UPDATE: In announcing the freeze, the BBC has bowed to the inevitable. New UK Prime Minister David Cameron first called for the licence fee to be frozen in March. TV consultant Claire Enders of Enders Analysis tells me this is a ”sensible approach from the BBC to accept that it does not require this additional income to fulfill its responsibilities.” And budget trims of 3% sound measly at a time government departments are facing 25% reductions. But BBC Trust, the Beeb’s governing body, warns that £144 million will have to be chopped from planned budgets. Responds the TV Producers’ lobbyist PACT: “We are alarmed at what impact this may have on the TV programme budget and the consequences that any further reduction will have on individual programme budgets, which are already under considerable strain,” says CEO John McVay. Right now every UK household pays for BBC service through a TV license fee of £145.50 ($227) until the current deal expires March 2013. So British taxpayers fund the BBC to the tune of £3.5 billion a year.

What the BBC’s licence freeze amounts to is simply waiting two years before asking for the inevitable increase, something impossible in the present financial climate. And licence fee payers should be grateful? What would really influence friends and enemies alike would be for the BBC to get a real grip on its non-programming expenditure, as well as its still overpaid talent (3% a year savings – don’t make me laugh) and actually cut the licence fee. That really would make broadcasting history!
What BBC/BBC Worldwide need to do is get a subscription-based international iPlayer up and running immediately. There are many people in the US and other foreign countries who would gladly pay $15 or so per month for “soon after UK broadcast” access to the shows airing on BBC1/2/3/4.
There must be at least 500,000 people around the world willing to pay $15 x 12 = $180 per year for a “soon after UK broadcast” international BBC iPlayer (think of the subscription as an “international BBC TV license fee”), which would generate at least $90 million in revenue. The BBC could easily afford to reduce the actual UK TV license fee down to a comparable amount.
@UKTVFan
Couldn’t agree more. As an American who loves UK tv, I would love for their iPlayer to be international. That way I wouldn’t have to wait months for a slight chance of those shows airing on BBC America or having to wait for the DVDs to come out. The only problem with that is that it would render BBC America obsolete for people in the US which could hurt the BBC. But great point nonetheless.
Here, Here!! The BBC needs to realize that it’s viewer/subscriber base is now global. I’ve spoken with London, and told them flat out that I would pay a full license fee if it would get me full access to BBC content online. Their reply was (in June 2010) “We’re very flattered, but as of now, we have no faculty for accepting subscription fees outside of the UK.”
It may come as a complete shock to some of the stodgy old geezers at Broadcast House, but this is the computer age. It’s high time the BBC got off dead center and tapped a new(and eager) revenue stream rather than winge on and on about how much money they suddenly don’t have because of horse and buggy thinking.
The BBC’s license fee is like something out of Communist Russia. White vans with scanning devices go around each neighborhood in England to hunt down people who have televisions and who don’t have a TV license. Then the people in the vans knock on the doors and demand to see the license. If a TV License agent suspects someone has a television and hasn’t paid for it, they can get a search warrant. If the person is guilty, they can not only be fined but wind up with a criminal record.
*each neighborhood in Britain (not just England).
Is that how you spell license in the UK?
Yes, it’s licence in the UK, also colour, neighbour, pavement and not sidewalk, lift and not elevator, flat and not apartment, you say tomato, I say tomato, you say potato, I say… etc.
I agree on the international payment scheme. I’m frustrated by being “teased” by streaming BBC programming that can’t be seen in my area. Much of it is never available commercially here, so blocking it is not protecting value, just making it unavailable. Having some sort of paywall with a password for people with foreign ISPs and making the content available would generate some income in the short term, and also increase viewership of those programs.
I would gladly pay an international licence fee as well. Even though the proposed budget freezes the fee for six years, Broadcast House would do well to look into international online access:
1. Technology–currently not difficult to create secure accounts. Multiple models exist
2. Business–Expand revenue base beyond the UK and capture revenue currently being lost to illegal methods of obtaining content.
3. Marketing–the BBC product/brand is of the highest quality in the world. Promotion would be facile.