
BREAKING:: So Paramount Pictures won’t be screen-testing any young actors to star opposite Tom Cruise after all. I’ve learned that the studio has just chosen Jeremy Renner to infuse new blood in its Mission: Impossible franchise. Renner is the Oscar-nominated star of The Hurt Locker and will star alongside Cruise in the fourth installment of the franchise that will begin production in the fall as a reboot. Brad Bird is directing and Cruise is producing with JJ Abrams.
Paramount has struggled to find the right co-star to play the operative opposite Cruise. One factor was selecting an actor who could potentially carry the series on his own down the line, should Cruise’s Ethan Hunt character not continue to be the emphasis. While Cruise is expected to return for a fifth installment, production chief Adam Goodman wanted a guy who could grow into a leading man in his own right. The studio boss was interested in actors like Tom Hardy and Chris Pine, but they were booked. So the studio planned to test a group of young actors later this week, and Deadline spent all Tuesday going back and forth with the studio over candidates Kevin Zegers, Christopher Egan and Anthony Mackie (the latter of whom starred with Renner in The Hurt Locker). But it was clear that Paramount wasn’t sure what it was going to do. Those tests have been canceled now (Mackie, another seasoned actor poised for a breakout, ultimately pulled himself out of the running and didn’t sign a test deal.) Goodman, sources said, felt Renner’s “has a Daniel Craig quality” and the heft to carry the franchise. Interesting that, rather than trying to create a star by going with a young unknown, Paramount instead has placed its bet on a 39-year old actor who has been around for years.
This casting fills a big piece in the Mission: Impossible 4 puzzle, which has included coming to resolution on a budget. The script by Josh Appelbaum and Andre Nemec came in just as Cruise’s Knight and Day opened to lackluster U.S. box office which caused Paramount to rethink M:I4 budget. Cruise’s deal has now been completed, though his perks package is still being worked out. The film will shoot in the U.S., Vancouver, Prague and Dubai.
Renner only truly reached the A-list with The Hurt Locker even though his earlier work is memorable, but he has the grit, maturity, and chops to take this next big step. It is the second major role for Renner coming out of his turn as the reckless explosives specialist. Renner also will star in Marvel Studios’ The Avengers, playing the role of Hawkeye in that star-studded superhero ensemble that will be directed by Joss Whedon. Paramount is expected to release that film under its distribution deal with Marvel Studios, made before the company was acquired by Disney. Renner will next be seen in the Ben Affleck-directed The Town, the GK Films-produced drama that Warner Bros opens September 17.


Great choice! Renner is a great actor, and will be a good match for Cruise. Way to go Paramount.
How could MICHAEL CERA not be on this list?!!!!
Unbelievable!!
HAHAHA, hilarious!
Renner was brilliant in Hurt Locker. He’s something special.
Renner doen’r make me want to go see the new MI anymore than Cruise being in it again. The franchise us dead in the water and needs a Jolie or a Pitt/Cruise reunion…like maybe on an opposing side or something. Renner hasn’t got the teeth to bring the rain on this one and I hope the powers that be will reconsider.
M:I4 vs. Mr & Mrs. Smith. Haha, brilliant.
Jolie in Mission: Impossible? Sounds delicious… She’d outshine Cruise though.
I’m sorry… I have no idea what you just said. Keep the martini lunch to a minimum. Please.
He’s a great actor. Glad they chose him. Let’s see what he does and if he doesn’t pull it off then save the criticism for later.
I love it. Love this guy. He’s a true talent who deserves this and so much more. RIP, “The Unusuals!”
Nice, I’m not the only one left who remembers The Unusuals. I’m pretty discerning about the TV I watch and I thought that show was a kick.
makes zero sense. this guy looks older than cruise. he is not good looking. this is the worst choice ever.
classic inside the box thinking. no one knows who renner is outside of hollywood, the movie didnt gross more than $20m.
Completely agree. This is just classic Hollywood inside baseball thinking. Renner is a nice actor, no question. And a good guy.
But he had a great turn in a movie that LITERALLY no one – outside of NY and LA – saw. Add to that the reality that he’s not long on charisma, is not funny, and not a classically good looking actor, and you have a guy that is essentially a character actor (a very good character actor) being positioned as a future face and star of a franchise.
Again, just classic inside Hollywood thinking. Tough day for the Mission Impossible franchise.
When you use the word ‘literally’ it actually has to be a literal statement: clearly people outside of LA did see The Hurt Locker, just not very many.
Sorry to be picky but quite a few of us over here in London saw him in The Hurt Locker…….and S.W.A.T. but that might have just been me
Well, I think Jeremy is a wonderful actor, and I liked The Hurt Locker for what it was (don’t think it deserved the Oscar though…), but he should be pretty good in something more mainstream. This could be his make or break moment in the mainstream market.
Why, oh why do people use the world LITERALLY when they actually mean the exact opposite: FIGURATIVELY?
So what you’re saying is not a single person saw this movie outside of LA/NY? Not a single one?
@joel:
“no one knows who renner is outside of hollywood”
While this may have been true a year ago, Mr. Renner’s Oscar nom for Best Actor made him well known enough to be part of the promos for the MTV Movie Awards AND “The Town” looks like a decent thriller.
But I think what really got him the MI4 gig is the simple fact that he is playing Hawkeye in “The Avengers” and after the group appearance at Comic-Con every teen fanboy in the country knows who he is. That demopgraphic will be key to MI4′s success when it is finally released.
Well, if those Comic Con Kids are as “key” to MI4′s success as they have been to Scott Pilgrim’s, then get the smelling salts ready for Tom and the gang, ’cause this sucker is going down. I like Renner, but he is a very UNinspired choice if what they want is to pump new interest into the franchise. I actually thought Mackie (and many others) would have presented a world of opportunities in terms of storylines. Jeremy, not so much. (*Intense middle-aged white guy meet intense (slightly-younger) middle-aged white guym. Let’s go off and do intense middle-aged white guy scenes together.*)
The ComicCon fanboys don’t support films that star geeks like themselves (Scott Pilgrim etc.) They support action movies with action heroes (Iron Man, Batman, 300 etc) – like MI4.
Throw in JJ “Star Trek” Abrams and Brad “Iron Giant/Incredibles” Bird and you have a Comic Con frenzy.
Agree with everybody that nobody outside of L.A. knows who Renner is. Maybe some people would recognize him, and maybe if you said “The guy from The Hurt Locker” they’d go “Oh yeah,” but calling him A-list is just incorrect.
Now Mr. Horn, it isn’t nice to bad mouth rival studios especially when your spell check doesn’t work.
Why Jeremy WHY?!? You’re so much better than this stale series!!!
I like Renner, but he’s not someone that I would see in a Tom Cruise movie and think of him as a co-lead. Paramount would have been better served by reverting to more an ensemble, featuring some younger actors (maybe a few from popular TV shows that have a following), where the group could become the focus and move audiences past perceiving this as being a series that lives and dies with Cruise.
I absolutely agree! The team format is what made the television series special, and it’s a shame that Paramount has paid for the title and the theme music and rejected everything else for the most part so far. M:I-3 was a positive step in the right direction with more focus on a team, but the problem with making it up of mostly unknowns (or less knowns, anyway) was that Cruise still towered above them. If they make Renner an equal to Cruise and then build more of a team around them, THAT could be a foundation for a good franchise reboot. Take Cruise out of the picture next time, but don’t leave Renner to carry it on his own. Surround him with good people and let their relationships build.
Agreed–the only MI:3 part worth re-watching is the Vatican caper because the teamwork is fun to see. Making this franchise a star vehicle has always been a mistake–without the teamwork angle, it’s standard stuff.
He’s a great choice. Loved him in 28 Weeks Later. Knew he was gonna be big.
Yawwwnnnnnn……Knight & Day without Diaz.
exactly, so it could be good.
Renner lists his height as 5’10″. How much you want to be Cruise will tower over him onscreen? Contractually.
Renner is 5’7″ tops, so he’s perfect.
No f’ing way Renner is 5’10″. Even on the big screen he looks short.
Robb is right to a degree. I liked the team in MI:3, Ving Rhames, Maggie Q and Jonathan Rhys-Meyers, with Fishburne as the boss. Thought they had finally hit on something with that combo.
Renner is almost as old as Cruise, so I don’t see how his addition is so fresh.
Nor am I excited about Brad Bird directing. Too bad J.J. isn’t coming back, his was the best of the three so far.
Love how Deadline never misses an opportunity to point out how Knight and Day tanked…LOL.
But it at least made 222 million world wide…
@ Observer —
Knight and Day is at $223 million and counting. The only tank was your weak-ass comment.
K & D may be at 223 worldwide, but that’s far from the break even point for the film. With a budget of 117 minus 10 in tax credits and another 75 or so million in US and International marketing, it has a way to go to get rid of the red ink.
You do realize its not all profit, don’t you?
I liked Knight and Day, actually quite a lot, but it’s foolish to put our heads in the sand and say it’s all good because it’s at $225 million worldwide. It was a mainstream summer action comedy starring what was supposed to be one of the biggest stars around, and it made $75 million domestically.
By comparison, less than ten years ago, the oddball critically-bashed R-rated non-summer Vanilla Sky managed to do $100 million.
By another comparison, Angelina Jolie’s straightforward action flick this summer, Salt, which put all its chips on her star power and her star power alone, cracked $100 million without even trying.
Now that’s what I’m talking about!!! Can not wait to see this! Renner can go toe to toe with any actor on screen today and make them look better. Wise choice Cruise and Paramount. Huge fan of Renner and good to see real talent is making a comeback!!!!
Great choice! Jeremy Renner was fantastic in The Hurt Locker, and I can’t wait to see him in The Town as well. He deserves a big role like this. I’ll probably pass on The Avengers, though..
Is Renner not in “The Master” by Anderson?
I still say that Tom Hardy would have been perfect for this, maybe he can be cast as part of the team or the bad guy
Wow, wrong move big time by the studio. What this franchise needed was a much younger actor. I like Renner, but lets face it he’s no spring chicken either. Oh well, didn’t have much faith in this franchise before anyway.
Renner is great, but he’s not that young. Didn’t they say they wanted to cast a younger person? Renner is 40. He’s not that much younger than Cruise, nor does he look much younger either.
seems like the theme of the past 2 days has been ‘what ever happened to the hurt locker team?’ now everyone seems to be accounted for except for kathryn bigelow. i know imdb is unreliable. but is it really true that she’s only got 1 film in development (hell) and that her ex has like 20?
Separated at Birth:
Jeremy Renner and Clint Culpepper.
Renner is talented and always has been. As for the ‘outside Hwood’ contingent – so what? “MI” is a concept, and although Cruise hijacked it as a star vehicle, it can move beyond that when he’s gone (ala Bond).
Renner is an excellent choice. I recently attended a screening of THE TOWN (directed by Ben Affleck) and Renner was EXCELLENT in it (the movie was awesome too as was Affleck). He’s an actor’s actor who has been at it for years and is finally getting his due. Kudos to Paramount and Cruise for a brave choice and props to Renner for landing the gig. This is not an inside the box choice as someone posted above, it’s thinking outside the box – they didn’t go with some vapid pretty boy but went with an exciting intense and interesting actor. A great day for Mission Impossible fans.
They should have kept Kittridge from the first film. I feel this franchise has suffered terribly from lack of continuity. The only things that carry from film to film are (1) Tom Cruise, (2) Ving Rhames, and (3) masks. James Bond carried Q & M with him, as well as Felix.
The first film was great. It focused on the team aspect of the Mission Impossible TV series. Also, it had so many memorable scenes. Most importantly, it had a mystery element that the subsequent two never did.
Get back to those roots folks, even if it is with Renner. BTW, Renner’s character can’t be like Hunt (though has Hunt really been the same character in all three films?). He needs to be his own guy. I picture him being somewhat of a wild card who hunt can’t trust, but he proves himself reliable over the course of the film.
Totally agree with you. The tone shifts of each film have always bothered me and I’ve always had a hard time articulating why. Ethan Hunt is a different character in each movie. You just don’t buy that the guy of the second and third movies is the same guy who went through everything in the first.
It’s a travesty Tom Hardy was booked. He would’ve been FAN-FUCKING-TASTIC. He’s suave, sexy, as talented as they come and could have sustained the M:I franchise for a number of post-Cruise installments.
Renner is solid, too, but I weep for what could have been with Hardy….