EXCLUSIVE… UPDATE: John Woodward, CEO of the UK Film Council, has e-mailed staff telling them today’s government decision to abolish the government agency “has been imposed with no notice and no consultation… I think we can all agree that this is short-sighted and potentially very damaging, especially as there is at present no roadmap setting out where the UK Film Council’s responsibilities and funding will be placed in the future.”
The government intends to close the organisation completely down with its assets and its remaining operations transferred out by April 2012. The Conservatives have underlined their commitment to £15 million a year of lottery-funded film. The tax credit is also to be retained – at least for now. The question going forward is who will control that money pot. UKFC will be working with Culture Department officials over the summer on transferring power and assets.
Tim Bevan, chairman of the UKFC, also blasted today’s news calling it “a bad decision”. He said: “People will rightly look back on today’s announcement and say it was a big mistake, driven by short-term thinking and political expediency. British film, which is one of the UK’s more successful growth industries, deserves better.”
Today’s announcement comes as 55 other culture department bodies are set to be merged, abolished or streamlined as part of the government’s cost-cutting drive. Department For Culture, Media and Sport secretary Jeremy Hunt gave an interview to the Independent newspaper over the weekend, apparently softening people up for today’s announcement. He warned that no area of his department’s activity was immune from cuts – including the BBC and the Olympics. The culture department, which funds British film to the tune of £26 million each year, was preparing for savage cuts. The Department For Culture, Media and Sport faces having its budget slashed by 25% – or even higher – over the next four years. Back in June, UKFC told me it was drawing up plans for what were 20% cuts in grant-in-aid expenditure might look like over three years. Now that looked optimistic. Final government department budgets will be set in the October 20th spending review.
It’s all part of the kill-or-cure Budget unveiled by the Conservatives, determined to get the UK’s debt-load down before Britain implodes like Greece or Iceland. The BBC has also lost out. Chancellor George Osborne confirmed that a tax on landline phones, proposed by Labour, to fund national broadband access, will not now happen. Instead, cash will be taken out of money Auntie had set aside to help digital TV switchover.
Personally, I think these budget cuts are a Trojan horse for the Conservatives’ political agenda, which has always been to reduce Big Government. Prime Minister David Cameron has long wanted to rein in the state, which currently spends 43% of UK national income. But he knew he couldn’t get rid of all these government jobs when these are the very people whose votes he needs to be re-elected. Now the Tories can just shrug and call everything they do “unavoidable.”
Back in May, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport was ordered to make £88 million of emergency savings as part of Osborne’s plans for £6.2 billion of cuts for 2010/2011. The DCMS and bodies such as the Film Council were told to find savings of 3% out of this year’s budget. As a result, DCMS scrapped the BFI National Film Centre, leaving the BFI to suck up 50% of all arts savings.






As a Canadian, one can only hope this inspires the government here to re-tool or just shutdown Telefilm Canada. I believe in subsidizing the arts to some degree but not when it comes to movies with budgets in the millions. Fund short films, give bursaries for script development etc. but stop pretending you’re a studio.
Much like the UKFC, Telefilm Canada is welfare for filmmakers who have little care for creating product that has any chance in hell of ever making money back. Damn irresponsible if you ask me. When they have attempted to make “commercial” fare the results are garbage bombs like “Men With Brooms” or “Gunless”.
You’re wrong. Telefilm supports numerous artists who go on to be HUGE commercial successes, after moving to L.A. for a bigger payday. Their expat taxes alone probably fund the whole thing.
Take a look at the Canadians acting, writing and directing in Hollywood, then check their credits. They all got their start with Telefilm projects. Without those projects to give Canadian talent their start, none of the multimillion-dollar Hollywood paydays would be kicking back taxes to Ottawa.
Yeah, b/c making a commercially successful film is SOOOOO easy (especially on 1/10th the budget of the competition/studios etc)… and fyi Men w Brooms (a film I loathe) was the highest grossing Cdn film in the year it was made and hence as commercially successful as you’ll find.
One issue I always have with these discussions (about UKFC, Telefilm etc.) is why does no one realize that nearly EVERY industry (agriculture, manufact. etc.) is subsidized in some shape way or form… usually to the tune of FAR more money than film/tv etc… and pls. don’t make the argument that “culture” isn’t vital b/c I promise you, nearly everything you consume (in the broadest sense of the term) isn’t manufactured locally (food, gas etc.)… so you’d do just fine if they didn’t exist locally too.
Also, culture/film stimulates spending far beyond their budgets and rarely has the negative cultural/societal impact of so many subsidized industries (yes, BP I’m looking at you).
Re. UKFC throwing the baby out w the bath water is rarely the right response… trim the fat, demand better, monitor it; but as one of the other commentators stated, they’ll just be looking to initiate another similar entity in the not too distant future and at least wouldn’t have to absorb heavy start up costs.
Finally if a country isn’t telling/sharing its own stories in the most dominant storytelling medium of its time (and yes, for most/near all countries this requires gov. involvement), how much longer can it hope to maintain a singular culture/identity… or should we all be waving the same cultural/corporate flag?
Time for better projects to emerge out of the UK. Everyone is tired of the art house crap. Very little money is made on these films and the govt is tired of it. It’s about time people start to wake up.
The business of film around the world was built on a spirit of entrepreneurship, not filmmakers waiting in line for government hand outs. That is why the UKFC is counterproductive, and has bred a dysfunctional mindset of self-entitlement amongst many British filmmakers. It is why there is no UK film Industry, only a Cottage Industry. A little government support is ok, but when a whole industry relies on government cash for their sustainability you’ve got a problem.
And to answer the question, where will UK filmmakers go to get their cash now and who will support UK Film – try Ingenious and Mr. Mckenna- I hear they’re loaded! They have more money than the UKFC ever did and I suspect a more entrepreneurial spirit to boot.
http://www.deadline.com/2010/04/ingenious-boss-tops-uk-filmtv-rich-list/
So it is wrong, for example, for the French government to help their filmmakers and industry?
I guess the French don’t have a word for “entrepreneur”.
ex-UKFC insider (old regime):
So it is wrong for, say, France is help its filmmakers and industry?
If only the French had a word for “entrepreneur”.
The Ingenious Film Fund has all but closed as the taxman caugh them out – they will facilitating tax avoidance.
Celebrate good times, come on. This is great news for the UK film industry. Going to have to start thinking commercially now instead of producing a load of introspective crap that nobody else in the world is interested in seeing.
Is this deadlinehollywooddaily or deadlineliverpooldaily, what is with all of the UK articles. I can’t stand British film directors like Paul Greengrass with his shaky cam and Guy Ciccone with his awful cockney gangster movies, Paul Haggis is quite good though!
Bill H – Haggis is Canadian, born in that “other” London.
And what is with your xenophobia?
P.S. Paul Haggis is Canadian not British.
Bill H – Haggis is from that *other* London, in Canada.
Well lets hope that more tax benefits come so it helps when raising funds. Film Maker
Waaa! Where we gonna get the money for our movies now. Welcome to independent film American style. Scratch, claw, and bite for it and if you’re determined enough you’ll make it.
I’m old enough to remember the UK film industry under the previous conservative rule – they completely destroyed it.
Mark my words, the break up of the UK film council is just the opening salvo from a party that cares nothing for the arts.
You thought getting a film funded in the UK was hard for the last ten years – you ain’t seen nothing yet.
Despite it’s faults, within a year, all the naysayers are going to be begging for another UK film Council.
Sorry Michael but that’s crap. I’m no Tory sympathiser but the UK film industry wasn’t in trouble because of Tory policies. Producers need to look closer to home for someone to blame when their films can’t compete in the marketplace.
The one thing the UKFC could have done to stimulate British global competitiveness – invest in and support new talent – it utterly failed to do. Let’s hope whoever holds the lottery purse strings from now on stops spending money on trying to get teenagers interested in films (WTF?!) and starts spending money on supporting people who have to pay rent while they learn their craft to make new films to an international standard.
I think there should be a protest film made. Anyone know where where we can get funding?
The UK Film Council has done more to paint the UK in a very favorable light throughout the English speaking world. No amount of paid advertising will be able to make up for the film council’s contribution to UK tourism. This is a very short sighted move that will create much bigger losses to the bottom line than anyone in the new and clearly rather idiotic govt undertands.
“Lizzie – I agree wholeheartedly with that. Where are filmmakers going to go for development or production money? Where do they begin?”
get hollywood to fund your projects. or get your OWN show in the US! (House, Lie to Me, AIdol, FlashForward, True Blood).
I remember the last time the Torys were in power. They don’t give a damn about the arts. This sort of macho posturing and bullying is exactly why they’ve been out of power for so long. I only hope they won’t be around for long. The c***nts.
For all intents and purposes, love them or loath them, The UKFC was essentially like a studio to the British Film Industry. Those who support its closure will surely realize that our options within the UK are very limited now and that can’t be good for anyone.
Please tell me there is a petition to sign to prevent the liquidation of the film council, as I want to sign it, as this is a disgrace!
C.S.Marshall
Go and sit outside Parliament with a placard saying “save the film quango and its overpaid employees”.
I’m sure Brian Haw will keep you company.
Or get a digital camera and make a movie without waiting for a government agency to give you their money and approval. You never know, you might make something interesting that people will actually want to see.