Beverly Hills, CA — The governors of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences finalized the rules for the 83rd Academy Awards at its most recent meeting (June 22). The most significant change is in the Visual Effects category, which will now feature five nominees rather than three.
Since 1963, when the Special Effects award was discontinued and new separate categories for achievements in visual effects and sound effects were established, the only period during which it was possible to have five visual effects nominees was 1977 through 1979. In only one of those years (1979) were five achievements actually recognized. Between 1980 and 1995, two or three productions could be nominated; since 1996 the rules have dictated there be exactly three nominees.
In the Animated Feature Film category, the rule governing running time for a motion picture to qualify was changed from at least 70 minutes to greater than 40 minutes, which is consistent with the running time requirements for feature films in all other categories. The running time for a motion picture to qualify as an animated, live action or documentary short film has been and continues to be a maximum of 40 minutes. The previous 70-minute threshold for an animated feature had left a gap for films that ran between 40 and 70 minutes, effectively preventing them from being able to qualify as either features or shorts.
Also in the Animated Feature Film category, a sentence regarding motion capture was added to clarify the definition of an animated film. The language now reads: “An animated feature film is defined as a motion picture with a running time of greater than 40 minutes, in which movement and characters’ performances are created using a frame-by-frame technique. Motion capture by itself is not an animation technique. In addition, a significant number of the major characters must be animated, and animation must figure in no less than 75 percent of the picture’s running time.”
Other modifications of the 83rd Academy Awards rules include normal date changes and minor “housekeeping” changes.
Rules are reviewed annually by individual branch and category committees. The Awards Rules Committee then reviews all proposed changes before presenting its recommendations to the Academy’s Board of Governors for approval.
Academy Awards for outstanding film achievements of 2010 will be presented on Sunday, February 27, 2011, at the Kodak Theatre.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.
Beverly Hills, CA — The governors of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences finalized the rules for the 83rd Academy Awards at its most recent meeting (June 22). The most significant change is in the Visual Effects category, which will now feature five nominees rather than three.

Congratulations Jeffrey for finally getting those mocap guys out of YOUR category.
Uh… “Motion capture by itself is not an animation technique”? There has never been a movie that used motion capture by ITSELF. Real animators are ALWAYS supplemented to smooth out performances, or in most cases, make sense of captured performances. This is another instance of the Academy being out of touch with how movie making is done.
I disagree. This is more proof that they are in touch. You could really call this the “Avatar Rule”.
While animators traditionally referenced motion capture it’s becoming more and more a question of technically cleaning the data than simply referencing it.
As motion capture improves the animator will have less to do with the output or performance capture than a sound mixer over the quality performance. They might still be a necessary component to polish what’s already there but they won’t be adding very much.
By contrast an animator bringing life to a character based off of reference or inspiration would in my opinion be the animator’s performance and should be recognized as such.
Another good analogy would be the difference between the mold maker and sculptor. While the mold maker will still need to clean the mold and prepare it for casting–they aren’t creating original work they’re just reproducing the existing work as best they can.
So to use the language “by itself is not” is actually very forward looking. It allows for motion capture to be used but requires that animators actually add to the work before it’s considered animation. This way we can still shoot ‘live action’ performance capture films in the future and distinguish between them and truly animated films.
Okay, yes mocap does require a few animators to smooth and interpret, however they are correct to classify mocap as something separate from animation in the traditional sense. I am a digital animator. Mocap can be spotted from a mile away, and while it works well for photo-real productions, it is considered by most as a bit of a cheat. It requires fewer animators than key frame animation, and less artistic talent among the animators themselves.
I think the Academy is correct to make this distinction.
Mocap can be awesome, though.
Visual effects have become an ever increasing part of the filmmaking landscape.
The decision to expand the nominees to five is absolutely the right thing for the Academy to do, and in fact, should have been done several years ago.
Well the animated feature rule is a no-brainer. Shouldn’t they go by the same rules in terms of feature length to qualify. Films in the 41-69 range had to decide to shave off a few minutes to be a short or plump up enough to be a feature. 41 min’s and up is a feature makes sense.
And the visual effects expanding to 5 is something I’ve been expecting for a while now. Too large a percentage of Hollywood films rely on Visual Effects either heavily, moderately, or slightly. With the field expanding I’m guessing the bake-off process is also altered.
Seems like a good change/clarification. Motion Capture is essentially a visual effect but one that is greatly enhanced by the use of animators when done correctly. It should be something that falls into a VFX category. (i.e. Gullum/Andy Serksis + VFX team brought that character to life through VFX not what’s traditionally considered “Animation” … and they did an amazing job!)
It’s about time, really. I’ve been wondering for years with all the FX-driven films why there were only 3 contenders. Visual Effects is like the main driving force for many of the most financially successful movies of the last 20 years. Finally it’s recognized by the Academy.
It is complete bull..
This stinks politics in Hollywood and I think Dreamworks and Pixar is the most happy camper about this new rules in the animation catagory! But Motion Capture “by itself” is never used in a animation film (as someone also commented).
Most of the time working with mocap you use it as a quide (just as you use rotoscoping in 2D-animation). Mocap is an animations tool – no more no less.
R
So, does this mean the Academy is going to be doing away with their 7 visual effects finalists much like they did with Sound Effects back in 2006 when they expanded it to five nominees instead of their usual three?
This sucks, I used to love seeing what the semi-finalists were.