Details Of Matthew Vaughn’s UK-Hollywood Film Plan
Hollywood studios have a long history of shooting blockbusters in England. For instance, Britain’s Pinewood Shepperton has been the location of choice for big Hollywood blockbusters like the Harry Potter, James Bond and Batman franchises. But for all intents and purposes the U.S. majors have viewed the 20% UK tax credit they receive for making films here as free money. Now Matthew Vaughn, director of X Men: First Class which is just about to start shooting here, is floating an interesting suggestion. He is proposing that Hollywood majors who take advantage of the 20% British tax credit then repay the money in the event of a hit — and plough that portion of the profits into a UK film fund backing British-produced pics.
“The thing I’m annoyed about,” Vaughn tells me, “is how many movies are made in Britain without any British money in them. It’s tragic how we’ve handled things. Most British producers think it’s an achievement even getting a film made. My goal is that we won’t even need Hollywood money in 10 years’ time.”
Vaughn tells me that the UK needs to monetize that 20% studio tax credit. Since Hollywood needs investor equity now that Wall Street money has dried up, the studios could count on UK plc as a firm partner that takes a secondary equity position. “In today’s cash-strapped world, ‘soft equity’ is a valuable commodity for studios and producers alike,” Vaugh insists. “Looking at the UK’s position as a production centre, the country has a strong hand and should play to it.”
Simply put, the fund will match cash invested by other private investors and split its profit share with the producer once it has recouped its investment. However, the fund would be aimed at commercial, rather than arthouse films. Producers must either have a U.S. studio on board or a big-hitting sales agent who has pre-sold the film to at least two major territories. Only then will the fund come in.
Vaughn acknowledges the risk of Hollywood quitting England atogether and basing productions elsewhere. Attracting Hollywood is, after all, a competitive race between nations as to who can provide the most attractive package. i mean, rival counties such as France won’t be asking for their 20% tax breaks back. But, Vaughn tells me, “We’re convinced that the U.S. film industry will keep coming back to England.” Also, trying to get Hollywood to say that a film’s gone into profit is like trying to nail custard to a wall. Deadline ran a story recently showing Warner Bros accounting still doesn’t acknowledge that a recent Harry Potter film has seen a dime. Maintains Vaughn: “I know what deals can be structured. There’s a reason why investors like Legendary keep coming back to Warner Bros. The way we’ve structured [the film fund plan], it’s a win/win for Britain and Hollywood.”

I won’t pretend to know anything about the financials but from what I see the British Film Industry currently consists of Keira Knightley in corsets and films about ‘the streets’. There are many more films but none of them get seen because of the system, and because people aren’t that interested in seeing low-budget dramas when they could be seeing fighting robots.
I think Vaughn can help the industry. All of his films have been successful and have made money. Making low-budget Oscar fare is all well and good but if they don’t make any money then no more movies can be made.
I don’t know anything about financials either but I do know Vaughn’s “successes” have usually been low-budget straight-to-DVD affairs that didn’t have much of a hurdle to get over, like Layer Cake (budget of 6 mil/grossed 11), or Harry Brown (budget 7 mil/grossed almost 10).
His bigger-budget stuff has wound up having to crawl across the finish line (Stardust flopped in the US was was saved solely by int’l box-office) or they just don’t make it at all –people are still trying to figure out if Kick-Ass has (or will) recoup it’s total budget.
And if I were Vaughn I’d be concentrating on trying to untangle the unspeakable mess he’s making X-Men:First Class into.
Agree!
Yep, this sounds like exactly the kind of fund that UK needs. There’s definitely a lot of great commercial ideas in the UK that have struggled to get funding because of a disconnect with investors, and by being hindered by the UKFC, directly and indirectly.
This is a great idea. It should really help UK filmmakers.
Hilarious.
“… sharing in studio profits.”
“The fund will split its profit share with the producer once it’s recouped its investment.”
“Hollywood” exports its production to various countries and states BECAUSE of the FREE MONEY (i.e., “bribes”) offered by those various countries and states.
When the “free money” is no longer offered, “Hollywood” will simply relocate to the next country or state where it is being offered.
Producers would film “X-Men: First Class” in HELL if Satan offered a 50% tax incentive.
I’m offended that you would dare suggest that producers would film in Hades if the price was right. What a low opinion!
BTW my former boss just texted me – asked me if you had Prince of Darkness contact info. Wants to set up a meet at The Kress.
When Hollywood needs to share its profits, it will take all financing in-house. That’s filmmaking 101, and Vaughn should know that.
Studios will just take their films elsewhere to cheaper locations; digital technology makes that very very easy. Vaughn, wake the hell up.
What percentage does Vancouver give back in taxes? I find it odd that the last two(not the Wolverine movie) X-Men films we’re filmed in Vancouver but this one isn’t? What’s up with that? Apparenty(ask George Lucas) crew members in the UK are difficult to work with due to strict labour laws so why would a Hollywood Productions go all the way to England when Vancouver is less then 5 hours away? I don’t get it
JUST WATCH! ALL THE STUDIOS WILL GIVE BRITAIN “NET POINTS”!
“Sorry, Sir Charles, but even though our movie made over $893 MILLION – it’s still in the RED! So go blow yourself.” “Save Pinewood? Fuck that…we’ll shoot in a converted aircraft hanger.”