UPDATE: Susan Boyle’s famous audition for Britain’s Got Talent was digitally tweaked, according to a show insider. The Evening Standard quotes an anonymous source saying that the show’s production team — which is the same as The X Factor — smoothed out the Scottish singer’s voice in post-production.
PREVIOUS: Talkback Thames, which co-produces Simon Cowell’s Britain’s Got Talent with his Syco, has admitted to me that the show has used Auto-Tune to make auditions sound better. (Auto-Tune is primarily designed to correct pitch and disguise off-key mistakes as well as filter outside noise.) This is now the 2nd Cowell contest show which is using sound enhancement technology and the 3rd Cowell contest show which is cheating. ”In line with standard television practice, sound filtering technology has been used on Britain’s Got Talent on our pre-recorded shows, but this does not unfairly reflect any singer’s performance. The performance shown on screen is a fair reflection of performance given in the live theatre. Judges make their decision based on that live performance,” Talkback Thames emailed me.
The producers are trying to split hairs; they claim the sound enhancement software is used only in post-production, and that Cowell and fellow panelists Piers Morgan and Amanda Holden do hear and judge only the performers’ raw efforts. But the audience is deprived of making fair comparisons about the contestants’ talent amid allegations that some singers are advancing because of interesting backstories instead of vocal ability. Even now, Talkback Thames is refusing to confirm or deny whether Britain’s Got Talent‘s most famous contestant, Susan Boyle, had her audition helped by Auto-Tune. That YouTube video of her performance garnered 120 million views, earning ITV an estimated $500,000 and making her a global singing sensation. But her success won’t feel so magical if it turns out her audition was Auto-Tuned as well.
Cowell’s UK version of The X Factor has been rocked by two cheating scandals already before it even airs on Fox in Fall 2011. The first coincided with the start of the new season when it was revealed that the show has been using Auto-Tune to make the audition contestants sound better. Many pop singers use Auto-Tune on their recordings or in live performance. But no one knew it was being used until a performance by 18-year-old contestant Gamu Nhengu who sang Katrina and the Waves’ 1980s hit “Walking On Sunshine”. After hearing her effort, judge Simon Cowell told her she was “really talented” before she was unanimously voted through to the next round, in part because of her compelling back story.That’s when fans crowded onto Facebook claiming they could clearly hear that vocal enhancements had been employed on Gamu’s voice and accusing the show of perpetrating a massive con. (“When she got going on the second verse, there’s a 10-second chunk where it’s really, really sharp and there’s an Auto-Tune moment.”) In response to the controversy, an X-Factor spokesman admitted that post-production work such as vocal enhancement technology was used. But he claimed it was needed because of all the microphones on stage to “deliver the most entertaining experience possible for viewers”.
A second scandal rocked the UK show after it emerged that a contestant already has a record contract in the U.S. Cowell, meanwhile, has been stung by all the criticism and banned performance-enhancing software from edited pre-recorded auditions. Still, UK newspapers are calling X Factor “the TV scandal of the year” and complaints have been lodged with UK regulators. On the one hand, all this cheating has attracted even more publicity and therefore rising ratings to Cowell’s UK shows. But how will Fox feel if Cowell’s credibility falls to zero?


Duh ?!?
Are we really supposed to be shocked about these allegations?
I suppose that most TV audiences are gullible and naive — that’s why it’s called the boob tube or stupid box.
Simon a fraud? No way!!!!!
Tim, I can’t believe you’re buying in to this clever PR stunt so hard.
Ugh…who cares?
Next you’ll tell me the Monkees didn’t play on their records.
Anyone who thinks their is anything “real” whatsoever about ‘reality’ tv needs to have their heads examined.
is there a demolition job going on vs simon cowell at Deadline.com?
Hi,
As far as I was aware, ITV made $0 from all the youtube clip-plays, while youtube had to cover the hosting costs. This was because Youtube wasn’t willing to submit to ITV’s terms.
On the subject of the post, it’s still not gaining full traction (Except the tabloid front-pages!), but then nor did the PRS (Premium Rate Services, calls) scandal which ended up eventually costing $100m’s in fines/compensation and some jobs, get an immediate effect.
Auto-tuning would be almost as contrived as the phone-in scandal where producers had already deigned participants and winners, combine that with the effect of those manipulated clips motivating voting at premium (or even standard) rates, and you have the potential for the whole house of Reality-tv cards, where even the American practice of some “scenes created for entertainment” wouldn’t be enough to cover the wrath of various regulators, and ultimately offended viewers who don’t like to believe they’ve been played for fools.
Yours kindly,
Shakir Razak
Come on… have you nothing better to do than recycle news pieces like this? Why not look at the OTHER broadcasts that use this technology! This is hardly fair or accurate journalism as you are simply victimising one production in particular!
EVERY show that is reality-entertainment has used this technology in some capacity in the last few years. American screens have had it bestowed upon them a lot more and just haven’t noticed. Why not report into that if you want to go down that route? Or instead simple tabloid journalism that your sticking to!
Post work is needed as this is TELEVISION ENTERTAINMENT. The aim is to make an enjoyable show. What is next, colour correction was used to make certain performers look ‘better’? or the use of coldplay music during one contestants backstory gives her an unfair emotional advantage? Sheesh!
Please stop this campaign of hatred unless you wish to do some objective and well informed journalistic pieces.
Thanks for my say!
a guy, chris, was defending the show by saying all TV shows use post production effects to enhance the experience…while this may be true for video editing and stuff, which is fine, the same should not be true of auto-tune and singing contests…Auto tune will take your voice and force it to be in perfect tune with a chromatic scale…so if you are singing sharp, it will make it stay in tune…on top of that, you can program auto-tune to stay within a certain scale, or even programming it note for note so you have to sing the correct note…Of course, no one should really give a damn about these manufactured pop artists anyways, but if its supposed to be a contest on singing the best, using auto-tune takes ALL credibility from the singer…essential anyone can sound okay with auto-tune, and anyone who can sing half right can sound amazing as long as their tonal quality stays rich…so you can miss notes as the computer will make u sing the right note, unless you suck so hard that you can’t even stay within the same realm of the note and than you will start sounding like Lil Wayne.
I agree – why is there an constant smear campaign going on against Simon Cowell especially on here? I hear that maybe someone who ‘used’ to work with him is getting a very paranoid and is behind all of this.
So SuBo is big fake. I wonder how all those millions of people who bought her album to support the poor, homely singing prodigy feel now.
I do not understand how some people think. Faking someones voice in the music industry means all they do is pick out a poster child and artificially engineer a voice to go with it.This will eventually give truly talented vocalists a very rough road. I believe he just did this with a ten year old in america. Her voice on agt was strange and overly mature. When her mouth was closed due to she fell short of her note.The note amazingly continued. This is sad.