
Roll Over Or Get Tough… I Have Choices… Fighting 4 You… All sound like campaign slogans. And they are, but not for a political race: they are slogans used by cable companies and networks in more and more public battles over carriage agreements. This trend of launching a website to rally public opinion intensified in December, about a week before Time Warner’s and Fox’s agreement was about to expire. TWC launched RollOverOrGetTough.com, followed immediately by Fox’s KeepFoxOn.com. After the two sides reached a new deal on New Year’s Day, TWC’s site went dormant until the company reactivated it earlier this week as part of preparation for the upcoming standoff with Disney over ABC, ESPN, and other cable networks. (Their current agreement expires on September 2nd.) Disney’s response was a new site, IHaveChoices.com, which went live today, urging viewers in TWC markets to switch providers ahead of the Sept. 2 deadline.
This is the earliest I’ve seen companies involved in carriage negotiations start campaigning, a possible indication that the battle will be tough. For now, the two sides are actively talking with no signs of impasse. But they have checkered past (anyone remembers the ABC blackout on TWC systems during May sweep in 2000?) and the issue of retransmission consent fees for broadcast stations’ signal is a thorny one. In fact, also this week, TWC, along with most leading cable and satellite providers, telcos and a couple of cable channels announced the launch of American Television Alliance with the goal of putting pressure on the FCC to revise retransmission consent rules so stations can’t pull their signal if renegotiations fail. Not surprisingly, the only big cable or satellite operator missing from the list of partners in the alliance is Comcast, which is lying low as it is going through the process of regulatory approval for its proposed merger with NBC Universal. Somewhat surprisingly, pay cable network Starz is on.
With all that sabre-rattling, there was one carriage dispute story with a happy ending this week when Rainbow Media and AT&T U-Verse agreed on a new deal, keeping AMC and its upcoming season of Mad Men on for some 2.3 AT&T U-Verse subscribers. In its campaign, AT&T also used a Web site, Fighting4You.
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.


Disingenuous behavior by all sides. If all sides were concerned about their customers as they claim to be, then we would have ala carte pricing.
Until then, we have some very big companies arguing who gets first crack at the bent-over customer.
If you have any questions about TWC negotiations with ESPN and ABC please feel free to reach out on Twitter:
http://twitter.com/i_have_choices
or on Facebook:
http://twitter.com/ihavechoices
There’s a nifty service provider lookup tool on http://www.ihavechoices.com if you need it!
-Peter Corbett (@corbett3000)
I suppose one could argue that such campaigns over carriage disputes at least show signs of competition in the marketplace. What’s going to happen when Comcast takes over NBC Universal? Do you you really think NBC Uni will really get into a dispute with Comcast over carrying a subsidiary network like Bravo? Doubtful. But they will have every interest in holding TimeWarner Cable’s feet to the fire over any of their family of cable networks.
this just shows how in the end the customers wind up losing as the big cable companies in their desire to be tops will do anything including risking pulling channels if they can not get carriages companys to pay them what they want. another reason ala carte packages should be allowed to happen. it will get worse once comcast has nbc in its clutches
It’s not different than when the teachers’ unions use to scream “we need more money – it’s for the children.” Eventually everyone knew it was just a for them to get higher salaries, and that chicken little antic no longer works. The same thing will happen with cable companies and carriers. Eventually everyone will realize it’s just a ploy to try and justify higher rates and maybe, just maybe, customers won’t fall for it anymore.
I believe as customers we deserve to have choices. I want Time Warner in Glendale and any other company that wants to be in Glendale and any other city. One cable company is ridiculous and a monopoly. They cheat customers by raising the bill every time they want to. TV used to be free. This is highway robbery and cruel. Seniors would like cable and can’t have it. That is why they eat dog food. Dog food is cheap. This is just plain mean and cruel. Rent is highway robbery. Taxes are sinful. And the officials in Bell, CA make 800,000 dollars a year for doing nothing.
I think it’s a shame that because Disney now owns ABC & wants more money, they are threatening TWC users. I’m not going to go to the expense & headaches of changing TV service, so I suppose I’ll just watch the other channels. Good-bye ABC
My comment will be short and direct: Bottom line is both ABC and TWC serving their own interests, i.e., increase their rates to line their pockets with more money, not the public’s. The big picture: money
If u 2 do not work out your differences there will be many Cable TV subscribers that will switch for sure. There are many programs that everyone watches & if u can’t provide them they will switch. Hope u can work things out.
I believe that this is a pile of BS…everytime we turn around, time warner is talking about removing a station, that people actually watch. There are other companies to choose from, so let’s get it together and stop Monopoly syndrome that is plaguing time warner….These stations give us our emergency broadcast alerts, and keep us up to date on Amber alerts, and weather emergencies.