Hollywood has newly minted its next star, and it’s baby-faced Andrew Garfield. [UPDATE: I'm told Garfield's pay scale on the film is around $500,000 salary on the first film, $1 million for the second one, and $2 million for the third film. All of the finalists were presented with those terms in a deal for one film and two options.] I was first to tell you the 26-year-old was a finalist to play the new Spider-Man in the Marc Webb-directed 3D relaunch of Sony Picture Entertainment’s most lucrative film franchise. Also under consideration were Jamie Bell, Anton Yelchin, Aaron Johnson, Logan Lerman, Alden Ehrenreich, Frank Dillane, and Michael Angarano. Sony execs viewed the screen tests of six of those eight finalists last Friday night. Garfield’s biggest break until today was being cast in the upcoming David Fincher-directed The Social Network about the Facebook founders; my sources say his scene-stealing star turn in it is the reason he snagged the role of Spidey over the other finalists.
The young thesp also can be seen in The Other Boleyn Girl and The Imaginarium Of Dr Parnassus and The Red Riding Trilogy and the upcoming Never Let Me Go. Born in Los Angeles to a British mother and an American father, he moved with his family to Surrey, England when he was 3. He was trained at the Central School of Speech and Drama and then began acting primarily on stage. He played Romeo once, and modeled in Vogue, and in 2007 was named ONE OF 10 ACTORS TO WATCH by a Hollywood trade.
But it is his heartbreaking performance in Boy A, playing a character trying to outrun his involvement in a heinous crime during his childhood, that captured my attention. With the studio taking the rebooted Peter Parker back in time to high school, Garfield’s youthful appearance and ability to display vulnerability was as important to his casting as his believability in the action sequences. Neither Garfield nor director Webb have ever done a 3D or tentpole movie. Sony will now be able to line up the rest of its cast for the film which will begin shooting by year’s end for a July 3, 2012 release date from a script by Jamie Vanderbilt.
This puts an end to all the speculation and drama that began last December for Spider-Man 4. It prompted an internal memo to the crew from the visual effects department that script problems were going to delay a February start of production and the film’s May 11, 2011 release date. Director Sam Raimi hated the script, which saw the writers Jamie Vanderbilt, David Lindsay-Abaire, Gary Ross and Alvin Sargent all take passes at it. The seriousness of those script woes became evident when visual effects crews were told to take other jobs, because there was no longer a date when production would start.
On January 11th, Deadline broke the story that Raimi, the studio, and the producers had decided to scrap the fourth Spider-Man film. Star Tobey Maguire was dumped as Spidey. The studio instead decided on a franchise reboot, emboldened by a script that Vanderbilt wrote. The studio’s determination to move quickly was borne out by a Deadline scoop two days later that Webb became the choice to direct a new 3D-shot film which would take the franchise back to the beginning, with Peter Parker struggling to come to grips with his superpowers in high school.
While websites floated bogus rumors about who had supposedly landed the Spidey role, the studio quietly narrowed its list of 8 finalists to play the wall crawler. Sony brass viewed the screen tests of 6 of the eight candidates that most impressed the studio, the director, and Avi Arad and Laura Ziskin, who are producing for Columbia Pictures and Marvel Studios. This week, the studio ended the search and quickly locked in a deal with Garfield’s CAA reps.
- Sony Views Screen Tests Of Spider-Man Finalists; Decision Expected Shortly
- It’s Official: ‘Spider-Man’ Reboot Will Be 3D
- TOLDJA! Sony Announced ‘(500 Days)’ Marc Webb As Spider-Man Reboot Director
- Will Sony Spin Spidey Reboot With Marc Webb?
- EXCLUSIVE: ‘Spider-Man 4′ Scrapped; Sam Raimi & Tobey Maguire & Cast Out; Franchise Reboot For 2012
- ‘Spider-Man 4′ VFX Crew Encouraged “To Look For Other Work” Because Of Delays
- EXCLUSIVE: ‘Spider-Man 4′ Officially Has No Start Date As Of Today Because Of Script Problems; Sony Unlikely To Make Scheduled May 5, 2011 Release Date





Hey Mike:
Can you tell us which agency reps this kid as well as the other finalists — I suspect they wanted this guy all along (since he was working on their key release of the year) but had to appease the talent heads at the other agencies with screentests for the other contenders.
Recall that Gersh was only able to hold onto Tobey until the second Spidey film before he jumped to CAA…
This is a really bad idea on Sony’s part. This is going to blow up in their face just like the last Superman blew up in WB’s face when they hired unknown pretty boy Brandon Routh to star as Superman. Routh’s career went nowhere, and WB killed their most prized franchise. I guess it doesn’t really matter what Sony does at this point since they lose the Spiderman franchise in 2015.
I don’t think it’s a bad idea at all.
Why did Star Wars work? – No one knew who three of the four leads were and Alec Guinness was a lot older so young people didn’t care.
Why did Superman work with Christopher Reeve? – Same thing.
Sure, in the industry people may have known them all but the public didn’t see them as A-list stars. So they captured the belief of the audiences.
When you have a character as iconic as Spiderman, people will buy tickets because they know and love the CHARACTER, not the actor.
I have seen none of Garfield’s work so I’ll be going in clean (though probably not after THE SOCIAL NETWORK comes out) and I’m psyched about that.
Though announcing he’s 26 might hurt if it takes place in high school.
The failure of the upcoming Spiderman movies won’t be the fault of the director, writer, or star. What is going to do the movie in is that IT’S TOO DAMN SOON TO REBOOT SPIDERMAN!
EVERYONE KNOWS THIS, yet Sony pretends like nothing is wrong.
You are 100% correct too soon to reboot spidey. They are going to screw this up so bad starting from scratch like that totally by passing the other 3 movies like they never existed so many ppl were looking forward to spider-man 4. It is going to piss alot of ppl off.I mean the 3rd was not really great.But anyways you are right about that way too soon.Garfield is a guy alot of ppl haven’t really seen much of. Sony is just digging themselves a grave.IT pisses me off as a fan,im outraged.
“Why did Star Wars work? – No one knew who three of the four leads were and Alec Guinness was a lot older so young people didn’t care.”
Yes, that’s why it worked. Not because of the visual effects or the script.
Why did Star Wars work? No one knew who three of the four leads were
{cough} Hayden Christensen {cough}
I think the OP meant the original Star Wars.
Why did Star Wars work? No one knew who three of the four leads were
{cough} Hayden Christensen {cough}
Um. FYI, wrong Star Wars trilogy. If someone mentions Alec Guinness, they’re not talking about episodes 1-3…
Agree. What the hell they gonna do? Bring in a reboot of Doc Oc and Green G.? Prime example of how fucked up Hollywood is!!!!!!
It’s just so fucking insane! Every 3 or 4 years…bring in a young version of Peter and do it all over? Don’t they get it…that especially in the digital world…audiences are not stupid?
Thank God for just being an indie filmmaker and writer and I don’t have to wear a suit or even have an agent. Go right to the audience…which is global and diversified…and incredibly
attune to the real world. And do it wiht a few select people and
lotsa untapped talent, that is not on the Hollywierd radar.
He was Awesome in Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus. Best thing in it…
Clearly you must have fell asleep at some point, since you don’t mention Johnny Depp.
I take it he was the young guy working on the show? I actually liked that film and I don’t remember him at all. That’s how much he registers.
Webster’s Dictionary revised meaning for the word ‘Hubris’: Sony’s re-boot of the Spiderman franchise.
I feel like crying.
I’ve never wished for a film to fail, but… this choice just makes me so angry!!
Although I’m typing from London, I absolutely hate the idea of a British 26-year-old adult man playing Peter Parker. THIS IS STUPID! Spidey is AMERICAN! FFS.
Wow, a jewish kid makes good in Hollywood. Who’d have thought! Good luck to him.
hahaha, my exact thoughts!
“His film (500) Days of Summer showed that Webb knows how to communicate in the language of the young audience.”
Why do keep saying that? That movie was about characters in their late 20s, not high schoolers.
It’s a shame he isn’t all that attractive.
it’s true. i’m sure he’s a good actor. but he’s unbelievably homely and has zero sex appeal. doesn’t have to be a male model, but garfield couldn’t model ski masks. not that a good looking bloke automatically means he’s hot. asexual hugh jackman comes to mind. daniel craig, on the other hand, is not great looking in the runway model sense, but he’s super magnetic/charismatic/red hot.
wtf sony?! bad choice.
Quick! You best get on to Vogue who hired him as a model in their Hansel and Gretel spread in 2009. They obviously had no idea.
LOL, I would like to see pictures of what you guys look like. Most of the time when people make fun of mildly handsome actors its because they’re ashamed of their own fat ass.
You should watch him in Lions for Lambs or one of his other movies. He’s certainly a very good looking guy. I think he just tends to photoraph weirdly at premieres or whatever. But he looks different on camera.
Peter Parker is supposed to be a huge nerd who’s constantly picked on in high school. This new actor apparently modeled in Vogue. He’s WAY overqualified for the part in the looks department. If Tobey had a fault, it was that he was too passive and not aggressively nerdy enough as Parker. Parker in the original comics was such an angry misfit a lot of his internal monologues made it sound like he was this close to going Columbine on his classmates. This guy doesn’t seem totally miscast, but is probably too pretty boy to pull that off. And unfortunately that’s the strongest dynamic to this or any superhero character. The more screwed up and unappealing the non-hero alter ego side of the character is, the more interesting it becomes to see them transform and lead a double life as a superhero. You take that irony away and you have a boring flick, like the first, terribly overrated Iron Man.
Eric, he’s “WAY overqualified in the looks department” if Sarah Palin is WAY overqualified to teach quantum physics at Cal Tech. garfield is less attractive than the raw hemorrhoids on my exposed crackstack. Jesus Eric!
Well, if the monster billion dollar franchise Twilight has taught us anything, it’s that in order for a film to appeal to more than half the population in the world (i.e., read FEMALES), it really isn’t that crucial to focus on trivialities such as drop dead chiseled good looks, and gasp-inducing washboard abs…I mean really, women are not that superfi- oh, wait…nevermind.
I’m amazed how studios heads and casting directors are continuously dazzled by British and Australian actors because they can fake an American accent in the room for 5 minutes. Congrats to this kid sincerely. Huge break. Just wish Hollywood would stop outsourcing for American movies. That would be like Channing Tatum playing the new James Bond. Come on. Hollywood 1, my Childhood 0.
Or like RDJ as Sherlock Holmes, Russel Crowe as Robin Hood, and Sam Worthington as Dan Dare…
And I don’t think any of them were good in those roles either. I’m with you, they just don’t fit. And I LOVE RJD, just not in that. No need to outsource those roles either.
You are aware that this kid was not only born in the US (Los Angeles to be exact and to the point) but is also by all definitions an American – American father, born in America, Right?
(even though he probably doesn’t claim his American citizenship, and was raised in the UK)
British Spiderman makes Jesus cry.
That, sir, was genius giggle-spawning funny.
Kate Bryden (UK Agency)
Joel Lubin (CAA)
Jack Whigham (CAA)
BOY A was an excellent little movie made so by his performance.
Then fck, let this guy make BOY A the motherf* sequel, and leave off Spidey okay?? Seriously, if I had to make an analogy, this is like ‘the powers that be,’ casting for ‘Wonderwoman,’ and choosing Saoirse Ronan.
Agreed. Anyone who takes the time to see Boy A will know why this seemingly awful decision is actually a REALLY good one.
repped by Joel Lubin/Jack Whigham/CAA and the Collective.
total “Who dat” choice… a british peter parker?
I would’ve gone w Lerman but Amy has been on a hot streak for such a long time that I quit second-guessing her years ago.
30 DAYS was overrated dreck. But this is just a franchise film at this point anyway. Doubt there’s much juice left in the b.o. for a teenybopper reboot. What’s the budget?
LERMAN!..did you see PJATO:TLT?
Acutally, ’500 Days’ was overrated dreck. Just…utter dreck. I feel bad for Entertainment Weekly. Yesterday they had a front page conversation with Josh Hutcherson since the talk was ‘spinning and close to landing on him’. Way to stay on top of it like always EW! Poor kid, he would have been a good choice.
And yes, dear Hollywood…please stop outsourcing so dang much. K? K. It’s bad enough that Vancouver is your sizable twin sister. No offense to the Canadians.
I was getting ready to spill some hate-o-rade. But Boy A was amaaazing. And he was quite stellar in it. Check it out and you will surely agree.
Feel bummed for Donald Glover though. But congrats and good luck to you Andrew! Don’t let the franchise down, my man.
SO HAPPY WITH THIS DECISION. Anton and Jamie are great, but Andrew is amazing. Boy A is a great film that everyone needs to see. I know he’ll do great things with this role. Really looking forward to this reboot now.
I loved Boy A, and his performance in it was heart-wrenching. I’m sure he’ll do well.
This is a mistake. This guy is more heel than hero. Look at how two other great directors casted him, both Redford and Fincher cast him as a punk/guy with a chip on his shoulder. You look at this guy’s face and he just seems sneaky. No way is he Peter Parker. Only seems give further credence to the fact that Webb is probably not the right guy for this.
Call me an isolationist but really…? Yet another British actor takes a huge role. I really can’t believe that in our great country we can’t find any good actors. What happened to the Sean Penn’s of this new generation. I love all these guys, they are great but WTF. Hollywood is the most insular corporate culture in America and it’s stars are being taken over by foreigners. It’s not just movies either…True Blood? English, Irish and Swede…
It’s a sad sad day that our own country can’t come up with any good actors for manly roles. You’re either a pansy (Sorry Zac) or kind of dumb (I’m looking at you Fast and Furious) or…old (Tom, you’re over 40!)
Don’t tell me shit about the Twilight guys. I have yet to believe any of those abs can act.
Who is the next great American actor?
Not sure what’s going on but I can tell you if a movie calls for a young man (not a dude/boy/guy) with some substance the casting directors complain that the pool for American actors is beyond shallow.
Where it not for the UK, Australia, Canada etc., we would have even fewer leading men in Hollywood.
Andrew Garfield is certainly American. Born in the U.S., and has an American father and dual U.S./U.K. citizenship. He’s eligible to run for President some day if he wanted to. So how is he not American?
Please, if you spend all of your formative years in the UK and speak with a British accent – people will not associate you with things ‘American.’ It’s all about perception – is he gonna do his press tours and adopt a fake American accent, because his real accent is thorough Londoner. Let’s be clear, I’m not talking ‘patriotism,’ here – I could care less what someone’s nationality is, I’m just saying this guy is a Brit – that’s what he seems to id as, and sound like. I have a cousin who’s lived in Sweden his whole life, whose technically ‘American,’ I wouldn’t want him cast as Peter Parker either. You feel me?? Even if a person, who was born and bred in the US spent most of his time in England, and was associated with England, grew up there – he’d more or less be a Brit too – and I’d want him nix’d. I’d say the EXACT same sh*t about him. So please, don’t call tech on stupid stuff, like where his Mama or Daddy was born. Unlike this guy, if you had a Brit, who lived here and was thoroughly ‘Americanized,’ it would be different, but you don’t. He’s a Brit, he acts in Brit films, he plays Brits, and he’s won a few Brit tv awards.
…..so can we assume that you had a problem with Welsh Christian Bale playing the quintessentially American Batman in Nolan’s Batman movies?
“like where his Mama or Daddy was born”
Not just his father was born in the U.S. – he was, too. And while I’m actually not big on casting British actors in very American parts, I consider Garfield American, even if he’s not exclusively so. If he was born in the U.S. and has U.S. citizenship, not even the “birthers” would touch him.
Joseph Gordon Levitt would have been great, and don’t say he’s too old – since he’s the same age as Garfield.
Perhaps he’s going to be occupied filming the next Batman film, if Riddler rumors are to be believed.
This whole project is a stupid idea. Audiences aren’t going to embrace it like they did the Raimi Spider-Man films
Instead of a reboot they should have let Raimi fix the script(s) they had in place for a follow up trilogy, he showed he was more than capable with the first three.
In the end Sony saw a chance to not have to spend a huge amount on stars and a big director and jumped at that chance.
The Spiderman franchise gave Raimi the credit the power he deserved in Hollywood but also held him back from his true dark style. One can only hope that since he is now free of the franchise he makes films that can show his talent. I can only hope that Evil Dead IV is somewhere on that list of projects.
if he’s good enough for Fincher, he’s good enough for me
The dude is 26? That’s too old, especially if the reboot goes back to Parker’s high school years. If they get around to a third film, he’ll be in his 30s by then. Didn’t Sony learn anything with old-ass Tobey Maguire?
Many of the Brit up and comers tend to have better, formal training (as it seems Garfield does)than the model turned actors i.e Channing Tatum or actors who hit it big based on charisma (Efron, Lautner). Smart agents like Theresa Peters have developed relationships with the Brit market and have been able to snag the talented ones early(Macavoy, Dancy) And no,this isn’t Theresa Peters writing this comment:)
I don’t care if you are Theresa Peters, you’re right. If the US had a decent actor/theater training program (and don’t even pretend any of the university programs are more than emotional masturbation and circus technique) and national/federal funding for theater like England and Australia, maybe US actors could compete with the Brits and Aussies. And the attitude in England about the work is completely different. Not every role an actor takes has to be the lead, not every performance is “starring” or “breakout.” They just want to do good work. Is there a successful American actor under the age of 30 who even knows what The Method is? Or Lee Strasberg or Stella Adler or Stanislavski? They think the Actors Studio is that place where people get interviewed by that pompous guy Will Ferrell used to imitate on SNL.
Exactly, in England they care about the craft and art of acting. In Hollywood jaded cynical agents rule everything so it’s all about money and starring roles.
Oh, yeah. Macavoy and Dancy. There’s a couple of huge stars. Geez, is it any wonder there are no stars in Hollywood under 50 who can open a movie? No one wants to see these guys. No one.
Bill, oh yeah because that’s all it’s about. Being a huge star and headlining movies, forget about being a good actor who works at his craft. People like you are everything that’s wrong with Hollywood nowadays. All you people care about is box office dough, you hate real artists and love cash cows like the Twilight pieces of meat.
British Spiderman = EPIC FAIL
This is one reboot I won’t be bothering to watch. If you can’t cast Spidey correctly, why should I believe you can do anything at all?
Why does it matter that he is British? It’s not like Peter Parker is going to have a British accent. I am astonished that you think just because he is British means it is ‘not cast correctly’ and an ‘epic fail’. Yet you give no reasoning for your opinion. Based on your logic, Christian Bale being cast as Batman was an epic fail and you didn’t bother to watch it, right?
Out of all the guys they screen tested, wouldn’t you prefer Sony cast the best actor regardless of his nationality? Based on the films I’ve seen from Andrew, such as ‘The Imaginarium Of Dr. Parnassus’, ‘Boy A’, and ‘The Social Network’ it is obvious that he is a remarkable actor with a wide range of talent.
For the record, I am a proud American from Texas.
I also forgot to mention that Andrew was born in Los Angeles, California, so he actually is American. The only thing that really makes him British is his accent, which he wont have in the new film. Sooooo yeah…
I will not comment on his acting skills since I have not seen him in anything yet. I will say that they better move the setting of the movie to college because quite frankly he does not look like he could be in high school. If there is a second film in this rebooted series he will likely be 30 when they start filming it.
The foreign actor thing works both ways for inexplicable reasons. Johnny Depp as a British Pirate. Robert Downey, JR as Sherlock Holmes. Gwenyth Paltrow in Shakespeare in Love. It’s a weird phenomena in Hollywood. They seem to love casting across the pond and vice verse for the opposite role.
So, the kid is 26 now. He’ll be what 27 or 28 when they film. Yeah, he seems like a high school kid. He’s also rather ugly. Great if he was in an English pop band, bad for Peter Parker.
Isn’t he a bit patrician-looking to play red-blooded, all-American male Peter Parker? Then again, I can’t seem to drum up any energy for this reboot anyway, so whatev.
Congrats to this guy, I’m sure he’ll make the most of it. It’s just — even with the nonsense of Spidey 3, I really liked the Maguire/Raimi team.
I cant believe they got any of the actors on their list to take that contract.