EXCLUSIVE: I learned this morning that Tom Selleck hasn’t been accepting the scripts which CBS’ Blue Bloods executive producer Ken Sanzel has been giving him. So a standoff developed over character vs procedural visions for the series, summarized to me as “creative tension”. By midday, Sanzel was still staying with the show. No more. Insiders just emailed me that the former New York cop told the staff late today that he is leaving. There’s no exit date yet.
“He’s a stand-up guy; he won’t leave the network or studio hanging,” a network source explains. “Simply creative differences. It happens. He was brought in after the pilot as a showrunner to set the show up. We often do this for pilots picked up to series that have great writers but who haven’t run shows before.” Now, to replace Sanzel, Selleck wants to find ”his guy” who must also meet with studio/network approval. Unfortunately this turmoil is especially embarrassing because it’s executive produced by Leonard Goldberg, a CBS Corporation board member.
Sanzel, a longtime Numb3rs showrunner, was handpicked by CBS and CBS Studios to executive produce with creators Mitchell Burgess and Robin Green, who continue with the show. ”Ken is a real take-charge tough guy and everyone knows it. They begged him to take the show. He was reluctant to do it. And Selleck was not crazy to have Ken imposed on hm. But Ken was doing the network bidding thanklessly,” an insider tells me. Sanzel’s vision was for a compelling crime procedural, whereas Selleck wanted softer character exploration. Sanzel knew the network was behind him. But Selleck wanted to be in charge of the show. “Too many cooks,” one of my insiders explains. “They love him at CBS. But Selleck realized it’s not the show he thought he was in. Ken calls Nina Tassler and says, ‘What do you want to do?’ And she says, ‘Let me talk to Tom.’” Today, it became clear to me it was just a matter of hours before Sanzel left the show. ”Not bail on them in one day. Just saunter off peacefully,” a source tells me. “If we were to count up every single show where there’s creative friction between actors and producers, we’d have a number like the census bureau.”
At first considered a long shot (“pilot #10 of 10″), Blue Bloods made it onto the schedule seemingly because of Selleck’s stardom and Goldberg’s juice. It even inherited Numb3rs’ Friday 10 PM time slot this fall. And Sanzel himself was a New York cop before becoming a writer. CBS traditionally teams the limited experience creators of its newly picked-up series with seasoned showrunners after the pilot. Sanzel ran Numb3rs for most of the crime procedural’s 6-season run on CBS and has an overall deal at CBS Studios. This development season, he wrote, directed and executive produced the CW pilot presentation Nomads.
Blue Bloods is the first hour-long drama Selleck has headlined since Magnum, P.I. from 1980 to 1988. And he’s back with CBS where had a half shortlived half-hour sitcom The Closer and in more recent years the Jesse Stone telepics made from Robert B. Parker’s mystery novels. Originally titled Reagan’s Law, the new series is a drama about 3 generations of a storied police family. Selleck plays a widower and the current NYPD chief.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Where are Green and Burgess in all of this? How were they meshing with Sanzel?
My question, also. Why can’t these very experienced, very grown-up writers run their own show? Or give them a co-showrunner partner who can write character as well as they can. Come on, Nina. You know in your heart what would make it good. You are such a good developer — one of the best in town — and then you fuck up your shows so royally once their on the air. What’s that all about?
I wrote a produced pilot for CBS and even though I had successfully run my own show previously, CBS insisted I add a showrunner for series.
This is a Moonves policy. Nina Tassler is a woman that follows orders and nothing else. So you meet with a bunch of CBS approved showrunners (not good or talented showrunners just CBS approved) which is hilarious when you read the list.
It’s a shot gun marriage from hell that is a creative time bomb at best.
Sanzel is a ball buster. Huge ego. Green and Burgess know their stuff. Five years with David Chase will teach you a thing or two. Selleck is difficult and thinks he knows best. He is very interfering. CBS and CBS P are ineffectual at this point.
There is no self examination at CBS. Whatever Moonves wants Moonves gets. Whether it makes sense or not. And by the way Moonves has put so many of his cronies on that board of directors stockholders in Viacom should be pissed.
Tom Selleck is old school and delightful and charming and mannered and a team player and blah blah blah, but that man can be a PILL. No one wins against him so don’t even try. Ken, life’s too short and has just gotten infinitely easier for you, sir.
This was a bait and switch for Selleck. The pilot promised a story about real and interesting people who happen to be cops; Sanzel is just cops and robbers. Stick with the premise. Enough dead-end remakes of bang-bang shows already. Give us something with a bit of depth and quality. Network TV execs can be as brain-dead as they seem to think everyone else must be when they try to foist the same crap on us over and over again. Haven’t you seen viewing figures? It’s almost time to put out the lights, networks. You never get it. Maybe Selleck does.
There is enough of the blood and gore shoot them up cop shows on TV. I have always watched Tom Selleck’s shows because he always give a good show that is appropriate for the WHOLe FAMILY! I’m sick of listening to the “F” word over and over and over on most TV shows. Can wait for a new Selleck series! I never missed and TV show or movie with him in it! Go for it Tom, you will make it work the way your fans want to see it!!
Yes – I’m tired of the “B” word, the “F” word, etc. Tom Selleck may be old fashioned, but the youth of America need to have good examples – good people to look up to – SOMETHING refreshing on TV to watch. Tom Selleck has never failed to show character. Do you young people know what “character” means exactly? Well, watch some of his movies & it will gradually dawn on you.
Cary Grant refused many movie parts, just like Tom Selleck does. So did Gregory Peck and John Wayne.
Selleck not in it I’m nopt on board. I don’t care how good it is or how bad if I don’t like the star I don’t watch. He knows every part of the business let him work eith it. He knows what works for him I have never seen him in anything I didn’t like.
Even “Vegas”?
Selleck knows good scripts – as proven by the Jesse Stone series. So I’ll have to side with his judgment in this case. I must say that it strikes me as a bit odd that the writers who wrote the pilot were more than good enough to impress CBS – but apparently not good to write the series. I would think that if they had the talent for one script, than they certainly had it for the entire series. This could be a case of loyalty – Selleck standing by the original writers and not letting them be shoved aside for someone else.
“Selleck knows good scripts ?” Funny, because he was on “Killers”
Actually, check out the credits of the last few Jesse Stone scripts–Selleck gets co-writing credit first. He knows scripts, because those are excellent made-for-TV movies.
I hear Don Bellisario is available. Maybe they’ve made up by now.
Wait a sec – is Tom Selleck executive producing this? If not, why in the hell would he feel it is his place to clash with the showrunner?
Isn’t he a has-been who hasn’t been in the mainstream public eye for DECADES? Why not replace HIM? Seems his place is on the other side of the camera?
He must have a lot of money. And by a lot, I mean like TENS OF MILLIONS to feel he is in a position to jeapordize a good thing for him.
Just sayin…
Because even if he’s not a producer (which he probably is) Selleck is in front of the camera which puts him in a position to be a dick if he feels like it. It’s more difficult to make changes with cast than with the (just as crucial if not more so) writers.
Actually his Jesse Stone series of movies (for tv) have been very popular. He also executive produces them. So for those paying attention, he’s been in the public eye. In the 90s of course he had a recurring role on Friends and Boston Legal
He was also in the series “Las Vegas”. I watch everything Tom Selleck is in. I LOVE the Jesse Stone movies and am sad the writer has died. I sure hope they make all the books into made for tv shows. I am not looking for another cops and robbers show, we have plenty of those already. I am hoping for a show that shows the life of family and friends that happen to be cops. So I guess I agree with Tom Selleck on the direction this show should take.
Maybe Mr. Selleck is just as tired of the junk that is on tv now, he prefers to work at something most of us who actually watch tv want. Enough of these phony scripts trying to make jokes of writers who have talent. Kudos to you, Tom.
And who made the decision that Tom Selleck, “Mr. Baseball”, knows what the target audiences of today want to watch?
It seems his acting career fizzled out in the 90′s…
I’d say this is an early case of senioritis (people way past their prime attempting to tell the new generation what the new generation should watch or create).
I don’t think with Selleck it is money as the issue–he just wants a quality series and isn’t going to settle for anything less than he knows is right. He is not going to fall into the “GARBAGE” TV series like is on TV now. I can honestly say that I have not watched any series on a weekly basis since Mag. PI went off the air in 1988. Guess you could say I’m one of his most loyal fans!
this matches up with a recent blind item about a well known older TV star having “script issues” on his new series. Tom should shut up and let the showrunner RUN the show.
Having worked with Mr. Selleck in the past, I can tell you he is one difficult, ornery old bastard. Any showrunner who takes that job will run head-on into his ego — which happens to still be stuck in his glory days of Magnum. Selleck should be happy to have the job and be back on network TV. I feel sorry for the poor schmuchk who has to deal with him day-to-day. I know from first-hand experience it’s a nightmare.
My experience working with Tom was quite different than yours. I had a blast and I thought he was just great. Smart, dedicated, hardworking – and a standup guy.
A-men.
I second Jim’s comment, that is.
Funnny Jim? I don’t see you on the screen! And I don’t see anyone clamoring for you to have a show.
So I guess it’s just another case of a no-talent loser venting about someone who has been making a great living and doing it it his own way.
W
I was hoping Walhberg would be the main star of this show but it seems Selleck will be. Fail. I give this one season.
While Tom Selleck may not be at the top of the A-list these days, any actor who truly feels he isn’t being given a quality script has the right to be concerned, A-lister or not. You don’t *get* to the A-list without being choosy about your projects and the quality of your work, so I find statements that he should “shut up and be thankful he has a job” senseless.
That said, I doubt we’ll ever really know the details of the issues. I suppose time will tell, whether running off the showrunner was a positive move for Selleck and the show.
If Selleck was not “choosy” he’d be doing a reality show about now.
That is correct! Selleck will NEVER do a show of any kind like is on TV now.
Well i’m glad Sanzel is leaving the show. Numb3rs was a boring procedural and i guess he wanted to write the same shitty scripts.
Seriously, Numb3rs was an ace sleep-inducer. The cast was the only lively thing about it, and they get high props for just being able to stay awake.
I’ve always liked Selleck personally and respected him professionally, but sometimes the actor needs to step back and concentrate on the craft and let the leader lead. If Tom were the gentleman I’ve known him to be, he’ll support the next guy and hopefully this show won’t be DOA.
I’ve seen the appalling promo for this show. I wouldn’t accept the scripts, either. The dialog is so pompous, so serious, so humorlessly self-important, I don’t know how the show will run two weeks. I’m a New Yorker and I have no desire to see it. Our cops are no nonsense matter-of-fact, they don’t make those speeches for the ages I heard in that promo. Awful.
Character over procedural is always a win for TV, especially at CBS!
Really? Have you seen CSI: MIAMI?!?!
Wow. Just, wow. All CBS does with dramas are godawful procedurals stocked with one dimensional “characters.” (The Good Wife might be an exception to this. I haven’t seen it, but it sounds different from their usual CSI/NCIS dreck.)
Good thing that Seeleck won. No one needs another crappy run of the mill crime procedural. If you make a show about a family of cops of course it should be about the characters.
No one needs Tom Selleck either. I would rather have an expert writing the show than a cranky old has-been forcing his ego onto the scripts.
You certainly have a right to your opinion, but plenty of people do not think Mr. Selleck is a has-been. He has plenty of fans who love to watch him in whatever he does because he is talented, charming, smart and handsome. I hope he continues to work for years to come. If you don’t like him, don’t watch the show; simple as that.
Happens all the time especially after the initial pilot.
The pilot tested so well because it focused on the characters. It was different from the run of the mill procedural stuff out there now. Hope they get it worked out.
Virtually every TV star is a pain in the ass, past or present … but Selleck is probably right about this, who the hell wants to see yet another procedural show??? … Gimme Lance White over some tight lipped police scientist, any day … The future of TV, if there is a future, is character-driven… anyone can write a by the book crime drama — case closed; make it funny and personal and interesting …. Who gives a shit if Tom’s character ever catches the bad guy.
Selleck is a notorious douche. A lot of actors are, but Selleck’s douche/talent ratio is pretty high.
I’ve met Ken Sanzel. He’s not a studio ass kisser, on the contrary, he could be a real ally to the talent because the network/studio trusts him and he knows how stupid their notes can be sometimes. Also, did everybody miss the part about him having been cop?? He actually knows this world really well, so really? You’re going to trust the instincts of a spoiled egomaniacal actor over a former cop turned show runner. Okay, you watch that show then.
Well it looks like they may be working something out. I saw Tom Sellick out to dinner with Leonard Goldberg and William Bratton last night in New York. They looked like they were all getting along just fine.
A really sympathetic take on Ken Sanzel. Numb3rs was a lousy show where people stood around and read from file folders in a dimly lit office. Do we really need another lazily written procedural?
One would think with the Good Wife, CBS was starting to realize a way they could steer just a little wee bit from their usual formula: not by doing something so out of the box like Swingtown or Viva Laughlin, which is bound to fail, but doing a character drama that has the same sensibility as their character-free Bruckheimer shows, with a classic franchise at the center (cop, lawyer, doctor) to act as a story engine and a stakes builder.
I had hopes for this, given that I liked the script and think Green and Burgess (Sopranos writers, sure, but also writers on Northern Exposure etc) are very good writers. Building a show around a police chief can be a problem (ask anyone who had to come up with stories for the District) but at least you have one son as a beat cop, Donnie Wahlberg as a homicide detective, Moynahan as a lawyer.
I never cared much for Numbers, but had heard that Sanzel was a nice guy, good to his writing staff. Still, this was a weird pick. Yes, he’s a former cop, but not a lot of experience in crafting the ensemble multi-storyline structure that this show has. It sounds like he was trying to push it to be more procedural; on the other hand, CBS’s executives always push the shows to be more procedural, even when at the outset it wasn’t supposed to be.
On another note, I just watched the preview on CBS. Is that an accent Selleck’s trying to do? Or did his character have a minor stroke?
Tom might be tough, but a lot of good actors are. Showrunners engaging in a pissing contest with their stars is frankly absurd. Fact is Tom’s been a round a lot longer than Ken. His instincts for a character driven show, and what he signed up for in the first place, is far more important than Kens designs for a procedural. Period. One of the most important jobs of any showrunners is to create the template and structure of a show that is congruent with the creators vision and the actors who bring it to life. Just cause the guy was a NY cop doesn’t afford him a loop hole in in the rules of running a successful show. Sounds like be was using a good excuse to give the show his pink slip. Nmaybe they should bring someone on the show that knows how to corroborate with actors.
You lost me at “good actor”.
If Tom’s character needs a girlfriend, I am ready and willing!
To the commentary I am responding to, I have only one reply –
baby, I have had first dibbs on Mr. Selleck needing a girlfriend
on the air for some time now. This goes back to the Dating Game
show he first appeared on back in the ’60s. I have seen every movie
he has every made for screen, tv , DVD,,and so on. Besides I have just about all of the movies he has made on TV and screen in my
library. Plus, meaning no disrespect, but I am closer to his age group, no doubt, and have seen almost as much of life as he has.
To the commentary I am responding to… get a life.
This is is a good reality check for Ken, hopefully he swallows it and gets his act together moving forward.
That’s right. Too many cocks.