The California Assembly today passed AB 2479 by a margin of 43-13 to impose penalties of up to $5,000, with the possibility of jail time, for paparazzi who drive recklessly and endanger celebrities and the general public. The legislation passed on the anniversary of the 1997 death of Princess Diana, who was killed in a Paris car crash as she and her boyfriend and their security were fleeing the stalkarazzi. Depending on your POV, this law which now goes to Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to sign is either badly needed legislation to control a public menace or an unnecessary restriction on press freedom.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: I believe the only way to stop outrageous behavior by the photogs is to hold responsible the editors of those magazines and websites willing to pay outrageous prices for celebrity pictures. None of this would be happening if the photos weren’t worth big bucks in newsstand sales or online traffic. Of course, the public is at fault for wanting to see the snaps or videos in the first place. But I say that if a stalkarazzi is getting too rough and tumble, then the mag or web editor who assigns or publishes those photos and footage is as much morally and legally at fault as the picture taker.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.



Maybe we need to go after the publishers too, but this is good news. I got caught up in a paparazzi chase in Beachwood Canyon, and one car whipped around me and blew through a stop sign at 40 mph. So often, they only pass laws after a local example of “the horse is already gone” – a toddler dead on the street, for example – so I applaud them for trying to keep that from happening in L.A.
Publishers should be forbidden to use unstaged, ‘captured’ photos of celebs. That would but an end to the problem.
Actors could go about their days work at peace and their big heads just might deflate in the process.
Then they cold be people just like the rest of us….even if they make 10 bjillion $$SS per project.
But if you are a star and you drive recklessly and endanger the public, you will receive a suspended sentence and a book deal. That is to say, if you are held to account at all, which you likely won’t be.
@Oy vey, beautifully said. What a negligent waste of taxpayer resources during these lean times. Another instance of celebrity rule of the CA judicial system. There are many ’causes’ more pressing, and to a greater swath of people, than an infrequent actor chase. Grew up on the westside, never seen a pap chase. Let’s get rid of all celebrity coverage.. the actors will be starting high speed chases for attention, unless some do already. Meanwhile, many celebs could simply not live in the hornet’s nest of Los Angeles, but they choose to.
Can someone explain to me how sites like TMZ can profit from photos of celebs 1) without their permission, and 2) without paying the celebs?
Has no one thought of suing them for money for unauthorized use?
Hollywood Celebs ARE regular people who just happen to have entertainment industry related jobs. I don’t think the general public is half as fascinated by those celeb photos as any editor thinks, so call off the stalkers. What happened to Princess Diana was beyond insanity. SOLUTION: Establish photo, and no-photo zones in Hollywood. Anyone within a photo zone will consent to some nice photos for the press, anyone outside this zone will be uncooperative as hell. Be creative, a little mooning maybe,-payback.
The celebrity image business should be required to pay celebrities for use of their likeness. That would end all this nonsense.
Tell it! Some schmuck who can score 50 grand for a picture isn’t going to be stopped by silly street rules or more rules! They were already breaking the law by driving recklessly. Too little, too late.
Finke is on the money on this; if you don’t cut it off at the source (the guys paying the big bucks) then nothing is going to change. The dolts who argue “Well, but, this is something… this will stop someone…” NO! It means the idiots who have the slightest bit of self-respect will slow down and *not* get the shot so the incentive will goto the idiots who really don’t care, who are willing to take more risks, who don’t have moral responsibility.
All it did was raise the price of those pictures.
The pap’s are parasites, and blaming the American public is off-point. Only a small percentage of the country buys or cares about these trash mag’s. But it’s enough to turn a profit, especially when advertisers throw money at anything and everything, thinking a full-page pic of vodka will make me run out and buy vodka.
The pap’s really need to find some level of shame in their being. Just because a percentage of Americans might like cocaine, doesn’t mean you should go out and become a dealer.