Ray Richmond is contributing to Deadline’s 2010 Emmy coverage. Here’s his scorecard assessing the Outstanding Lead Drama Series Actress race:
GLENN CLOSE, DAMAGES
Why She Got Nominated: If the TV Academy voters hadn’t nominated Glenn Close in this race, they might as well have called off the Emmys. She’s still the gold standard for actresses on TV. Her episode submitted for consideration, “Your Secrets Are Safe”, was the first of this past season and aired back in January. But that’s what screeners are for.
Why She Has To Win: This is Close’s 13th Emmy nomination. She’s won 3, including two in a row in this category. Close’s reputation precedes her: it’s tough to find anyone who can say anything even remotely negative about her. That goes a long way in contests of this sort. It also helps that she hasn’t lost a step in her performance. “Voting for Glenn Close, you never feel like you’re settling,” one actor says.
Why She Can’t Possibly Win: Three-peating is never easy. Things like professional jealousy come into play, as does increased competition. Close also has to fight the “been there, done that” vibe of the multiple winner. Lastly, the fact her ratings-challenged show could no longer cut it on FX and is now moving to DirecTV may hurt.
JULIANNA MARGULIES, THE GOOD WIFE
Why She Got Nominated: Margulies gave the most high-profile performance of any lead actress in a freshman drama, CBS pulled out all the stops publicity-wise for her and the show, and the TV Academy has a obvious soft spot for this actress as evidenced by her career 7 Emmy noms.
Why She Has To Win: She’s already won the SAG Award and a statuette from the Television Critics Association. The table seems set for Margulies to make it a clean sweep at the Emmys, though as she’s pointed out herself, she’s won only once in 6 previous tries (in 1995 for her work on the first season of ER). “She’s the one to beat this time,” believes a fellow actor and TV Academy member. Airing on a broadcast network doesn’t hurt, either.
Why She Can’t Possibly Win: A contingent of critics have found her performance to be overly subtle and one-note. And in Glenn Close, Margulies has a formidable competitor whom the TV Academy already has embraced repeatedly. Expect this race to be a nail-biter.
JANUARY JONES, MAD MEN
Why She Got Nominated: She enjoyed a season of terrific scripts and storylines on Mad Men that supplied Jones increased street cred with Tv Academy voters. As one producer gushes, “The prevailing view is that January really came into her own this year.”
Why She Has To Win: If there is a wave of momentum that carries Jon Hamm, John Slattery, and Elizabeth Moss or Christina Hendricks into the winner’s circle, Jones could well get swept along. It should help that her show is airing its current season right now during the voting period.
Why She Can’t Possibly Win: There’s the constant complaint about Mad Men’s threadbare ratings on AMC. Her own body of work outside the show is thin compared to the rich resumes of her rivals. No actor/actress from the show has yet won. And Jones took a big risk this time by entering for Emmy consideration as a lead. It landed her a first-time nomination, but beyond that, she’s entered a minefield.
KYRA SEDGWICK, THE CLOSER
Why She Got Nominated: Sedgwick is a nomination machine: 5 consecutive years for the Emmy and the SAG Award.
Why She Has To Win: If ever an actress was due, it’s Sedgwick. Her first few years on TNT’s The Closer, she was a heavy favorite. Also, it’s not lost of the TV Academy that ratings put her series at the top among cable originals. “There’s no more consistently fine performance by an actress on TV week in and week out than Kyra Sedgwick’s,” a producer stresses. She could benefit from the fact her series is airing originals during the judging period. And she’s a beloved figure on set to hear those below the line tell it.
Why She Can’t Possibly Win: Her nominated episode, “Maternal Instincts”, starring her real-life daughter Sosie, premiered a year ago. That’s a lifetime ago in TV terms even with screeners. The competition now is fierce. Sedgwick’s window of opportunity could well have closed.
CONNIE BRITTON, FRIDAY NIGHT LIGHTS
Why She Got Nominated: Britton’s first Emmy nomination is the result of past performance quality and recent word of mouth considering Friday Night Lights runs first on DirecTV, and six months later on NBC. It’s a somewhat astonishing accomplishment for that reason alone.
Why She Has To Win: NBC was showing the series’ new season during the voting period. Long known as primetime’s most underappreciated series, Britton could benefit from a groundswell of support for the show’s perseverance and quality. Her acting chops are solid and unquestioned.
Why She Can’t Possibly Win: Really? You think an actress on a series whose originals run first on a satcaster has a decent shot? Only in an alternate universe. The Friday Night Lights ratings make Mad Men‘s look like American Idol‘s.
MARISKA HARGITAY, LAW & ORDER: SVU
Why She Got Nominated: It may now be part of the TV Academy bylaws that Hargitay be nominated every year she’s eligible, this being her 7th straight for NBC’s SVU. She’s a serious actress in a serious role in a serious show: that means Emmy nods.
Why She Has To Win: She won once before, and voters may want to give the trophy to someone on a broadcast network show – and, if Margulies falters, Hargitay is the only way to go. It’s one scenario, anyway.
Why She Can’t Possibly Win: This would be among the biggest upsets in Emmy awards history considering the competition. Plus, most people don’t even know she’s nominated since NBC, Universal Media Studio, and Wolf Films have spent roughly zero on promoting her candidacy. Maybe even the bigwigs sense there may be an NBC boycott at this year’s Emmys.


A Glenn Close three-peat would be AMAZING. It’s unlikely, but she completely deserves to win. I don’t understand what low ratings have to do with the quality of one’s work — especially in a dumbed down society that has an insatiable appetite for crap … but that’s superficial Hollywood for ya (and you’re clearly doing your best to perpetuate such shallow criteria, Ray). When idiotic reality shows rule the Nielsons, the fact that DAMAGES, FNL and MAD MEN do not receive high ratings is, in fact, a testament to their value.
I hope Kyra pulls this off. I’m tired of seeing her lose. The Closer is one of the most enjoyable things on tv, particularly this season.
You should do your research. Even though it has low ratings for broadcast, “Friday Night Lights” has equal if not better ratings than “Mad Men” on it’s NBC run this summer. FNL suffers from the fact that it probably should have been a cable show all along. And to any of us who actually WATCH the show, Connie Britton has been overdue for A LONG TIME. And BTW, since when do ratings factor in on who wins? Have we already forgotten Blythe Danner won TWICE for her brilliant turn on the near-the-bottom rated “Huff”? And also, ACTORS vote for this, so they tend to care more about good performances than business people do.
To my knowledge, Friday Night Lights does more viewers than Mad Men when it airs on NBC.
Sedgwick was terrific in “Maternal Instincts”. If she doesn’t win for that than the Emmys might as well scrap the notion that the voters actually have to watch the tapes because if they watch the tapes Kyra should win.
But instead I imagine Marguiles will win based on hype alone even though I find her show to be incredibly mediocre.
Julianna Margulies also has already won the Golden Globe. So that’s the SAG award, TCA award AND the Golden Globe. Emmy makes it a clean sweep…
Connie Britton is amazing. Whole scenes of her’s from each season of FNL stick in my head. She is totally believable as a rather progressive W. Texas woman rooted in a community that isn’t always so. Also portrays well the positive and negative affects of being an attractive woman – compelling.
I thought the emmys were less about promotion as you contend with Hargitay’s post nomination — and more about the performance since screeners are involved.
That’s a nice thought but sadly not the case. William Shatner has won twice. Martin Sheen never won for The West Wing. Clearly there is more to it than the performances.
Connie Britton always makes me believe I’m watching a real person move through her life. With the other actresses I’m very aware of the acting. Part of this is the excellent writing on FNL, but Britton is consistently moving, complicated and authentic. She deserves this ten times over.
Given that Sally Field won twice for Brothers and Sisters, I question the validity of it being performance based winners. However, Glenn Close has been incredible in Damages, so what’s the exception, what’s the rule?
I think Margulies has it in the bag, and it’s a good role/show. However, Kyra Sedgwick is indeed way overdue for consistently amazing performances in a show that has her in just about every scene, with complex and emotional dialogue.
Kyra Sedgwick’s portrayal of Brenda Leigh Johnson is exceptional week after week, year after year. Why she has not won before now is a complete mystery to me and all of her viewers most probably. If the voters watch the episodes submitted then Kyra should win however I suspect she will get overlooked again this year with the votes going to JM for the Good Wife, no matter how one dimensional the performance is.
Margulies will probably win. I also find the Good Wife to be a bit mediocre but I think that some of the supporting cast on the show except for Archie Panjabi are all average at best actresses. One weak actor or actress can drag a show down. On the Good Wife Juliana and Archie do their best to keep the show in line. As for the other actresses in the category January Jones and Mariska Hargitay were the least deserving nominees this year. If I had to omit one nominee from this category it would be Hargitay. Connie Britton is the best drama actress on NBC but the network fails to see that. Michael Ausiello from Entertainment Weekly keeps suggesting Connie should be cast in the NBC remake of Prime Suspect. I think Connie should stay away from that project and try to get onto cable. Cable networks appreciate the true talent more than broadcast networks do.
Sedgwick absolutely deserves this, as she has many years before. Her character is one of the most demanding and complex, and she has continuously delivered fantastic performances each week. She is waaay overdue and its a shame. The episode Hargitay is nominated for was hard to watch it was ridiculous, and its disappointing to see Christopher Meloni always overlooked because most of the time he is more compelling than his costar.
I am not much accredited to judge because I know the work of all the actresses. But Mariska Hargitay on SVU fantástica.Ela is simply not going to win but certainly deserved the nomination.
Britton should win, but they’ll give it to Julianna, who is the heart of one of the only network shows to really break through the last couple of years.
I love Mariska Hargitay! In my opinion- she is the best actress ever! I really hope she wins this award <3 She is an actress nominated on a police procedural…now that is something you don't see everyday and is not very common. That woman, that amazing, kind-hearted, loving, beautiful woman has a lot of talent and it should be recognized.
Mariska Hargitay FTW!! That is all I am going to say because I honestly believe that she deserves it!!