In a deal that is in the vicinity of $2 million against $5 million, Ryan Kavanaugh’s Relativity Media won the auction for the Nicholas Sparks novel Safe Haven. Temple Hill partners Marty Bowen and Wyck Godfrey will produce with Kavanaugh and Sparks, and Tucker Tooley exec producing. All of them teamed on the adaptation of the Sparks novel Dear John, the Relativity-financed pic that grossed $110 million worldwide with Channing Tatum and Amanda Seyfried starring. Sparks has become the closest thing the movie business has to a slam dunk, and that allowed UTA to make a rather sensational ask in a sluggish book-to-movie marketplace. What is most intriguing is the quick trigger on the deal, whose heft turned off some potential bidders. Buyers got a 9-month window to develop a script. If that date passes and a script isn’t ready, the rights return to Sparks and he keeps the $2 million, sources tell me. It’s unclear how close Kavanaugh came to paying that number, but I think he got close. Not a lot of Relativity’s films have been working lately, but he stepped into a hit with Dear John, a package that was fully developed at New Line by Toby Emmerich, who couldn’t get his then boss Bob Shaye to pull the trigger and instead settled for a 7.5 % of first dollar gross receipts to let it go.
The new Sparks novel follows Katie, a young North Carolina woman, determined to avoid forming personal ties until a series of events draws her into two reluctant relationships. As she begins to fall in love, she struggles with a dark secret that still haunt and terrifies her.
Sparks is coming off The Last Song, a novel he wrote to be a screen vehicle for Miley Cyrus. He also penned the script. This time, he’ll leave that chore to others. His novels The Notebook, Message in a Bottle, A Walk to Remember, Nights in Rodanthe and the upcoming The Lucky One, have all been fashioned into romantic movies.
“I chalk it up to working with great people, and I’ve had more than my fair share of luck,” Sparks told me. “The only thing I ask studios is to retain the spirit of the story and characters and make the best film they possibly can. I’m an author who lives in a little town in North Carolina, and I know very little about making movies. Without going into specifics on the deal, I can honestly say I was thrilled at the unprecedented support they will give this project on all different levels.”
Relativity has just sent a release on the deal, claiming that there is a “unique collaboration” between Grand Central Publishing and Relativity Media to provide marketing and promotional support when the novel gets published in September. That will be accomplished through The Rogue Network, an online venture that claims 50 million views per month. and Tucker Tooley will be executive producer.





Relativity has a secret formula they use to overpay wildly for movies that aren’t that good and don’t make much/any money.
………coming from someone who is totally clueless about how their finances work. You should be such a failure.
50 million hits a month? That doesn’t really reflect why they’re ranked 52,888 in US websites? Source: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/http://www.iamrogue.com
If Kavanaugh is messing with website numbers, I wonder what else he is messing with…
Running a successful business has nothing to do with a website growth! There films make money and that is what matters!
Yea Marc, you certainly must be in the know, I mean clearly you know more about relativity and their success then the oldest and most prestigious hedge fund who’s been in business for 40 years and has 16 billion dollars under management and is relativity’s sole financial investor, or Netflix who is giving them hundreds of millions, or Michael Joe who was the guy that dealt with them at uni and left one of the top operational roles at uni to go to relativity, or Richard branson who’s never done film before and chose relativity as a partner. Tell us Marc exactly what you know that others don’t, please shed your infinite wisdom on us.
Well, films of Sparks’ novels don’t bomb – but the numbers don’t exactly wow. “Message in a Bottle” was $80 million budget vs. $118 million gross; “A Walk To Remember” was $18 million vs. $47 million; “The Notebook” was $29 million vs. $115 million; “Nights in Rodanthe” was an unknown budget vs. $84 million; and “Dear John” was $25 million vs. $112 million. Except for ‘Notebook’ and ‘Dear John’, the numbers are decent but they’re not spectacular. So I’m not exactly sure it’s worth $2 million up front for Sparks. But good on him if he can get it.
You’re correct, but right now all Relativity is looking for is a PROFITABLE film. Tooley jumped behind A Perfect Getaway, Spy Next Door, and MacGruber, only to see all of those bomb (“Brother’s” did ok). Let’s not even talk about Season of The Witch. They keep pushing that. It’s sad that Dear John was their biggest hit. So he’s probably just trying to line up another mediocre success to keep his job. What are they doing wrong? Is it just bad scripts? I cannot figure it out!
I don’t think they’re doing anything wrong per say. In general I think the entire industry has had a rough year per say and no studio has been exempt
Clearly you are just jelous haters who chose to ingnore fact. Relativity has had more number one hits, more films that have broken 100m box, and higher gross then any studio. How about despicable me, hancock, 300, pursuit of happiness, 3:10 to yuma, dear john, salt, grown ups, mama mia, fast and the furious.
Will Jamie Linden write it?
Sparks is already in danger of becoming the next M. Night Shamylan, in terms of product quality. Predictable plots and one-dimensional characters. Enough already.
Tucker is just not that smart and he pushes Ryan to use all his friends on their projects.
Tucker works his butt off.
Dear Haters: I beg to differ. Tucker IS very smart he’s just not an arrogant loudmouth like the haters in this town. Both Ryan and Tucker work their butts off. There is no formula for a successful film, no matter who produces, writes or stars in the movie. Just wait and see what they have up their sleeves for Oscar season..you wish you had the opportunities they do. Personally, I can’t wait for The Fighter.
You just said it. There is NO formula.
But there is one formula. Make films that people want to see.
Fighter is not good. I’ve seen it. Why do you think they reshot the ending?
Well if they ending wasn’t good… as you claim… why wouldn’t they re-shoot it?? Is that a bad thing?
If the ending was bad… as you claim… why wouldn’t they re-shoot it? Is that a bad thing? Films constantly have alternate endings!
The problem with A Perfect Getaway was the marketing. For anyone that actually saw it, they would discover it to be a slick, clever and twisting thriller with great performances from a talented cast. And no, I have no connection to anyone involved with the project.
I went in thinking it was going to be a typical lame thriller but it flipped the entire thing on its head and was a subtle commentary on “judging a book by its cover.” Particularly it commented on how its “en vogue” to bash southerners because they don’t drive a Prius or wear black.
i thought perfect getaway was gonna suck and just be another excuse for actors to work in a cool location. I thought the performances were better than to be expected and overall pretty clever.
What is you are upset about, did they not buy your script? Aren’t you late for your job at the cheescake factory?
Hollywood is a place where dreams come true. All you haters just hate it when anyone elses dreams come true or anyone else succeeds. The irony is that without relativity their would be at least 50 percent less films and all you out of work writers/producers who have time to sit here and attack those actually doing something with their lives wouldn’t even have the 1 percent chance you currently have of getting something made, if it wasn’t for relativity.
Hmmm, they own a distribution company. The head of distribution and marketing has been the head of disti and marketing at 3 of the largest studios over the past two decades, their president was a very high level exec at uni for 15 years who uni offered the coo job too to try and keep him, yet he still left to join relativity. They are in business with netflix, richard branson and many others. They finance/make some 30 films a year and 20 telivision shows. They have built one of the largest online ad networks and are gorwing in digital media, and you guys think this crap you write has any credibility? Why don’t you stick to writing messages on the back of the bathroom stall doors your work in.
This comment goes to Marc above… you certainly must be in the know, I mean clearly you know more about relativity and their success then the oldest and most prestigious hedge fund who’s been in business for 40 years and has 16 billion dollars under management and is relativity’s sole financial investor, or Netflix who is giving them hundreds of millions, or Michael Joe who was the guy that dealt with them at uni and left one of the top operational roles at uni to go to relativity, or Richard branson who’s never done film before and chose relativity as a partner. Tell us Marc exactly what you know that others don’t, please shed your infinite wisdom on us.
I think Jamie linden is confirmed to adapt this. Hopefully some of the magic from this amazing book translates to Lindens screenwriting….. Hopefully….