EXCLUSIVE: Watching the sausage being made when it comes to major studio laughers isn’t pretty. So here’s a very typical example. Ever since shooting began on the threequel in the lucrative franchise, Universal has been trying to figure out how to improve its Little Fockers. At one point, replacing director Paul Weitz with producer-writer John Hamburg was contemplated early on and then rejected after Hamburg visited the set one weekend. That’s because everyone realized what a DGA mess this would result in. Plus, Adam Fogelson had just taken over as chairman and didn’t want to throw the already traumatized studio into a worse funk. So the decision was made to fix the movie in post. For about 4 to 5 weeks now, Weitz, Hamburg, Jay Roach, and Ben Stiller have been going through the footage. The good news is that they just decided that re-shoots aren’t needed. The not-so-good news is that they think a week of pickups with all the principal cast in September is required. Fortunately for the studio, the film is “dramatically under budget”, according to an insider. But even so it’s still a $100M film as contemplated. ”The last research screening on June 8th in Sherman Oaks scored great. 54% excellent, 85% total favorable, 73% definitely recommend. But it can be even better after working on it,” a studio exec told me diplomatically. Oh, puh-leeze. Considering that Meet The Parents was a comedic classic, but its sequel Meet The Fockers was so godawful, I can only imagine how lousy Little Fockers must be at this point in the process before its December release.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


So “godawful” that it only made $516 million in worldwide box office and was the biggest box office comedy of all time. They should have such problems.
“Meet the Fockers,” was hilarious! It was it’s predecessor that was just ok. Looking forward to the third one.
“Meet The Fockers” was stale and forced. How it made the money it did is a testament to how stupid we’ve become as a society.
I couldn’t disagree more. The set pieces in MTP were very well done. Everything from the burning gazebo to the fake replacement cat to the volleyball to the nose to the stop light race were solid – if heightened – comedic moments that sprung from the premise. Whirrlygigging a way for a 40 year old foreskin to wind up in a fondue pot pushes the very definition of the word “forced.”
In MTP you really felt that Greg wanted to impress Jack and the harder he tried, the worse things got. Simple. Relatable. I have no idea what the Fockers movie was even about or why at that point Greg gave a rats ass what Jack thought about him.
MTP had a very clever script that’s based on one simple idea: a guy who’s frightened at the idea he’s judged an underachiever in front of hard guy De Niro or rich and talented former fiancé Owen Wilson and who has to choose between being himself or acting fake. It’s the kind of material that Blake Edwards would have loved in his greatest days. It begins with a missing suitcase and it ends with many valuable things being destroyed because of one small lie that snowballed.
MTF completely lost that concept and it was just a succession of expensive cameos. It has no focus, no stake, just a succession of crowd-pleasing numbers and recalls from the original (you loved the cat that used the bathroom? You’ll get the cat flushing a dog down the toilet). The characters from MTP were secondary to the situation but there’s absolutely no development between the two movies, just a rehash with a bigger budget. Jay Roach wasn’t very lucky with the sequels he shot and if he’s preferred to stay out of Little Fockers while he accepted to direct Goldmember, that should be telling.
Adrian, you are a moron. Meet The Fockers is one of the worst movies ever made. What did you like? When they incessantly kept cutting to the little babies reaction?
I’m very disappointed in you son and am forbidding you from posting on here again.
Go to your room.
Enough already with all the second-guessing.
Practically everything goes through reshoots these days. Wait to see the movie, then judge.
It’s fitting you didn’t list DeNiro’s hack partner Jane Rosenthal as a producer on Little Fockers, since she wasn’t around for 90% of the shoot but was instead busy taking their shitty film festival to the middle East as if they didn’t hate Americans enough… You also mislabeled Ben Stiller a producer, which is not correct and is unfortunate because he at least showed up to work every day. Rest assured Ms. Rosenthal will still get her credit, has cashed her fat check and I’m sure has her publicist calling you as I type to correct the oversight… (How dare you, Nikke!)
Good thing for Universal Jay Roach is done with “Schmucks” so he can clean up their mess like last time – even though they decided to press on and make the movie without him despite his protests. The “Sausage” part of movie making will get much less messy when studios stop rewarding bad behavior from it’s stars and producers-in-absentia alike.
Jane Rosenthal is a fantastic producer and was on set nearly ever day. What she did for Manhattan with the Tribeca Film Festival was noble and amazing; great for the city, great for film.
I suspect WME agents (Stiller’s agent, Nick Stevens?) wrote this because they are angry she left them and took DeNiro with her.
Every studio movie I have worked on goes through re-shoots. This is not news.
My nephew and his girlfriend as well as another couple my age (38) went to a preview screening a month ago in Sherman Oaks and loved it.
Some serious folks with real comedy chops working on this film.
i heard the music on this one is the best. Go Amanda!
Meet the Parents was average at best. But at least it wasn’t a giant pay-check BJ like Fockers. I’m so glad Greenberg bombed, too, ‘cus Stiller owes me $10 after enduring that former monstrosity. No, I *don’t* give a f**k how hard it is for a yuppie to get over his meds and drug problems, Ben. How about showing some humility like your dad, instead? At least he’s not going to run his rep into the ground with junk like Envy and Heartbreak Kid.
Scott: Home Alone at least did the job. Meet the Fockers is more like Home Alone 2.
Why the Face: Yes, because making a lot of money guarantees quality, which must make Austin Powers 3 one of the best movies ever.
Can’t wait to see this; fav. franch.
Wait a minute, the film scored a “54% excellent, 85% total favorable, 73% definitely recommend” and is under budget? Sounds good to me.
The only reason why I enjoyed FOCKERS so much was the Dustin Hoffman -Barbra Streisand inspired pairing. It seems to me, judging from the LITTLE FOCKERS trailer that Hoffman isn’t in it, and Streisand may have a cameo role.
The new trailer is not funny, just seems like a rehash of the first film with some newer characters thrown into the mix such as Jessica Alba and Harvey Keitel. Throw in a Viagra joke and the trailer seemed quite lame.
Had they been smart they’ve have given Hoffman and Streisand major roles in this – it would have been a battle of the inlaws, each with their respective styles raising the grandchildren, that would have been a better comedic hook for the film as opposed to the old I’m-watching-you Stiller De Niro schtick.
The trailer was SHOCKINGLY bad!
Especially in a packed theater waiting for Dinner with Schmucks to start….
Lame jokes, boners, boner injections, etc.
Everyone wanted to laugh, but it just wasn’t funny
Watching the sausage being made when your Chaz Bono is no picnic either.
So Universal started the spin control early trying to stop the hemmoraging of bad press on their big 4th Quarter release! Their covert strategy suggests that the situation on this film could be quite grim. Not a problem, I’ll just wipe this film off of my movies to see list and catch this film one day when it plays on TV for free and I’ll invite some buddies over and we’ll play a game where we try to spot the reshot scenes from the originally shot scenes.
Here, here! Nikki just loves the smell of blood and there is no blood here. I saw a test screening and truly enjoyed it. If you enjoyed the first two flicks then you will definitely enjoy this one and it returns to a great deal of heart that the first flick had. There were A LOT of cooks in the kitchen given the power of the franchise and Weitz and Co. pulled it off admirably.
Meet the Parents has the most successful set-pieces of almost any modern comedy I can think of. I didn’t care at all for the belabored second one so I hope a third installment can recapture some of the inspired mayhem of the first.
Exactly right. MTP and Something About Mary had amazing set pieces and had me laughing my ass off. MTF was an atrocity. I was hoping they’d get back on track with LF, but it’s not sounding good right now. As for people talking about how many “comedy chefs” are working on this? That’s a BAD THING, not a good one.
the sausage making process is not pretty.
I was a bit underwhelmed by the preview and I thought it would be a somewhat “bigger” picture and I definitely thought that Hoffman and Streisand would play as big a role as they did in the second one — so that is a major disappointment for me.
Reshoots happen, if they make it better, why not?
Neither of the first two films was that funny, neither are true classics and I have zero interest in the third.
And for everyone quoting box office figures as some validation of the first two films, I do hope that you all bear in mind box-office gross in Hollywood has no proportionality to how good an actual film is – Twilight franchise anyone?
They are also comedy films – and what makes one laugh elicits groans from others.
Astonished: “And btw, Meet the Fockers, a film that financed Universal for over a year, made well over 500 million dollars worldwide.”
Yes, and the last Chipmunk movie made almost that same amount. What’s your point?
“It had amazing word of mouth,”
So did that Karate Kid remake, and we all know it’s not much better than the Swank version.
“and attracted astounding levels of repeat business”
It was a holiday film, and a sequel to a popular Ben Stiller comedy. Of course it was going to get repeat business.
people, Fockers was really stupid. Little Fockers will make a ton of money because America wants to see more mummified foreskin.
loved Parents. that movie was smart and had a tight story.
what exactly is the difference between ‘pick ups’ with the principal cast and re-shoots? isn’t that like saying i want a turkey sandwich vs. i want a sliced turkey sandwich?
All these competing views are hilarious.
Meet The Parents was a well made and well received movie. Saying otherwise is just silly and contrarian in a way that is obviously bored.
The sequel was a (late arriving) rush job that never elevated itself above its disjointed ideas of “wouldn’t it be funny if…”
Since the cast is all game and they have this track record of experience over 2 of them you’d think they know what to do and what not to do by now. Some pick ups are hardly an indicator of anything. I know this isn’t high art but the divide between the money and creative sensibility is on full display here.
more BARBRA STREISAND. That is the only way to say this movie. She is the reason the other did so well. Remeber she is a comic genius. Give her more screen time then just the end.
I hate to sound ignorant, but can someone tell me what “pickups” means?
Anything the Weitz brothers touch turns to crap. The only people keeping them in business are their close friends.
Why oh why does Ben Stiller have a career? Unfunniest person ever.
Really? Number one, if you think this, why did you read this article and these comments?
Number two, Ben Stiller is a comedic GOD. See Tropic Thunder (Half-squat scene? So good!), Zoolander, etc.
Number three, I know that is your opinion, but I’d hate to see what you think is funny,