BREAKING NEWS: Peter Jackson Slaps Back At Kiwi/Oz/Hollywood Unions
UPDATE: A “Member Alert” went out yesterday afternoon from the Screen Actors Guild advising actors not to accept work on the non-union production of The Hobbit. (See below.) It’s part of an international showbiz labor effort begun by New Zealand Actors’ Equity and its umbrella The Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance headquartered in Australia to go public with a campaign confronting Peter Jackson, the director and producer of the long planned and high profile back-to-back Hobbit movies and filmmakers Three Foot Seven, MGM, and Warner Brothers. NZ Actors’ Equity is calling a meeting of actors on Tuesday to bring The Hobbit filmmakers to the negotiating table for a
contract providing minimum guarantees on wages and working conditions, residual payments, and cancellation payments to actors engaged on the production. Now, the International Federation of Actors (FIA) is supporting the NZ Equity/MEAA campaign, and last month issued letters to The Hobbit production company Three Foot Seven, Warner Brothers, and MGM seeking a union-negotiated contract to cover all performers on the production. That’s why SAG and AFTRA are now involved as well as Actors’ Equity, Equity (UK), and equivalent organisations in Australia, Canada and South Africa.
Equity has been trying since 2006 to negotiate minimum guarantees contracts across the film and television industries in New Zealand, but can’t get that country’s producers organisation SPADA to take part in talks. SPADA says it did agree to a meeting skedded 18 months ago, but nixed an Equity condition that reaching a collective agreement was a requirement for the discussions.
Yesterday afternoon, Three Foot Seven’s lawyers issued this statement: “3 Foot 7 has received legal advice that it is not lawful under New Zealand law for 3 Foot 7 to engage in collective bargaining with MEAA or any other labour organisation, regarding performers who are independent contractors. Under the New Zealand Commerce Act it would be unlawful to engage with an Australian union on these matters.”
What happens next is anybody’s guess. But news reports say Three Foot Seven has been trying to resolve the situation behind closed doors and is pissed it’s now being played out internationally.
The long delayed MGM/Warner Bros/New Line project consisting of 2 back-to-back films produced and directed by Peter Jackson recently got a new lease on life. That’s because the MGM ownership situation is inching closer to resolution with Spyglass chiefs Roger Birnbaum and Gary Barber about to become MGM co-chairmen/CEOs. So currently underway a pre-packaged bankruptcy proceeding that would convert MGM’s debt to equity and remove the $4 billion albatross from around the Lion’s neck so that the studio can start roaring to go on films again. The prepackaged bankruptcy not only allows MGM to be restructured but also freezes existing deals for franchises that include the James Bond series and The Hobbit. All this means that The Hobbit, with Peter Jackson at the helm, is able to move forward, with co-financing partner Warner Bros distributing the two films worldwide. But now this union action is a new wrinkle no one expected:
The makers of feature film The Hobbit – to be shot in New Zealand next year – have refused to engage performers on union-negotiated agreements.
Members of Canadian Actors Equity, U.S. Actors Equity, the Screen Actors Guild, UK Actors Equity, the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, the Media, Entertainment & Arts Alliance (Australia) and the Alliance of Canadian Cinema, Television and Radio Artists are advised not to accept work on this non-union production.
If you are contacted to be engaged on The Hobbit please notify your union immediately.
For more information about this non-union production click here.
—
The Hobbit and Engagement of PerformersBackground
For some years performers in New Zealand have struggled on non-union contracts. These contracts provide no minimum guarantees of wages or working conditions, no residual payments and no cancellation payments in the event the performer’s contract is cancelled.In 2006, at the request of New Zealand performers, the Australian union, the Media Entertainment & Arts Alliance (Alliance) opened an office in New Zealand.
Since that time the New Zealand branch of the Alliance has sought to negotiate with both individual producers and with the producers’ association but to no avail.
The International Federation of Actors (FIA), of which the vast majority of performer unions around the world are members, resolved that the time had come for performers around the world to support their colleagues in New Zealand and seek a union contract for all performers on The Hobbit.
Who is FIA?
FIA represents performer unions in 100 countries around the world. Unions represented include the Screen Actors Guild (SAG), the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA), American Actors Equity, the Alliance of Canadian Cinema, Television and Radio Artists (ACTRA), Canadian Actors Equity, Equity UK and the Media Entertainment & Arts Alliance.FIA’s goal is to advance the interests of performers around the world.
What did FIA decide?
At a recent meeting FIA decided that the situation had persisted long enough and that it was time for action to be taken.Consequently, FIA resolved as follows:
“Resolved, that the International Federation of Actors urges each of its affiliates to adopt instructions to their members that no member of any FIA affiliate will agree to act in the theatrical film The Hobbit until such time as the producer has entered into a collective bargaining agreement with the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance for production in New Zealand providing for satisfactory terms and conditions for all performers employed on the productions.”
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.



Hang tough Mr. Jackson and crew. Your money, your risk, your decision…
and also Financed by the NZ tax payer who’s government has also changed the employment law -that had been upheld by our justice system in court- to appease Jackson and the movie company.
I have worked in the performing arts industry for nearly a decade and know the most staff in the industry love what they do so much that they would do it for nothing if they needed to. I dont think this love should be exploited. Fair pay and conditions for all-
So bogus when two productions with budgets of $94M each won’t cough up union wages for its (scale) cast members. Lets them avoid residuals. Cheap bastards.
Umm – didn’t you read the bit about the SAG actors getting their residuals. Which bit of cheap is in that…
The “bit of cheap” comes in when the New Zealand actors working alongside those SAG actors and doing the same job don’t get the same salary, residuals, or contract protections.
I think it’s just terrible that this film — which is as sure to top 500-700 million worldwide as any film in history, somehow cant afford to pay union contracts. Do they really need to nickle and dime with such a huge pie? I’m embarrassed FOR the filmmakers.
I agree -greed is a sickness that reflects in their souls. Look at what New zealand returned to them in Lord of the Rings profits and its still not enough for them, they still will not pay them fairly
This sucks. Politics, yet another reason these movies will never be made.
Politics? You mean money? Because money is the reason why nothing ever gets done.
Politics?! Its about time we enforced union regs on megga studios and producers who fly away to save a few bucks on the backs of performers, who give of their time and considerable talents to help make a picture succeed and then get screwed out of any residual payments despite the millions that picture makes. Shame on them.
Jackson just needs to say “Fuck It” and move on. Despite the BILLIONS he generated with the LOTR trilogy,it seems that no one involved with this project has any desire to see The Hobbit get made. GDT had the right idea,methinks.
Oh. So now SAG and AFTRA want to appear as if they give a shit about union work. Where were they when our AMERICAN employers placed non union work on the negotiating table in 2008/2009. In case your readers have forgotten, never understood or didn’t give a shit, during the last TV/Theatrical negotiations, our employers wanted the right to produce Original Product Made For New Media NON UNION as long as the project was $15,000.00 a minute or less. $15 freakin thousand dollars a freakin minute or less!! Well, the average new media project is less than $3,000.00 per minute. SAG and AFTRA rolled over (under the kinder and gentler leadership) and didn’t fight against that proposal. Then the idiot membership of both unions voted it up because Tom Hanks and George Clooney told them to vote it up. Forget about minimums, union security and protections or residual. For the first time in SAG history, non union, widely released work can be done non union with SAG’s blessing. And that’ll never go away. Cats out of the bag. The bell is rung. No way either union, whether merged or not, can get that back.
So, now SAG/AFTRA tries to puff up its wimpy collective chests to make a point!? Give me a brake. If I were Peter Jackson and/or his associates, I would fire off a public letter to SAG and AFTRA telling them if they are so offended by his desire to do a film non union, they need to take a look at their own codified agreements with American employers and think twice before throwing stones. So typical of SAG’s current leadership. Quick to appear indignant and holier than thou while at the same time doing whatever they can to weaken unionism within the entertainment industry. The emperor has absolutely no clothes.
How can AFTRA of all unions say anything. That union lets its members work non-union with impunity.
AFTRA card holder Larry King worked non-union on the non-union network CNN for, what, decades?
What about Keith Olbermann, he is an AFTRA member that works non-union on MSNBC.
And SAG wants to merge with AFTRA. When SAG merges with AFTRA the merged union, whatever they call it (I hear uncle Joe’s Actor’s Union is a Candidate), will have zero credibility.
You must not have read the release. It is not just AFTRA and SAG and AEA, it is EVERY ACTORS UNION IN THE WORLD WHO BELONG TO FIA! This is huge and if you are an actor, you should celebrate. If you are not you ought to celebrate for those of us who are, since we are the people who entertain you and we do a better job of it when we have what a US citizen have come to expect. A decent salary, a pension and health plan and a nice shelter from the storms.
Forget about the shelter from the storms. Haven’t you heard the Motion Picture Home is closing its doors in nothing less than a non-negotiated takeaway? SAG leaders or AMPTP appeasers?
For shame! Like there’s not enough money to go around, people? These two films will make $2 billion and the people in front of the camera should be protected! Even if they ARE really short.
I’m curious…
Does the crew participate in the downside when a movie flops and loses tons of cash?
If not, why should they get any of the upside for a successful picture?
Precisely. In what other business (not dominated by coercive unions) do employees get to dtermine how the business will be run?
Uh that would be any business that hires workers who want to make a living based on whether the project is making the owners money, which is what a union asks for when they come in the door. The only reason there are unions is because it has been proven that rich corporations don’t do a good job sharing their profits except to shareholders, and sometimes they even screw them if they can get away with it.
no the crew doesn’t get the tax write offs- or the 1 dollar out of every 6 returned to them from the NZ tax payer. NZlanders get a change in their employmeny laws for a bonus as well, the crew here get to pay their own tax, insurance, workers ins ( acc), and no penalties rates ever. they do not get a share of anything that union members get, no residuals, and a worthless contract with no rights,
My arguement has nothing to do with what a union does or doesn’t do- it is about fair pay and conditions in New zealand- The nz gov changed an employment law to appease the film makers. The law had been upheld here in our court and the plaintiff won. There was no longer any confusion – it had been satisfied in court ages ago. The film makers have interferred in NZ law- Our government has conned NZ. The lord of the rings has returned huge profits to them but they still want more from battling Nzlanders wallets, Shame on Jackson, Key, and all the other greedy people involved in this con job
Peter Jackson is getting paid $25,000,000 to direct THGE HOBBIT plus he gets 22% of the gross revenue. THEY CAN AFORD AFTRA WAGES> I do not know who is to blame here MGM WARENRS OR PETER JACKSON. His last 2 movies were stinkers anyway. KING KONG was too long and so was The Lovely Bones.
So let me get this straight. Jackson pays his Kiwis s**t money and his movies still go well over the budget. Where does the money go since it obviously isn`t used to pay actors? And it looks like non-union is the reason why he insists to make movies on NZ, not care for economy, employment,etc. And didn`t LOTR actors who had big roles (Astin, Boyd,etc) complain that they worked for food and lodgings so to speak because it was a non-union job? So much for Jackson being the good guy. His Neverland-like mansion got bigger and bigger and we now know why.
BTW, totally agree that King Kong and TLB were stinkers. Total and utter garbage especially TLB. KK had saving grace in Naomi Watts, TLB had no one.
I agree NZ was conned by all. Greed rules-New Zealanders always seem to lie back and think of England- what can you say when people won’t stand up for themselves? then they shoot down anyone who tries to help them. I am disgusted our government and laws were for sale
About time someone stood up to the union thugs.
It’s one thing when TV / HV were new income sources that came along 20 years after films were released, but no unions can in anyway justify that a TV and HV can break even without these income streams.
So residuals turned from “profit participations” to just “delayed compensation” (and delayed only to the extent a studio qualifies as a “qualified distributor”, otherwise the guilds often demand a deposit).
This business is not highly profitable, and unlike any other industry, the people taking the highest risk, are not the ones that are reaping the highest returns. The glamor of the biz constantly allows for dumb money to constantly fall inline behind high priced over rated talent, producers and guilds. I’d like to say it’s an a unsustainable economic situation, but hollywood seems to always find dumber money.
Union thugs? I don’t know about NZ, but do you realize that this is the ONLY affordable way for a family to get health care in this country? Is that a spoiled fat union perk, or is it simply the only way a worker can survive in a nation where the gap between rich and poor increases significantly every year fueled by corporations who allowed to bully both consumers and their employees to maximize profits. We need our unions so our families can stay healthy, and we can stand a chance at retiring on our pension. Nasty greedy unions, right?
Do yourself and your family a favour and move to Australia where they treat a working man fairly. I have returned to nz after 15 years and found it has regressed. Our laws and government are for sale and the gap has widened between rich and poor. I cannot beleive they still are giving Tax breaks to the rich and increasing GST. And now they are giving tax breaks to overseas film makers as well. Peter Jackson who once seemed a hero is now a greedy souless leach enlarging his fortune by feeding on the low paid.
following union demands usually leads to more job killings.
Since the film is “owned” by an American film production company, aren’t they obligated that no matter where they film to participate in agreements already bargained by SAG, AFTRA, the WGA et al?
Sara, not when they run off to other countries (Or Right To Work States) to escape paying union actors and crews.
Right. Because those of us performers who aren’t union members don’t deserve to work at all.
Go for it, Peter!!
You know, I’m absolutely sure Peter Jackson is sitting in his Hobbit house in New Zealand (no shit, I hear he actually has a hobbit door into a hobbit house thing going on his property there) on the other side of the fucking world, just going, you know what – fuck you, I’m Peter Jackson, I made the fucking trilogy and I’m a New Zealander and fuck The fucking Screen Actors Guild and AFTRA and the United Association of Fucking Fucks.
And here in Hollywood, “union advocate” has it DEAD RIGHT.
SAG is currently run by a gang of pussies and supported by a small army of pussies, who didn’t have the calzones to step up to the producer’s grill in ’08 and say “CUT THE SHIT OR WE WALK.”
So, what do we now, as SAG actors have?
A PUSSY UNION RUN BY PUSSIES AND ENDORSED BY A-LIST PUSSY ACTORS that is about to merge with AFTRA into THE UNITED ASSOCIATION OF PUSSIES.
I mean, go look at Global Rule One on the Sag web-site. What does it say?
It says “We don’t take shit from anybody and if you make a home movie without clearing it with us we will cut your lips off.”
And who made “Band of Brothers” NON-UNION – JUST before Global Rule One kicked in, then came out in a clip TELLING actors “follow Rule One little people” soon after it came into effect?
Tom BIGGEST PUSSY ON THE PLANET Hanks, that’s who.
The same guy who came out and said “the world is changing and we need to change, so, I instruct you all, fellow pussies, to put on some pink shoes, and sign this new pussy contract, that allows NON-UNION work into a SAG contract FOR THE FIRT TIME IN THE HISTORY of SAG, and gives BACK clip consent, product placement protections and force majeure, which SAG has had since it was FUCKING FORMED.
See what’s happening here is, oh so ironic and full of the big barrels of bullshit being handed out by the A-list actors and moderate SAG and AFTRA – guys like Peter Jackson are WAY ahead on this, and they are like, “you know what, SAG is gonna FOLD in the next year anyway, they are COMPLETE PUSSIES, so, fuck their rules.”
“WE’RE KEEPING AS MUCH OF THIS MONEY AS WE WANT.”
I’ll pay Ian McKellan and Cate Blanchett whatever they want, but every body else?
Fuck Global Rule One
Global Rule one my BALLS
Right here with your Global Rule one
And why? Because the word is out folks – SAG is run by PUSSIES and is about to merge into a union of PUSSIES.
You bought the bullshit, you dumb motherfuckers? Well, here it is – eat it.
Thanks for your time.
Union Ethics
But how do you really feel?
Oh my god, I love you! I just laughed my ass off for a good 5 minutes at your post. I have to say I agree! Especially the part about Tom (biggest pussy of the century) Hanks! God, he is SO overrated and overpaid! With his looks, I don’t know how he got anywhere anyway! I think Forrest Gump was typecasting. And now his douchebag son is running around making movies and TV shows. God save us all!
These unions ruin everything. I wish they would just fuck off and let them make the damn movie! God forbid, the top “A-list” actors not get a billion dollars for dressing up and playing make believe. I say Peter Jackson deserves his money and his little hobbit house, damn it! He worked his ass off. I’d like to see other directors (especially the one who makes those piece of shit Transformers movies) make a movie with even HALF the level of quality as The Lod of The Rings. They couldn’t because they suck!
yeah -its like the more money the Hank’s and the Jacksons of this world have- the more they want. Greed rules. Maybe when they make a flop they could get Obamas government to bail them out? hey he did it for the Banks and banks does sound alot like hanks.It seems if your rick enough you can do anything. NZ are giving them Tax payers money- changed their employment laws overnight to appease them. I think the PMs also offered them shandies.
You meed to call your shrink…again…it is time.
This is embarrassing for SAG…
Local actors who don’t look to acting as a prime source of income will get the chance of a lifetime. Actors with resumes probably have agents who will negotiate salaries that far exceed “scale” regardless of their union. Name actors will get their huge salaries and a cut of the backend that will put the SAG demands to shame. Everybody gets free trips to beautiful New Zealand The only losers are the unions themselves who don’t get to shave money off the talent. You guys think non-SAG means that Peter Jackson is going to pay people less than minimum wage which is ridiculous. They are trying to avoid paying an outside organization 15% of the total actor wages and 3% of the gross.
And hey, if a name actor or some unknown wants to hold out to show “solidarity” with their union, so be it. At that point, when there is something on the table, the producers may opt to sign a contract.
Yeah and that is why FIA and SAG and AFTRA and the other unions have issued a stop work order. To force them to pay union wages.
Well Maverick you plainly don’t know shit. I’ve worked for Peter in the past and he pays well below union minimums for all but the biggest names in his cast. The cast of LOTR had to send Viggo to personally petition for a chump share of the huge sums of money that the trilogy made because the contracts they signed didn’t give the anything like a “cut of the backend that will put SAG demands to shame” you speak of. If it weren’t for the unions there wouldn’t be any backend to shave from idiot, we’d all be making bare bottom weeklies like the factory workers studios wish we were.
Hey “Maverick” ,
If you’re making a joke,
kudos for the ultra dry wit
If you’re serious,
go fuck yourself you ridiculous, union busting douche bag.
I live in New Zealand and from my perspective, it looks alot like an Australian Union (with help from their American & British associates) is simply trying to increase their profits. They targeted Jackson’s “The Hobbit” on purpose, because it’s internationally recognized and stands to make a huge profit. Most of the local kiwi tv & film productions, such as the recent “Boy”, don’t make alot of money even by say Australian standards, so the MEAA and other Unions aren’t too interested in “organizing” them and have never made much of an effort to organize Kiwi film, tv, and theater actors & crew. Only when Kiwis “make it big” overseas are the Unions interested or when it’s mega hollywood financed production being made here. It’s about money really, not helping fellow actors and crew, because if was the MEAA would have been boycotting Shortland Street or Outrageous Fortune, both non Union kiwi shows.
Sorry Jack but you got it wrong. MEAA are only just beginning their work with NZ Equity. If they’d come in and started bossing around local productions like Shorty or Outrageous fortune they’d be gone quicker than stink. MEAA are all for supporting local productions, they do the same in Oz where local productions are offered far lower pay scales and often no residuals deals because they want local production to flourish. The reason they are pushing for resids on Hobbit is because the main cast are on SAG resids, the money is coming from the US at the expense of US performers so the least they can do is offer kiwis similar conditions. If you want kiwis to continue being Mexicans with cellphones then keep rolling over when big money calls you to. Otherwise learn from the experience of other performers like those from all the unions names above and stick up for yourselves.
Are you kidding!! MEAA have successfully lost production for Australia. Australian rates are higher than in LA which is known as being expensive. MEAA supports local production because they get a cut of the Australian residuals. Want to talk about money greedy bastards. Start with the Australian Union who is not representing the people who want to work but their own interests.
Australian rates higher than LA? Buddy you are full of shit! I’ve been working in the biz for 15 years in Australia and overseas and can tell you without a shadow of a doubt that yanks (on SAG contracts) are significantly more expensive than us. I’ve seen the figures, I know how it works. Try roughly twice the price and you’re getting close, not to mention better overtime, conditions like travel and accomodation etc etc. Have you seen what Australian residuals are like? LOL! I remember getting a check for $12.75 from Neighbours once, that’s about the most I’ve ever got from local productions. If you want to talk bucks then it’s the resids from SAG shows that have made money for everyone. If it wasn’t for the union we wouldn’t be getting any money to even give them a share. Do you get it yet?
So it’s alright if local New Zealand tv, film, and theater workers are treated like “Mexicans with cell phones” in order for local productions to “flourish” but if a Hollywood financed production does it, it’s suddenly wrong? The truth is the MEAA is only getting involved now because they smell money, hasn’t a thing to do with “fair pay” for local New Zealand actors & crew, which what Unions are suppose to be about. And by pushing for better resid or “fair pay” on Hollywood financed productions, but not local New Zealand (or Australian) productions, you’re actually hurting local productions as that only further encourages local talent to only work on Hollywood financed productions or simply go to the States or the UK altogether.
Actually Jack you are once again wrong.
MEAA and NZ equity have been trying to get NZ actors a fair contract for years now. It is most definitely not recent. The only reason this has become so big now is because the producers of the hobbit took it to the media instead. Plus it’s the hobbit which is a huge production. And yet with such a huge production which is going to make millions they can’t seem to treat NZ actors the same as they are treating the American actors? Or the Australian actors?
Jack if you have an issue with the basic pay rates and conditions for NZ media people then you need to look at your market. What have you got, 4.4 million people? You’re lucky you have local industry with those numbers bro. That’s why everyone is keen to help out and work for less on local because they want to build talent and create. When the market is bigger eg. LOTR, King Long etc. you need to take that into account. Why should kiwis get paid the same to perform for the entire world when the producers are making unbelievable cash? Did you see Peter just bought himself a new Gulf Stream personal jet for $105M? He’s benefitting form the increased market, why not other kiwis?
George Lucas does the same thing with the star wars prequels. Kind of different due to his dispute with WGA but it’s why Speilberg didn’t direct Return of the Jedi and why Gary Oldman dropped out of voicing General Greivious from Revenge of the Sith. Fuck the unions they make everything so grueling during pre-production. These two have balls to stand up and say F U. Union contracts can be a joke. Jackson is the writer/producer/director why should anyone but him get residuals? The director busts his ass over every faucet of production and an actor shows up reads his lines and gets residuals for that? Unions drive up the cost of a film and take their dues for being nothing but penny pinchers(like the movie studios they demonize). Grow up
“The Lovely Bones” was a “stinker?” …omg…
As for SAG/AFTRA or is it AFTRA/SAG now, the producers are in charge, so maybe they’re not getting their cut… because, folks, “…it’s all smoke and mirrors,” as Orson Welles was wont to say.
Finally, IMHO, “The Lovely Bones” was brilliant, atypical film making, which is why the genius opinion of this pathetic group that mominated that Indian/”Is That Your Final Answer” film as the best film of the phuckin’ year is so flawed…
Pretty soon it’ll be 1931 in Hollywood again and working actors will be gotten for a ‘Dollar A Holler”… Union dayz are over… and the non-working actors — should we say, non reading — have fallen for the cheap tricks of the powerful and voted their line…
Lucas had a dispute with DGA not WGA for the opening crawl of Empire Strikes Back. He didn’t open with production credits so they gave him a hefty fine. They didn’t bother when the original came out in ’77 cause they didn’t know how big the film was going to be so when the sequel comes around 3 years later the DGA shakes down 250,000 off of Lucas just so he can keep his opening crawl. Which serves the story of the films. That is not what unions should be doing. Corrupt. Ya Ya Lucas is made of money but clearly they just wanted a quick cash grab since he paid out of pocket for ESB instead of using studio financing/hedge funds. They hate when people try to shake up the system. You go Jackson! I am for real
I gotta stay consistent, when Tyler Hack Perry was being slammed for not hiring union members, I raised a ruckus. Well, here’s Ruckus Part 2. I refuse to see this film unless it’s employees receive equal compensation as their union brothers and sisters.
just when it looked like the hobbit would finaly see the light of day and go into production. now comes the unions that make sure actors and other movie workers are well compensated for their work step in and start screaming unfair deals. which could mean no staff or cast for the hobbit after so long of delays.
Hm, I thought that no greenlight = no production = no ability on the producer’s part to enter into any such contracts.
Which then means that the actors unions are paridoxically penalizing the films for going into production without their contract, when the filmmakers cannot legally enter that contract without going into production.
How… absurd.
FOCUS ALL YOUR ATTENTION ON PETER JACKSON. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Peter Jackson can be shamed, Warner Bros. cannot.
“PETER JACKSON: LORD OF THE SCABS?” Or how ’bout, “PETER JACKSON: RETURN OF THE THIEF?”
Actors need to weigh in on this. Where is commentary from uber-political Viggo Mortensen?
If this “works,” nobody will ever make a living as an actor, again.
This and other films / tv to come will simply need a good, old fashioned collective protest by the workers whether they include unions on this or not. The real question is how much more in assets, pay, insurnce and future jobs are we willing to sacrifice? After all that has happened economically in the last few years this is a ridiculous conversation and is something more
attuned to action now.
Im conclicted here ..while i personally think union actors should be getting their just rights im no fan at all of the idea that they should be able to stall a project like The Hobbit or even worse stop non-union labour from appearing,i know the producers are hiding behind NZ law by denying the unions the reasonable requests they`ve made but maybe the unions should be trying to change(or amend) the law first before trying to hi-jack a high profile film
I guess you do not understand what a union does…it creates minimums and if a producer is not doing what they agree to do, they go on strike to force them to do what is their contractual obligation. Or as you put it, the stall the production in order to force them to look at what is going on and to fix it.
That is why, btw, the talks about merger are happening. Digital has changed the game and the unions can compete against each other, so we need to stop this and unite to set up rates for digital that are fair and share in the wealth new media will eventually provide.
Stay classy, Peter.
Weren’t you suing New Line not too many years back when they wouldn’t fulfill their contractual obligation by paying you back end on LOTR?