and lament the continued “feminization” of society…that doesn’t mean that others agree.
The only U2 albums that have sold more in the US than Gaga’s The Fame are Joshua Tree and Achtung Baby. Meanwhile, she’s already equaled their singles chart achievements (and sold more singles). Same with The Police. Only Synchronicity was a bigger hit. And if The Fame was released in an album market like the 80′s, it would totally be at that level. Her videos get 40 million views on you tube. Her tour is sold out worldwide. I guarantee that she is making people money.
How in the world is she your example for why the music industry is failing? Lady Gaga is a world artist on par with U2 in their prime. Just because you don’t like her and long for the days when white boys made popular music (see your Elvis, Beach Boys, Beatles, U2, Police references) it doesn’t mean that others don’t like her…listen to her…buy her music.
Do you think there is a single major label music executive who is like “Nah…I don’t want Gaga or Miley”? Please.
Guess this beats actually reading the comments filed at the FCC on the deal.
Why is everyone so up in arms about the Comcast purchase of NBCU. Time Warner had a studio and a broadcast network (or at least half of one), and cable networks and cable systems, but no one seems to be talking about that? How about Fox and its cable networks and its past ownership of DirecTV.
Comcast is an entertainment company that will INVEST in NBCU as opposed to GE which just sucked the life and every last dime out of the company.
Everyone is using this opportunity to air their gripes and complaints, so they can get what they want out of NBCU/Comcast/The Government, but truly no one is looking at the big picture here!
NBC is dying. Local stations are dying. Comcast is in the entertainment business, and will be SPENDING to make it grow. GE has not. And if the merger is not approved, count on GE selling the whole thing off in little pieces to other media companies that will just make more jobs leave the industry! Is that really what would be best for everyone?
You’re totally wrong and an obvious plant.
When has any big company done the right thing after a merger. there will be layoff, downsizing and a $300 payoff to the worst executive in the history of TV.
This deal is poison and Zucker’s attempt to hid his massive failure in a business deal.
As the poster above said the real culprit is crummy product. Crummy product comes from a business that can’t produce quality writers because its mired in bigotry, racism and sexism that persists and is even rewarded.
The business is headed for a massive implosion.
See you on the other side.
BIG difference between NBC Universal and TimeWarner.
NBC-Uni has 27 owned-and-operated stations (10 outright with NBC, 16 with Telemundo and one Spanish independent). It has duopolies in New York, Chicago, Miami, Dallas and San Francisco. Plus they have a triopoly in Los Angeles, and have been rumored to buy a third station in San Fran (the bankrupt KRON-TV).
TimeWarner has only owned one over-the-air TV station: the former WTBS, Channel 17, in Atlanta. (Now WPCH “PeachtreeTV”) WTBS was never an affiliate of the WB, period.
Nor did the WB have any O&O stations. In fact, it was Tribune Broadcasting who owned the vast majority of WB affiliates in major markets, including New York, LA, Philly, Chicago, Miami, Denver and (prior to 2007) in Boston.
Oh, and TimeWarner spun off their cable system – out of their own volition – in 2009.
Thanks for posting this Nikki. It’s amazing to me how many insiders are shrugging their shoulders. I suspect this won’t be the case should this egregious proposal pass and the nobless oblige arrive too little too late. Frankly in this economy, more are willing to drink the kool aid for fear of biting the hand that feeds. This, a veiled illusion but one Im afraid we will be suffering for some time. I imagine it matters not to the artists who already have a seat at the table, but the ones who never will –simply due to the silence of the former. One last note: albeit a potentially contentious observation, but nonetheless worth paralleling; these same corporate scare tactics were employed not too long ago, only instead of suits they wore swastikas.
This presumes that people want to watch laugh-track driven medicore sitcoms.
Interent delivery of entertainment will win over the dinosaur cable/studio/congloms because – to paraphrase Andy Warhol – in the future everyone will be Tyler Perry and create programs in their in-home studio and distribute online.
Dinosaur-media stars like Tom Hanks and Tom Cruise will produce original programming and present their shows on the TomTV.com website. The day when we see “Band of Desert Strom Brothers” on the Playtone.com website is not far off.
“Funny Or Die” and Les Grossman videos are the future. Jeff Zucker and his minions are the past.
This is a deal that from its very inception cried out to be stopped. It serves nobody’s interest other than the private equity interests of Comcast and its financiers. For everybody else, and I do mean everybody it is terrible. Terrible for the industry, terrible for the consumer. Anti-competitive at every level which means it will drive prices up for the consumer and compensation down for everyone else. It rewards in the greatest way the absolutely most miserable performance in the industry. NBC is a once majestic ship that has been run aground by an incompetent captain and seemingly indifferent owner. Why continue to reward these people?
Unfortunately, and as I have said before, this deal is a steamroller that will not be stopped. The current administration has too cozy a relationship with NBC to do anything other than continue its cuddling and let the deal proceed. Unless Comcast were foolish enough (which is not) to announce that it will change NBC’s editorial policies (which it will not) toward the present administration, there is not a chance in hell this deal will be stopped. NBC is the administration’s lapdog and they want to keep it that way (which it will).
how could anyone call this business venture anti-competitive? The fact that Comcast has the means to expand their company clearly shows that they are superior to their competitors, and the FCC trying to regulate them only works against the principles of the free market economy which we reside in. Comcast competitors will have to do what they can to compete.
Bravo Jay! Well put. The only thing I’d add, is that all of this boils down to the critical importance of Net Neutrality.
I’ve gone off cable all together. It’s simply too expensive. Instead I’ve hooked up my computer to the screen and watch Hulu, or whatever else is offered online. And, frankly, most of the people I know have done the same. If Comcast wants a piece of this, driving up cost to the end viewer, then I can only surmise viewership will go down, or piracy up. Americans aren’t getting richer, we’re getting poorer and television isn’t health care, it’s subject to the market. Hey, I can always spend my leisure time with friends, video games, and you tube.
Got debt?
BTW, Speaking of Hulu, I watched a show last season, that I never would have thought I liked, Sons of Anarchy. This season, for whatever reason, it’s not on Hulu and I haven’t watched it since, too bad.
I’d still be outraged if it was another company but this is made stupendously worse by Comcast being one of the sleaziest companies in the entirety of the USA. Comcast cable TV service is one of the worst and most cynically delivered products foisted on American consumers, regardless of industry.
I don’t understand how this is going to drive up consumer prices.
What’s stopping Comcast from raising prices now? What’s going to change after the deal on the consumer end? Nothing.
If you don’t like Comcast then you can switch to Time-Warner, Verizon or AT&T cable or Dish or DirecTV satellite.
Comcast WILL NOT threaten to withhold NBCU content from these other providers if that’s what you’re worried about. That would hurt them more than the other studios. You can’t charge top dollar for ad time if your viewership is cut by 2/3rds.
So everyone take a deep breath and relax. It’ll be ok.
Agree w/ almost everything written here. This merger is bad news, I wish more people were voicing their opinions and not just these K-razy groups. But you know, now that I think about it…
Doesn’t matter – one company should just own ALL media because these 5 companies owning everything has just worked out so well for the industry. I mean, wow even before this bad economy and the writers strike, all of these mergers have just created thousands of new jobs, these companies owning two local television channels in the same markets and countless radio stations has just been SUCH a great public service to local communities, there’s been so much more local coverage, runaway production has ground to a halt, producers have been able to make deals with studios and sell to any network they choose and not be forced in to going to the main broadcast network first, if you want to sell a television show – you can make it as an independent producer and not be aligned with a major conglomerate, the list goes on and on. It’s been wonderful. Verticle integration has saved us all. AOL/Time Warner is SUCH a great company! And I have some ocean view land in the middle of the country I’d be willing to part with if anyone is buying.