The following is a joint filing submitted to the Federal Communications Commission today by a broad coalition of entertainment industry guilds, unions and studios, including AFTRA, DGA, IATSE, SAG and the MPAA who have combined forces to speak with one voice on the issue of Internet theft through a single filing.
The joint filing is in response to the FCC’s request for comments on a framework for broadband services, and addresses the possibility that the FCC will choose to reclassify the Internet as a telecommunications service subject to regulation under Title II. Please find excerpts from the filing below:
• “As creators of content, we realize that the theft of copyrighted works is the ultimate discouragement of content. The content protection measures that we have proposed only discourage the outright theft of copyrighted content, while protecting jobs and fostering creativity and American ingenuity. We believe that an open Internet offers tremendous promise for the proliferation of diverse audiovisual content, sound recordings, and myriad other forms of expression – it is those who break the law by exploiting these works without appropriately compensating their creators and financiers who discourage the creation of content.”
• “The Guilds, Unions, and MPAA do not believe that Title II regulation is either necessary or desirable to achieve the public policy goals the Commission has articulated for broadband and an open Internet. But whether the Commission reclassifies under Title II or finds a new basis for ancillary jurisdiction under Title I, the Guilds, Unions, and MPAA believe the Commission’s ultimate goal remains a clear, enforceable set of rules defining an “open Internet” framework. Whether under the Title II rubric of “reasonable non-discrimination” or otherwise, the Commission must provide clear and unambiguous guidance so that BIAPs can design their networks to include innovative solutions to online theft without fear of liability.”
Click here to download complete filing.






Net Neutrality simply means don’t discriminate internet traffic. That’s it. To oppose that is to oppose the freedom of information that built the internet itself.
Where’s the WGA???
I am appalled at SAG. Seriously, has ANYONE over there done any homework?
Have they spent even two minutes to get educated on sites like at http://www.savetheinternet.com?
Do they have ANY idea what they are doing right now?
I wish people at SAG headquarters had spent even an hour a day online over the past year. Then they might have an idea of the level of stupidity in fighting Net Neutrality.
I’d like to second Justine’s comments.
Verizon and Google have made their intentions quite clear. They want to stifle the dissemination of independent content by forcing it into the slow lane. Their intentions are no different than those of ATT, Comcast, and the other big players.
We the people through our Federal government got the Internet going long before the corporations recognized the value of it, swooped in and pretended it was theirs all along.
With content dissemination moving away from physical media – newspapers, DVDs – the Internet is fasting becoming the single most important means by which the citizens of the US, nay, the world, may become informed and make informed decisions.
What’s at stake here is not just studio profits, but democracy in the US. This is as fundamental a First Amendment issue as any our republic has ever faced.
These unions’ equivocation on this is tragic. They did their best to weasel-word their way into their opposition of Net Neutrality, and Justine to her credit saw right through it.
George W. Bush famously said, “If you’re not with us, you’re against us.” These unions and the MPAA have lined up against the First Amendment. They need to get on the right side of freedom of speech, on the right side of democracy, and they need to do it now.
The unions are spot on here. Those who believe that net neutrality and piracy are not related are simply not educated in the matter. The pro-net-neutraliy lobby is heavily funded by corporations that have a vested interest in piracy. If you don’t believe it, you’re drinking too much Kool Aid.
Net neutrality would have positives, but the proposed legislation would also eliminate the right of ISPs to block illegal contraband (piracy). The unions are saying that any net neutrality legislation should be worded so that piracy can still be stopped. This is just like UPS and FedEX having the right to scan your packages for illegal weapons. There is no downside to fighting piracy, except for the assholes who want to keep stealing movies. For those losers, I have no sympathy.