As expected, the MGM ownership situation is getting closer to being sorted, and it won’t be long before the Lion has a chance to roar again. Or at least emerge from its cage. Spyglass chiefs Roger Birnbaum and Gary Barber have signed non-binding letters of intent that will make them MGM co-chairmen/CEOs. That leads to the next step, which is a pre-packaged bankruptcy proceeding that would convert debt to equity, removing the $4 billion albatross from around the Lion’s neck so that it can start generating films again. The prepackaged bankruptcy allows the company to be restructured while it freezes existing deals for franchises that include the James Bond series and The Hobbit.
The LA Times reports that the Spyglass guys are already looking past this hurdle, and are talking with Ken Schapiro about coming aboard as COO. He’s a vet of Qualia Capital, which was among the entities that kicked the tires on MGM before management decided to go with Birnbaum and Barber, who are expected to make projects but will likely eliminate the studio’s marketing and distribution arms and set the projects up elsewhere. All this means that The Hobbit, with Peter Jackson at the helm, can move forward, with co-financing partner Warner Bros distributing the two films worldwide.
The situation on 007 will be more feverish. Warner Bros, Sony Pictures Entertainment and 20th Century Fox are the obvious outlets, but don’t count out Paramount. That studio has been co-financing partners with Spyglass on Star Trek and the upcoming sequel. That has grown into a strong relationship. I’m told that Paramount is making an aggressive push to win that franchise, much the way that it captured the Marvel Entertainment deal before that enterprise was sold to Disney. That gave Paramount distribution rights to the Iron Man series and the upcoming films Thor, The First Avenger: Captain America and The Avengers. Obviously, Barbara Broccoli and Michael Wilson hold a lot of say in where the films go, but it will be a hotly contested property–if MGM indeed stops functioning as a distributor. The appeal to such a move is, it shaves costs upfront. The downside is MGM will have to pay distribution fees down the road. Deadline was first to report the distribution outsourcing plan by the Spyglass duo, on June 29. It would mean major downsizing of those divisions.
Also in the mix are remakes of films that include Robocop, as well as development projects like the Robert Ludlum thriller The Matarese Circle, which at one time, had Denzel Washington attached to star with Tom Cruise, and David Cronenberg directing.
All this leaves the existing executive team headed by Mary Parent looking at the exit, but that is also no surprise. Parent put together an enviable slate, but only released one projects–Hot Tub Time Machine– and watched another, The Zookeeper, become a big Sony Pictures Entertainment summer 2011 release after creditors plunged the studio into a state of paralysis as they put a “for sale” sign on the studio.






Ummmm, I think she also released the bomb FAME remake. I don’t know who you think is envious of her. Maybe they’re envious of the salary that she conned Harry Sloan out of.
Ummmm. That was Lakeshore Entertainment.
No one’s talking about the biggest issue with the restructuring, that is, what’s the library really worth? it’s plundered, over-exploited, and here’s the kicker, no one really knows at MGM, about titles produced since the mid 1980, what rights they really own. Some of my titles are listed in their asset base, and I know they no longer own the rights. There are many other producers in the same boat. If I were a creditor, I wouldn’t be so quick to swap debt for a non-existent equity.
Sorry Princess, Parent didn’t green light FAME. It was inherited from the previous regime.
I thought Lakeshore and MGM were already making FAME when Mary Parent’s group got there.
My biggest concern are the reports that Spyglass wants to drop MGM’s distribution capability and become just a production company.
Any MGM Productions film without Bilbo Baggins or James Bond involved will be pretty much guaranteed second class status, battling with pics produced by whoever signs on to be their distributor.
Well, not really. The troubles at MGM well preceeded her. If anything it was beyond impressive to see the impact she made with the absolutely miniscule/hamstrung and dysfunctional resources she was given. She’ll continue to suceed post-MGM. That’s a given.
I’m curious where this leaves Harry Sloan. Is he out completely now?
Sloan has been out. I’d be surprised if he doesn’t need a hall pass to take a pee, it was his fault The Hobbit got tangled up in this to begin with. Before Sloan, all MGM ever had any rights for on it was distribution. Sloan wrangled a substantial producing cred with WB when NL got shaken up. Oh wait, with money MGM didn’t have to give away. Didn’t expect that dirty little secret to get out, did you, Harry?
I hope Sloan is out…what a blowhard!!…Spyglass (really Barber) is the only hope MGM has. Barber knows what he’s doing and can turn the place around — for real. Keeping my eyes crossed!!
MGM’s problems are not due to Mary Parent. Leave the girl alone. That kind of thinking is completely myopic.
MGM, in the hands of Gary Barber and Roger Birnbaum, would do well. And what a great coup for them to inherit one of the most notable and recognized brand names in the world. I mean Spyglass has some recognition but nothing whatsoever like the MGM brand.
Gary is a smart and financially careful businessman and Roger who years ago was overshadowed and then dumped on by his “friend” Joe Roth (with friends like him who needs enemies?) has proven himself time and time again.
The Barber/Birnbaum team is a capable and experienced one, in both production and domestic and foreign rights and distribution. All they need do is pick a distribution deal based on the strongest studio marketing team, which they already know.
I hope it all goes as planned. And how interesting that Roger was once at UA and Gary previously led the charge many years ago to possibly buy MGM.
So, it becomes a pared down production company. The name’s the thing … and there are SO many ways to exploit it all over the world. Good going, guys.
if this means the Hobbit will finaly get to move to be able to be filmed and on the big screen then hope spy glass suceedes and makes the lion roar once again. as for James bond that is one franchise that is sure to be a bidding war of the ages.
I don’t see why they don’t just keep some of the existing creative team– they were the ones who assembled a solid slate and have been struggling to do something — anything — during this nebulous time. Are they just going to move Spyglass people over? Or is Spyglass going to remain a separate entity or just dissolve altogether?
I am curious to know how a “pre-packaged” bankruptcy affects their rights to various properties such as the Bond movies. If a contract stipulates that rights revert to the original holder in the event of bankruptcy, can a pre-packaged bankruptcy somehow negate that?
Layman, you’ve made the best point yet.
the only other issue is one of production and distribution cashflow – Bond and Hobbit alone would suck up about 500m to produce and market. Unless they are able to raise a significant line of credit (a la Marvel and Summit) via banks or someone like Relativity AND get one of the studios to front up the p&a cash in exchange for a fee, they are likely to be constrained once again as as soon as they ever have a flop
the whole proposition is quite risky for the exisiting debtholders (who could probably sell the entity for about 1.5B right now vs converting to even riskier equity) and any subsequent debt financier (although again they would have some sort of recourse just as the exisiting debtholders have now)
history could well repeat itself….
Sloan is not out exactly. Still Chairman, probably to do with last contract renewal. He needs to be out out out! What a mess he’s made.
How do you build value into a company around the world using the MGM brand without mentioning television, as well as the domestic and foreign distribution of the companies huge library. B & B are very smart guys but can you really grow a company without a dominant theatrical distribution operation as well as taking full advantage of the film and television library in the digital age? Just making movies is not enough in this day and age.
P.S. The rights to individual films in the MGM library are so complex to begin with a pre-packaged bankruptcy can only make a already complicated situation just a little more complicated. I think?
What I want to know is how you take $4 billion in debt and turn it into equity.
Library is worth about 300-350 million
If this deal does work (and frankly I’m skeptical to say the least) I fully expect us all to be back here in a few years time once again talking about who is going to buy the broke (and one again broken) MGM 2.0 from these Spyglass partners.
The biggest assets on the current MGM slate are the biggest monkeys on their back. The Hobbit will cost a fortune to make but at least they are potentially splitting that budget with WB.
But what about Bond? Will this new MGM really be willing to pay more than $200m for the next Bond title, because that’s what they cost nowadays.
Say what you will about Sony and the Bond films but Sony were prepared to pay through the nose to make that franchise work. And the Broccoli’s loved them for it.
Once again we see a minnow (formerly a titan) trying to play amongst the ‘big boys’ and, at best, treading water.
We shall see, but Time Warner and some other well financed sharks are still swimming in the water and may yet try and make a move near the bankruptcy hearing.
This story is far from over.
Roger Birnbaum never forgave Rupert Murdoch for not getting Joe Roth’s job after Roth left. And by golly, Roger won’t stop until he buys MGM and sinks it again.
I have no doubt the loses are just going to keep coming. Time Warner might have been able to do something with those titles, use them as a bargaining chip perhaps. At some point the cost of maintaining them is going to be higher than the revenue. Of course, that was the case prior to the success of Blockbuster and so on. I wonder if MGM or Blockbuster will go through bankruptcy first.
Actually FAME is an MGM title, they asked Lakeshore to come on for the INTL.
MGM, well Spy Glass dudes know what they are doing. Wish they could hold on to the BOND franchise.
Robert Not so Wise…….
Do you mean 300-350m a year in free cash flow or total value?
This seems like a possible green light for many projects that many people, including me, are waiting for (next BOND films, ROBOCOP, THE HOBBIT, etc…)
Personally, I would like to see what happens with David Cronenberg’s state on THE MATARESE CIRCLE. I enjoyed the Robert Ludlum’s novel a lot, and I think it’s a very interesting genre that Cronenberg could be working on.