EXCLUSIVE: Universal Pictures and NBC Universal Television Entertainment have closed a deal to turn Stephen King’s mammoth novel series The Dark Tower into a feature film trilogy and a network TV series, both of which will be creatively steered by the Oscar-winning team behind A Beautiful Mind and The Da Vinci Code.
Ron Howard has committed to direct the initial feature film, as well as the first season of the TV series that will follow in close proximity. Akiva Goldsman will write the film, and the first season of the TV series. Howard’s Imagine Entertainment partner Brian Grazer will produce, with Goldsman and the author.
When Deadline revealed in April that Howard, Goldman and Grazer planned to team with King, Universal was battling Warner Bros—home of Goldsman’s Weed Road–for the property. The multi-platform deal was so comprehensive, it took months to close. It will be announced later today by Universal Pictures chairman Adam Fogelson, co-chairman Donna Langley, NBC Universal Television Entertainment chairman Jeff Gaspin, and NBC & Universal Media Studios Primetime Entertainment president Angela Bromstad, all of whom pulled it together.
I spoke with Goldsman and Howard, who have polled enough of their peers to be convinced what they are doing here has never been attempted: using a major studio’s film and TV platforms simultaneously to tell a story. It is reminiscent of when Peter Jackson directed three installments of The Lord of The Rings, back to back, so that they could be released in three consecutive years.
“What Peter did was a feat, cinematic history,” Howard told me. “The approach we’re taking also stands on its own, but it’s driven by the material. I love both, and like what’s going on in TV. With this story, if you dedicated to one medium or another, there’s the horrible risk of cheating material. The scope and scale call for a big screen budget. But if you committed only to films, you’d deny the audience the intimacy and nuance of some of these characters and a lot of cool twists and turns that make for jaw-dropping, compelling television. We’ve put some real time and deep thought into this, and a lot of conversations and analysis from a business standpoint, to get people to believe in this and take this leap with us. I hope audiences respond to it in a way that compels us to keep going after the first year or two of work. It’s fresh territory for me, as a filmmaker.”
Considered King’s answer to JRR Tolkien’s Middle Earth trilogy, The Dark Tower revolves around Roland Deschain, the last living member of a knightly order of gunslingers, and humanity’s last hope to save a civilization that will crumble unless he finds the Dark Tower. Howard and Goldsman describe the world as “an alternate Americana, one part post-apocalyptic, one part Sergio Leone.”
Goldsman first mentioned The Dark Tower to Howard and Grazer while they worked on A Beautiful Mind nearly a decade ago.
“Akiva said, ‘Stephen will not let go of it, but it’s like nothing else you’ve ever read,’” Howard recalled. “It was frustrating because it’s one of those works where you read it, and then at odd times, the imagery and sensations just pop up in your mind. This is going to be an amazing life experience for us, trying to do justice to the story and the universe.”
King granted an option—for $19, a number relevant to the plotline–to JJ Abrams and his Lost partners Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse. They never cracked the sprawling plotline and all the characters. Goldsman pounced when the rights were available, but saw the same problems until Howard suggested using film and TV platforms. Though Howard famously grew up on a TV screen on The Andy Griffith Show, he hasn’t directed TV since the early 80s, but is eager to return. It seems hard to fathom he’d direct a full season’s worth of episodes, but that is the early plan, and who says they have to do 22 to create that bridge to the next film?
The plan is to start with the feature film, and then create a bridge to the second feature with a season of TV episodes. That means the feature cast—and the big star who’ll play Deschain—also has to appear in the TV series before returning to the second film. After that sequel is done, the TV series picks up again, this time focusing on Deschain as a young gunslinger. Those storylines will be informed by a prequel comic book series that King was heavily involved in plotting. The third film would pick up the mature Deshain as he completes his journey. They will benefit from being able to use the same sets cast and crew for the movie and TV, which could help contain costs on what will be a financially ambitious undertaking.
“We will certainly be looking to maximize both creative and fiscal opportunities by creating one enterprise that encompasses TV and movies,” Goldsman said. “Some of the shooting will likely encompass both platforms, and that has never been done before. It’s thrilling, we feel like kids in a candy story.”
Goldsman is writing, and Howard said he and Grazer have cleared the decks to do this quickly. “I’m finishing The Dilemma, and then I don’t have anything scheduled and I plan to work hard on this with Akiva and Brian,” Howard told me. “We will refine our take on the feature and TV shows. We have a clear view of what we want to do, and we’re lucky to have a company with the nerve to back us up on this venture.”
Howard, Grazer and Goldsman will exec produce the TV series for Universal Media Studios. Kerry Foster will exec produce the first film for Weed Road, along with Imagine’s Todd Hallowell and Erica Huggins.






Peter Jackson!!!
Just wanted to say that since he was mentioned….
There is only one actor with the physical presence, penetrating calm / demeanor and ambling gait who can “become” Roland Deschain – Timothy Olyphant. Watch Hitman & Justified – you’ll be convinced that Roland walks among us
Actually, that’s not a bad idea….
true. see also: Deadwood
You are so very right, was reading everyones comments wishing someone would mention him, he is seriously the guy for this, just take one glace at this
- http://ones2watch4.com/content/wp-content/gallery/timothy-olyphant/tim-9.jpg
Check out Justified to see the should be Roland!
He looks far too young and his features dont look like what is described in the books, plus his eyes would need serious work.
olyphant is about 20-30 years to young, sorry guys Clint would kick his ass with a .44 magnum anyway
Okay, since we can’t have Clint, I will take Tim. Oh, I auew hope this works.
Clint Eastwood is the ONLY CHOICE! Roland was ancient, ancient I tell you in the Dark Tower. If you don’t think so you didn’t read it carefully.
Or at all…
he was around 350 years old when the series ended. . .
OR DID IT???
With films set on the ol wild wild west, I always imagine two actors that can best play as Roland, it is either Clint Eastwood or to settle for a younger one, Kieffer Sutherland. They are the best choices for me.
Are we talking HBO, SHO or some other cable TV here? I’m hoping so, because we can dump the whole ratings issue and make a movie for adults (these certainly aren’t books for kids). Network TV would be the kiss of death. I hope they find spectacular unknowns for these roles, as knowing the stars too well can take you out of the story. A BIG part of me wishes that they would just leave it alone, but I felt the same way about the LOTR movies before I saw them.
I usually don’t even consider getting HBO, but for the Gunslinger I certainly would. It would be worth every penny, just to see him. I have read the books at least 4 or 5 times (actually I have lost count). As to who should star, I have to agree that, on looks, Timothy Oliphant would definitely fit the part. I am not familiar enough with his acting to make a judgement there. I got hooked on the series by listening to a book-on-tape, at the insistence of my sons, as we drove up to their brother’s wedding in 1995. Even though I was a rather captive audience, it was great. I couldn’t wait to get home to read the rest of the books.
You nailed my one major concern square on the head. A tale like this must have either unknown actors in it, or actors who are not yet too identified with another role and are willing to 100% commit to becoming King’s.
That’s why LOTR worked, all those actors were not A Listers and moreover they gave it 110% because they respected the material. If the team has a level of reverence for the spirit of the work, we may be okay.
I’d suggest they shop around western and ganster/crime dramas of the last 10 years and look at the gritty sidekick bad guys for a hard case that went undiscovered.
I too am concerned about NBC and Howard muting the vibrancy of the work but we’ll have to see what happens.
Good luck trying to get an A-lister like Jackman or working actors like Brolin or Mortensen to do a tv series. That sort of commitment would be difficult with rising stars like Channing Tatum or Jeremy Renner.
Thus…
… Alexander Skarsgard
You sir, are a moron….
I don’t know if A listers would balk at this project because of the TV stigma. I think A listers will balk a the duration of the shoot. Lord of the Rings shot for 18 months. This is going to be three features and two years of tv in between? How long is this thing going to be in production? Two and a half year? Three years? I think you’d have a hard time getting anybody to commit to that length.
i agree completely with tanuki
This sounds different and bigger, but ironically Universal in the late 70′s (in desperate STAR WARS rip-off mode) launched both BUCK ROGERS and the original BATTLE STAR GALACTICA in movie theaters the summers before they launched on NBC and ABC respectively with the same casts and creative teams. Just a little useless history…
You are epically wrong with regards to Battlestar Galactica. It started out as a TV series in the US- no one cares about Canada. When the series puttered out, they recut the premiere, remixed the soundtrack in sensorround (remember that craze?) and released it in theaters.
The BO was respectable enough, that ABC tried to revive the series as the ill fated Galactica 1980.
Please get your facts straight.
O yeah, thanks for the reminder… Let’s all hope this is MUCH better (searching for razor blades in case it’s not….)
ohmygodronhowardissobooooorrrrriiiiiiing!
The absolute definition of “square” filmmaking.
This is amazing news.
Books 1 and 4 are particularly amazing. Song of Suzannah was a bit of a throwaway, but overall, this is a true EPIC work of literature.
Very excited to see what they can do with it.
There will definitely need to be a variety of people playing Roland (young and old).
I actually don’t think it will be too hard to cast him. He’s so stoic and classic “strong silent type”, anyone can do that. Wearing a cowboy hat a six-shooters helps too.
you sir are a moron… roland is not just the strong silent type, read the books and you’ll see he is very emotional, he just never showed it and was very subtle, are you suggesting sylvester stalone, he’s the strong silent type, although he could work on the silent
“Emotional, he just never showed it and was very subtle” = strong, silent type.
Will this include the new Tower book King’s been promising, The Wind Through the Keyhole?
Wow, sounds interesting. Too bad it will NEVER happen.
what the fugg are you talking about?! did you not read the story? it is happening fool.
Ideas on who to play Roland the Gunslinger of Gilead, since this article said they want a big name for that role: Hugh Jackman, Gerard Butler, Russell Crowe, Cristian Bale, Tom Cruise or Robert Downey Jr.
idiot, lets stay away from mainstream
+1
roland-will smith
susanah- taraji p henson
Tom Cruise? He isn’t an actor, he’s an action star. And he is far from being an imposing figure like Roland. That is the dumbest suggestion I have ever heard anywhere. I’m surprised no one else chided you for it.
Tom Cruise??? Are you high? No No No they are all wrong….all wrong. Tom Cruise is too girly to even pull off Eddie much less Roland….might could cast him as Susan Delgado? Miss Oh So Young and Pretty….eh maybe not. Whatever the casting choice I agree with everyone who is calling for unknowns. Please don’t ruin my beautiful images of Roland, Eddie, Susannah and Jake by putting big name actors in there.
People said for 20 years that “Watchmen” was unfilmable. And when the movie was finally made, it turned out that the pundits were right. Some stories are just too involved and complex to be transferred from the pages of a book to a movie screen, no matter how many extra TV episodes you throw into the mix. This hasn’t even started filming yet and it already sounds like a confusing, jumbled mess.
just shut up.
Thanks for the intelligent reply, Junior. Aren’t you late for your nap?
no i agree, shut up, the original watchmen was a frigging gordon’s knot of contradicting stories and details to begin with, of course it filmed badly, king has a slightly more streamlined story
You OBVIOUSLY have never read the entire Dark Tower series if you consider it to be a “streamlined” story. King himself has said that he had trouble keeping plot points in continuity. Perhaps you read the comic book version?
Very lame comparison. Watchmen was one movie…. this is going to be 3 movies and two seasons on tv. That’s a lot more time to cover a lot more ground.
Roland is Clint Eastwood. No he is not too old, remember he ages 10 years at the end of book one. & time runs funny in these parts. Im worried about the casting more than directing. but Peter Jackson & quentin tarantino together are about the only two that could remain sane through this. Stephen King has a pattern of his movies & mini series getting fucked up & away from the point. This has to be perfect.
Eastwood would be great as Steven Deschain, the father of Roland. But I’m afraid that Clint’s 20 years past playing Roland.
Love love LOVE this idea!!!
But, he may even be too old for that
At the time that Steven Deschain is in the story, he would have been much younger himself
Fabulous idea though!
Frederick Weller, The Guy Who plays Marshall Marshall on “In Plain Sight” should play Roland. Gina Torres, Zoe from “Firefly” should be Susannah and Eddie…. , maybe Carmine Gio….zo, Danny from “CSI NY”. Jake is going to be a problem because he has to stay 10 years old, I have no idea, Maybe Andy Sirkis in CGI suit? Clint Howard should be Gasher and Bryce Dallas Howard can be Susan Delgado.
Wow, this is cool and ambitious news! What an amazing tapestry, esp with the addition of Roland’s backstory as (mostly) newly presented in the Marvel graphic novels. An my pick for Roland: Josh Holloway, who played Sawyer on LOST.
I think Josh Holloway would be PERFECT! I’ve never thought about that until now. I think he’s rather young, but as was said above… time runs funny in these parts.
I really hope they don’t screw this up. We all have high expectations, but at the same time we’ll be expecting the worst.
All in all, I’m SUPER excited about this!!! I loved loved LOVED the series and I can’t wait to see what they’ll put on the big screen!
Wow, I had suggested Josh Holloway for this to somebody before I read this comment. I agree, he IS Roland. He has to be watchable for widespread ratings. Josh Holloway is veeeerrrry watchable. Whoever it is they’re going to have to make him look young and old – That’s what makeup is for.
first Roland suggestion i can get on board with… I dont think he is PERFECT, but he fits
I never thought of him for this; I always had this picture of a younger Clint Eastwood. That being said, I think Holloway would be very good for this. I just hope upon hope that they don’t mess this up…
That’s a great idea. Josh Holloway is a very likeable and watchable actor.
Great idea, but not an original way to present it. The X-Files TV series already did the TV-Movie-TV thing back in 1998 when they made the movie Fight The Future as a bridge between seasons 5 and 6 of the TV series. The movie carried the story along and supplied information and plot advancement that wasn’t seen in season 5 but was developed on in season 6. Looking forward to this development of King’s story, but the method is not original with it.
I also would love Timothy Olyphant (just watch anything he’s done especially Justified). My backup would be Josh Holloway too.
I’m so excited and so terrified all at once. There’s no way to cast “Roland” right. Clint Eastwood is too old…deal with it (breaks my heart to say it). The only suggestion that made sense that anyone came up with was Josh Brolin. He’s an actual MAN. I’m a fan of a lot of the other actors, but if they go with a cliche actor, the whole series will die before it takes off.
Goldsman couldn’t be bothered to read I Am Legend… he watched and adapted The Omega Man instead. God knows how he’ll adapt the stories that haven’t been done in comic books.
I wonder how they’ll handle the Crimson King, ’cause he (along with Mordred and Flagg) is kind of a letdown.
Any film maker who dares try to do this in 3D is epicly forgetting the face of their fathers
I’m certainly a fan of this series, although I like the material featuring Eddie and Susannah a lot more than I do the earlier Roland material in “The Gunslinger” (when King wasn’t yet the writer he would become) and “Wizard And Glass.” So to me, the question is what gets put in the movies and what gets put into the TV shows. If you put the early Western type material on TV, I don’t think it would do very well. You could certainly save money doing “The Drawing Of The Three” that takes place more in our world on TV, but that would take some of the fun out of the movies. I’m sure King won’t let them lose much of the narrative, which I see as a big problem…
you and I are on polar opposites. “Wizards and Glass” is one of my favorite books of all time!!!
Ugh worst comment ever
I will wait with great trepidation. Hollywood’s track record on moving great literature to the screen is not good. Look at what they did to I Robot, and many others. If done well, this will be a timeless classic. If done poorly it will be an unwatchable fiasco.