Ray Richmond is contributing to Deadline’s 2010 Emmy coverage. Here’s his scorecard assessing the Outstanding Drama Series race:
MAD MEN (AMC – Lionsgate TV)
Why It Was Nominated: The critics rave. The fans swoon. But the masses yawn. Fortunately for AMC, the masses don’t get to choose the Emmy nominations. But no Industry type believes AMC’s Mad Men doesn’t deserve to at least try for a 3rd consecutive Primetime Emmy. After all, The West Wing won four Emmys in a row.
Why It Has To Win: The fact that the show launched its new season last month (and to raves) is a shrewd move on the part of AMC to create fresh buzz. As one producer told me: “At this point, the show’s reputation precedes it. But that doesn’t mean it doesn’t deserve to win.”
Why It Can’t Possibly Win: Roughly seven times more households tuned to the Lost finale on ABC in May than watched Mad Men‘s Season 4 premiere in July. That greatly shakes up the voting equation. More to the point, can Matthew Weiner shake off some bad press after last year’s win? (The young female staff writer who’d won the 2009 drama-writing Emmy with Weiner quit Mad Men before she could be let go by him.)
LOST (ABC – Grass Skirts Prod w/ ABC Network & Studios)
Why It Was Nominated: Had the voters failed to nominate it, Lost‘s multitudes of fans might have marched on the TV Academy headquarters. The show had a buzzworthy final season that dominated not just watercooler talk but also Industry dialogue.
Why It Has To Win: Before cable became the place where quality lives, voters would have easily anointed a show that brought as much excitement to broadcast network primetime as the Lost finale did. (Remember, more of the Academy work in network TV than for cable outlets.) Plus, TV folks are suckers for a good swan song. (Witness the final season wins of The Sopranos and Everybody Loves Raymond.)
Why It Can’t Possibly Win: A show this odd and surreal takes more commitment than watching only a couple of episodes as part of a judging panel. The finale created a furor about whether the show’s conceit was overblown. There also could remain some lingering resentment over rumors Carlton Cuse secretly went back to work during the writers strike even though he was on the WGA negotiating committee.
THE GOOD WIFE (CBS – CBS Prod)
Why It Was Nominated: It’s a tried-and-true network procedural wrapped in a juicy premise. And yet, even though the show borrowed from the Eliot Spitzer sex scandal and focused on his wife Silda, it deliberately wasn’t lurid. Instead, some fortuitous scheduling, and compelling performances by Julianna Margulies, Alan Cumming, and Christine Baranski, made the rookie series stand out from the crowd.
Why It Has To Win: Producers Tony Scott/Ridley Scott bring the prestige of a cinematic pedigree. But, more to the point, The Good Wife is the only show among nominees that has that retro feel recalling when network TV was in its prime and actor parts were big and juicy.
Why It Can’t Possibly Win: Producers Tony Scott/RidleyScott bring the baggage of a cinematic pedigree. And Margulies’ subtle work seems somnambulant to some. Besides, the last time CBS won this category was 16 years ago for David E. Kelley’s quirky Picket Fences. But The Good Wife may need another season to inspire the voters. “I think people in the Academy would like to show some love for a broadcast series like Good Wife that doesn’t try too hard to compete with cable in terms of content,” one writer says. “But I doubt that will be enough to beat Mad Men or Lost because everyone I know is voting for one or the other.”
BREAKING BAD (AMC – Sony Pictures TV)
Why It Was Nominated: It is, pure and simple, a great show about an edgy subject that only got greater during its 3rd season. Bryan Cranston brings a tortured intensity to his lead performance that’s as hypnotically brilliant as any found on any screen in any year.
Why It Has To Win: People seem to root for showrunner Vince Gilligan, known as an unassuming guy who runs a tight ship but gets the best out of his below-the-line crew by creating camaraderie. It helps too also have expert production and perfect casting.
Why It Can’t Possibly Win: The TV Academy doesn’t typically bestow honors on shows this unrelentingly dark and depressing. And the meth lab storyline is hardly TV Academy-friendly. And while it is every bit Mad Men’s equal in terms of acting, writing and production, Breaking Bad tends to get overshadowed by its AMC stablemate at the Emmys (except in the lead actor category). “It’s a better show than Mad Men,” a producer tells me, “but it seems to get shafted on the marketing side by comparison.”
DEXTER (SHOWTIME – John Goldwyn Prod, The Colleton Co, Clyde Phillips Prod)
Why It Was Nominated: Dexter’s 4th season killed in every sense of the word, helped by the nuanced performance of Industry favorite John lithgow. Besides, this is the show’s 3rd consecutive category nomination.
Why It Has To Win: A buzz builds every year for this show to pull off not just an upset win but also Showtime’s first in a top series category. This could be Dexter‘s year, also considering the sympathetic outpouring for star Hall and his successful recovery from Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
Why It Can’t Possibly Win: The show has been off ethe pay channel since last December, and, no matter what the Academy may say about judging the submitted episodes, shows long out of circulation tend to get forgotten by the voters.
TRUE BLOOD (HBO – Your Face Goes Here Ent w/ HBO Ent)
Why It Was Nominated: This is a very good question. And the first vampire show to be so honored. Credit showrunner Alan Ball whose involvement elevated the you’ve-got-to-be-kidding-me subject matter.
Why It Has To Win: Vampire mania remains in vogue, and the TV community can appreciate a big fat hit that made for HBO’s highest ratings since the glory days of Tony and Carmela. Plus Ball is considered an engaging and inclusive guy on set.
Why It Can’t Possibly Win: Vampire mania remains in contempt. As one TV Academy member promised me, “If True Blood wins the Emmy, I’ll drive a stake through someone’s heart.” Also count on lingering resentment that True Blood beat out shows more deserving of an Emmy nomination like Big Love, Damages, Friday Night Lights, and Rescue Me.


Excuse me, but how in the world was Friday Night Lights not nominated for outstanding drama?! It is absolutely ludicrous to me that anyone could watch that show and not instantly recognize it as at least one of the six best dramas on television, if not the best.
Total joke.
More hyperbole please.
Why didn’t Buffy ever get nominated for Best Drama? It really deserved it.
It wasn’t on HBO.
And thus bereft of HBO’s ocean of payola…
You’re kidding, right?
It had hardly any real actors in it? The production quality was dire?
Other than a few good episodes, it was pretty badly-written? Ever seen the episode “Beer Bad”? It has to be one of the worst written hours of TV in history.
Seriously, you HAVE to be kidding.
I wish Big Love was nominated. Their last season was so powerful. Easily replace Mad Men with it. As you pointed out, mass audiences don’t care. Most people have heard of Mad Men, but haven’t watched it and only know that it’s about an advertising agency.
Terrible logic here…the masses don’t care about “Big Love” either.
And even if they did, if we’re going to make our awards decisions based on what the masses care about, then the winners this year should be like Grey’s Anatomy and Two and a Half Men. I’m sure everyone here would be thrilled with that.
Plus, didn’t at least one of the Big Love cast members acknowledge how poor this season was in comparison to past ones?
Friday Night Lights absolutely deserves to be in the mix, but this is a pretty strong list, and four of the potential winners would be quite deserving.
The last season of Big Love that aired in early 2010 was an absolute trainwreck – so bad, in fact, that even the cast members were appalled by how poorly their characters were written. I enjoyed the show for the first few seasons but it degenerated into a nonsensical soap opera and needs to get back on track STAT. And since when does an Emmy nomination only get bestowed upon what the mass audience (who could care less about such things) tends to watch? The award is for the best written, best acted highest quality drama, and that clearly goes to Mad Men or Breaking Bad, or even Lost Seasons 4 or 5 (but not this past one – ugh!).
Agreed. Big Love is one of the best written shows on television. Definitely deserves to be competing again this year.
“True Blood beat out shows more deserving of an Emmy nomination like Big Love, Damages, Friday Night Lights, and Rescue Me.”
Rescue Me. for season 5? you’re kidding. besides, the series is eligible for this years emmys?
I love True Blood, Mad Men, and Lost… but that last season of Dexter stayed with me. I still find myself thinking about that season, which I haven’t watched since Christmas. Honestly, that show is the perfect balance between the sexy, campy brain candy that is ‘True Blood’ and the stylish, intellectual yet ultimately melodramatic ‘Mad Men.’
I can’t talk about Lost.
Thanks God the ‘masses’ don’t get to vote: Mad Men is excellent.
I was a fan of Lost, but its final two seasons were terrible.
NOTES TO RAY RICHMOND: Hey, dope – you do NOT compare a cable channel’s ratings to a full Network’s ratings. Even a simpleton knows this. ANY network’s ratings will be cable… so your comparison of AMC’s MAD MEN to ABC’s LOST is absolutely NOT applicable. Hope you learn your lesson for today.
ALSO – Emmy nominations are not based on POPULARITY… it’s is supposedly for QUALITY. Got that? So MAD MEN is not in a popularity contest here… something important for you to know.
THIRDLY – Emmy’s are NOT given out on the basis of BUZZ. Some of the lowest-rated cable show ever have won for best drama series. Go back and check the record – seems you need to.
LASTLY – just because you have a hard jones for LOST doesn’t mean a damn. Get over it and get real. There are easily as many people who hated/never watched LOST as those non-fans of MAD MEN… SO WHAT?? Let me guess, Ray – You’re reaaaaaally amazed – right?
NOTES TO RAY RICHMOND: Hey, dope – you do NOT compare a cable channel’s ratings to a full Network’s ratings. Even a simpleton knows this. ANY network’s ratings will be cable… so your comparison of AMC’s MAD MEN to ABC’s LOST is absolutely NOT applicable. Hope you learn your lesson for today.
ALSO – Emmy nominations are not based on POPULARITY… it’s is supposedly for QUALITY. Got that? So MAD MEN is not in a popularity contest here… something important for you to know.
THIRDLY – Emmy’s are NOT given out on the basis of BUZZ. Some of the lowest-rated cable show ever have won for best drama series. Go back and check the record – seems you need to.
LASTLY – just because you have a hard jones for LOST doesn’t mean a damn. Get over it and get real. There are easily as many people who hated/never watched LOST as those non-fans of MAD MEN… SO WHAT?? Let me guess, Ray – You’re reaaaaaally amazed – right?
It is LOST for me in a walk.
Dexter and Breaking Bad are brilliant.
Mad Men is pretentious and Weiner was cruel to his fellow writer on stage. Then fired her. He should be brought up on charges for verbal abuse and a hostile work environment from the word around town.
The age of the TV academy is why this show is nominated for a weak season.
The Good Wife shouldn’t have been nominated over Friday Night Lights or Rescue Me.
Can’t ever game the Emmys, Ray. It doesn’t work. The voting is bizarre.
True Blood does NOT deserve it. With last weeks episode, the show has de-evolved to the level of a repulsive, grade B splatter film, filled with (literal) geysers of blood and viscera, too over-the-top to be taken seriously. Additionally, there are clues that the show is going to start delving into the whole fairy world story line that the Harris books have followed. Is this really what we look for in a best drama winner? Christ, I hope not.
Couldn’t agree more. The acting is awful, the production quality is awful, the scripts are awful. No way it should be nominated for anything, never mind win.
Plus, lets face it, we are all sick to death of emasculated vampire love stories.
It’s fine TV for 14 year old girls, but it’s of no value or interest to anyone else.
Lost all the way — it has been so crafty in every episode and deserves to win for best drama. Mad Men is good but another award?
The Wire never got nominated. Ergo, why take the Emmys seriously?
The Wire never got an Emmy nomination because other than its fourth season, it was never that good. As bad as it was, though, it was infinitely better than Treme.
How could “Southland” not be nominated for an Emmy? It had this smokin’ hot young writing team, Green and Burgess working on it
To call “True Blood” undeserving is unfair. Unlike most vampire romances these days, this one is all grown-up, with strong performances, writing, directing, and superb production values. It’s closer in quality to “Buffy” than it is to “Twilight.”
“Big Love” was hardly more deserving. I thought the third season was superb, but season four was a bit of a mess. Even Chloe Sevigny admitted it, and got in trouble for saying what the rest of us were already thinking.
“It’s closer in quality to “Buffy” than it is to “Twilight.””
It is indeed. And that’s exactly why it shouldn’t be winning awards. Buffy was probably one of the most over-rated shows on TV of its time. True Blood is no better, if not slightly worse.
The VFX are crap, the scripts are crap, the acting is crap, the camerawork is crap. It’s crap.
I love Alan Cumming! I just saw this adorable video of him and his dogs: http://www.itsasickness.com/lounge/alan-cumming-obsessed-his-dogs. He totally deserves an Emmy!!!
The “rumors” that Carlton Cuse was still editing his show during the strike were just that — rumors and total bull%#*t. As someone who worked in post, I know that neither Carlton Cuse (nor his partner Damon Lindelof, nor any of the writers) had anything to do with the show once the strike started. In fact, their absence caused enormous problems.
Breaking Bad…
“Why It Has To Win: People seem to root for showrunner Vince Gilligan, known as an unassuming guy who runs a tight ship but gets the best out of his below-the-line crew by creating camaraderie. It helps too also have expert production and perfect casting.”
I couldn’t agree more about how great this show is and that the casting directors should have been nominated for an Emmy.
It’s a crime that True Blood got nominated over Friday Night Lights. It’s obvious the lame ass academy voters aren’t watching shows but rather trying to be culturally vampire relevant or some b.s.
Nice writing, Ray. And thanks for saying it about True Blood.
Big Love was a train wreck this year (even one of the leads said so to the press), and so soapy (stolen eggs, forced inscestual insemination, the entire bird subplot in Mexico) it made True Blood look like a PBS episode of Frontline.
Friday Night Lights, Damages, Sons of Anarchy and Treme were all snubbed (FNL especially). But let’s face it: the Academy has never supported David Simon shows (Homicide, the Wire, the Corner), has only just discovered FNL, and SOA is way too in-your-face for them.
I think folks secretly dig True Blood (look at the numbers- it keeps growing every week) and publicly disdain it b/c it uses Vampires in a trashy town as a framework for the story. The thing is, even if TB is not your cup of tea, you can’t deny the great craftsmanship that goes into making it: Production Designer Suzuki Ingerslev makes amazing sets and scenes that make the world believable and real; Costume designer Audrey Fisher puts fascinating high-end looks and Walmart togs together to make amazing visuals; the writing is consistently sharp and funny, and the cast fearlessly puts themselves in crazy situations. The show is not Ibsen or Chekov, but it’s very good in it’s own right, and is one of the few entertaining/compelling options for new programming in the summer doldrums. Give it a little respect at least.
Honestly, at this point is having a show that uses vampires as a story device any weirder than a magical island with time traveling (Lost), a funeral home where the corpses talk (6 Feet Under), mafia don who visits a psychiatrist (Sopranos), or a western where people use profanity as conjunctions (Deadwood)? I’m no vampire fanatic, but True Blood should not be blamed for existing at the same time as other vampire-themed projects. (Though, why exactly are we scoffing at the “vampire craze”? Isn’t it employing thousands of actors and crew with some job security during a recession, and bringing viewers to the projects?)
We’ve seen a thousand and one police, lawyer, and doctor dramas. Instead of maligning dramas that exist in non-traditional settings why not encourage them? Good storytelling is not dependent on the professions of its characters or settings or genre.
Richmond’s posts are incisive and worth the read. Just needs a good copy editor.
Agree with Matt on Lost—last two seasons went downhill as characters, moments, and the big questions became subject to unsatisfying puzzle-based story mechanics as opposed to genuine intrigue. The time-bending narrative devices were groundbreaking, but too often became a way to dance around giving the answers as opposed to exploring the material. And the general quality of the writing, acting, and directing suffered. (Telling that Tucker Gates directed both the best- and worst-received eps of the last season—Ab Aeterno and Across the Sea.)
Bet it still wins, though.
Lost was a brilliant show until the last two seasons when it became apparent the writers had no clue how to end it. Fortunately the last season does nothing to take away from my enjoyment of the previous ones.
Thanks, Ray. It’s nice to find you here. I appreciated this, your comedy scorecard and the rest of your contributions. Your work raises the bar wherever I’ve read it. You’re an insightful straight-shooter in a town filled with jerks and wannabes who blow smoke up my skirt.
(And, Jesus, you people. What’s with the vitriol? No dog to kick?)
You can’t say that “Mad Men” won’t win because of its ratings. The 3rd season was higher-rated than either of the first two, and it won both of those years. Sheer numbers of viewers has absolutely nothing to do with it. They submitted perfect sample episodes to the voting panels again this year and remain the front-runner.