EXCLUSIVE: Gravity, the 3D film that Warner Bros is mobilizing with director Alfonso Cuaron and Robert Downey Jr., is suddenly in danger of falling back to earth after Angellina Jolie said no to a full court press and a big money offer to star in the film. It has put Warner Bros in a bind. The studio needs an actress who can hold the screen and draw an audience to an $80 million film. Much like Tom Hanks’ role in Cast Away, the Gravity heroine is the only person onscreen for a large part of the movie. Beyond Jolie, which other actress do you bet on?
Cuaron first courted Jolie when the project was tethered at Universal. She was intrigued with the filmmaker, but passed around the time it landed at Warner Bros. I’m told the studio tested or made approaches to actresses including Sandra Bullock and Natalie Portman (word around town is the studio’s intrigued with both), Naomi Watts, Marion Cotillard, Carey Mulligan, Scarlett Johansson, Sienna Miller, Abbie Cornish, Rebecca Hall, Olivia Wilde, Blake Lively. Warner Bros made a second overture to Jolie, but she just passed for a second time. While Downey certainly has the star power to carry such a movie, he plays a comparatively small role and it was never Downey’s or Cuaron’s intention for him to carry the picture.
Scripted by Cuaron and his son Jonas, Gravity is set on a remote space station. While a team leader (Downey) and a female colleague are traveling outside, the other team members get wiped out by a debris field from an exploding satellite. The film’s central focus is the heroine’s desperate attempt to return home to her child. The intention is to shoot the film next year after Downey completes Sherlock Holmes 2.
I don’t see Jolie returning to the fold. Right now, she is focused on making her directorial debut this fall on a love story that takes place in 1990s Bosnia, from a script she wrote, with GK Films co-financing with an equity partner. Not counting offers coming in, Jolie and longtime manager Geyer Kosinski are figuring out a full slate of projects that are in various stages of development for her. They include joining director Tim Burton in the role of Maleficent in Disney’s Sleeping Beauty; playing the title role in Cleopatra, which is being scripted by Brian Helgeland for Sony Pictures Entertainment; playing the lead role in Scarpetta, the Fox 2000 adaptation of Patricia Cornwell’s bestselling novel series about medical examiner Kay Scarpetta, which Kerry Williamson adapted. In addition, there is a sequel to Jolie’s summer hit Salt just getting underway at SPE; Christopher McQuarrie is adapting the British miniseries Unforgiven for GK Films as a potential star vehicle for Jolie, and Paramount is developing Code Name Sasha with Bryan Bertino writing the script. Jolie next stars alongside Johnny Depp in the Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck-directed The Tourist, which SPE releases December 10, and then provides a lead voice in Kung Fu Panda 2, which will be released May 26, 2011.






Emily Blunt!!
Emily Blunt is a great actress but she can’t open a big budget movie to big numbers…..the best bet is probably Sandra Bullock if she wants it in order to get this greenlit
Rachel McAdams is cute and has depth…I think she could carry this pic….just like Sam Rockwell did with Moon, premise sounds similiar.
But Moon didn`t make money. WB wants money. And McAdams is too cute for a tough chick role that requires Weaver or Jolie. She was totally miscast in Sherlock Holmes as Irene Adler, a role that required Zeta-Jones type of glamour and feminity.
I completely agree! And I’m a fan of McAdams, so I mean no offense to her and I was looking forward to seeing her in the role. When I did see it, though, I was so disappointed and more than a little surprised. She can play a high school Mean Girl okay, but she was really unconvincing in the Irene Adler role, which required someone who could project a more glamourous grown up and femme-fatale presence. I was surprised she couldn’t carry it off, but she couldn’t. A better choice would have been Catherine Zeta Jones, Rachel Weisz, or even Angelina.
As for this part, either CZJ, Weisz, Naomi Watts, or Michelle Williams.
Charlize Theron. She has a look and think she could pull off a good “desperate mother” that the audience could identify with and watch.
Charlize too would be phenom! Why didn’t I think of that?!
Christina Hendricks!
Natalie Portman is a captivating actress and could boost this film to a whole nother lever. And it’d be awesome to see her paired with RDJ. Plus she got the look to play a rookie, but also can be tough. Natalie Portman please.
If not, I like Zoe Saldana, or Charlize Theron for this role. I would watch it with either of these actresses.
Not after Wolfman and Victoria. Drippy.
I agree Emily Blunt would be awesome in this flick.
Rachel Weisz could carry it off too.
Amy Adams is a long-shot but she’s also extremely talented. It would be a great switch-up for her career.
Here’s an idea; why doesn’t Cuaron take the script out and reread it to see why so many great actresses have passed on the part. Will audiences also pass on the film when it comes out? If a script is fantastic then actors will claw and fight to get the part.
By character representation Sandra Bullock is seductive and off balance. An opposite to dark forces of seduction, that a person creates in there mind. If the plane is to survive the darkness of continuity dark is majestic reactions to developments.
Dark forces represent a continuity of death and populated by a carrier of dark significance can develop strains of anticipation in fuel that can lead to death by dismantlement an effort that must be always anticipated in the return to civilization expressions. Space is majestic, majestic is a supplement to darkness when a balance of struggles is contained.
In a space explosion thriller where the main character has to get home is an astonishing conglomerate of deployment arguments. In space exploration the functionality of gravity is to develop magnetic distributions.
From an explosion the crew should be mostly dependent on organic life that represent strong magnetic structures.
In the frozen planes these magnetic structures can develop survival emphasis where by natural contingencies develop water simulations that require for a group of bodies to engage in sexual activity on a constant bases, to develop these structures in a containment environment. The darkness of raw energy has no dependencies, it is up to the developer to balance these energies, where any one supplement can create an explosive functionality depending on the individuals mind structures.
The first sine of life gives you a sign that is potent where you can make choices to flee or to stay as the potent structures may simply accumulate trough magnetic compression of coexistence.
Trade Marc Mo-System Language by MannyOceans. Please include The Mo-System language in your definitions for interpretations of contingencies.
No doubt Angie makes smart moves for a reason.
She began her career as a great actress. This phase of her career she rather be the big female movie star. In a few years she can go back to being that great actress. Would of loved to see her in Gravity. Too bad. Don’t know of any other actress today who could fill her shoes acting wise as well as star power wise. Maybe Sandra but definitely that’s a maybe.
I`m not sure if Sandra can sell an actioner/sci fi. Jolie is the only A-list bone fide action star among actresses (Jovovich works in Resident Evil but that`s about it and those movies open because of the brand name although Jovovich is damn fine in them).
I would say maybe Scarlett or Natalie should do it since they’re well known (though they don’t have the star power of Jolie. But hey, Jolie was born a box office draw). And why stop there? Maybe get someone who isn’t white? Zoe Saldana is rising. Penelope Cruz?
If you can’t get a big star, then make one. Just make a good product and they (the audience) should come. Though my theory isn’t perfect (points at Scott Pilgrim) sad face!
Just as long as they don’t put Megan Fox in the movie, I’ll be happy. That girl can’t act her way out of a cardboard box.
I think Natalie is always a good choice, she’s beautiful smart, and acts circles around Scarlett Johansson. Sandra Bullock would also do a great job..but that’s about it I think.
You are onto something. Black Swan is not only getting raves for Portman`s acting turn (lots of Oscar predix…fingers crossed) but for her major leading lady turn. Apparently, and I can`t wait to see the movie, she carries it phenomenally. So I would definitely keep her in mind if Jolie persist at declining the offer. Plus, Portman was great as a mother in Cold Mountain.
I know that men drool over Johansson`s T&A but that never transalted into the boxoffice (IM2 doesn`t count cause it`s a brand name and RDJ show and yet, despite having Johansson in tight leather, it didn`t surpass the original).
Zoe Saldana would be amazing! Also Halle Barry
Angelina does not look like that anymore
There you go: Emily Blunt.
I strongly second that.
Why not Sandra Bullock? She can certainly carry a movie, probably more so than Jolie. And she’s arguably a hotter commodity right now.
Yeah, Emily Blunt!! That’s like saying “Since I can’t get the Bentley I’ll settle for the Chrysler 300″.
Ideas:
Julia Roberts
Jennifer Aniston
Megan Fox
Renee Zellweger
Kate Winslet
Nicole Kidman
I’d case Megan Fox to go grab the attention of every male in the room, or Kate Winslet, for a great actress with a name everyone knows and loves.
This could possibly the worst list ever written on the subject. You have nothing but box office underperformers on this list.
Megan Fox – are you insane!! Julia Roberts – she is a great actress but no one really wants to see her anymore. Kate Winslet – phenomenal actress, but can’t star in a movie of this magnitude. Jen Aniston – really?! Switch anyone (and a host of others? Besides, if I wanted to see Rachel for an hour and a half, I’d just watch Friends or every movies she’s ever been in. Renee Z – I just produced a movie with her that tanked, so no thanks. Nicole Kidman – she can’t get arrested for a reason genuis. Totally unlikable on screen.
Try again…
LOL, don’t get upset incredulous, Aniston’s agent’s flackeys & interns who he pays to troll boards for her (I know, I once had the job), are just here having some fun. This is a woman who can’t even fill fellow castmates Lisa Kudrow or Courtney Cox’s shoes – talent wise, just having fun on an Angelina thread, in between feeding blurbs about how Aniston will show her 45 yr old t&a in her next dud to rags, mags and blogs.
ROTFLMAO. Awww. Don’t make fun of Rachel Green and her PR guru! You know he’s going to be calling up Nikki and demanding to know the IP address of the person who submitted such a flagrantly negative and scurrilous comment about his fave (and best paying) client. Don’t you know that Jen is so universally loved that she doesn’t need her hired flunky to troll blogs posting negative stories about Jolie? Shame on you!
During the casting of Quantum of Solace, Aniston’s agent’s flackeys & interns kept floating the press releases that Jennifer Aniston is being considered as the new James Bond girl. The Bond girl role went to Russian Olga Kurylenko.
Well, Jen Aniston can’t possibly do it. She’ll be too busy posing naked on her 212th magazine cover (“Fab at 41, Y’all”), as a prelude to having her 129th baby by her 113th boyfriend who has helped her achive her latest “renewal” from her domestic setback. In case some of you haven’t heard, our little Jen was divorced a few yers ago. Yes, I know it comes as a shock to most of you, since she and her people don’t like to talk about it.
But thanks for the laugh, Avi. Aniston as a “serious actress” in a role that commands screen time for the majority of the film. LOL! How would she do that exactly — 90 minutes of hair-flipping then another 30 minutes of trademark squinting and stammering?
Thank you!
I nearly choked on my meal reading that list. I’d have fired that numbskull if he brought that list to the table.
really???? did you just say megan fox and kate winslet in the same sentence?
Emily Blunt is a great choice, because she’s quality actress… but no home run starring vehicles yet. Portman and Johanssen? Maybe. Naomi Watts had the wattage before taking time off for baby, but now… what was her last big film, King Kong?
I still think that it’s sad that no female’s broken out of the gates in 4 or 5 years…
Blake Lively is starting to blow up.
Blow up? Well, so says Lively’s publicist’s staff anonymously on various blog message boards around the web for the last few years despite all evidence to the contrary anyway. Right, hon?
…and seriously, I’d eat my own arm off if I had to look at any of the women named on that one dude’s list above for 2 hours. Winslet is probably the only exception. I say probably…because I’d only eat up to my wrist bone w/ her.
Charisma, THAT is what is needed. Not drop dead good looks – that’s why people get confused when they’re trying to think of a suitable Jolie substitute, and they immediately go for ‘beautiful’ forgetting that Jolie is imminently watchable regardless, and believe it or not it has little to do with her ‘looks’ — some of those choices are about as exciting/interesting as a stale doughnut.
Blunt carrying an $80M movie nearly on her own? Get real.
sounds like a jodie foster film.
Good call on Jodie Foster! The Silence of the Lambs, Contact, Panic Room, Flightplan…. She would be a smart and classy choice!
She could do it although it would be one too many movie where she plays a tough single mom trying to get to her child or save her child. But good call. She was the action heroine before Jolie soldified her status.
. There isn’t many women who can open an action film. Maybe Sandra Bullock, but you really have to change the script to make her character a bit more fun… (Playful, sarcastic wit etc)
Michelle Pfeiffer, Julianne Moore, or Sigourney Weaver. (If they can cast an actor over 40 – Downey – why not an actress, which would make her role as an astronaut more believable?)
Go with PFEIFFER – pforget Jolie
for this, I’ll definitely go Imax and skip downloading it
Read the script. Robert Downey Jr’s role is an experienced “old school” astronaut who is on his final mission. The female role is a newbie, who is on her first trip to space and completely unprepared for the disastrous events that occur. An older actress would make no sense in the role.
Then create a role for Pfeiffer as a knowing, sultry, mystical alien on a bohemian planet. It doesn’t matter, just do it.
Or maybe she spent her entire career working ground control and wants to go up before she retires, and that makes her a newbie. Pfeiffer can definitely carry a movie and she has been convincing in every role she’s tackled. I would love to see her tackle this sci-fi genre before she retires for good. Julianne Moore has actually worked with the director so that should give her an advantage. And Sigourney Weaver has the “Alien” movies to prove why she would be better than these cute little clueless 20-somethings they’re trying to cast.
Zoe Saldana … and call it “Gravatar Trek.”
What about a more edgy choice? Michelle Rodriguez comes to mind. She was the lead in Girlfight and was the focus of every single scene and won a bunch of awards for doing so. She has proven she can also be quite vulnerable in some roles. She’s also been in Avatar and Machete recently, which are two huge/buzz-worthy flicks.
The only other choice I’d go with would be Marion Cotillard. She’s been the leading lady to every major leading man lately and successfully so and she has a very defining presence. I think with the right marketing she could be a super star lead. But again, so could Rodriguez. So it depends on the “type” they want.
If any of her representatives are reading this, ask Angelina to reconsider this project. She would be fabulous in this.
Puh-leeze! What about Ashley Judd? Why does this woman always get overlooked? She’s far more interesting to watch than Blunt. Anyone lucky enough to catch “Come Early Morning?” She’s strong, quiet, soft, fierce and divine.
Ashley Judd? She’s a lovely person personally. Put her on tv show. You, get off this site.
Oh, excuse me. I didn’t realize you were King Asshole here. I thought you were just a funny, sass and even complimented you up there. I’ll know better next time. Sorry about your failures in real life. But I guess one has to vent somewhere, ay?
I agree. Emily Blunt is awesome. Beautiful, smart, sexy and a hell of an actress. Good call.
Or how about Sigourney Weaver! The woman is mesmerizing to watch and has gotten even better with age. Or are we (meaning YOU Hollywood) being ageist here?
Sigourney can make anything better. Remember her appearance on SNL? The material was crap (as usual) and she made it sing. Sigourney was one of the best hosts they’ve had in a long time. She’s a pro. Must we really hold her age against her?
The character is a rookie astronaut in her 20s who has only eight months of experience. Good luck casting Sigourney Weaver in that. Ageism does exist in Hollywood but the script always drives the bus.
If Tom Cruise wanted to do the movie they would rewrite the entire script for him.
Gotcha. Didn’t know that.
Then why are they talking to Bullock? She’s nearing 50, so no way she is believable as a 20-something rookie (though she’s beautiful and I like her a lot). You’re talking major script re-write if they go with her. Plus, let’s be honest. “Blindside” was nothing more than Lifetime movie (only in bedbug-infested theatres instead of at home on the sofa). Nothing more. So I can’t see Bullock handling the same material that a Jolie could handle.
Catherine Zeta-Jones
Ramses-
I hope you were joking with that hilarious list of yours. None of your choices can open a film.
This sounds like a great role. I wish she would talk it. I like Angelina as an actress but she rarely chooses movies that I’m interested in. I liked salt but just say no to cleopatra, lady
Drew Barrymoore,
Drew Barrymoore,
Drew Barrymoore.
sympathetic, evokes compassion, believable, funny, dramatic, scarred, tough, with whit, intelligent and would give the movie legs and stamina. Also balances seriousness and optimism without seeming cheery or fake.
funny? dramatic? tough?
at least you didnt say shes pretty cause shes the ugliest star in hollywood
well, just the worst choice by now since a guy up there suggested the “star power” of renee zellweger
As an astronaut? Not really.
Drew Barrymoore? You must be joking.