EXCLUSIVE: A real battle is brewing between rival aliens-invade-Los Angeles films Skyline and Battle: Los Angeles. Sony Pictures Entertainment, the studio behind the big budget Battle: Los Angeles, is exploring its legal options. At issue: Greg and Colin Strause, the owners of visual effects house Hydraulx, were paid millions of dollars to generate visual effects work for Battle: Los Angeles. But Hydraulx never informed SPE the siblings were directing a VFX-driven rival alien invasion feature that will hit theaters four months before SPE’s March 12, 2011 release. SPE higher-ups discovered it was in a real horse race after Universal Pictures released a trailer that showed Los Angeles denizens being vacuumed into the sky by hovering space ships.
SPE lawyers have just started digging into the matter. This can be viewed as a Goliath vs. David story considering that the Strause brothers shot most of their film in an apartment, with the entire film costing a fraction of what SPE has spent for a full-scale alien battle film. But Skyline created strong buzz at Comic-Con that will give it a wide release through Relativity and Universal Pictures. Battle: Los Angeles could certainly have its thunder stolen. At issue: did Hydraulx and its owners owe SPE a heads-up?
And is SPE trying to create a legal issue with a film that can’t afford it, to leverage a release date change that delays Skyline?
Hydraulx Filmz is a major VFX company for commercials and cutting-edge visual films that have included Avatar, 300, Terminator 3, The Day After Tomorrow, Constantine, X-Men: The Last Stand, and the SPE hit 2012. Hydraulx was hired by SPE in early 2009 to be one of the primary VFX vendors on Battle: Los Angeles. That gave Hydraulx access to proprietary information that included script drafts, storyboards, and pre-viz animatics. The Strause brothers had already seen the Battle: Los Angeles script, I’m told, because they were considered as potential directors.
Now, Skyline didn’t exactly come out of nowhere. Deadline exclusively splashed a story in May about the film when Relativity Media acquired the picture–Brett Ratner was the catalyst and is a producer–at a time when IM Global’s Stuart Ford had brokered deals for most major world territories. I reported the plot—four friends return from a night of hard partying to down L.A., slowly realize they are among a small group of survivors after most of humanity was wiped out by a deadly unknown force, and I mentioned an “extraterrestrial twist.”
Sources said that SPE looked at the film at that time. But SPE legal only to delve into the conflict of interest issue after Comic-Con. One day after SPE previewed a Battle: Los Angeles trailer and introduced its cast, Universal Pictures debuted its Skyline trailer, with the Strause brothers presiding over a panel.
Making the situation even more incestuous is that Battlefield: Los Angeles is part of the slate financing deal that Ryan Kavanaugh’s Relativity has with SPE, and he acquired Skyline.
Skyline will be released November 12 by Universal. I’m told the questions that SPE legal are asking include whether Hydraulx’s work on Battle: Los Angeles served as a springboard for Skyline, or gave the Strause brothers access to equipment that helped bolster the visual effects on their small budget film. SPE’s position is that at minimum, the Hydraulx principals should have disclosed their intention to make the rival project, to avoid any conflict of interest issues. Expect the legal letters to begin flying shortly.
A rep for the Strause issued a statement: “Any claims of impropriety are completely baseless. This is a blatant attempt by Sony to force these independent filmmakers to move a release date that has long been set by Universal and Relativity and is outside the filmmakers’ control.” SPE declined comment as did Relativity.



Sure smells like a rip off to me. I saw the Battle footage at Comic-Con, looks bad ass!!!
How, if the film was aquired in May by Relativity and Universal does this statement hold water?
“…to force these independent filmmakers to move a release date that has long been set by Universal and Relativity and is outside the filmmakers’ control.”
A release date that’s long been set is 10 weeks?? Hmmmmmmmm
Skyline looks like a cheap wannabe blockbuster, whereas Battle has a great cast and interestingly unique take on alien invasion (by making it like a first person shooter/Saving Private Ryan style where you feel like you’re fighting alongside the marines).
Finished or in production are alien invasion movies:
BATTLE FOR LA
SKYLINE
THE DARKEST HOUR
DARK SKIES
BATTLESHIP
AMONG US
PACIFIC RIM
four others I can’t remember and another handful recently announced for TV beyond V.
Add MONSTERS to that.
By the way, PACIFIC RIM doesn’t actually feature aliens despite what the trades said.
Just trying to keep you right.
scanning for impropriety…yes, duh. and I guess they don’t need SONY’s VFX money anymore???
Now I’m torn between which movie to not see first.
I saw both panels at Comic-Con, Skyline seemed pretty cool.
I don’t think it really matters. There is plenty of room for aliens to kill us all. Haven’t seen much from Battle LA, but Skyline teaser looks rad–especially for an indie flick!
Skyline was super-cool at the Con
and looks at least some-what original. I think there are a bunch of planted comments on here…
They both look like District 9 knock offs.
Really?
They both have aliens that landed 20 years ago and are now populating a small part of the city from which the humans are trying to evict them?
Really?
I’ll take a look at both of them when they come on PPV…but neither one will get box office from me. Done before…I smell Hurt Locker in Battle.
I saw the theatrical teaser for Skyline, and it ‘s pretty awesome. But I’m sure once we see more than that (like it’s cheap effects and cast), it will look horrible. My advice to Uni: don’t even cut a regular trailer. No TV spots with any new footage, no giving away half the movie as exclusive clips online. Just continue to tease like it’s Paranormal Activity or something.
Screw ‘Skyline’. H*ll will freeze over before I pay to watch Dan Rather’s face on the screen; nor will I pay one cent for the ‘privilege’ of hearing a self-righteous lecture on the evils of the white man. I go to films for entertainment – not sermons.
And I come here to read the thoughts of rational people with regards to the movie business, not some rant by a person who is so insecure they see Dan Rather as a serious threat to the plight of white people. I’m pretty sure Dan Rather was used in the *trailer* to give the movie an air of realism and that’s about it.
Wow. You must be a pretty poor representative of the white race to be so angry at something so silly. Dan Rather and Lawrence O’Donnell didn’t “film” those scenes. they were clips from newscast of Professor Hawking’s theory, which he released a few months ago. Those statement’s were perfectly in context. perhaps you should do more to better your life rather than take out your angst on the decline of white privilege in this country.
SPE was being cheap hiring an outside vendor instead of their own Imageworks division to do the effects for their film, and now they are upset that their decision to trip over dollars to save dimes will bite them in the ass. Boo Hoo.
You do realize that any big effects film has dozens of visual effects houses working on it, right?
ILM and Sony Imageworks batter than Hydraulx. hahhaha+
This smells of Dante’s Peak vs Volcano…
In the end, they both sucked.
Guess which effects house won’t be doing any SPE films. Truth is I saw the Skyline teaser or trailer whatever it was. My first thought was it would have made a better commercial for Dyson. Sucking up humans like a vacuum, really? Not exactly suspenseful. There’s a reason effects houses don’t make good films…because they make effects, not scripts.
And neither of them have watched Independence Day, right?
Or V?
Or War of the Worlds?
However, I think Hydraulx should have informed the client, the guys paying them, that they were planning this. Their bad.
Oh brother, this problem again? Remember ROBIN HOOD (Kevin Costner’s) vs the other Robin Hoods? Remember the plot of BIG (Tom Hanks) and the 4 other tv & feature movies that ripped it off-from the George Burns pic to Judge Reingold’s, etc.? The two dumb Volcano movies? And today we have two different 20,000 LEAGUES UNDER THE SEA pics competing to reach the screen.
Happens all the time. As as of filmdom’s biggest attorneys once told me: “So what? The studio’s indemnified, so they go ahead and see how far they can go. It’s business as ususal.”
The issue here in not rival films with similar subject matter – as you point out that has happened several times with well-publicised results.
The issue here for genuine film-making professionals is that there is strong, reliable word out there amongst the pro-VFX community that the Hydraulix guys “borrowed” VFX assets from the Sony movie.
That’s a major “no-no” and these guys reputation will pay heavily for that kinda indescretion.
It’s a small business…
I can’t believe Hollywood made two films about aliens invading Los Angeles. Who cares? Let the aliens have it!
I think they’ve already attacked and sucked up Manny Ramirez’s brain.
The draft of BATTLE:LA that Sony bought is still one of the worst ‘studio level’ scripts I’ve read in the past few years. Truly awful.
It read like a child with ADD had decided to write what it was like playing Modern Warfare online……while he was playing it.
And Chad St John’s script The Days Before that Warners bought in November 2008 heavily featured humans being ‘frozen’ and then ‘sucked’ up by huge alien space craft.
Long story short? Neither project is coming from a strong position creatively.
I’ll just wait for a ‘proper’ alien invasion film rather than these grainy, flat, shuddering, low budget efforts.
Really? That’s sad to hear. I’m a sucker for sci-fi. Yet for me, the cheesiness of, say, an Independence Day sort of takes the joy out of that genre.
It seemed like Battle for Los Angeles could be gritty and non-cheese, but is it really that bad story wise? What about Skyline?
At what point does it become a conflict of interest? If their film was also action? If their film involved aliens but not LA? Legally I don’t think it holds water. I think both will do well but Skyline will be considered the bigger success because of its lower budget
Sony was offered Skyline first as a show of good faith by the Brothers Strause. They passed because of Battle LA. Now they’re upset because Universal set an aggressive release date. That’s it.
“The Strause brothers had already seen the Battle: Los Angeles script, I’m told, because they were considered as potential directors.” They didn’t get the job and proceeded to make their own rival alien movie, betting against their clients. Poor taste indeed
Fuck! That’s when my District 9 prequel was supposed to come out.
The Strause brothers run a sweatshop in Santa Monica called Hydraulx. They love to skirt both overtime rules and payroll tax laws. They will clock you out if you get up from your desk to use the washroom. Maybe karma is finally catching up.
If this is true then I hope that Battle turns out to be the better movie. I actually believe that it will. Did you see the teaser for Skyline? There were these two cops standing in front of an alien ship after the vacuum, and one had his gun drawn, and they both looked like they were from a video game from like 2001.
Not that I don’t believe you, but I’m gonna need a source on that. That would be good reading.
You know why it took so long to get “Battle: Los Angeles” made? Because every director in Hollywood came in after reading the draft and said, “Yeah, I’ll make it, but it needs this change and that change and this change to make it even remotely coherent.” After word got out, the director who eventually made the movie went in, said that he wouldn’t change a line and was hired immediately.
you pulled my comment… OK – here is my adjusted version for censors:
I guess this is what it sounds like… the VFX house (owned by strause brothers) is using the assets that the studio paid for! SKYLINE probably did cost only a fraction of BATTLE LA as the most expensive part (VFX) was paid by SPE – in which case they – the strause brothers, are the DAVID – using your D.vs G. analogy.