
EXCLUSIVE: The writer/director Wachowski siblings have begun to invite actors to meet on their new film Cobalt Neural 9 about a taboo gay romance
between an American and Iraqi soldier. But agents are telling me it has become yet another “top secret” project they and their actors can’t read. That means they can’t advise their clients whether to be in the pic sure to be controversial because of its “Hard R” storyline. But I’ve learned there is an increasing Hollywood obsession with keeping scripts under wraps right now because of the ease with which these copyrighted documents get published on the Internet. So much so that this is changing the way actors audition for hot button or fanboy friendly projects. More and more, reps don’t get to read full scripts. In some cases, on films like Spider-Man or The Avengers, the actors don’t, either. “CN9 is just the latest of a growing list of scripts that are being kept under lock and key,” one frustrated dealmaker tells me. “How do you do your job and advise clients when studios and filmmakers don’t want agents and managers to see scripts? If actors are lucky, they go to an office and read it with somebody watching. This kind of secrecy only used to happen with Woody Allen and maybe Steven Spielberg. But now it is rampant.”
Reps say it has happened recently on such scripts as Universal’s Battleship, the Planet of the Apes prequel Rise of the Apes, Thor, X-Men: First Class, X-Men: Wolverine, the Twilight Saga films, and the two installments of The Hobbit. Regarding actors, agents said filmmakers are shielding scripts is focused on newcomers trying to jump start careers in superhero roles, not with big stars. I’m told that many of the actors vying to play superheroes in Marvel Comics films, Spider-Man included, didn’t get to read entire scripts when they were testing. Instead, they were given pages with villains glossed over to keep their identities fuzzy and had to rely on director Marc Webb to explain the plot and character.
It’s no mystery why this is happening: security. Producers and studio executives claim that if they email or messenger even one copy to an agency, it goes into that tenpercentery’s library — and then becomes fodder for low-level employees who trade the content of those scripts like currency. Suddenly, that copyrighted document is on the Internet. Disturbing but not illegal is having the script picked apart in a forum, or presented as a blog scoop that gives away story reveals. ”I doubt a blogger with 60 readers will ruin a movie even if they publish a script or rip it apart,” said one dealmaker who considers the increased secrecy “ridiculous” but acknowledges the bigger problem. “What is more important is the number of movies that are being leaked onto the internet before they are released.”
The box office success of Chris Nolan’s Inception demonstrates the benefit of keeping story details secret. Expect the same under cover treatment with Nolan’s next Batman and his production of a rebooted Superman. Every superhero movie gets this approach nowadays, and increasingly controversial motion pictures like the Wachowskis’ Cobalt Neural 9 whose “Hard R” gay romance storyline Deadline revealed.


How do you advise your clients about this project?
You tell them tse are the guys that didn’t write the first MATRIX movie and anything they touch since bombs.
Avoid.
V for Vendetta and the first sequel to The Matrix were not bad, but quite good.
Wait — who *did* write the first “Matrix” then? I don’t know this rumor.
And not only … but sounds like there’s very little ‘commercial’ about the stupid plot. Brokeback has already been done, right? Let’s see, we’ve had real men cowboys be gay, next is real men soldiers be gay … what’s next? Real men wrestlers… no, too easy. Constructi… nah. I know, let’s have really feminine women be gay! Real doe eyed, innocent, soft pedal flowers. Yeah, there’s a plot. Cause it’s up to Hollywood to prove that real men and feminine women can be gay too. It just screams commercial viability!
They did BOUND fyi.
It’s too bad there’s so much stealing going on in Hollywood or this wouldn’t be going on for actors and their screenwriters. Still, I thinks it’s a good idea to keep the actor in the dark because it adds and edge to the performance and keep one’s mouth shut at the sane time. I’d say “bring it!”
Right, but how are you going to decide to be in a movie or not if you don’t know whether it sucks?
Same way an audience member throws down their money at the theatre without having first read the script.
V
Excellent point, V.
yeah, except if you see a lousy movie, you lose a few bucks and two hours of your life. an actor can do a lot more damage to their careers by agreeing to appear in something of which they know very little.
That makes no sense. Paying $8 to see a movie (which by the way, you can at the very LEAST read reviews on or find out from your friends who have already seen it if it’s good or not) and then going on about your day is not the same as committing weeks, possibly months of your life to working on a project that’s going to affect your career.
$8? Where do you live, 1987 ?
Commercials?
V, its a lot different as an actor- how can you prepare for a role if you can’t know what you’re preparing for? Auditions give you a few minutes to stand out from dozens if not hundreds of other actors- now, instead of having the basic tool to get ready, (the script, so you can understand the character as much as possible), we’ll give you a neutered copy- oh, and let’s not forget they said BIG names weren’t given the same scrutiny, just actors who are trying to audition without a marquee walking in with them.
Good. Too many scripts leaking on the Internet means yet another blow to what makes movies fun – the anticipation and the NOT KNOWING what it’s all about. Inception would never have been the hit it is without such secrecy. Ditto Avatar.
This obsession by fans (and the resultant acquiescence by studio marketing departments) to know absolutely every last behind-the-scenes detail before a movie so much as hits a screen threatens the “wow” factor, a valuable commodity that those in charge are wise to reinstate.
Here here for top-secrecy!
I hope they shoot it in black and white with ambient sounds and lots of shots with cigarette smoke wafting in circles.
Yeah, with credits that run for an hour.
Actors aside, the plus side of all of this: with someone sitting in the room watching executives and reps read – well, then they’re actually reading it. Now we’ll see who knows how to read a script, and who has been biding their luck by working off of coverage from film school grad (and mostly bitter) “readers”.
Yeah I wasn’t aware anyone actually read scripts anyway. Actors do sometimes, agents do never, and producers read very few. So what’s the difference?
Managers read scripts, and actors definitely do.
Producers read and ask for too many scripts.
This trend is also in TV but with a different spin. You’re given fake audition material from password-protected breakdowns. So, they just want to see you on tape. After that, you find out what you are really being asked to do. Personally, I think it’s unethical and unfair to the actor in some way. But, what do I know? I’m just an actor. Right?
Excellent point. Having had the experience of getting notes from an exec, only to leave their office and see the coverage, written by a 22 year old newbie. Meeting with exec was the coverage verbatim…
there’s too much on the line (money, jobs) in regards to these scripts to just be sending copies of them electronically out to agencies where disgruntled employees can do whatever they want with them. it seems perfectly acceptable to have people sit and read a hard copy to protect the work from getting out, at least on high profile projects.
Ridiculous they did this on the Planet of the Apes prequel, considering that script in all its drafts has been floating around for quite some time now.
It’s hard to legitimately complain when you’re part of the problem. If so many scripts hadn’t been leaked by short-sighted employees, studios and filmmakers wouldn’t have to keep them secret.
I love Carson Reeves and I think he and others like him are actually doing a great service for aspiring writers, but your point is well-taken.
“I doubt a blogger with 60 readers will ruin a movie even if they publish a script or rip it apart….”
The majority of people who spend their money on going to the movies is unlikely to be one of these bloggers (if they like what they read, they would go). Bloggers are people who are just interested to get their hands on something exclusive to talk about, like the IPhone that was supposedly stolen… then lost… then sold. Apple still made a profit, the buzz was about how the phone was acquired and then about the lost signal by the phone’s built-in antenna.
Then there are bloggers or anyone really who just want to ruin a good twist… like TMZ. Shutter Island was out a few weeks… this show gave away the ending; same with Marley and Me. They could have spoiled Inception but I seriously think no one on that staff could figure out or explain the ending.
From a studio’s perspective, I for one would not like my work leaked. When I write I like to come up with things that are unexpected, i.e. twists. The feeling you get when someone watches or reads some of your work… it’s as if I’m getting high. I like it when they gasp or turn to me, “You wrote this?” “Yeah, do you want to watch it again?”
From an actor’s perspective, times are changing. If you have to read the script with a guy looking over you… read fast, try not to blink.
“They could have spoiled Inception but I seriously think no one on that staff could figure out or explain the ending.”
Them and a lot of other people…
Good gawd, if I relied on my reps “advice” about which projects to do my career would be in a much sorrier state than it is. I rely on my reps to let me know what’s casting, to make best efforts to get me meetings, and – when I do get job offers – to let me know how much others are getting paid for similar work, so I can get paid properly. If I want advice about whether a script is good or not, I’ll show it to other actors and screenwriters I know and respect. Hey, if anyone knows the agents who are great judges of a script’s quality (and who aren’t dickheads), send me their names.
Edward – Loved you in Fight Club. Glad you’re not doing Hulk again.
well, here’s hoping Stone will turn stuff around.
A gay romance between an American and Iraqi soldier…if they spend more than 8 million on this the studio is out of their fucking minds!
I have a script. This is all you need to know. Send me your reps’ details and I will put the contracts in the mail. Sign and return them to me. After you’ve done that, I have some prime real estate in Florida I know you’re going to love.
Brokeback sand dune. “I don’t know how to quit you. Wait, yes I do. I’ll just blow you up”.
This is ludicrous. Movies are always a “risk” but not reading the script beforehand, regardless of the quality of the attachments, is a “crapshoot”.
I don’t think its about security at all….there is something else at work here….
Agents and managers bitching about scripts that they never even read in the first place.
Ironic isn’t it?
Managers read scripts, especially for clients with actual careers to think of.
especially THIS script! Spiderman I can see. The next Star Trek ok…but to throw your clients in an R rated gay movie about Iraq????
They’re keeping the script to “Twilight” under wraps? What, cuz no one can figure out the film from the books?
Haha, my thoughts exactly.
Unless said scripts somehow manage to improve on the godawful original material…um…er. Never mind.
Edward – loved you in Down inthe Valley. Keep doing good films.
It’s called a watermark. You create it in photoshop and lay it over your pdf doc. At least that way if it lands on the internet you know who’s ass to chew. Surely I’m not the only person who’s heard of this.
(and stop calling me Shirley)
No shit! I’m gonna make millions in the watermark biz, cause evidently no one but samuel’s ever heard of them!
yes. but a watermark won’t stop a fanboy from retyping the entire screenplay.
What exactly has changed? Agents never read scripts.
It seems fairly clear it *is* about security for the studios. But even so, if an actor requests he or his rep be allowed to read it, they should, since only the most foolish of actors would regularly sign on to projects script-unseen.
That said, the article stated that established actors usually *are* allowed to read the full script. Only newcomers are denied to tighten security. I imagine this is because a newcomer can’t afford to be as discriminatory, and should be lucky to be cast in a big-budget flick, while there’s a chance an A-lister will pass, if the script isn’t right.
I’m all for more gay love stories from major studios, but this does sounds like a hard sell for most mainstream audiences – not due to the gay angle, but ironically, the Iraq war angle – just take a sample of recent Iraq war-themed movies:
IN THE VALLEY OF ELAH – $6.7M
RENDITION – $9.6M
STOP LOSS – $10.9M
BROTHERS – $28.5M
THE HURT LOCKER – $16.4M (*even though it won Best Picture/Director/Screenplay)
Even when BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN made nearly $100M domestic (ok, $83M, but who’s counting) on a mere $12M budget +P/A, the film’s major commercial and critical success didn’t quite usher in a veritable deluge of gay-themed feature films from major studios, except for MILK (also released/marketed by Focus), that many had hoped would come as a result of Brokeback’s breakthrough BO success as the first big gay movie to approach the magic $100M cume and win multiple Oscars (except Best Picture, for which it was robbed due to Hollywood’s still-rampant homophobia.)
Let’s face it, the hard truth is the vast majority of U.S. audiences, not to mention increasingly crucial international markets, have little interest paying $13 + $5 popcorn and $4 Coke to see dramatic stories about the current war.
I will be line to see the Wachowski bros’ take on US/Iraqi love that dare not speak its name, but how many others will? (Also, wondering if this narrative has any connection to one of the Wachowski bros emerging as a pre-op transexual a few years back? I’m jus sayin…)
What would be really ground-breaking, and what many have been waiting for years to see on the big screen, is a major studio summer tentpole big-budget action-movie where the lead just happens to be gay or lesbian: SALT could have easily been lesbian instead of a wife with no kids (JANE BOND anyone?…or what if IRON MAN came home to Paul Rudd instead of Gwyneth Paltrow – and it wasn’t the movie’s central dramatic “conflict” but just a matter-of-fact element in the storyline?
Alas, we’ll probably never get this kind of real progress as long as conglomerates chase the widest range of demographics possible.
The Girl Who Played with Fire?
There you have it…
I think these writers and studio execs are guarding their “originality” – which is a joke. It’s all the same rehashed garbage.
And as for agents getting upset about not reading theses scripts, that’s just silly. They’re upset that their assistants aren’t reading them and doing coverage.
To a degree, I can understand the secrecy with potential blockbuster films and sequels. However, something like “Cobalt Neutral 9″ doesn’t really deserve this secrecy. It’s an indie film, right? Secrecy for an indie film just doesn’t bode well.
I can understand secrecy on SOME projects, but come on — trading scripts in the Biz is tradition. And if details leak onto the Net, it won’t make a movie collapse. If anything, it probably helps filmmakers step up their game and actually write QUALITY. The truth is, it’s a very select, mostly curious insider base reading / swapping scripts on the Net — most of America hardly fucking reads, let alone read MOVIE SCRIPTS! This is not a problem.
“If anything, it probably helps filmmakers step up their game and actually write QUALITY.”
Is this what you think, based on all the “QUALITY” we’ve seen in theaters lately?
What it does is cause executives to freak out and go into another frenzy of ass-covering notes, which leads to even less “QUALITY”.
What I meant was, if it’s ripped to shreds / fans destroy the credibility of the story, etc., it will give the filmmakers an idea of what their target audience won’t enjoy watching; based on that, it (ideally) should lead to them stepping up the game in terms of storytelling. This, of course, is presuming that the filmmakers are thoughtful, intelligent, somewhat literate individuals who actually care about the craft of screenwriting, story structure, etc. Which I understand many are not.
You’re right about “quality” in film lately. No need to get snarky. That’s Nikki’s job.
I don’t know if sharing in the writing process with the fans (especially the rabid fan boys who are the types to read scripts on the internet) is such a good idea. a filmmaker is already getting notes from producers and the studio– is it really such a great idea to have every tom, dick, and harry throw in their opinions, and possibly hurt a film’s credibility before the shooting script is even completed?
This is how I feel on the subject. If the script is bad, then the movie may suffer from exposure before it comes out. However if the script is well written, it would only prompt more people to go see the words in motion.
This same thing happens in other mediums as well, such as Japanese animations. Many popular shows are first drawn into comics or “mangas” which are usually very far ahead of their animated counterparts. People still watch the show to see the images of the page come to life.
You’re correct, and I might add that most sites are cool enough about spoilers to not include them in their headlines.
Filmgoers who want to be surprised can read selectively.
You’re missing the point Martin A.
It’s not about people reading the whole script before it comes out, but about that small fringe who reads scripts leaking major plot points to the media, online, etc.
Think about it this way: ‘The Sixth Sense’ (written by Shymalan, notoriously protective of who reads his scripts) made $672 million worldwide, with much of that gross driven by media, friends, etc. telling people “You won’t believe how it ends!” You think it makes that much if two months before it’s released, every one in the country knows that Willis’ character is dead at the end.
Obviously these details are still released after opening weekend, but opening weekend is when studios make the majority of their money (90% of ticket sales, compared to 40-60% each weekend after). If a movie bombs opening weekend, it could mean the end of a writer/director/actor’s career. That’s why talent wants to prevent their stuff from being read.
I thought about it that way and would be severely upset if any refutable source of information leaked the ending of a movie (either before or after it came out and wasn’t considered “common knowledge”). I’d still go see the flick to find out how that happened, and would probably stop watching, reading, or listening to that particular source for my information. (In my experience) Not many people enjoy having things like this given to them, they want to experience it, be entertained by it, become engulfed in the story and forget their own world for one to four hours at a time. Having someone spoil the ending of a mystery story in less than ten seconds is never fun.
V for Vendetta was fucking terrible.
I know, I was bored outta my fooking MIND.
I’m sorry, but with only very few exceptions (all the Marvel Superhero movies come to mind), it is extremely rare for an agency not to get their hands on a script. Someone always gets a watermarked copy. I had the script-ment for AVATAR before casting had begun in earnest. And I am no one of any particular consequence.
What this will mean ultimately is that the really big agencies will have the leverage to get their hands on a script (which will then immediately be scanned into a central script library with varying degrees of access permitted) but anyone below the top 2 or 3 agencies will be left out in the cold.