As Sunday’s Emmy Awards telecast approaches, the Writers Guild of America West last night hosted its annual ”Sublime Primetime 2010″. It was a panel discussion with Emmy-nominated TV writer-producers including Carlton Cuse (Lost), Rolin Jones (Friday Night Lights), Mindy Kaling (The Office), Robert King and Michelle King (The Good Wife), Bruce C. McKenna and Robert Schenkkan (The Pacific), and Ryan Murphy, Brad Falchuck, and Ian Brennan (Glee). As part of Deadline’s ongoing series on TV’s top showrunners, freelance journalist Diane Haithman examines the WGA’s Showrunners Training Program about making the leap from writer to boss:
The sixth season of the Writers Guild West’s Showrunner Training Program begins January 2011 and is taking applications now.
Conducted in partnership with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, it’s designed to help senior-level writer-producers hone the skills necessary to become successful showrunners in today’s television landscape. But if you want to find about 2010′s boot camp, then you have to first get past the “Cone of Silence”. It seems fitting that the people who make and create TV shows would turn to the sitcom Get Smart to describe the bubble of secrecy that shrouds the popular program. Though voluntary, the pledge to not reveal what happens is vital to the program’s effectiveness. “We’ve only had one instance in five years when something got out of the room, and it was unfortunate but
it was the result of an honest mistake,” Jeff Melvoin, showrunner for Lifetime’s Army Wives and one of the founders of the program, tells me. “The reason we have the Cone of Silence is, we want the experience to be meaningful. We have top folks coming in and talking about their experiences, and I think that if people are going to give up six Saturdays and do this program, they deserve the best that we can give them, and that means not pulling any punches.”
While the artistic mission behind the program is making better TV, there’s also another compelling reason: money. Networks and studios are constantly complaining there aren’t enough experienced TV showrunners (creatives who also know how to handle the financial and managerial aspects of putting on their shows). The AMPTP collectively give an estimated $125,000 to $150,000 annually to fund the boot camp. After all, they benefit most from it. The program is one of the most sacrosanct even when the WGA and AMPTP negotiate contracts.
As program co-founder and WGAW president John Wells (E.R., Third Watch, West Wing) tells me: “It’s really kind of a crazy thing, if you think about it – there aren’t too many businesses where somebody writes something, they produce it in the spring [as a pilot episode] and come May 1st somebody says: ‘All right, here’s $26 million – go hire 150 to 200 people and spend it all by sometime next May.’” Wells says that it’s virtually impossible to be just a writer anymore in television. “Some people have done it very successfully, where they’ve found a partner who is willing to take over all the managerial stuff and they are allowed to just sit someplace and write,” says Wells. “But in television, it is certainly the aspiration to reach a point where you are controlling your own material, and feel that you are making decisions about what you are doing – the cast, the music, what the cut looks like.”
Wells and Melvoin formed the program because both believe the apprenticeship system long in place before the word “showrunner” even existed has disappeared. Plus, shows are being given to creators who cut their teeth in the feature film world or, more rarely, playwriting or other writing disciplines. So these creatives were coming to television with a unique vision but no practical experience in the medium. “For people my age and older, you used to hear the term ‘head writer’ – and it goes back to The Dick Van Dyke Show – Dick Van Dyke was the head writer for the [fictional] ’Alan Brady Show’, and everybody loved him,” says Melvoin. “You get this handsome guy with this beautiful wife and these two nuts who work for him – one of whom plays the cello – and that’s how you make a show.” Now, he says, those nutty writers suddenly find themselves managing what amounts to multimillion-dollar enterprises.
Welcome to apply are current-active WGAW or WGAE members in good standing with writer-producer credit or above on a current, dramatic (comedy or drama) television series and/or an active studio or network pilot script commitment. Writing teams are considered a single entity. To apply, a recommendation form must first be submitted on the writer’s behalf by a current or recent (2009-2010) showrunner or a network or studio executive (from the development or current departments). The deadline for recommendations to be received is Friday, September 17. Once the Recommendation Form has been received, the candidate will be sent the URL for the online Application and will have four weeks to complete and submit to the Guild. Once Applications are reviewed, select candidates are invited for personal interviews. Approximately 20 writers/writing teams evaluated principally on leadership potential, managerial skills and career experience will be invited to join the program. “Our goal is to provide this program to people who need it most immediately,” program director Carole Kirschner tells me.
2010’s Showrunner Training Program (January 9-February 20) included the following seminar topics: From Writer to Manager; Managing Writers and the Script Process; Managing Production & Directors; Managing Executives and Actors; Managing Post-Production and Managing Your Career. Speakers and instructors included not only veteran showrunners Joss Whedon, Steve Levitan and Jason Katims, but also actors, directors, teamsters and network/studio executives. Also part of the program were breakout sessions with John Wells discussing budget/scheduling issues and Stephen J. Cannell instructing on the pilot process. According to participants, woven into these sessions are plenty of tips on dealing with network and studio script notes, crisis management, real-world scenarios, even what to do if a major earthquake scares your actors so much they don’t want to return to the set. Due to the Cone of Silence, network and executives are not usually invited to sit in on the writer-producers sessions. Still, at their own sessions, I’ve heard that execs tend to be surprisingly frank.
For Lost showrunner Carlton Cuse, an instructor since the inaugural program, the course is all about writer empowerment. He tells me he tries to give writers the tools to stand their ground against an avalanche of notes (“I don’t see a lot of shows failing and people saying: ‘We just didn’t give enough notes on that show,’ he grumbles), and the obvious pitfalls of trying to maintain artistic control in a collaborative medium. “I think writers have always had to sort of struggle with being perceived as second-class citizens,” he says. “That’s not to say that other people aren’t significant, but they are interpretive artists – whether you are a director, or an actor. TV is really the medium of the writer.
“It truly a circumstance where knowledge is power,” Cuse continues. “One thing that’s important is just sort of learning the lexicon of production; you can be shanghaied by a studio executive or a line producer if you don’t really know what’s going on when people start talking about numbers and budgets and the logistics of production…what you have to do as a showrunner is sort of win the battle, figure out a way to get the network and the studio to respect your vision.
“In most cases, what is being done on TV is better than in film right now, and I attribute that significantly to writers who are in control of their medium and you are getting a kind of pure, undiluted vision, whether it’s Ryan Murphy with Glee or David Chase with The Sopranos.“
Recent graduates of the program include Matt Nix (Burn Notice, The Good Guys), Jennifer Johnson (Cold Case), John Stephens (Gossip Girl) and Sam Baum (Lie To Me).
Danielle Sanchez-Witzel is a program graduate who took the course while she was working her way up the writer’s ranks on My Name Is Earl, where she started as a co-producer, then became a supervising producer, and ended up as a co-executive producer. She says the program can be of greatest value “before you become a co-EP.” Now she has a “showverall” –- that is, a day job running a show (NBC’s Love Bites) along with a studio development deal (NBCU’s Universal Media Studios). She says that, when she attended the program, questions were flying from young showrunners about how to cope with this stressful situation.
“The first thing we have to think about is being creative, but it’s a little naïve to thing that we don’t have to think about [money], it’s definitely a factor in decision making,” she says. The showrunner program, she adds, is about “doing a schedule and managing writers and all the things that really might not occur to you sitting in a writers’ room trying to get a laugh. “
One of Sanchez-Witzel’s favorite parts of the program was Wells’ half-day budget seminar, which she says “sounds infinitely boring,” but instead was fascinating given Wells’ track record of success. She also liked Cannell, who “was the greatest, nicest guy – often we think the jerks rise to the top, but he showed us that it’s not necessary to run a business that way.”
Ok, so does the WGAW Showrunner Program actually help you get a job? Cuse says yes. “I feel the program is pretty well respected; people have come to see the value of it. I do really think it helps if you say to the network: ‘I’ve been through that program.’ ”



This program only takes people who are about to be showrunners anyway so they can point to all their success.
Not exactly true. They accept people who have worked their way up through the ranks, and/or are at the point where they are out pitching or have sold something, or are poised to take over a show… but there’s no guarantees that the writer is about to be a showrunner. You have to be recommended by bosses (current showrunners) and studio/network execs. who know your work. But acceptance into the program is no guarantee that you are about to step over that great divide. There have been plenty of people who have gone through that program who have not yet made it to showrunner. Me being one of them. Still — it’s a great program, a rare honest and truth telling look into what the business of television is like once you step through the looking glass, and a fantastic font of information, contacts and people you can call on for advice if/when you do sell a show. Writers don’t often think of the business side of the business… and this program makes you confront it. I applaud the WGA and AMPT for having consensus on, at least, this one issue.
Anon,
Not trying to pick a fight, but the “…showrunners anyway” comment isn’t true. I’m a grad of the program and I’ve yet to run a show, nor have I sold a pilot that’s made it on air. The only thing I had when I applied was an aspiration to run a show and a desire to learn the craft of showrunning. They recognized I was seeking knowledge to better understand the business of television and accepted me into the program.
Please don’t discourage people from trying to get into a really good program.
I may only be just starting out, but judging from some of the people I met at the sublime primetime panel this week, the showrunner seminar should be very selective. Some people just have the natural talent to be a showrunner, but need the instruction and mentoring of this program to help them do it right the first time. Some just will never have the ability to do it, no matter how much expert training they get.
Well, obviously those are the people who are going to need it the most. It’s not a film school where they can be like who wants to maka the films? The point is people who are transitioning from writer/producer to showrunner need to learn a lot.
What a load of bunk. I hope young wanna be showrunners and writers don’t buy into this egalitarian bullshit that talent comes into play very much at all. Kids, it mostly comes down to sucking up and who you know. I can count three names on this list who are utterly talentless, but someone took a liking to him/her, sometimes for the right reasons, sometimes for wrong reasons, that I won’t go into. And no, I’m not some disgruntled failure. I’ve had plenty of success, but that was 20 years ago (I’m a dinosaur) before the Harvard Mafia and, worse, the Elitist Snob Mafia, took over TV.
What a joke having Carlton Cuse giving advice to writers after the way he and Damon Lindelof abused the writers on LOST – it’s universally known that they created the nastiest room in hollywood…
And they took a great show and ran it into the ground. They need to take a seminar on what not to do: write a bunch of crazy shit for six years and then fail to tie any of it together at the end.
Anonymous is right!
How dare a program training people for one of a finite number of jobs (maybe 100?) train only those people most likely to be hired.
Down with the meritocracy! They should start training the baby writers that can’t build relationships and alliances on their own to perform a job they’ll never be hired for!
“Commander in Chief” showed real promise with strong debut ratings, a well-written story led by a strong cast, including Geena Davis and Donald Sutherland. It can be argued that the impetus of its ultimate downfall was an unprepared showrunner. The studio would replace the creator with an experienced, outside showrunner after only a few episodes and myriad delays and setbacks.
Did Wells instruct them on how to cross the picket line?
I’m curious as to how much this camp costs?
Finally some information on what a Showrunner actually does! I’ve been trying for two years to get someone to tell me what a Showrunner actually does. MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS, PLEASE! Your interviews with Showrunner’s, while interesting, focus on what is going to happen on the show itself, NOT on what functions the Showrunner does or what problems he/she must handle.
Anonymous’s comment above isn’t really true, and if you look through the lists of participants over the past few years (which I believe are somewhere on the wga website) you’ll see that there a re a lot of mid-level writer/producer types who haven’t yet become showrunners who have done the program.
why not share this with everyone; what is the secret for………to exclude people?????why????
how would anyone expect success when its judged?????
Because Terri, only really smart and evolved people can be showrunners; only they truly understand the “secret”. Everyone knows that. Just ask their writers. But since you asked, the “secret” is…strike fear into the hearts of your insecure monkey writing staff. Anytime one of them shows a little self-confidence and/or self-esteem, mock them publicly. Routinely remind the network how late you had to stay “fixing” scripts and “editing” the director’s cut. Fire your staff regularly. Turn co-ep’s on each other to insure they won’t attempt to usurp your power. And most importantly, work out ten versions of the same sneer.
Understand Terri? If so, you’re ready to run a show!
Nancy — you’re dead-on. You described my EXACT experience being on staff at at top-ten show. Why must they make it so miserable???
For what it’s worth- and it sounds like you’re angry enough this won’t make a difference to you – much of the discussion in the program is about how unnecessary and counter-productive the kind of behavior you describe is.
If you dislike the way shows are managed, you should support a program that advises people on how to be better managers.
Ultimately, being a showrunner is about getting your vision onto the air and to the viewer. And that means running the gauntlet of studio, network, writers room, staffing, budgeting, casting, supervising directors, handling actors, scheduling, editing, scoring, mixing, publicity, alternate media, brand management and… well I’m sure I’ve left out more than a few things.
If anyone out there thinks you can pick up these skills by being in a couple of different writers’ rooms and hearing a few anecdotes/war stories, well, then good luck. Because I’ve worked with literally dozens of showrunners and can assure you that a well-prepared showrunner clearly stands a better chance of survival for himself/herself as well as the nearly 200 people who work with them on every single series.
This program benefits all of us who work in television and television itself as an industry. The incredibly talented men and women who give their time (to train their competition, no less), are to be applauded.
Where can one apply for this? I’m in a hybrid showrunner/SP position now on a daily show and would like to hear the other side about making the leap to network…
The richest irony is that John Wells, as a young man (and I knew him when) would NEVER have sat for this kind of hand holding B.S.
It’s a nice jerkoff for playwrites and movie folks. If you’ve worked your way up in TV and you hope to gain anything from this program, then you haven’t been paying attention on your way up and you’ll fall flat on your face regardless.
This program is off the rails.
Everyone had high hopes for it. Now it’s getting to be a joke among TV writers. They see it as a networking opportunity – but they know you don’t learn anything, and the only advantage is social climbing.
Younger writers bound for big things have to wait a few years to get tapped, while middling talents that have percolated to the upper levels by kissing ass and growing older are waved in.
The people doing the choosing don’t seem to have any taste.
It’s why some of the most talented young TV writers have no interest in participating.
And Anonymous had a point – they take every Co-EP with no future, every joke of a playwrite and feature drop out with a pilot script deal. Instead of eyeing the middle level staffers who WILL run shows down the line.
That’s actually fundamentally untrue. There weren’t any playwrights in it the year I was in it (three years ago), and of the people who were in the program that year, already four or five of the class of 25 have shows on the air — Jon Steinberg (Human Target), Janet Tamaro (Rizzoli and Isles), Sam Ernst and Jim Dunn (Haven), and Abraham Higgenbothom (I forget the name of the comedy he created). In addition, several members are running other shows they didn’t create — Don McGill, co-running CSI — or in prime positions on other shows, like Walsh-Corrigan on Modern Family.
Me thinks this isn’t an agency vet, but instead someone who was rejected from the program. To which I say, keep applying.
‘the only advantage is social climbing’ well isn’t that more valuable? I mean anyone can go to seminar after seminar, buy book after book and learn. And then what?
That’s why some of the “most talented’ young TV writers…musicians, actors, artists, etc..end up drinking themselves into–potential having–failed professionals.
I’m not trying to pick a fight with you agency vet, but maybe you’re outlook is not working. What IS kissing ass? Showing up and telling someone you’re big fan of their work? Smiling while holding an appetizer? Some find it’s easier to bitch, than actually work.
Writers are their own worst enemies sometimes. This is merely another tool to be successful in this business via intellectual property.
I liken showrunning to being a professional athlete. You can train for years on a lower level, but once you step into a situation where you are expected to deliver every night, all the practice in the world doesn’t guarantee that you will deliver the goods.
In the same way, a showrunner can only be succssful by being allowed to fail. That’s how you separate the contenders from the pretenders. Giving them a crash course in showrunning might be a hindrance.
Then again, my feelings have always been that every writer with showrunning aspiations should have an LLC and stop thinking like an individual and start thinking like a business.
Let’s put it this way. If you can take care of a household, you can be a showrunner. It just depends on you’re ability to communicate, your decision making and your flexibility. If you have a great show, the network will do everything in their power to help you succeed. If you have a dog, not even John Wells can save it.
Now as to a bubble show, yes having a savvy, experienced cool customer for a showrunner is definitely more desirable than a haphazard noob of course.
@Nancy: great!!! I have sneers !!!!!!
“It’s really kind of a crazy thing, if you think about it – there aren’t too many businesses where somebody writes something, they produce it in the spring [as a pilot episode] and come May 1st somebody says: ‘All right, here’s $26 million – go hire 150 to 200 people and spend it all by sometime next May.’”
This is typical WGA nonsense. As a line producer, I take real offense to this characterization of this made up term “show runner”. Ever since the day that Writers hijacked the term “producer” the WGA has been pushing this nonsense in order to drive higher salaries and bigger back end deals for writer/creators. Mind you, I have no problem with writers and show creators getting what they well deserve for their creative talent without which my job would not exist.
However, after 3 decades in this business working as a UPM and a Line Producer I take great offense to this public mentality that “show runners” have somehow adopted the responsibilities of UPMs and Line Producers. We the actual producers of these programs bear all responsibility for the hiring, budgeting and delivery of shows to the studio.
I have worked with good show runners and bad, but I have never worked with a “show runner” who has been involved in the hiring of 200 crew members or dealt with the burden of hiring/firing and accepting responsibility for said decisions.
I have a lot of friends in the WGA and none of them want any part of what we do as Line Producers.
It’s time to return dignity and honor to the field of “producing” while at the same time recognizing the immense and vital talents of the very creative writers and directors with who we work.
The term “show runner” has to go and along with it the absolute bastardization of the term “Producer” by the WGA. It reflects the disrespectful and childish nature of several past leaders of the WGA and has sapped all dignity from within it’s membership.
Agreed. See all those producer credits that run 5 minutes into the show? They are all writers who know next to nothing about producing, directing, or editing. When writers run everything, they run their own shows into the ground.
It’s “playwright”, people, not “playwrite”. And to think I probably work for some of you…
While I’m an outsider to the program (I work in Film), I did wish to comment about someone’s personal observation above regarding Mr. Wells. I knew him way back when, too (even before NGDE). He was always quite humble about the people who were his mentors on the way up, and I remember him mentioning any number of old-timers he knew, and always held them in/with great reverence.
The system’s never been perfect, whatever that is. It’s absolutely a town built upon relationships, timing and dumb luck. Talent? Not always, maybe (it certainly seems like some people continue to fail upwards).
But there are some AWESOME writers out there, too, so if this thing is just another boys club, or if in fact there’s a mix of altruism and pragmatism in its need and execution – so be it. An opportunity is an opportunity, and that’s been increasingly rare ’round here. And John? People are entitled to their opinions. I think he’s a good guy, and that’s rare, too.
I participated in the program earlier this year. I had no connections to it. Knew nobody in the program. And yet I was selected after I was nominated, submitted an essay and gave a good interview. The program is fantastic. Anyone who says differently has an agenda. The insights shared by EPs/showrunners in the program are amazingly insightful, but the shared knowledge from fellow participants is priceless. The program doesn’t prepare you to be a showrunner — only experience can truly prepare you for that — but it lets you know what you’ll be up against when the opportunity comes to run your own show. And that alone is worth it. From managing writers room crises to talent issues to budgets and everything in between, the program is a thorough review of what a showrunner faces as the #1 on a show. That person has to answer to the network/studio for million dollar decisions, and not everyone is qualified to do that. The candidates who make it in are selected because someone believes they have the potential to do it, and do it well. Don’t listen to the naysayer commenters — the SRTP is a legitimate and invaluable training ground for writer/producers whose colleagues believe they have the potential to be showrunners.
Most writers ARE their own worst enemies.
Anti-social, elitist, too smart for the room, etc.
It’s what makes them great writers.
But show running (done right) is about team building, crisis management and knowing when to pick your fights and when to roll over.
Ultimately: it’s about leadership. The prickly insecure writer is the worst choice for this job. Sometimes the middle talent blowhard writer who knows how to charm or bully everyone into submission IS the right person for the job. The added benefit: all the better writers get to feel superior behind his/her back and vow to themselves that when they run a show they’ll fight for EVERYTHING and never let any transgression go without appropriate payback!