EXCLUSIVE: Gravity, the 3D film that Warner Bros is mobilizing with director Alfonso Cuaron and Robert Downey Jr., is suddenly in danger of falling back to earth after Angellina Jolie said no to a full court press and a big money offer to star in the film. It has put Warner Bros in a bind. The studio needs an actress who can hold the screen and draw an audience to an $80 million film. Much like Tom Hanks’ role in Cast Away, the Gravity heroine is the only person onscreen for a large part of the movie. Beyond Jolie, which other actress do you bet on?
Cuaron first courted Jolie when the project was tethered at Universal. She was intrigued with the filmmaker, but passed around the time it landed at Warner Bros. I’m told the studio tested or made approaches to actresses including Sandra Bullock and Natalie Portman (word around town is the studio’s intrigued with both), Naomi Watts, Marion Cotillard, Carey Mulligan, Scarlett Johansson, Sienna Miller, Abbie Cornish, Rebecca Hall, Olivia Wilde, Blake Lively. Warner Bros made a second overture to Jolie, but she just passed for a second time. While Downey certainly has the star power to carry such a movie, he plays a comparatively small role and it was never Downey’s or Cuaron’s intention for him to carry the picture.
Scripted by Cuaron and his son Jonas, Gravity is set on a remote space station. While a team leader (Downey) and a female colleague are traveling outside, the other team members get wiped out by a debris field from an exploding satellite. The film’s central focus is the heroine’s desperate attempt to return home to her child. The intention is to shoot the film next year after Downey completes Sherlock Holmes 2.
I don’t see Jolie returning to the fold. Right now, she is focused on making her directorial debut this fall on a love story that takes place in 1990s Bosnia, from a script she wrote, with GK Films co-financing with an equity partner. Not counting offers coming in, Jolie and longtime manager Geyer Kosinski are figuring out a full slate of projects that are in various stages of development for her. They include joining director Tim Burton in the role of Maleficent in Disney’s Sleeping Beauty; playing the title role in Cleopatra, which is being scripted by Brian Helgeland for Sony Pictures Entertainment; playing the lead role in Scarpetta, the Fox 2000 adaptation of Patricia Cornwell’s bestselling novel series about medical examiner Kay Scarpetta, which Kerry Williamson adapted. In addition, there is a sequel to Jolie’s summer hit Salt just getting underway at SPE; Christopher McQuarrie is adapting the British miniseries Unforgiven for GK Films as a potential star vehicle for Jolie, and Paramount is developing Code Name Sasha with Bryan Bertino writing the script. Jolie next stars alongside Johnny Depp in the Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck-directed The Tourist, which SPE releases December 10, and then provides a lead voice in Kung Fu Panda 2, which will be released May 26, 2011.





“I’m told the studio tested or met with actresses including Sandra Bullock, Natalie Portman, Marion Cotillard, Naomi Watts, Carey Mulligan, Scarlett Johansson, Sienna Miller, Abbie Cornish, Rebecca Hall, Olivia Wilde, and Blake Lively.”
All terrible ideas. None of these can carry a movie that will do well at the box office except Bullock and she can only carry stupid Disney rom-coms. Meryl Streep and Julia Roberts can too, but they’re definitely not doing this film.
My guess is that this film will not be made.
Huh? The Blind Side was a rom-com?
Wait…I thought Jolie said she was planning to take time off or retire or something? Stay home and be a mother with her 15 nannies. Or was I hearing things? Now she’s writing and directing???
Jolie did say Vanity Fair made a big deal out of her supposed “retirement”. She told the interviewer that at some point in the future she would work less and turn her attention to other things.
As for the nannies, unless you are a member of her household, then you cannot definitively talk about the number of nannies she AND BRAD employ. Having nannies does not make one a bad mother. I grew up with a nanny and never once mistook her for my mother.
Kudos to her for wanting to stretch her creative side by writing and directing a film. I’m sure it’s not a project that she’s taking lightly. I am all for giving people the chance to evolve and grow.
She never said she was retiring. She said she was planning to take year off back in 2008 and she did. She didn’t work from the time she finished Changeling at the end of 2007 till she started Salt in the spring of 2009. IIRC, the only thing she did in 2008 was press for Kung Fu Panda and Changeling. I don’t think she did press for Wanted because she was a about to give birth when Wanted came out.
She never said anything like that…there was some comment that was taken out of context and hyped as though she were retiring, but in context she never hinted at anything of the sort. Snarky people picked up on it because they’re lame and don’t care about facts or reality. She always had these other offers and projects in the works, so it’s obvious she wasn’t planning any lengthy sabbatical or anything.
Why not Anne Hathaway or Rachel McAdams? Both are better at projecting fierce intelligence than many of the names mentioned.
And while neither has ever carried a film, I’d add Vera Farmiga and Michelle Monaghan to the list.
Excellent picks, both of them are rising BO-stars AND talented actresses.
Rachel McAdams seems a good fit. But let’s face it no female actress will carry an $80 Million move like Jolie could.
I think Anne and Rachel are both good choices. They don’t have quite the box office power that Angie does, but they’re the best thing you’ll find as far as younger actresses.
Marion Cotillard! She is now well known in the States, can act her ass off and is a huge star internationally as well.
Here’s a thought? How about someone up-and-coming or a talented no-name? How about the script and filmmaking “carrying” the movie?
As much as the lively discussion regarding casting is educational and intriguing – and I say that without sarcasm – the script is the problem.
I love Mr. Cuaron and his work but found Gravity a strangely underwhelming piece, which reads more like a 99 page sequence than a movie. A good sequence, admittedly, but not a movie.
I imagine this is why Ms. Jolie is turning it down. And love her or hate her, you can’t deny her success based largely on the smart moves she makes.
I’m pretty sure the studio wouldn’t want to have a “no-name” carry a movie that will cost 80mil to make.
This sounds like more of a dramatic role since the action takes place in a weightless environment that will probably involve a lot of wire work. And probably the reason Jolie passed since she knows that isn’t a lot of fun. Blunt, Portman and the others are fine actresses but they aren’t big box office draws. Bullock’s hits were either Rom-Coms or the feel good one-of Blind Side that had very limited International appeal. She isn’t a big international box office draw. Outside of Jolie, there isn’t anyone else out there who can carry this so my guess is they’ll shelve it for now.
What´s all this about? It´s just one movie that won´t be made. I´m so sorry. Angelina Jolie is the just the most overrated woman in the world. She can run, she can fight all right, she has muscles all over Rover, three elbows where I have one, and she happens to be controlling the life of one Brad Pitt. But that´s about it. What else is interesting? Can you name one movie starring Angelina Jolie that is even remotely interesting? Let´s face it, she´s not an actress. We need a new name for it. Poseur?
Jen Aniston, please – stop posting…and put the cigarettes, the self-tanner, the hair weave, the vodka, and the target w/ Brad Pitt’s face on it, DOWN and leave this board.
Oh geez. Give it a rest. People who say Jolie is controlling the life of Brad Pitt obviously don’t know anything about Brad Pitt. If he didn’t want to be where he is, he’d be gone. Just ask Jennifer Aniston. People who knew him before he hooked up with Aniston are again seeing the Brad Pitt they USED to know and not the guy who only went to Mexico, sat on his couch smoking weed, spent hours working out & tanning – and was bored out of his mind until he couldn’t take it anymore and dumped Aniston. Five years and six kids later he’s exactly where he wants to be and doing all the things he said 20 years ago he wanted to do. Don’t blame Jolie just because Pitt isn’t the veg-head you want him to be. He got lost for about 6 1/2 years and has finally found his way back to his true self. Sorry if that bums you out, dude.
Interesting that with all the unemployed actors in the world it all comes down to Jolie.
Kate Beckinsale
I hear Lindsey Lohan’s looking for work
Surprised Charlize Theron has fallen off the radar. And I thought Warner Bros. didn’t make movies driven by female leads anymore?
Jolie is always the first choice for such movies because she can be warm and feminie, hard and strong and you earnestly can’t take your eyes off of her because you are not sure of what she will do next on screen and you don’t want to miss it. She is also genius when it comes to projects she does. They may not make sense to some but to her, she has actually got to believe in the character and the story. So when she refuses twice you know that she is not sold on something.
Maybe Jolie doesn’t want to play a helpless young rookie astronaut needing Downey’s help.
Sandra Bullock could carry it, and bring in a female audience that otherwise wouldn’t be there.
15 nannies?Peggy, you might want to put down the tabloids.Angelina said in the FUTURE she planed to work alot less.Vanity Fair decided to put the statement on the cover to make it salacious,when it wasn’t.I like Emily Blunt but….she doesn’t have the star power to carry a big budget film.Sandra Bullock…maybe…but she is better in Rom-Coms.I still don’t think her performance in The Blindside warranted a Oscar.
Anne Hathaway and Rachel McAdams both fine actresses but….they don’t have the star power to carry a $80 million dollar film.And that is the truth!
And the same goes for….
Julia Roberts Naomi Watts
Jennifer Aniston Carey Mulligan
Megan Fox Olivia Wilde
Rebecca Hall Vera Farmiga
Scarlett Johansson
Renee Zellweger Michelle Monaghan
Julianne Moore
Sigourney Weaver
Zoe Saldana
Catherine Zeta-Jones
Drew Barrymoore
Sienna Miller
Kate Winslet
Nicole Kidman
Blake Lively
Michelle Pfeiffer
Natalie Portman
Marion Cotillard
Last time I checked Titanic and What Lies Beneath each cost more than Gravity.
I read on THR that Lively and Johansson are the last two standing.
I would go with Judd or Cotillard or Portman.
But WB could definitely see Lively’s potential, too…they DID gave her the female lead in Green Lantern, a prominent role in The Town and her breakthrough roles (Traveling Pants, Gossip Girl), as well.
anyone who would gamble $80 million on blake lively’s acting ability is a fool. she simply does not emote.
she is certainly gorgeous, though.
Pure speculation on my part but I believe Angelina will be in Tim Burton’s “Dark Shadows” movie filming next year. It makes sense on so many levels. Think about it.
Anyone but Jolie. This sounds like Apollo 13 but with a female. Get rid of the 3-D, they didn’t need it for Apollo 13 and that was a huge hit. Use an actress in her late 30′s, early 40′s.
Also, reduce the budget to $55M. Don’t need $80M to do this when its been done before. Focus on the story, not the special effects. They spent so much on Salt ($130M) and Jolie can’t even get that film to profitability.
The film’s grosses 225 m worldwide. How is that not profitable, especially when we haven’t even factored in DVD sales/rentals?
Please get your facts straight – Salt only cost $110 million not $130 million. It currently stands at $244 million world wide and after this weekend should be at about $262 million and will probably finish at around $280 million. I doubt Amy Pascal is crying in her beer over those results because Sony will make a bundle in worldwide after-market sales.
I immediately thought of Penelope Cruz, but I think Emily Blunt is a great idea! Zoe Saldana…maybe not just yet. But it would be nice to see a new girl, and yes, why not create (or recreate) the star for this film? Cuaron is brilliant; he can do it.
I’ve read the script and it has to be a 20-something actress since the character is a rookie astronaut. Natalie Portman if she’s available and if not then Anne Hathaway.
Try… Ali Larter. She has a great future as an action star.
Charlize? Halle?
Wow. Jolie has become such a power house in Hollywood, and Salt only solidifies that. Gravity being pretty much dead in the water even after testing ALL THOSE ACTRESSES just proves that Jolie is pretty much the only bankable actress in the business right now. She can make or break a project.
Angela Jolie brings nothing to the table… honestly, the filmmakers are better off without her.
Still waiting on a good picture from her.
Except two Oscar nods, and the little Gold man himself. GTFO bish. If the late great Pauline Kael though Jolie was magnificent why should I give a fck what YOU think?
Remember how Julia Roberts rehearsed scenes with Hugh Grant for a space movie in Notting Hill? Would be fun to actually see her in one (her movie Eat Pray Love proved the haters wrong). Sandra Bullock would be great fun, too.
It’s very telling to see the variety of actresses who are being considered, the age range, the very different types. Seems like they have no idea whatsoever who this character is. It boggles the mind.
Yes! I was thinking the same. It would be a good wink. She needs something quite unexpected next after Ryan Murphy failed her with EPL.