Here’s the announcement from Mark Gill and Neil Sacker:
The Film Department announced today that it is in negotiation with investors who prefer to keep the company in private hands for $200 million in equity and debt that will be used to finance the production, acquisition and U.S. release of 5-10 films per year. As a result, the company has withdrawn its registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
6 AM: SEC filings show that Mark Gill’s and Neil Sacker’s The Film Department has cut the price of its expected IPO again — this time by more than half to $6 a share. Obviously, the reason for the public offering is to raise money for this production, finance, and international sales movie indie which also wants a domestic distribution arm. But this just may not be the right time economy-wise considering even powerhouse private equity firm KKR’s recent IPO was flat. The Film Department first filed for an IPO in December at between $12 to $14 a share price to raise $100M, and this is the 2nd time it has trimmed its share price. The problem now is that the cut-price IPO may not even cover The Film Department’s $25M of outstanding debt.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.






the film dept and kkr couldn’t be less relevant comps for the IPO marketplace, and kkr’s situation is a bit more complex bc of how long they were trying to go public and their int’l listing.
the IPO market exists – it’s not sweltering but plenty of companies are pricing in or above their ranges – the film dept just sounds like a flat story especially w/ all that debt.
Even at that price TFD will be a good short sale.
A truly absurd basis for an IPO. What cash flows is Film Department selling equity against? What assets? Oh, forgive me – they don’t have assets, they have $25 million in debt.
Yeesh. Why is this even taken remotely seriously?
I sense a sinking ship here. Too bad.
Or the cost of their new swanky headquarters in BH.
Actually I think they moved because the rent at the BH offices is substantially less.
As am familiar with TFD. I would suggest they pause on filing the IPO with the SEC.
Like this article indicates it is not the best of times to do so. However that is subjected to change based on how TFD handles it’s 25mil debt.
I hope my friends at TFD are doing well.
Where did the first +/- $200 million go? only three films in the can. Seems odd and doesn’t add up.
Would someone please clarify – I must be missing something or be miss-informed. Thanks
are you saying there’s a reason more new film companies don’t go public on the stock exchange?
I’m confused. I know IMDBpro doesn’t have many or all a companies movies on there site but a look at Film Department’s projects makes anyone who knows the business laugh and ask “do they think that bankers and investors are that stupid”. This so pathetic and confusing. $25 million in debt. A slate that most would say is ordinary to it has no real potential for any big winners.
What is the big edge they have versus the other 100 production entities out there? Do they have a special niche? Relationships that are so great? What about Gill and Sackers track record tells you they can repeat or find something special? Do the agencies trust and believe in them enough to send them a great package for a prokect that looks to be an obvious winner?
I would ask those that know the Film Department better than I do can answer these question for us. From what I can see the answer to these would be they have no edge and thus they are getting laughed out of the rooms and calls they are on to try and go public.
Seems like a ruse to steal investors money.
I’m in at 2 and a quarter.
allright–you guys really seem to be NOT rocket scientists when it comes to film finance and I love it when newbies talk out of their asses to get attention. So let me educate you mailroom workers and assistants on reality—
1. Film Department raised $20 million in equity. rest in debt which was never used. it was on hold but the equity was never leveraged
2. the $20 million they burned through on 8 million a year overhead and a few films which didnt make then any money
3. Their main investor is an arab sheikh who is pissed about losing the money
4. They are doing IPO not to make films but to repay their $20 million loss + make some films (gag)
Off course if I dont know what I am talking about go to the sec.gov website and do a search on edgar for film department. all the info is there
5. Nobody is doing IPO;s today that doesnt have a positive cash flow, assets, and little debt—this aint 1999
6. Private equity in U.S. is dead..DOA. Especially for film deals. yes you have relativity and legendary and Bain but those are lotto winners
Enjoy the guessing
smells like soon to be bankruptcy
Neil Sacker’s been living off investors since 1997, when he left Miramax, you know the same year Bob & Harvey had to sell to Disney!? Nomura, Miracle Ent, Destination, Yari Films, and soon to be bankrupt Film Dept., all share two common denominators,
Mr. Sacker, head of Business & Legal Affairs (acquisitions) & bankrupt or so to be…
Another one “bites the dust!” The Film Dept was unable to talk, yet another investor out of a stash of cash! (11/2/10 check details with Mark Gill).
Is that a record for Neil Sacker most consistant company failures???
Where Neil Sacker goes a lawsuit is sure to follow!
How to warn investors???