Los Angeles, (August 4, 2010) – Seeking to extend its majority coalition on SAG’s National Board of Directors, Unite for Strength today announced its slate of 35 candidates running for election to the SAG National and Hollywood Division Boards. In addition to 15 incumbent Hollywood Board members, the UFS slate features numerous first-time candidates, including veteran actor Ron Perlman and noted comedian/actor Jeff Garlin.
“I’m inspired by our candidates,” said SAG President Ken Howard, who was elected on the Unite for Strength ticket in 2009. “These are smart, dedicated SAG members who are passionate about protecting actors. They represent the diversity of our membership and I know they’ll be terrific leaders if elected.”
Referring to the joint TV/Theatrical-Exhibit A Contract talks set to begin September 27, Jeff Garlin said, “Thanks to Ken and UFS, SAG and AFTRA have teamed up to negotiate the TV and Film Contracts, putting us in a much stronger position than last time, when we were divided. It’s hard to believe nearly a quarter of SAG’s board wanted to negotiate separately again, but the key to staying strong is to elect more board members who see the importance of working together. That’s why I’m running.”
Ron Perlman added “I became a professional actor in 1973. I’ve done just about every type of work possible in this business and it’s never made sense that my jobs were covered by separate unions. With digital video fast becoming the state of the art in filmmaking, splitting work between SAG and AFTRA goes way beyond senseless; it is unacceptable. The only ones who benefit from that division are our employers and we have to put a stop to it. Performers deserve one union that covers all their work, period – and I’m running for the SAG board to help make it happen.”
Unite for Strength was formed in 2008 after then Guild President Alan Rosenberg and his Membership First allies repeatedly attacked AFTRA, leading to the breakdown of joint bargaining and a subsequent SAG contract stalemate. In response, UFS ran its first slate of board candidates in September 2008, successfully taking control of SAG’s National Board with a coalition of board members from across the country. In 2009, running on a platform of strengthening ties with AFTRA, the group won a majority of contested board seats and elected Ken Howard as SAG President and Amy Aquino as the Guild’s Secretary-Treasurer.
This year, Unite for Strength was instrumental in reviving SAG’s historic bargaining partnership with AFTRA. The group also made progress toward its goal of permanently uniting SAG and AFTRA as a single performers’ union when Ken Howard and AFTRA President Roberta Reardon established The Presidents’ Forum for One Union. Candidate and UFS co-founder Ned Vaughn noted, “Recent history has proven that competing with ourselves is a terrible mistake. Actors are facing serious challenges ahead and we need to be as strong and united as possible to protect our livelihoods – that means one union for all of us. The President’s Forum is a crucial step in that direction and I’m excited to be part of it.”
Ballots will be mailed to SAG Hollywood Division members on August 24, 2010. Ballots are due and results will be tabulated on September 23, 2010.
The candidates running on the Unite for Strength slate are:
Michelle Allsopp, Scotty Caldwell, Gabrielle Carteris, William Charlton, Assaf Cohen, Mimi Cozzens, Ellen Crawford, Bertila Damas, Patrick Fabian, Jeff Garlin, Jason George, Clark Gregg, Jon Huertas, Sam Jaeger, Clyde Kusatsu, Christine Lakin, Dawnn Lewis, Donal Logue, Gilles Marini, D.W. Moffett, Marisol Nichols, Jenny O’Hara, Michael O’Keefe, Michael O’Neill, Conrad Palmisano, Ron Perlman, Tara Radcliffe, Dileep Rao, Sarayu Rao, Woody Schultz, Bill Smitrovich, Mandy Steckelberg, Marcia Strassman, Stacey Travis, Ned Vaughn.
For more information, visit www.uniteforstrength.com
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KB9dAFkKlBo&feature=player_embedded
If we (you) are not going to the wall for this future, which is not far off, which means actors MUST have a participatory deal in ALL contracts, which will eventually become ONE contract, then what are we doing?
The people advocating merger are advocating allowing the producers to dictate, unimpeded, the terms under which actors get paid in THIS future.
They are NOT interested in “strength in numbers,” as I assume you already know.
They are advocating CONTROL and POWER that cuts actors OUT of the full participation they deserve for MAKING THE CONTENT producers deliver in the IP universe that will soon overtake the television broadcast universe.
It will soon ALL be ONE blob of content that ANY consumer can access, exactly as he or she pleases at ANY time. Schedules and programming will NOT EXIST ANYMORE.
So, the question circles back to: are we (you) going to get a participatory deal across ALL platforms, and ALL contracts, or not?
If we don’t get out of this box moderate SAG put us in with the 2009 TV/Theatrical contract NOW, we will NEVER get out of it.
So, how does going along with merger, because “we don’t have the votes” stop that from happening?
And, if you don’t have ANY answer for that, what are you doing?
Would you rather go down telling the truth and resigning to tell it freely, without fear of reprisal (that’s almost definitely unconstitutional anyway) or, do you want to go down making it a little less terrible, which, let’s face it, is all you can hope for?
To the remaining MF dissent in a position to expose these lying motherfuckers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KB9dAFkKlBo&feature=player_embedded
If we (you) are not going to the wall for this future, which is not far off, which means actors MUST have a participatory deal in ALL contracts, which will eventually become ONE contract, then what are we doing?
The people advocating merger are advocating allowing the producers to dictate, unimpeded, the terms under which actors get paid in THIS future.
They are NOT interested in “strength in numbers,” as I assume you already know.
They are advocating CONTROL and POWER that cuts actors OUT of the full participation they deserve for MAKING THE CONTENT producers deliver in the IP universe that will soon overtake the television broadcast universe.
It will soon ALL be ONE blob of content that ANY consumer can access, exactly as he or she pleases at ANY time. Schedules and programming will NOT EXIST ANYMORE.
So, the question circles back to: are we (you) going to get a participatory deal across ALL platforms, and ALL contracts, or not?
If we don’t get out of this box moderate SAG put us in with the 2009 TV/Theatrical contract NOW, we will NEVER get out of it.
So, how does going along with merger, because “we don’t have the votes” stop that from happening?
And, if you don’t have ANY answer for that, what are you doing?
Would you rather go down telling the truth and resigning to tell it freely, without fear of reprisal (that’s almost definitely unconstitutional anyway) or, do you want to go down making it a little less terrible, which, let’s face it, is all you can hope for?
The vapid script reader for UFS, Ned Vaughn noted, “Recent history has proven that competing with ourselves is a terrible mistake. Actors are facing serious challenges ahead and we need to be as strong and united as possible to protect our livelihoods – that means one union for all of us.”
You may be on to something, Ned… The Screen Actors Guild is the actors union. AFTRA is the producer’s union. You want us to merge with the hot mess full of broadcasters working hard every day to destroy actors’ ability to make a decent living so they can fund their health and pension funds on our backs?!
If you want one union, you should support sending out a vote to all actors via the NLRB asking actors which union they’d prefer to work for. I think it’s called a Unit Clarification vote. Any serious career-oriented actor would pick SAG, then AFTRA would go back to producing radio and tv shows done live, and we’d get our freakin’ ‘strength’ back so fast your head would spin. But you guys have no spine so that’s never going to happen. Sigh.
While I most assuredly am a supporter of finding a way to create one union for actors,
I find this blatant ad for UFS to be highly distasteful in such a normally straightforward
and honest venue.
While the need to find a way for actors ( AFTRA for example, allows broadcaster members to work non-union?) to all come together under one strong unified banner for the betterment of all,
UFS has continued to preach one way and practice another.
While Mr. Rosenberg’s Presidency was not perfect (whose has been?) so many of the things of which Membership First and AR’s administration have been accused are false and so many of the things that UFS have taken credit for, were done before they got there and in many cases, in spite of them.
Simply put, the overall paradigms of the two unions have been radically different in view and practice, SAG is an actor’s membership driven union, while AFTRA has been largely an impenetrable corporate megalith run quite largely by non actors intent on maintaining their jobs, power and status quo often ending in poached jurisdiction and radically underpaying contracts and thus harming and forgetting the welfare of both Union’s members.
The idea of merger, while theoretically having merit looks to be virtually impossible.
A new union for actors/performers would certainly be ideal.
One for and by membership for the good of all, with transparency toward members and a unified, non-partisan focus on solidarity.
Is it possible? Of course. But this hysterical ninnyism and partisan power grabbing and childish name calling needs to stop and now.
Kids, this is show business…and that is how we need to approach it.
All for one and one for all,
DAPizzuto
SAG/AFTRA Member