
For someone who has been the face of the network for the past 25 years, you’d think CNN would have handled the departure of veteran Larry King with a little bit more dignity and respect. But a series of CNN blunders have surrounded both King’s exit from his talk show and the search for his successor. First, the network started feeling out potential replacements long before King announced on June 29th that he would be leaving the show in November. In theory, that’s
not a bad idea — Larry King Live had been the cornerstone of CNN’s primetime lineup, and management had to secure a strong successor in the 9 PM slot before it let King step down. But it was also a very risky strategy as proven by the June 12th leaks in UK papers that America’ Got Talent judge Piers Morgan, a Brit, was finalizing a deal to replace King. It was a blow to Larry, who had just celebrated his 25th anniversary at CNN and deserved a proper send-off.
But there was more humiliation in store for the veteran talk-show host. Instead of organizing the
announcement of King’s exit in the two weeks following the first wave of Piers Morgan/CNN stories, the network waited until June 29th, the day the Q2 ratings come out. CNN knew they wouldn’t be pretty: King already posted his lowest-rated month in at least 20 years in May. Indeed, the Q2 ratings report had Larry King Live drawing a mere 677,000 viewers and posting CNN’s biggest year-to-year demo loss of 37%. A few hours later, there was a hasty tweet by King announcing he was leaving his show. Worse, he later claimed “spending more time with family” as the reason for his retirement from the daily grind, which is never believable.
But the blunders continued the next day, with CNN/U.S. President Jonathan Klein saying on the record that management “never negotiated” with Morgan, only to be contradicted the following day by none other than Simon Cowell. As Morgan’s friend and America’s Got Talent producer, Cowell countered that he had been helping Morgan with the deal for weeks, prompting yet another denial by CNN, this time through a spokesperson.
And then the final insult: it came from NBC Universal chief Jeff Zucker to first acknowledge, though somewhat indirectly, Morgan’s negotiations with CNN. Zucker noted in a CNBC interview that Morgan could do both his job on Talent, where he has re-upped through 2013, and the CNN gig. That opened up a whole new level of irony as Zucker knows a thing or two about botched host transitions on talk shows having orchestrated the Jay Leno/Conan O’Brien succession mess on The Tonight Show.
The spectacle surrounding the host change at Larry King Live has reminded me of the Tonight Show fiasco. After a series of missteps by CNN, let’s hope that, if Morgan indeed gets the job, he’ll last longer than Conan did. If not, he has a full-time job at NBC to fall back upon.
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.


Ted Turner must be appalled at how far from grace CNN has fallen. A lot of it is their own doing. If he were still running CNN, it would still be a news organization whose anchors don’t give opinions.
I’m not that appalled. I’m too busy being crazy and making little cars out of my poop.
Well said. At this point if CNN did something right it would be news, not the other way around. What a pitiful fall for this news org since the horrible CNN/Time Warner merger.
Morgan is a twit….nuff said.
Piers Morgan…CNN, You have got to be kidding me! Who’s your next choice, Sharon Osbourne????
What is embarrassing is CNN not pulling Larry sooner. His interviews have been painful to watch and must be uncomfortable for his guests with his off the wall questions.
Piers Morgan is a joke in th eUK and I’m surprised that CNN are even considering him. He was fired from his job editing the newspaper The Mirror (a tabloid really) for publishing photos claimed to be British soldiers torturing prisoners. They turned out to be a hoax, but not before an uproar that could have endangered the lives of British soldiers in the middle east. He was also involved in a shares scandal at the same newspaper and is renowkned for being a bully. Here’s some video about him:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QfW58Efcck
Why are CNN getting into bed with this fool? I can understand him as the poor man’s Simon Cowell on America’s Got Talent (he hasn’t) but I can’t see him in the Larry King spot.
@tery: I’ve heard and read about all that. Honestly, if CNN wants Client #9 (err, Elliott Spitzer) at 8PM, Piers Morgan at 9PM, and audience-hemmoraging Anderson Cooper at 10PM… then be my guest, CNN.
But what an insult to not even give Ryan Seacrest a chance. He already replaced Rick Dees (KIIS-FM), Casey Kasem (AT40) and Dick Clark (ABC’s Rockin’ New Year’s Eve)… c’mon, give Ryan a shot at a quad-fecta and have him succeed Larry!
CNN is pretty good at not doing good these days. Add this awkward treatment of Larry King to their not acknowledging the death of CNN co-founder Robert Wussler until many days later. Would Fox News be gaining so much if CNN hadn’t lost some of its focus (and so many Americans their brains?)?
Piers Morgan? Really CNN?
This Piers guy will fail. LOL, So many amazing choices.. Network exec’s, wake the F up. LOL.
Here’s some more “vintage” Morgan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOWcYhlYARw&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nnutj7RkXes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKUvTyq3Zek
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtFNUK1x2ys
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtFNUK1x2ys
CNN management is renowned for announcing they are 100 percent behind a star while simultaneously nudging them off a cliff. They did it to Larry, but also to Aaron Brown, Paula Zahn, Connie Chung and I don’t know who else. Campbell Brown was smart enough to resign before she had to read in the papers that CNN was 100 percent behind her too.
There is no crime in making a succession plan for Larry — if they’d done nothing there would be stories about that too — but lying about it when the rest of the world knows what’s going on makes mgmt look ridiculous.
I don’t know anything about Piers but presume CNN talent scouts think English middle-class accent equals cheap class. I do know a little about Larry. He has done everything the network asked of him. He’s never said a word against CNN in public. He used to interview Yasir Arafat and F.W. deKlerk and Margaret Thatcher; today he’s forced to quiz airhead starlets and C-list celebs who can barely form sentences. I can tell you for a fact that he did not want to go out this way, doing junk interviews for a shrinking audience, but he is loyal to a fault to his producers and his employer. His loyalty has not exactly been reciprocated.
CNN mgmt may have been rolling its eyes the last few years at Larry’s age and occasional lapses, but they’re the ones who book guests neither LK nor the audience cares about, and as usual CNN has no idea what would work better instead. I kind of doubt the country will stop dead at 9p each night to watch Piers Morgan Live.
You mean to tell me there is not one American personality worthy of taking that slot?? Unless you’re a fan of America’s Got Talent, the question is: Piers who???? I’d almost take Seacrest or Prost over this guy. I’m surprised David Frost wasn’t in the mix too.
Dear CNN,
PLEASE give Piers Moron the gig. The longer he spends in the USA the less time he spends in the UK. If you want him you’re welcome to him.
If money is a problem I’m sure you could find enough Brits willing to chip in and help, just so long as you promise to take him and not give him back.
Regards,
The population of the UK
No surprise they screwed this up.
All you need to know is that LKL is the “cornerstone” of their prime time lineup.
As a sr-level communications exec for another (non-competing) company, I watched this train wreck with amazement. You’re on target. A few other points worth mentioning:
–CNN consistently refuses to act on such issues in a timely manner; virtually every change they’ve endured over the past few years follows the same M.O. Their top mgt and/or their PR people have convinced themselves that they can make decisions and announcements in their own time, no matter what facts have started to jell and what proof is already public. They seem to think that the rest of the world be damned and whatever they say and whenever they say it, it’ll be believed. And each time, they’ve looked foolish.
–Any good mgt team knows how to convince talent to make a change. While Larry King is probably a formidable figure within CNN, they clearly didn’t have him on board at the appropriate time. For those of us who do this regularly, the fact that his “decision” came out as late as it did and tied to awful ratings and a near-confirmation of his replacement shows their inability with this aspect of tv mgt.
–I strongly advise Piers Morgan to hire himself a strong personal publicist once he starts at CNN.
You have to be very poor to be a worse choice than Ryan Seacrest in anything. Who is going to watch Piers Morgan? Why is he in this country anyway; we need to pass an Arizona style law to deport talentless British media personalities/reality show judges.
You angry little twerps. The WHOLE point about Piers Morgan is that he gets you all wound up and loves it. He’s the wrestler you love to hate.
Let’s all meet back here in six months and I’ll bake a big fat humble pie for all you to eat.
He’s going to do great.
Piers will make Phil Donahue’s infamous 2002 show on MSNBC look like ratings gold. No one will watch him, at least on the
The only people that really want to see Piers hired (besides Piers himself) are execs at Fox News and MSNBC. Plus it will give Joy Behar even more audience share.
If they’re going Brit, they should have gone with Jonathan Ross. He’s entertaining and smart. Also, he’s apparently out of a job.
I don’t dispute that Larry King needed to retire (that said, a quiet in-depth conversation is quickly becoming a lost art form. At least we still have Charlie Rose and Terri Gross). That said, Morgan is a charisma vacuum. Here in the states, he’s just some anonymous cucumber-sandwich eating wanker that appeared on The Apprentice. Why would anyone choose to watch Morgan over Larry. The ratings will be as bad if not worse. CNN has gone down the toilet ever since they cancelled Crossfire. Contrary to Jon Stewart’s petulant whining, Crossfire was a great show and the ONLY show on all of cable news where both the libs and cons were screaming that the Iraq was a dumb and disastrous war. Our civil discourse is worse off without it.
I have been a huge Larry King fan and always check at 6 or 9 to see if I should tivo that night’s show. Piers Morgan? Yuck. Really? How many Brits starring/hosting on US television shows will it take before someone catches on to the fact that Brits can work here but we can’t work there. Just off the top – Mel B; Cat Deeley….. I would vote for Tavis Smiley. He’s a good interviewer and crosses many demographics.
Larry King is the 2nd biggest superfluous gasbag on TV (next to Rush Limbaugh of course) and cheapened his own image and stature (if possible) by throwing himself in front of every television show and movie camera and playing himself. He is long past his prime and when he is reduced to “interviewing” Paris Hilton and Kate Gosselin, you know it’s time to check out.
Interesting. I guess Jeff was not content to only Zuck-up NBCU, his reach has now extended to CNN. JZ continues to “fail-up” in his career and this is just another example.
Piers Morgam would be a HUGE mistake. Joy Behar will continue to beat their brains in…
Larry King doesn’t deserve shit. He became a joke a decade ago. Honestly, he’s the stupidest person ever to have that sort of cable real estate.
Yes, it’s awkward to boot Larry Legend off the air. BUT NO ONE GIVES A SHIT. NO ONE WATCHES HIM.
CNN should be congratulated for removing him before he dies, in his 90s, on the air, which is what undoubtedly would’ve happened.
I don’t care for Larry King and never watch his show unless there is a guest on that I really like. I think he is a terrible interviewer and interrupts his guests ALL THE TIME.
I also don’t care for this British guy as Larry’s replacement.
I have nothing against Brits working in the U.S., I just don’t think people will tune in to see him. I think the show needs someone more recognizable to Americans. I actually LOVE Ryan Seacrest for the job. NOT Joy Behar PLEASE….can’t stand her!!
CNN is a joke now – there’s nothing they can do that gives them any credibility. I started watching MSNBC months ago because EVERYBODY on CNN anchoring any show, day or night, is so irritating that I can’t stand to watch. From Tony Whatsit to Rick Sanchez (arrrrrrrgh) there is NOBODY who doesn’t irritate me so much that I lose whatever news they manage to report.
Anderson Cooper is the exception – I think he does great things, but even “The best political team” on TV is a joke now. You know exactly who is going to say what, who is going to argue with whom, and you never learn ANYTHING.
Larry King is painful to watch – he’s completely out of touch with the people he interviews – except Suzanne Somers, one of his BFFs.
I don’t really CARE who replaces him because unless there’s such a huge breaking story that I figure I have to get as much info as possible, I don’t watch CNN at all anymore.
I’ll bet Ted Turner wants to throw up every time he turns on CNN.
Poor CNN.
Stephen Fry would’ve been 1,552,692,661,044 times better choice than Piers Morgan.