
It’s like broadcast TV industry’s version of a hangover. It’s already August, the marketplace should be bustling with business but only a few pitches have trickled in so far. “We’re very late this year,” a network topper tells me. Why is that? Some point to the last selling season which was so long and bruising, by the end of it everyone felt exhausted. “We all took a collective break,” one top TV lit agent says. Also, there are a lot of new scripted series — 38 — picked up by the broadcast nets for next season, almost 60% more than the 24 new series ordered last year. That, coupled with the increased volume of original series on cable, made fewer writers available to develop this year. A non-writing producer told me he has never gotten so many “not available” answers from TV lit agents when inquiring about writers.
What’s more, I hear the major studios this year don’t allow writers staffed on first-year shows to develop. The general practice had been for scribes working on new series where they would be paid as much as $40,000-$50,000 an episode to regularly take time off to pitch their own projects or work on drafts of their own pilot scripts. “We don’t want them distracted, we want them focused on those 13 episodes,” a studio head said.
Additionally, there doesn’t seem to be a sense of urgency this year, with no any immediate work stoppage on the horizon. Who can forget the frenzy of summer 2007 when the broadcast networks were spending a fortune stockpiling in the face of the looming writers strike? News of deals finally started to crop up over the past couple of days, with Fox handing out a put pilot commitment to Breadwinners, a Diablo Cody comedy about 3 couples with young children. And things are expected to pick up soon. “In the end, it will be the same quality and the same volume, just a little late,” a leading non-writing producer said.
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.


there were a lot of crappy pilots this year picked up – I hope they have a backlog of mid-season replacements. I think there’ll be a lot of carnage by December of new shows kicking the can.
With all those former Friends writers “not available,” who will sell the 97 comedy pilots about couples who are…wait for it…AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF THEIR RELATIONSHIPS???
Some are new couples, some are old couples, some just had a baby…oh man, who will fill this pressing need?
That is so hilarious! I know the networks must be panicking since they won’t have that coffer filled with those shows!
F-ing hilarious!
There are like five of them including BET.
BET?!!!
God help us.
Wondering if they’re accepting pitches from diversity writers cuz God knows the diversity writers on staff.
Diversity you say? Then you should have sent an original pilot into the Fox Writer’s Inititive, a diversity spec pilot program, or the ABC Disney Writer Fellowship, CBS Diversity Institute Writing Program or Warner Bros writing fellowship.
The big five networks all offer them; google the network name and “diversity” or check out the TV contest listings at MovieBytes.
I have a pitch for a news series, I just don’t know who’s there to catch it.
Yo, if you find anyone, let me know. I’m in the same boat. Although I did reach Barry Sonnenfeld, when his “Pushing Daisies” was looking like it had legs, and he rejected mine.. or, his agent did. They really gave me the run-around.
Those $$ numbers per episode are a bit high-level/old school. Plenty of writers are not paid that much these days…
The numbers are out of the 90′s. 25-35 is tops.
The networks and cable channels are only interested in working with “brand” name writers and a few marquis producers a la Bruckheimer. I’ve heard a couple seriously awesome pitches from writers and newer producers (producers with prime-time success but not cushy overhead deals) with real credits and talent who can’t even get meetings. It’s very depressing to watch the crap pilots (when does the FAIL betting begin?!) and know there are some great ideas that won’t even have the chance of being rejected. Most of the current crop of development executives suck at their jobs and won’t even think about risking on people other than JJ and a few others because they lack any meaningful talent to be able to work with writers. Instead, they’d rather scramble for power while the brands run the shows. DEPRESSING!
Brother, your assessment is dead-on! The network series development strictly suits crave power and career promotion, but overlook that their predecessors successfully used “excellence” as their standard for hearing and buying pitches. Many, many times that excellence and talent came from writers outside the system.
See the scene between the writer and producer/exec. in “Barfly”.
Okay, there’s these two unemployed guys who ride around rural Georgia in an orange Dodge Charger with a Confederate flag painted on top that they call the General Lee. They live in this rundown shack with their decrepit Uncle Jesse and their smokin’ hot cousin Daisy who wears skimpy blouses and tight Levi’s cutoffs but never seems to date anyone. Then there’s this fat little guy called Boss Hogg who smokes cigars and wears white three piece suits and instigates trouble with the sheriff who has a dog named Flash that never moves. Then there’s this hillbilly auto mechanic named Crazy Cooter…you with me so far?
There are tons of good pitches out there, but they’re not from friends of the six white guys on the inside.
Six white guys? I haven’t been in a meeting in the last three years that didn’t have more than one guy in it. TV is dominated by female executives. Next time you go to any network, broadcast or cable, I guarantee that you’ll be pitching only to women.
Where are the multi-camera sitcoms?
Any word about “Family House”? Such a great pilot, they’re sure taking their time.
Here’s a pitch for a show:
Make a show about allowing the viewers to decide which pilot to create into a series. Air all the pilots that never got a chance/were close but got canned. There’s a ton of already-made gems sitting in studio vaults gathering dust and red ink.
You allow the viewers to feel engaged in the “green-lighting process,” you justify the hundreds of millions of dollars spent on pilots that never see the light of day, you make a whole lot of creatives and crew happy who otherwise felt like a good many months were spent for naught, and executives can fire 2/3 of their “development” staff who are clearly worthless anyway.
Who’s with me?
I have long thought that each season, they should put all the pilots they shoot on the Internet and let the audience decide which ones make it to the air. Having had the chance to see most of the pilots that get shot ever year, I can tell you,a hell of a lot of great ones are ashcanned because of politics or worse — some studio flunky thinking that’s not what the audience wants. We have the technology — just let the audience tell you what they want.
I was told networks dont want to hear any procedural pitches this year….anybody have info ?…
Funny how in the August 2010 edition of the CBS rag “Watch!” magazine, there’s an article about “How to get a ‘Yes!’”, and one of the subheds is “Sell Your TV Pilot.”
I’m not kidding. Page 91. My local CBS affiliate has copies in the lobby. Have a nice weekend, all.
This is why you take a ‘chance’ on new writers. Unknown today,Hollywood Mogul tomorrow. Are you agency folks with me so far? This is just common sense, and good business practice since nobody’s writeing career lasts forever.
I forgot to put this in my above post,- Yes I do know how many crappy scripts are out there in the slush piles. I recall reading that Frank Herberts manuscript for “Dune” was rejected by 23 different agencys. Dune has become something of a success over the years, that being the case perhaps there are other gems waiting to be unearthed. Take a chance,take a look.
Except for you RICH, if you’re writer.
Since writing is not — WRITEING
Write on, right on!