
It’s an unusual year with lots of first class lead performances from women, including Annette Bening, Julianne Moore, Natalie Portman, Diane Lane, Tilda Swinton, Lesley Manville, Michelle Williams, Noomi Rapace, Sally Hawkins, Jennifer Lawrence, and Anne Hathaway. I think there is none better than Nicole Kidman making a major artistic comeback after a string of disappointments that include Australia, Nine, Margot At The Wedding, The Invasion, Fur, and Human Stain. She turns in a brilliant performance in Rabbit Hole, which had its gala world premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival Monday night. (I saw it at a private screening in L.A. a few weeks ago.) As a mother dealing with the sudden death of her 4-year-old son, Kidman gets it all heartbreakingly right. She is matched by costars Aaron Eckhart as her husband and Dianne Wiest as her mother. This is easily her best work since winning an Oscar for 2002’s The Hours, and probably her most assured screen work, even though I confess to being a major To Die For groupie.
One thing the actress has always done is take creative leaps with scripts that aren’t obviously commercial (Dogville, anyone?). Based on David Lindsay-Abaire’s Tony and Pulitzer Prize winning play, the role Kidman plays won a Best Actress Tony for Cynthia Nixon. The film version, written by Lindsay-Abaire and directed by John Cameron Mitchell, is up for grabs at Toronto. Reps for the film tell me they not only hope to land a deal but want to get the film out in time for this year’s awards race. Problem is, the small character-driven film might be perceived as a real downer. Parents-grieving-over-dead-kid flicks don’t exactly get them lined up at the multiplex, so stellar reviews and awards attention are crucial. Should it find a distributor this week and get an end-of-year berth, past winners Kidman and Wiest both become bonafide Oscar contenders again. Particularly since it’s the actors branch doing the voting, and this kind of material is a thespian dream. I’m reminded of a couple of years ago when The Wrestler made a deal with Fox Searchlight hot off its success in Venice and Toronto. It became a major awards player by December. A savvy distrib would need to coordinate all this in a hurry for Rabbit Hole, and Fox Searchlight, Focus Features, Weinstein Co, all seem to have their dance cards full with lots of other Best Actress candidates already. Tough business, this Oscar thing.
Robert Redford’s The Conspirator is in the same boat. I hear today a deal is very, very close for this one and we can expect an announcement soon. I saw this film a few weeks ago at the CAA screening room before it had its Toronto premiere over the weekend. It is also angling for the right distributor presumably to put it in this year’s race as well. That, at least, is the conventional wisdom. Around the time I saw it, I heard it had interest from at least one mini-major (Focus has been mentioned) which wanted to hold it for a late 2011 release and skip the awards game this year. Don’t know if that is still the thinking now that it is crunch time in Toronto, but this is the type of movie that could play very well with the Academy whenever it’s released, particularly for older members. It’s the kind of classy project you would expect from Redford, a compelling courtroom drama with fine performances from James McAvoy, Tom Wilkinson, Kevin Kline and the criminally underrated Robin Wright in a role that could be either lead actress or supporting. I would go for the latter.
Naysayers are pidgeonholing this as History Channel fodder, but the story of a wide-ranging conspiracy behind the Lincoln assassination is eye-opening stuff, it has contemporary relevance and serves as a nice counterpoint to most of the films around today, certainly those in Toronto this week. Holding the film for 2011 and hoping to still be viable for next year’s awards race is risky business after a splashy Toronto unveiling. But you have to do what’s in the movie’s best interest marketing and distribution-wise. As one exec close to the film told me, it didn’t hurt Crash or The Hurt Locker, both of which went on to Best Picture Oscar glory a full 18 months after their Toronto debuts. My guess: look for The Conspirator to show up sometime in 2011.
Awards Columnist Pete Hammond - tip him here.


Pete, I love ya, but you are way off on “Conspirator.” HBO TV movie. Wright is not in play as good as she is.
Sorry, but Kidman is absolutely brilliant in Margot at the wedding. She’s also very strong in Fur, the fact that both films were unnoticed has nothing to do with her performances. She’s the actor in her age bracket with the most interesting filmography – she’s not stuck in suburban wife territory.
Her best work since The Hours ? Have you heard of Dogville ? Or Birth ? Seems you think about films in a very American-centric way.
Seriously. “Dogville” and “Birth” are absolutely amazing, as is “Margot At The Wedding.” It depresses me that her movies don’t perform better, because she gives me hope for the industry.
I would love to see Nicole in the race again, but her best performance since The Hours really? She was brilliant in Birth and Dogville. I would be positively ecstatic if Kidman took the second spot behind Bening in the Lead Actress race.
Nicole Kidman is an accomplished actress who seems to have found the right return vehicle with The Rabbit Hole. The subject matter, however, does not lend itself well to a holiday release and could doom awards recognition for all involved with the film.
Kidman has been turning in creative, great work over the last 10 years, and I think she is due for another nomination at the very least.
On the subject of TIFF, holy smokes was John Carpenter’s “The Ward” terrible. He should have really stayed retired after those horrible Showtime shows.
They’re gonna need a SHIT-ton of Award Buzz and some ol’e St. Nick Magic to sit through Rabbit Hole.
No one, and I mean NO ONE, wants to plunk down ten dollars to watch a woman grieve over the sudden death of her 4 year-old.
Not unless robots are responsible and she hires Will Smith to kill all of them.
Sorry.
Women will plunk down the money for this. It’s gut wrenching, but it’s real and women love emotion. Isn’t that what movies are all about? Movies are the roller coaster rides twisting the guts out of life!
“Not unless robots are responsible and she hires Will Smith to kill all of them.”
LMFAO!
I know this all seems to be about Nicole and her Oscar worthiness, and I agree she gives one of her very best perfs ever, though my faves remain TO DIE FOR and THE OTHERS.
But lets not take note of John Cameron Mitchell’s clearly topnotch directorial achievement here. He’s found the human comedy as well as human drama here and coaxed surprisingly potent work out of a usually so-so Aaron Eckhart. His trust in his whole cast and crew is so apparent as always and we see he’s much more than a terrific quirky talent. JCM is a major American director. Now go back and see “Hedwig” and “Short Bus” and see that his commitment is to true human emotions, nothing less in every moment!
box office it isn’t important…
Nicole Kidman is brave, and talentuos. so much.
Critics seems do not understand that she deserves awards…just becase she is a great star doesn’t mean she doesn’t have to be nominated to golden globe or even for an oscar..
She deserved a nomination for Margot at the wedding..come on..
as well as dogville…as other people have already said..
can’t wait to see this movie.
her best performance? lol..what a joke. nice PR. how can she act if her face is frozen? she can’t even smile…and that third lip. she is a disaster.
Rabbit Hole sounds like one of those cynical “i’ve been off the radar or not critically successful for a few years so i’m going to try and bag an Oscar” films like Things We Lost In The Fire or A Mighty Heart.
Voters can see through those, they smack of desperation.
Her true prestige is in “Dogville”
“No one, and I mean NO ONE, wants to plunk down ten dollars to watch a woman grieve over the sudden death of her 4 year-old.”
I do. Also, The Hours was about suicidal lesbians and that did quite well.
Can Nicole Kidman move her forehead yet or is she still paralyzed up there from the excessive Botox?
The reason some of her movies have bombed is that all her acting in her face is from the eyes down, so she looks “off” when portraying emotions. Everybody knows the eyebrows and forehead give important emotional cues.
Oh, and the other reason is that some of her scripts have not been really compelling.
THE WHISTLEBLOWER was amazing, fantastic directing, Rachel is going to get nominated for a second Oscar!
Nomination, maybe. Win over Portman in Black Swan? Not bloody likely. Portman is out of this world in Aronofsky`s movie. Also, Rabbit Hole has to be beyond good to leap over Social Network, 127 Hours, Black Swan, Inception and Let Me In or be more crowd-pleasing than King`s Speech (not my type of a movie but Firth and Rush are sensational).
My winner predix as of now:
Picture: The Social Network
Director: Fincher
Actor: Firth or Franco (Eisenberg is phenomenal in TSN but Franco is an incredible one-man show and Firth is amazing and due)
Actress: Portman (too spectacular not to win)
Are you seriously mentioning Natalie Portman in a conversation about NICOLE KIDMAN?
Maybe you are paid to keep Natalie’s name mentioned but this is beyond absurd.
Good luck creating Oscar buzz. ELSEWHERE.
‘To Die For’ is Kidman’s best but ‘Birth’ was awesome and highly underrated.
TIFF Monkey: On the subject of TIFF, holy smokes was John Carpenter’s “The Ward” terrible. He should have really stayed retired after those horrible Showtime shows.
C’mon! Please say it aint so! I’ve been looking forward to this flick for awhile now.
@Jack sure a mainstream audience doesn’t care about serious drama’s but I’d like to believe there is still a niche market out there for these types of movies. Get Low, Cyrus, Ghost Writer, The Kids are All Right all had solid box office turns this year. I think overall if you get a star like Kidman in a film on small-decent budget would be profitable. Of course she can’t open a big movie but besides Angelina Jolie (in the actress sector) who can consistently open a big movie
I’ve always enjoyed Nicole Kidman’s work. Throw in a dose of Aaron Eckhart and Dianne Wiest for good measure and “Rabbit Hole” is sure to be a pleaser even though the subject matter is gut-wrenching. I’ve grown weary of all the whiz, bang CGI-laden action flicks. I want my senses to get a different kind of work out. My suspicion is that audiences may be looking forward to seeing more adult-oriented fare that simply features intelligent writing, convincing performances and flawless direction. This fall’s movie-going experience may be looking up…
Nicole Kidman is an excellent actress, probably one of the best we ever had. Her filmography is filled with completely outstanding performances (To Die For, The Others, Moulin Rouge!, The Hours, Birth, Dogville, Margot at the Wedding, Fur) and she shines even when the film doesn’t. She makes brave career choices, she might not be a Box Office-draw (neither are Kate Winslet and Cate Blanchett for that matter), but she is definitely one of the best and most versatile actresses today.
P.S. Bringing up the Botox-issue is very low and very unprofessional.
Nice to see so many people mentioning “Birth” – one of the most underrated pictures of the past decade. I was happy to learn recently that critic David Thomson will be hosting a special screening of the film at this year’s New York Film Festival.
Hey, movies don’t get much more depressing than 21 Grams. That came out at Thanksgiving (I remember because my family made the mistake of seeing it pre-turkey), made $60 million on a $20 m budget and got two Oscar noms.
Kidman is getting really great reviews for her performance in ‘Rabbit Hole’. I hope she gets her 3rd Oscar nomination. It would be more than deserved considering all the great performances she’s given over the years.
Having seen both Black Swan and Rabbit Hole, I have to give Kidman the edge here. Her performance was mesmerizing. She will be near impossible to beat come Oscar time.
And how could any discussion about Kidman’s finest work leave out The Others?! One of the greatest female performances of that decade.