EXCLUSIVE: There’s an accusation that Hollywood studios are holding back their hottest 3D Blu-ray releases, including Avatar 3D and Toy Story 3, until they see how much demand there is for the new format. This is despite manufacturers needing to sell 3D BD players in the run-up before Christmas. London based consultancy Screen Digest says studios including Fox, Paramount, Universal, and Warner Bros are only making a handful of 3D Blu-Ray titles available on the shelves before December –- and risking choking off demand for what Blu-ray’s long-awaited killer app. Screen Digest predicts that, by 2014, 75% of U.S. homes that have 3D-enabled TV sets will be able to show 3D BDs. And that 28% of U.S. homes will have 3D TVs within 4 years. Right now, only 25 3D BD discs will go on sale before Christmas, but only 6 of these will not be bundled along with 3D hardware. This means hardly any choice on the shelves. Disney’s Alice In Wonderland and Bolt will be exclusively bundled with Sony 3D hardware until early December. DreamWorks Animations’ Monsters vs Aliens, How To Train Your Dragon, and Shrek 4 will only be available if you buy Samsung’s 3D hardware. Anybody buying Panasonic 3D TVs gets Fox’s Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs and/or Universal’s Coraline. But there are no plans as yet to release Disney’s Up or Warner’s Clash of the Titans on 3D BD in the U.S. or UK. Analyst Helen Davis Jayalath, head of video at Screen Digest, tells me: “Early take-up of 3D Blu-ray would provide a much needed boost to the format, sales of which have fallen short of projections made pre-recession. Perhaps, not surprisingly, studios are hesitant to release their ‘crown jewel’ titles on 3D BD.” Her colleague Richard Baxter, co-author of report Studio Caution May Stymie 3D, Blu-Ray’s Potential Killer App, adds: “Our research shows that all the studios support 3D BD but many of them are unwilling to release their strongest 3D titles before the installed base of home 3D hardware is large enough to generate serious returns.”
But one studio I spoke to says there are many more 3D BD releases ready to be announced — but it just couldn’t tell Screen Digest about them at the time. Yet if Hollywood is stocking Christmasholiday store shelves with more 3D product than Screen Digest thinks, it’d better hurry. Disney tells me its 4-disc version of Christmas Carol releasing before Christmas includes the 3D version, for example, and the studio claims it has strongly supported BD from the inception and continues to back industry initiatives to advance the platform.


Who was Norman Desmond? Norma Desmond’s husband? Good article btw. I embrace every new tech medium with open arms but turning every tv show into a pop up birthday card thrills me not.
Watch the movie Sunset Blvd.
3D is the future.FACT.
3D WITHOUT glasses is the future. FACT.
We ain’t livin’ in the future yet. FACT.
No one is talking about the elephant in the room when it comes to Blu-Ray. Most industry reports count PlayStation 3′s when tallying the total number of blu-ray players already in the marketplace.
Unless Sony is going to software update or offer an add on to their players to support this killer app, there will be a lot of consumer resistance to rushing out and buying these units.
the second limiting factor to 3d in the home is that no one is willing to buy the insanely priced 3d glasses per piece. it is impractical to have friends over to watch movies when you only get two pairs of glasses with your set. the manufacturers need to figure out how to put the lens over the screen. then you will see its adoption rise.
They did that update months ago. PS3 is completely 3D compatible.
Sony IS in fact releasing a firmware update to the PS3 this fall (believe next month) to upgrade the PS3 to a 3D BD player. They already did this for 3D gaming earlier this year.
I agree the glasses are ridiculously expensive. On top of that, what family man would spend $500+ dollars on glasses their kids will inevitably sit on, step on, etc. They are also really uncomfortable and I’ve seen many people rubbing their temples as they walk away from demos at Best Buy and other stores. Not a fan.
Sony already announced a software update that supports 3D is in the works, and will be pushed out before the holiday season.
As for price, the thousand dollar premium for 3D tv’s versus 2D models hurts my wallet more, but as for the glasses, that junk Lady GaGa wears looks more comfortable then the models I’ve tried at BestBuy. If they expect me to sit through a feature length movie with those things digging into my nose and skull, they’ve got a rude awakening coming.
FYI, Sony is already working on a firmware update to the PS3 and it’s been pushed back to October.
http://www.digitaltrends.com/gaming/3d-blu-ray-update-coming-to-ps3-in-october/
3D won’t catch on until it’s glasses free, anyway. No one wants to wear the glasses.
I’m sorry but home 3D is a nonstarter unless they can figure out a no-glasses option. The analysts banking on this are myopic and delusional to an insane degree.
BD just needs robust support. It’s a phenomenal home standard as it is without this gimmick which only applies properly to a fraction of available or to-be-released content.
So yeah it would be cool to watch stereoscopic versions of stuff that is actually created that way if one chooses but thinking that people want to fall over each other to see these post-conversions at home is just silly.
I know the suits are enamored with the box office numbers and higher ticket premiums but they like the movie business version of New Kids on the Block. The kids feeding this pipe will soon move on to something else. Most people can’t wait.
I’m with you on the no-glasses thing. I think 3D is the future, but I don’t think that future’s close yet. There are too many limitations to the current home 3D standard that make it feel like a gimmick.
For me, Blu-Ray’s killer app is still the quality of the HD video and sound (when done right) that makes DVD nearly unwatchable on a big TV once you’ve made the transition to Blu.
Towards one of the above posts, I read some time ago that there was a firmware update coming for the PS3 to make it 3D-compatible.
Toshiba has already said their no glasses 3DTVs will be hitting the market before the year is out. Likely in December.
Avatar 3D is being bundeld with Panasonic 3D TVS. Just check out blu-Ray.com or highdefdigest.com. This was announced weeks ago but it won’t be available for sell-thru til next year just the limited time bundle.
WTF! The fact that it is close to impossible to find 3D blu-ray discs separate from hardware is simply ridiculous. My buddy just got a 3D tv as a wedding present from his mom, but he is stuck watching demos and a used copy of Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs for his fix. How do these companies expect people to embrace this technology if they have damn near nothing to watch? You really expect people to drop $400 every time they want a new flick?
Tying the 3D software to specific hardware — bundling x-movie to y-TV — may sell certain TVs to certain viewers, but leaves customers high and dry. No one wants to wear these glasses at home– particularly as they’re overpriced and prone to breaking. I see 3D TV — especially broadcast 3D TV — as the biggest non-starter of all time, with studios trying to artificially create demand that doesn’t exist
Its a chicken and egg theory. BD 3D Players and 3D TV being the chicken, and the 3D movies being the egg. I’m not even sure the standard 2D BD Players have reach critical mass.
What about standardizing the 3D glasses so one pair will work with all TVs? I read something about it before.
While I can fault the studios for appearing to restrict material, the manufacturers need to do their part by lowering costs and having all their TV and BD Players 3D capable. I think 3D is still a decade away from mass adoption.
I’m not going to run out and buy an expensive peice of 3-D hardware that will be an antique in two years, if their isn’t a good selection of titles to play on it. Also, those glasses need to go,-if possible, I know we don’t have anything like the Holodeck on the USS Enterprise,-yet.
To answer a couple of questions posted above:
“Toshiba is said to be prepping three different TV models for launch before the holidays, all of which use a special screen that displays light at different angles, effectively making glasses obsolete.”-Tech News Daily
“Sony …plans to upgrade all PlayStation 3 consoles with a firmware update adding 3D capability by fiscal year ending March 31, 2011. -IGN
Nevertheless, few will be motivated to go out and buy a 3-D capable display without the software. It’s like buying a car without the tires. It’s just plain stupid. Most of the software will only be available via special budling with hardware. Personally, I don’t want to have to buy a particular display because I want a specific title in my 3-D library. My initial response to 3-D technology: YAWN
Dose anyone think the 3D craze will pass over anytime soon , i mean its so hot right now but everything that goes up must come down! beg the differ?
Welcome to the world of the Early Adopter. If you had an HD TV in 2000 you had very little to watch – a PBS demo station loop, an occasional event (i.e. presidential inauguration) and that was about it. It wasn’t until Blu-Ray came out and DirecTV put up their new satellites a few years ago before a significant amount of HD content was readily available and HD was for real for most consumers. 7-8 years? That said – it seemed clear that HD would become the standard someday. I don’t feel that way about 3D at all. I think original content produced in 3D is great for theaters but I have no interest in it for my home (and I have been an Early Adopter since I could afford it.) As much as manufacturers are pinning their hopes on 3D, I think it’s forever a niche thing.
Well put. 3D is not a natural upgrade for TV (like HD, Bluray) because it requires new habits to utilize (the glasses, viewing angle) it’s a new product and that means different rules for adoption. In movies you really can “PR” it as an upgrade because the environment is so controlled and special anyway (Yeah! You’re going to a movie!), someone hands you the glasses and someone takes them and cleans them (and you don’t have to buy extra pairs for friends).
It’s cool but sometimes I just want my TV to watch me.
I’m an early adaptor too, but 3D at home holds no interest for me either. I don’t want to wear glasses and get headaches. It’s OK for an “event” type experience in the theatre but just not at home.
And what are these execs smoking if they think that 75% of homes will have a 3D capable set in four short years?! Heck, only a slim majority today have an HD set. And who knows how long the Great Recession will drag on and depress discretionary spending even more? Then there’s people like my parents – who are older, poorer and live in a rural area – that bought an standard def set just a few years ago (over my reasoning that they were already obsolete). Those folks, the ones execs always forget about or ignore, are not going to get any kind of new TV until there present one dies, and then it will be a cheap LCD, no way will it be a big bucks 3D TV!
I agree with those who say home 3D will never be more than a niche. It’s just not necessary and doesn’t add enough to make it worth it. It took long enough for HD to become the norm and that has more noticeable, widespread benefits to the average consumer than 3D ever will. HD from standard is akin to the leap from VHS to DVD, it’s that noticeable to the average person that once they have it, they don’t want standard def. It’s sad that some networks like VH1 still aren’t broadcasting most of their shows in the format.
Hollywood has a tragically short memory. 3D movies (and I am not counting experimental films, and shorts screened at the 1939 World’s Fair, etc) first hit the mainstream with BWANA DEVIL in 1952. Between 1953-1955 nearly 75 “depthies” and were flung off the screens and then it all came crashing down due to audience boredom, technical difficulties, and the rise of better exhibition systems to pry people away from their new fangled TV sets and back into cinemas (CinemaScope, 70mm, stereo, etc.) Hollywood has gone nuts these days to put just about everything in 3D and get people away from their new fangled 60” HD plasma screens – but then they also want them back at those home screens as well. Yeesh….
The ONLY reason 3D has any real traction now is that the new digital projectors, while admittedly expensive, do provide the best looking 3D images. They’re rock solid and have no image weave which was the headache inducing nightmare of the past …although the degree of light loss and dim pictures that plagued the industry 60 years ago are still widespread. Earlier this year I saw a major well reviewed and really good animated 3D CGI film at one of the premium complexes in LA that was located only about 20 miles from the HQ of the company that produced it. It looked AWFUL. So dim and murky as to make some scenes indecipherable, and despite their claims of having people at the ready to handle any such concerns the cinema never remedied the problem. The TV spots for said film that we saw broadcast later that night at home (in HD…) were brighter, sharper and more saturated.
All the studios see now are $ signs and are in love the price mark up for the 3D glasses (which I believe one was NOT charged for back in the day). No wonder the box office figures are so high (Resident Evil #1? Seriously?) But crap in 2D is still crap in 3D, only it costs you more watch it. Why on earth anyone would pay for that in their homes is beyond me. MAYBE there is some allure for sporting events and live shows (Lady Gaga in 3D at the MTV Awards….? No thank you). There is simply not enough decent product out there to fill the home market pipeline. I am steeped in this stuff almost daily and the LAST thing I want to do put on glasses and shut out everyone else in the room. D.W. Griffith proclaimed talkies as a fad that would soon wane and, well – we saw how prescient he was…but I agree with the posts above that 3D in the home is an opium dream at best. I will be stunned if it truly ever takes hold. Oh – and I have also seen demos of those 3D sets that don’t require glasses: Meh…..very narrow viewing window/arc so good luck having everyone in the family get the sweet spot.
I am an early adopter with a “budget”. After waiting ten years with an “early adopted” “HDTV-ready, read 1080i CRT flat screen” I decided to get 3D for the price of a highish end lcd that was around 50″ with associated equipment. In the end with a 50 dollar DIY screen(s) I have both a high contrast and non-depolarizing silver screen for extremely bright 95″ dual projection using the latest in cheap 1080p projectors mounted to the roof with recently added cheap monoprice cable harness that is about 2 inches thick in diameter (Cost less than a handful of monster cables).
I found 3D gaming and movies to be readily available. Using acceptable and legal methods obtaining the so called locked content is not so hard (Costs a little bit money of course) and being an early adopter I have taken the liberty of being able to take any 3D bluray and make it into a true display agnostic format. (Technically any well written 3D computer game can be rendered in S3D easily for about a 1.5ish performance cost)
With a dual projection system you can get ftls (Brightness per ft^2) that exceed the cinema standards (IE too bright or just eye poppingly bright). The optical losses of the filters/glasses also naturally reduce ambient light affects and with high contrast projectors can provide an image more vivid than a movie theater. (You can also control the 3D effect separation to your own personal taste unlike the default separation levels selected in a theater)
All in all the projectors and screen combined were less than a 50″ LCD (LED Backlit) model that may have been acceptable. But once you see TV, movies, games,… on a 90+ inch screen there is no going back. Not to mention if you want the ideal prebuilt solution for any type of video content getting a high end projector/screen is still cheaper than buying an excessively large flat panel which are becoming more like mirrors than displays. (Cant even open a window or turn on a light because of the “glossy” screens)(Ironically a polarizing glass can cut through such reflections)
Although my setup requires a lot of knowhow to do technically it is quite simple and contrary to what some people are saying 3D is not really that complicated to setup in a pleasing fashion and it does enhance content if done correctly.
For one 3D blurays are just 2D blurays with an extra video track delta encoded so it only takes a bit more space instead of doubling the data rate requirements and size. Second HDMI1.4 is technically not required to have 3D display and if people just wrote better firmware and software it would be trivial to support dual projection systems or HDMI1.3 3D ready systems.
Another point of contention that I have with consoles is that they do not have the additional computational horsepower to produce S3D gaming anything like 720p30. My desktop can run games at 2K effective resolutions across two displays without issue and until the next generation of consoles 3D gaming on them will be a compromise that I wouldn’t take. The high resolution of a 3D feed is important to generate a clean look.