
EXCLUSIVE: I’ve learned that the stars of The Big Bang Theory are getting fat new paychecks just as the hit CBS comedy is getting ready for its big move to Thursdays next week. After almost 3 months of negotiations with series producer Warner Bros TV, Big Bang leads Johnny Galecki, Kaley Cuoco, and Jim Parsons have agreed to a major salary hike that would bring the trio’s salaries to $200,000 an episode for the upcoming fourth season, up from about $60,000 last season. The salaries will rise to $250,000 in Season 5, then $300,000 in Season 6 and 350,000 in Season 7. Additionally, they will each receive .25 point of the series’ lucrative backend and will be paid $1+ million as an advance against it now and another $1 million in Season 7. That effectively adds another $50,000 to their per-episode paycheck over the life of the deal.
I hear Galecki and Cuoco, who have been negotiating together, closed their deals on Monday in a face-to-face meeting between their representatives and Warner Bros following a powwow with the two actors and their teams on Friday where the studio’s final offer was presented. Meanwhile, recent Emmy winner Jim Parsons had been holding out for more money and had handled his negotiations separately despite the fact that he is represented by the same law firm as Galecki and Cuoco (Hansen, Jacobson, Teller, Hoberman, Newman, Warren & Richman). I learned that Parsons was offered the same deal as Galecki and Cuoco and given a deadline to take the take it or leave it by today. He just accepted. Talk about hardball: I hear the studio, which had made it clear it was planning to do “favored nations”-type deals (paying all the stars the same), was prepared to table re-negotiations with Parsons until next summer if he had turned down the offer.
Sources close to the talent and studio side called this a great deal for a first renegotiation, though some noted that the trio of Big Bang stars could have gotten even bigger salary bumps if Parsons had not gone solo and they all had bargained together. That’s how the Friends cast got to $100,000 an episode each in 1996 dollars during their first renegotiations with Warner Bros after Season 2. Big Bang has the potential to become the next Friends, especially if its move to Friends‘ Thursday 8 PM time slot works well. The series is coming off a red-hot 3rd season, in which it became the highest-rated comedy on TV, and a blockbuster syndication deal that netted Warner Bros. $2+ million per episode.
In fact, speculations about major cast salaries renegotiations started shortly after the giant syndication deal was announced in May. Talks began in late June with an $100,000 per-episode offer by the studio, to which the actors’ reps didn’t even respond. After Comic-Con, where the Big Bang cast was among the most popular attractions, talks remained stalled. But in the week leading to the show’s production start date, the two sides re-engaged and continued communication with a lot of backchannel conversations back-and-forth until an agreement was reached. “It’s been arduous and hard but amicable and based on real relationships,” between reps and Warner Bros execs, one source close to the negotiations tells me. Added another of my insiders, “It was done in a quiet, fair and respectful way.” Indeed, the actors never even considered a walkout and fulfilled all their duties on the show throughout the entire renegotiation process.
In the only downer, Cuoco won’t be able to fully celebrate her new deal right away. She is at a hospital recuperating from a horseback riding accident over the weekend but is expected to make a full recovery.
Next to renegotiate are Big Bang’s co-stars Simon Helberg and Kunal Nayyar, who also are expected to negotiate salary increases. Reps for Warner Bros. and the actors declined to comment for this story.
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.





Kaley is my neighbor, and I was concerned about her because it was announced she broke her leg this weekend.
Obviously, Monday was a better day, and I am happy that she and her cast mates are getting salaries commensurate with the huge success of the BBT.
Nice going, Kaley!
The problem with large salaries for stars is it takes money out of the budget and away from the crew and other non-star actors increasing the gap between those who can make a living in the industry and those who cannot.
There is a valid argument that without the stars a particular show would not exist and no one would work on that show- the stars are responsible for in a very large way for drawing in the viewers. And that is certainly true.
But if you’re in one of the support services: crew, supporting actors, and what have you to the lead actors bear in mind that a phenomenal over 200% salary increase for them means concessions for you in contract negotiations down the road because “there just isn’t money in the budget.” So bear in mind it’s money out of your pocket before you say “good for them.”
A healthy salary is certainly deserved….for everyone.
Welcome to capitalism.
Zachery, what you’re saying isn’t a new phenomenon. And we all know this when we enter this business called show.
“Welcome to capitalism”–yes, I get it. But it’s like smoking. We all know it it will be the demise of most of us– the difference with capitalism is it’s easy to see exactly who isn’t going to make it. And like with smoking we could make a decision to mitigate the damage already inflicted by changing the behavior thereby giving ourselves a CHANCE at survival. But, you know, whatever; go capitalism! Let’s hear it for the rich. Yeah, Kaley–thanks for doing your anti-middle class actor video during the SAG contract negotiations. Looks like it worked out quite well for you.
No problem, Zachary, we fully expect you to refuse to even consider any such increases for yourself, once you actually get cast as a series lead, and your show actually becomes a hit.
There’s absolutely NOTHING wrong with them getting a bigger payday – it takes NO money away from the production, because the production makes more money than it would were the ratings far lower. The higher the ratings, the more that can be charged per spot, the more the network and the studio makes – and the more the actors that got them there make.
What’s that odor in the air near Zachary? Num num num…oh yeah. Bitterness.
And Zachery is simply not entitled to his thoughts on this? You have to not only argue but degrade? Bad day?
It’s called “paying your dues”, and actors and other talent do that in many ways.
Maybe it’s time you swallowed some pride and “sucked up” as well?
All that money isn’t going straight to the actors, the government takes their chuck then there’s agencies, managers, lawyers, publicity, etc. The money is getting spread around to others in the business, this was an exciting day for a lot of people
I’m sill unsure about the math in the articel: they get 1 mil now, another mil later, makes 2. Spread over 4 season a (make it easy) 25 Episodes each – 100 episodes -, makes ‘just’ 20.000 an ep, not 50.000 – right?!
Bernd, You weren’t reading it correctly. The $1m advance now and the $1m advance in year 7 is money involving their .25% of the syndication deal.
(Totally separate issue from the “per episode” rate.)
They were awarded .25 of the syndication deal which is a bank load of money down the road. (Of course this is assuming the books are kept honestly.)
The two $1m advances are nice bonuses up front that are a part of their deal.
“Additionally, they will each receive .25 point of the series’ lucrative backend and will be paid $1+ million as an advance against it now and another $1 million in Season 7. That effectively adds another $50,000 to their per-episode paycheck over the life of the deal.”
That’s the $50k he was referring to.
Basically they get 1 million as minimum and they’ll be paid more later when they know how much .25 point is worth.
Good for the cast but unfortunately CBS still hasn’t learned that screwing with time slots of established shows causes viewership to plummet
@Steve – Exactly.
I love this show. I also enjoyed watching along with other comedies like HIMYM on Monday night.
Now, it’s going head to head with Community on Thursdays. Which I also love. A lot of the same demographic will now have to choose between the two. Most will probably DVR one. Either way, going head to head with comedy on Thursday night against NBC’s comedy block is just a recipe for ratings disaster.
They should have stuck with Mondays. They had a good thing going.
Stupid executives, they get paid so much more money than most, to make such foolish decisions, not knowing when to leave well enough alone.
Actually, Mr. Parsons only made $40,000 an episode so he was paid less than the other two leads.
really, let’s be honest. Kaley could be replaced by any other blond in Hollywood and the show would still work. They should have dropped her and given the money to Simon Helberg. He and Jim make the show. both over shadowing Johnny Galecki. But he’s a good “straight” man.
Helberg is very good – in terms of acting, his role by far requires the most range.
Kaley’s not that easy to replace. Her comic timing is excellent but it’s her heart, the way she empathizes with the guys, that is the roadmap for the whole series. And her wacky attitude always seems to get to me. I think a great deal of America wants to have her as a lover or sister. (And I’m going to avoid making the “or both in Arkansas” joke… oh, I just did it.)
She’s ok; decent in the role, but I sure wish people would quit referring to her as “hot” in the scripts and the media. Not even close. “Cute” works, “hot” does not.
That´s what i thought, Kaley does not deserve that, or Jim Parsons deserved more.
Did all the writers who actually make them funny get huge raises too?
That’s what I was wondering.
I was wondering the same thing.
I have it on good authority the writers got taken care of. $25 Starbucks gift cards for everyone!
Same thought here. But seriously, does anyone know about the compensation for the writers? Nikki?
Writers will continue to make the appropriate WGA minimums per their titles. It’s just Chuck Lorre and a group of his close friends anyway. And they’re all doing just fine for themselves, so don’t worry.
Someone point out to them that the move to Thursday is doomed. Get it while you can.
If it doesn’t work on Thurs you can bet it’ll be kicked back to Monday in a heartbeat
I’m betting “Tons ‘o Fun” is broomed before Thanksgiving, so maybe back to Mondays by Christmas?
Anybody got any preview feedback on this prediction?
Imagine how much they’d make if people actually watched the show.
A well-done traditional multi-cam, Big Bang does well and is considered a hit by virtue of the fact that most all other sitcoms today (the self-satisfied single-cams) do less well. It aint a hit. It just has lasted. There’s a difference.
And the new timeslot will mean less of the same.
It’s not a hit? It’s the highest rated comedy on television. So, by your logic, there are ZERO hit comedies on television right now?
Really?
so jim parsons just is a jerk – that’s what I take out of this…
Jim Parsons deserves to be the highest paid person in the cast. I’m disappointed he folded.
its his show. he should have asked for a line count contract. he does all the work. its him, blonde, Kunal, Helberg and the other dude who is the glue that binds but can be replaced. they should really write the glue off after next season.
Agreed. The glue sucks too. No way does he deserve that kind of money. He’s very lucky that his castmates are able to deliver every week, because he certainly can’t. He sucks. And if you watch him in interviews you can see he has a major chip on his shoulder. Cocky ass.
Here is the reality: Stars are not worth that much money. The reason they get that much money is that they have the producers over a barrel. They have been playing their parts for several seasons, and the audiences associate them with their parts. It is easier for the producers to pay them exorbitant salaries than to recast their parts and hope audiences take to the new actors. It is akin to a cameraman waiting until a crucial scene is to be shot and then refusing to shoot it unless he gets a raise.
Nonsense. Show me the cameraman who can never get another job because he’s so closely associated with the last show he did. If this, or any, TV show does extraordinarily well, the positive/negative for an actor is in extreme flux. There are some actors who become more employable stars after a successful series. There are also many actors who are never as fully employable after becoming inseparably associated with one particular role.
will watch on thursdays. tired of 30 rock, etc. watched the show from the start…they all deserve the success. crew is probably grateful to have a job at all. love parsons. adore galecki. congrats all. kayley cuoco! stay off the horses!
I hope Raj gets a salary decrease. He is a horrid actor and has never uttered even one funny line on the show. His idea of comedy is adding a fake Indian accent. As funny as Parsons is, Raj is the complete opposite.
uh, are you 12?
Kunal Nayyar IS Indian so I’m not sure how his accent is fake…exaggerated perhaps, but not fake.
If you don’t like the character or the actor, that’s fine, but don’t be adolescent about it…unless you ARE an adolescent then you shouldn’t be posting on here anyway…
(I would agree the character is not as well-written as some of the others, but that would be the fault of the writers and producers and not the actor.)
I always find that as soon as it is announced the huge paychecks of actors on sitcoms..there is a correlation between the show becoming unfunny. audiences subconsciously are more critical and if the show is not funny ever split second viewership lowers (if they think actors are overpaid they lose support and in this economy that sound like unknown actors getting overpaid)…This show will make money back on syndication but I predict it will not receive high ratings on a Thursday night time slot.
Maybe it’s me but this show eludes me. Have watched a few episodes and think it’s marginal at best. Same joke over and over, interchangeable characters, jacked-up laugh track. Parsons is unique and has a great delivery – the rest of them are men behaving virginally. Yes, I’m bitter.
This show is unwatchable. It’s a show for dudes.
How in the world is Big Bang not a hit, if I am not mistaken it has the 3rd highest demo ratings of all primetíme shows behind Idol and Sunday Night Football. For anyone to say it’s not a “hit” is baffling. Being the second highest viewed sitcom is just icing on the cake.
I agree, Jennifer. They should just fire Raj to make up for the other increases.
Shame on you, Jim Parsons.
Shame on Jim? If not for him, there would be no show. Everyone knows that. You can’t blame him for trying.
The money they make is all relative. If they can pay the stars that much per episode, then CBS is making a killing. It certainly isn’t Charlie Sheen money.
CBS isn’t paying them anything. Warner Bros is the studio (that produces the show). CBS is the distributor and pays a license fee to Warner Bros (in which Lorre and Arronson get paid).
This has nothing to do with CBS at all. Same as what happened with Charlie Sheen.
that is the single most intelligent comment here. all the others missed this.
CBS will pay soon enough when Warners jacks the license fee at renewal time. Who’s kidding who? Those Warner guys leave nothing on the table.
I’d hate to have to answer the phone at that law firm.
Well, I’m still reading downward, but so far yours is the best comment yet! And yes, that includes my brilliant excretions above.
So let me get this straight, Jim… being the highest rated comedy on network TV is “just surviving” and isn’t enough to make the show a hit?
Boy, that’s some funny logic you’ve got there buddy.
Um, really? Big Bang Theory was a top 10 show all of last season & the NUMBER 1 scripted series in 18-49. Clearly you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Not true. Parsons was bumped up to $60k in season 3. TV Guide misreported.