The just completed Thrillerfest — think Comic-Con for thriller authors and their fans — featured a lecture that caught my eye. Sleepers author Lorenzo Carcaterra chose the 10 best thriller films made from books, the 10 worst, and the 10 he most wants to see get made.
Carcaterra’s Sleepers was turned into a hit film by Barry Levinson, and most of his subsequent thrillers are under option by studios and big producers. His latest, Midnight Angels – an art history thriller set in Florence — was just published by Ballantine and is just being shopped now. Carcaterra cautioned that his lists (culled with the help of other authors and editors) were subjective, guaranteed to stir rancor, and maybe a frivolous exercise. So I say, what’s wrong with a little subjectivity, rancor, and frivolity on a summer Sunday morning?
The 10 Best: The Bourne Trilogy, Silence of the Lambs, Day of the Jackal, 3 Days of the Condor, The Manchurian Candidate, The Talented Mr. Ripley, The Getaway (Steve McQueen version), The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo, The French Connection, Patriot Games and Marathon Man (the last two tie for 10th).
The 10 Worst: The Getaway (Alec Baldwin version), The Eiger Sanction, The Osterman Weekend, The Manchurian Candidate (Denzel Washington version), The Sum of All Fears, The Da Vinci Code, Hannibal Rising, The Chamber, Hostage, Heat (the William Goldman novel adapted into a Burt Reynolds pic). Carcaterra hated the Richard Chamberlain TV adaptation of The Bourne Identity so much, he gave it dishonorable mention.
The 10 That Should Be Made: The Vince Flynn-written series about government operative Mitch Rapp (CBS Films is trying to make Consent to Kill, hoping Gerard Butler or Matthew Fox will star for Antoine Fuqua); Brad Thor ‘s Scot Horvath series; Lee Child’s series on hulking drifter Jack Reacher (last I recall, Cruise/Wagner had the rights, and while Reacher might be the top selling thriller protagonist without a film series, little has happened to get a film like The Killing Floor made); James Rollins’ Sigma Force series, William Diehl’s The Hunt, Bill Granger’s The November Man, Daniel Silva’s Gabriel Alon series, any of Matthew Pearl’s novels that include The Dante Club, The Poe Shadow and The Last Dickens; Christopher Reich’s Numbered Account; and PD James’ Innocent Blood and Jack Higgins’ Luciano’s Luck (tied for 10th).
Carcaterra put numerous authors on the best and the worst lists, including author Robert Ludlum, Tom Clancy’s Jack Ryan series, the Jim Thompson novel The Getaway (Carcaterra thought McQueen’s Doc McCoy was the personification of cool while Baldwin was too pretty) Tom Harris’s Hannibal Lecter series and William Goldman. Carcaterra considers Goldman’s Marathon Man to be one of the best adaptations ever, but he’s friends with Goldman, and the author/screenwriter suggested his own work, Heat, for the bad list). What becomes clear from Carcaterra’s experience is that the best adaptations are the ones where the screenwriter/director has the guts to tear apart the book to serve the film, even if a superstar author (think Clancy in Patriot Games or Anne Rice at the start of Interview with the Vampire) kicks and screams. The other make or break variable is the impact of actors who can use their influence to screw things up, or elevate the film. On Sleepers, Carcaterra said when they got Robert De Niro and Dustin Hoffman, the scenes for their characters escalated and made the movie much better.
“The Bourne Identity film is much better than the book, and when Tony Gilroy was asked to write, he told them he didn’t care for the book,” Carcaterra said. “He finally said the only part that interested him was an assassin who didn’t know who he was, wanted to find out, but didn’t want to kill. Of course, to find out, he has to kill. It was a troubled shoot, a lot of reshoots, but that core idea and the script started what has become the best thriller book series. I put all three into the same category because they’re all so good.”
Carcaterra said it was smart to change James Grady’s 6 Days of the Condor: “Whether it was a screenwriter economizing or a producer short of cash, it was a better title and the tightened time line helped the movie.” He said the David Fincher adaptation of The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo likely won’t come close to the darkness of the Swedish film that he feels will be tough to improve. Carcaterra worked on TV shows with Sonny Grosso, one of the two cops in The French Connection. Grosso told him that William Friedkin didn’t even read the book when he first met the cops, but studied them closely. “He was interested in these two cowboys on the streets, and the details of the case got sketched over,” Carcaterra said. “The chase scene was invented, the subway shooting scene didn’t happened. And when Sonny told Friedkin that shooting that Frenchman in the back wouldn’t happen because cops don’t shoot fleeing suspects in the back, Friedkin said, this guy killed five people, and the crowd will go nuts. He was absolutely right.”
Carcaterra said The Da Vinci Code suffered from reverence to Dan Brown’s huge bestseller and the fear of turning off the book’s huge fan base. Angels & Demons was a much better film, Carcaterra said, because the screenwriting and plotting were bolder.
Authors who get script approval can often hamper a screen adaptation, unless it is someone like Elmore Leonard, who wrote so many scripts himself that he knows what works on the screen and isn’t precious about his prose. “Authors like Elmore realize it’s unseemly to complain, when you consider how much we get paid. When Sydney Pollack mentioned to John Grisham he hoped they hadn’t messed up The Firm, Grisham said ‘if you did, you’ll never hear it from me.’ Anne Rice took out full page ads about the casting of Interview with the Vampire, until maybe somebody explained her backend definition, and suddenly she was ecstatic,” Carcaterra said. “Adapting books into movies is a hard job that becomes impossible with an author standing over your shoulder who doesn’t understand the process. Authors get paid very well, and so you have to take the money and shut up.”






I always imagine that some studio would make a film franchise based on the Elvis Cole or Joe Pike series of novels by Robert Crais.
I especially enjoyed L.A. Requiem. I think that would’ve made a great movie.
And now with the arrest of the Grim Sleeper – it would only make the subject matter even more reverent (spoiler warning of who the culprit works for).
~
Coat
Best adaptations? The Group, Rosemary’s Baby and LA Confidential should have made the list. Worst? Bonfire of the Vanities
Ten to develop for film or TV? And my list covers a lot of turf:
Vince Flynn’s Mitch Rapp series – C’mon, now that 24′s over it’s a natural.
Dianne Day’s series with “Fremont Jones” – Day’s take on a young, female turn of the century Holmes
Faye Kellerman’s Rina Lazarus/Peter Decker series – excellent throughout the series
Virginia Lanier’s “Bloodhound” series – Among the best underrated Southern mystery series
Arturo Perez-Reverte art history novels – Any one has movie potential
Bill Pronzini’s “Blue Lonesome” – better than his ‘no name detective’, dark noir, well written
Jane Rubino’s “Cat Austen/Jersey Shore” series – takes the “best cast” prize, sharp dialogue too
John Sandford’s “Prey” series – solid detective series for the FX lineup
Victoria Thompson’s “Gaslight” books – With Holmes redux maybe ripe for a Victorian series?
Persia Walker’s “Darkness and the Devil Behind Me” – atmospheric 1920s African-American mystery
I’d like to see Shane Stevens’s The Anvil Chorus adapted.
I’m guessing Carcaterra’s never heard of Hitchcock, and the great adaptations that became “Vertigo” and “Psycho”.
Not to mention “Rebecca”. But since his knowledge of film seems to date only as far back as 1970, I guess it’s understandable.
I know, right? I’m always amazed how many people (young and old alike) seem to think that movies were invented around the same time they began watching them.
The 39 Steps
What, no mention of Alistair MacLean? I always loved “The Guns Of Navarone” and actually kind of like “Ice Station Zebra”. IMDB says 17 movies made from his books.
While I eagerly await a movie based on Jack Reacher, the series I thought was a natural was Thomas Perry’s Jane Whitefield novels.
“Patriot Games” and not “The Hunt for Red October?”
Agreed, both were great flicks, but The Hunt for Red October was flawless.
I’d like to see Peter Straub’s Koko made into a movie (if already has and I missed, sorry).
The trick with a thriller adaptation is DON’T PUSSY OUT. Change the novel structurally, but don’t opt out on the harsh politically-incorrect details.
William Friedkin went ALL IN (and all out) for “French Connecton” and “Exorcist.” Jonathan Demme went ALL IN for “Silence of the Lambs.” Stylistically, Liman went ALL IN for “Bourne.” Many people were offended by those movies, more people were entertained.
Whatever pussy directed “Sum of All Fears” pussied out, made the villains vague neo-neo-Nazis. It’s Jack Ryan versus some old European dude with a swastika on the back of his watch.
If you’re going to direct the Mitch Rapp series, you better stick to Vince Flynn’s harsh non-PC worldview. If you’re going to adapt Larsson’s “The Girl Who…” series, you’re stuck with his harsh universe.
In other words, you gotta go ALL IN, or the audience will spit you out.
Paramount insisted on the villain change in Sum.
Tom Harris is a mentor of mine and often I’ve wondered if Hannibal and Hannibal Rising weren’t tongue in cheek, and/or some veiled snipe at the commercialization of Hannibal Lecter? He just smiles. So I’m inclined to cut him a break, though I agree w/Hannibal Rising being in the jacked-up pile. The Osterman Weekend was a TV movie, if I recall. I was young and the only reason I watched it was b/c my mother told me it was made from a great book.
Me, I ain’t gonna quibble re: Goldman and Marathon Man. Anything before and after the Laurence Olivier drilling Dustin Hoffman’s teeth scene could have sucked and I’d still love it…I learned to use oil of cloves on my kid’s gums thanks to that scene.
I just finished Under the dome by Stephen King and it felt like I was reading a screenplay. Ordinary book but I think it will make an ok movie
No “V.I. Warshawski” on the worst list? Oh well.
Glad to see “Marathon Man” is well remembered, but I would add “Black Sunday” to the best list.
Daniel Silva’s Allon series would be awesome, if done right.
Agreed. If in the wrong hands, they have the potential to be horrible. I remember reading a couple years ago that one of the later books (a weaker one IMO) had been optioned by Pierre Morel. That didn’t inspire much confidence.
The best ones are books one through 4 and the last two. I felt that Silva using Saudis as the terrorist villain was lazy and derivative. The same could be said about using Russians as villains, but it was a fresh take with the oligarchs rather than KGB as villains.
I like the books, but can understand why they haven’t been adapted into films yet. The subject matter is tough to adapt on screen post 9/11 and the Iraq/Afghanistan wars.
The Dante Club would be awesome but it would be a bit too high brow for mainstream audiences. Most people wouldn’t get it.
I have read all of Daniel Silva’s books and know them to be wonderful. Good movies? Only if the characters are cast properly, and if their personalities in a movie are kept true to the book. I find it hard to believe Gabriel cast as a well known actor. He needs to be someone who can become Gabriel just like Connery became 007. I never could think of anyone else as 007, no matter how well the acting.
Great article, but while everyone is debating the merits (and demerits) of Lorenzo’s list, I’d like to critique the author himself. I “met” Lorenzo 6 years ago when I was a writer/producer for Law & Order. We wrote a script together over the phone and became friends without ever meeting. I mentioned to the man, who was one of my literary heros, that I had always wanted to be a novelist (what a surprise for a Hollywood writer to say that!) and that I had just finished a novel. Lorenzo, without fanfare, proceeded to call editors, friends, colleagues, etc. to help a very young writer he never met. He gave me confidence and encouragement and was, to say the least, a prince. And when the call Lorenzo made didn’t result in a book sale, he said in only the way Lorenzo can, “Fuck ‘em, they’re stupid. We know you can write.” He’d call me a few times each year, check up on me, and ask about the book. Because of his encouragement, I never gave up, and eventually, years later, the book was published and was a best seller. If Lorenzo hand’t kept telling me not to give up on it, I may have put it on a shelf. Lorenzo is a massive talent – and his talent is dwarfed by his character. He’s a great writer, and a better person.
I don’t necessarily agree that an author should just take the money and shut up if he or she feels their original work will be hurt by the adaptation. Frankly, why bother using a book if you’re going to change everything but the name, and even then sometimes the name? If you’re going to do that then why not come up with something original? While I agree some writers can mess things up it goes both ways, not just the book author but the screen writer as well.
Yeah, I don’t agree with the “shut up and head for the bank” advice, either. Hell, Stephenie Meyer didn’t abide by that, and as lousy a writer as she is, she still now has the kind of Hollywood power the likes of which writers like F. Scott Fitzgerald never even got close to.
Excellent post. I think the rest of Dennis Lehane’s series would be fantastic on the screen as well.
I’d love to see The Dresden Files turned into a film series. It’s got everything that is popular now a days. Sex, Violence, Vampires, Werewolves, Wizards, Occult etc…
The books are really good and while the tv series was lacking it should translate well onto the big screen.
Great story! Do we consider “Sliver” a thriller? The way Ira Levin wrote it, a monkey could have turned it into a screenplay! Yet Eszterhas screwed it up.
God, what I wouldn’t give to see a good adaptation of Mickey Spillane’s Mike Hammer.
I think that Dennis Lehane’s Shutter Island was done beautifully on screen. I finished the book the same day that I saw the film, and I’d have to say the movie, while a bit rushed, was still one of the best adaptations onto film I have seen. There were only a few minor details missing that, after reading the book, I would have liked to see. But the general audience of movie-goers does not take the time to read the novel as well, and I don’t think that they would have missed anything. I am still partial to the book since Dennis Lehane’s descriptive talents are absolutely amazing, but I would also recommend the movie to anyone who wants to hear the story, but doesn’t want to take the time to read the book.
I disagree with his choice of The Talented Mr. Ripley. While it’s a decent adaptation, it’s not as good as some of the other films adapted from Patrica Highsmith’s books. The best movie to come from her books is Hitchcock’s Strangers on a Train. The best of her Ripley series to make it to the screen would be Wim Wenders’ The American Friend with Dennis Hopper and the movie Purple Noon, which is from the same book as the Talented Mr. Ripley. Even Ripley’s Game with John Malkovich was better, I’d say. I wonder if he’s seen any of these, because I don’t know how he could choose Talented Mr. Ripley if he has.
I have to SCREAM in neon lights: the Scarecrow and Jack West Jnr books written by Matthew Reilly.
Come on. If you’re saying Jason Bourne and you loved it, then you’d just devour Matthew Reilly’s amazing, breath-taking, cliff-hanging adventures on the big screen.
Great article. The recent TV show Past Life was based on M.J. Rose’s novel The Reincarnationist and was a truly terrible version of a truly wonderful book. If it was a film it should have been on the 10 worst adaptation list.
“Deep Creek” by Dana Hand would make a fine film–the novel is based on the real-life murders of over 30 Chinese gold miners on the Snake River in 1887, and imagines the hunt for the killers and the sham race-murder trial that followed. Likeable/flawed hero, a take-no-prisoners heroine (half French, half Nez Perce) and a villain who’s scary as hell.
Missing from the “Should be Made” list are Steve Hamilton’s Alex McKnight series, Joe Wambaugh’s Hollywood series and Michael Connelly’s Harry Bosch would make great adaptations. Don’t forget about Robert Crais and Stephen Cannell, who has plenty of movie and tv experience to build a movie with his Shane Scully character. A studio probably wouldn’t need to hire a writer for the screenplays.
that’s a great idea to make movie based on book..
but it’s really a hard challenge for the director, so the reader won’t be disappointed with their films..