Los Angeles, CA, September 29, 2010 – The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) today
released the 15th annual “Where We Are On TV” study, a comprehensive review of scripted LGBT primetime characters in the 2010-2011 television season. After more than doubling last year, the overall number of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) characters on broadcast networks continues a steady rise, though broadcast networks still report no transgender or black LGBT characters.
The report shows that 23 LGBT characters will account for 3.9% of scripted series regulars in the 2010-2011 broadcast television schedule, up from 1.1% in 2007, 2.6% in 2008, and 3% in 2009. The number of scripted LGBT series regulars found on mainstream cable networks has rebounded after a two year decline, from 40 in 2007, 32 in 2008, 25 in 2009, to 35 in the upcoming season.
HBO’s True Blood is the most inclusive program currently on television, featuring six regular and recurring LGBT characters.
From research and information provided by the five broadcast networks — ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC and The CW — GLAAD’s “Where We Are On TV” study reviewed 84 scripted television programs scheduled to air this upcoming season, and counted a total of 587 series regular characters, 23 of which are LGBT.
“The increase in lesbian, gay, and bisexual characters on primetime television not only reflects the shift in American culture towards greater awareness and understanding of our community, but also a new industry standard that a growing number of creators and networks are adopting,” said GLAAD President Jarrett Barrios. “The recent critical and commercial success of shows like Modern Family and Glee clearly indicate that mainstream audiences embrace gay characters and want to see well-crafted stories about our lives.”
In the upcoming 2010-2011 season:
- ABC continues to lead the other broadcast networks in LGBT representation, with 11 LGBT characters out of 152 total series regular characters (7.2%), the highest number and percentage of LGBT characters of any network for the 2010-2011 season.
- FOX, which in 2007 featured zero series regular LGBT characters at the launch of the season, now offers five LGBT series regulars out of 100 (5%).
- The CW continues to improve with three LGBT series regular characters out of 67 (4.5%).
- NBC becomes the only network that saw a decline from last year. The network will feature three series regular LGBT characters (2.1%) out of a total of 143.
- CBS remains in last place. Out of 125 series regular characters, only one will be LGBT (0.8%), but the network will include several LGBT recurring characters.On mainstream cable networks, the number of announced LGBT series regular characters has rebounded to 35 after a two-year decline.
- HBO features the greatest number of LGBT characters on cable with 10, six of which are series regulars.
- ABC Family has an edge in the number of series regular LGBT characters with seven.
- Also making a significant contribution to the count are Showtime (with seven characters), Syfy (with four), TNT, FX, Starz, and Teen Nick (with three each).For a complete list of LGBT characters on broadcast television, please see: <a href=”http://www.glaad.org/publications/tvreport10/broadcast”>http://www.glaad.org/publications/tvreport10/broadcast</a>.
For a complete list of LGBT characters on cable, click see: http://www.glaad.org/publications/tvreport10/cable.
The only original programming announced by the LGBT-focused cable networks here! and Logo is unscripted and alternative programming, and so they were not part of this year’s character count.
This marks the sixth year that GLAAD has analyzed the demographics of the race, gender and ethnicity of all the 587 series regular characters expected to appear on the broadcast networks in the upcoming season. Male characters continue to outweigh female characters 59% (345) to 41% (242) in overall numbers, while 77% (449) of all series regular characters are white. African American representation has increased slightly to 12% (71) while Latino/a representation has remained steady at 5% (29). GLAAD counted 25 Asian Pacific Islander characters (4%), two more than last season.
This year also marks the very first time GLAAD has included people with disabilities (PWD) in its overall study of diversity on the broadcast networks. A total of six series regular characters will be PWD, making them just 1% of all series regular characters. This research was conducted in conjunction with the Tri-Union I AM PWD (Inclusion in the Arts & Media of People With Disabilities) campaign of Actors’ Equity Association, AFTRA and SAG (IAMPWD.org).
Of the 23 announced LGBT regular characters in the 2010-2011 primetime broadcast season, six are people of color (26%), and two will be people with disabilities (8.6%). Not one LGBT character announced for the new broadcast season will be black or transgender. For complete analysis of diversity on the broadcast networks, see: http://www.glaad.org/publications/tvreport10/diversity.
“Unfortunately, while the number of characters is increasing, many members of our community still do not see stories reflecting their lives,” continued Barrios. “It is troubling that the broadcast networks will not feature even one black LGBT character or one transgender character in the upcoming primetime lineup. Because what people see in the media has a huge impact on how they understand others and perceive themselves, the media has a responsibility to tell stories that include the diversity of our community.”
This research serves as a benchmark for GLAAD’s advocacy efforts which call for fair, accurate and diverse LGBT representations across media platforms. The storylines and characters in the “Where We Are On TV” report will later be reviewed for GLAAD’s Network Responsibility Index (NRI), released after May 2011 sweeps, which grades networks on overall LGBT impressions.
Complete results of GLAAD’s “Where We Are On TV” report see: http://www.glaad.org/tvreport10.
About GLAAD
The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) is dedicated to promoting and ensuring fair, accurate and inclusive representation of people and events in the media as a means of eliminating homophobia and discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation. For more information, please visit www.glaad.org.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.



It appears that ever show now has to have at least have one gay character or else they are “not gay friendly.”
Once again, GLAAD is far too generous and uses the all too convenient LGBT term to disguise the sad state of persistent inequality. LESBIAN women are still very much underrepresented. So are BISEXUAL men. Bisexual women appear to be overrepresented for reasons that (I suppose) hardly need any explaining. The purpose and presentation of the individual L or B character (catering to heterosexual men’s fantasies or not, visibility per se) can’t figure into this report, of course, but that nevertheless leads to questions of its usefulness in regard to its intended purpose. The same is true for clichéd gay characters, of course. Quality doesn’t factor in at all.
Correction:
Since there are ZERO transgendered characters at broadcast, the use of that term is incorrect to begin with, as only LGB characters are represented there. There is only 1 T in cable, so let’s not go overboard using LGBT for all those fab claims of supposed improvement.
broadcast tv:
LESBIAN lead characters: 0 out of 5
(4 gay men, 1 bisexual woman)
LESBIAN supporting chars: 2* out of 18
(8 gay men, 5 bisexual women, 2 lesbians)
LESBIAN recurring chars: 2 out of 15**
(13 gay men, 2 lesbian women)
* Can we count Angela Montenegro of BONES this year as her supposed bisexuality has zero visibility and exists only in the memories of the fans? I don’t recall it even being mentioned once in a very very long time, not even by her husband.
**typo in source report, I count 15 not 14 total (?)
cable:
LESBIAN lead characters: 3 out of 12
(6 gay men, 5 bisexual women, 3 lesbian women, 1 bisexual man)
LESBIAN supporting chars: 5 out of 23
(16 gay men, 5 lesbian women, 1 bisexual man, 1 transgendered person)
LESBIAN recurring chars: 5 out of 18
(12 gay men, 5 lesbian women, 1 bisexual woman)
If it wasn’t for the series SKINS, cable wouldn’t have any lesbian lead characters at all.
Let’s celebrate that which deserves to be celebrated: the visibility of gay white men in the media.
Here’s to hoping that GLAAD will grow a pair of ovaries and learn to communicate better and more accurately. Nobody needs more press releases that spin the facts to make them look nice, as no improvement will come from it. Let your copy reflect the stats.
sorry, 1 asterisk with wrong figure. should read:
“broadcast tv:
LESBIAN lead characters: 0 out of 5
(4 gay men, 1 bisexual woman)
LESBIAN supporting chars: 2 out of 18
(8 gay men, 5* bisexual women, 2 lesbians)”
Only 1 percent of the population is gay. 3% exceeds the general population.
The result from this is less viewing from the general population. This will hurt the workers from behind the scenes who are more likely to be gay.
Only 1% of the population is gay? Where did you get that figure, Mr. Wizard? Church on Sunday?
I think you are over stating the “embracing” of these people in the general public. Since the demographic seems to be 18 to 35 year olds the numbers are rather dubious at best. Most folks I know change the channel when the “gay” characters come on. Wonder what kind of fire storm my expressing this view cause?? Isn’t it great one can’t have an oppossing view without being called a racist.
God bless the world of t.v.
If anybody DARED to say that about the white, heterosexual Christian characters, there would be a firestorm of epic proportions.
Also, gay =/= race, dummy, so people won’t call you a racist for that. They’ll call you a homophobe, though, which you sound like you are.
“Most folks I know change the channel when the ‘gay’ characters come on.”
You need to get out more.
“Wonder what kind of fire storm my expressing this view cause??”
You weren’t expressing anything beyond an observation. If you want to stir up trouble, do it right and don’t hide behind “most folks I know.” Also, proofread.
“Isn’t it great one can’t have an oppossing view without being called a racist.”
Why am I surprised you’re this much of an idiot?
We will only be a truly enlightened people when nobody counts things like this. While we’re counting, though, who thinks “Everybody Loves Raymond” would have been more popular if Raymond was transgender?
“We will only be a truly enlightened people when nobody counts things like this.” I’d say “once we don’t need to” anymore. Right now it’s only a numbers game, nobody seems to expect queer characters or storylines that make sense or resemble real life (especially outside LA) a bit more.
We thought we’d be there, too, but Proposition 8 taught us a lesson. You know,
the day… when DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES doesn’t give Katherine a coming-out story only to throw her and her gf Robin off the show… When BONES writers remember that Angela is supposedly bisexual and let her and future hubby at least talk two sentences about his insecurities re: that before they get married. When GREY’S ANATOMY writers have more sense than to send Callie to a straight woman and a straight man seeking advice re: her queerness. That still bugs me to this day, this refusal to at least acknowledge that there’s a community out there. And so on.
And no, I don’t see myself or my community represented at all despite the fab numbers. Because the mainstream must be able to relate to the queer female chars at any cost. And more often than not they must be able to know that a man is gay the second he struts in. The only thing we have right now is some rather dubious numbers, unbelievably lame and tame coming-out stories followed by marriage and adoption. Just like straight people, only partners of same sex, you know? Kinda like queer Oreos.
What would Jesus do?
CBS has an in house rule at their network. No gay characters and no bi racial love stories. The only reason they are adding any “gay” characters is because it has been pointed out in the press. Les Moonves would have a gay woman before he would have a gay man on CBS.
Gays in general make Les Moonves very uncomfortable. Notice how few even work at CBS.
But I think he’s uncomfortable with a lot of things.
His name is Les.
“We will only be a truly enlightened people when nobody counts things like this.”
Tell that to liberals. They are obsessed with head counting and quotas.