
After the Tom Hooper-directed Colin Firth-Geoffrey Rush film The King’s Speech came out of Toronto with strong Oscar buzz, United Talent Agency swooped in to sign the pic’s writer, David Seidler. It’s not unusual for the scribes of Oscar-bait film to get snapped up by major agencies. But Seidler is no flash in the pan. He’s 73 years old, and the effort to make the film dates back to before many of today’s top screenwriters were born. His script –covering King George VI’s race to overcome a stutter so he could rally his subjects in radio broadcasts as England fought Hitler’s invading forces in WWII–was subject matter that is woven through Seidler’s own life. While an eloquent speaker now, Seidler developed a debilitating childhood stutter he attributes to the shock of those early days of WWII. “I was a profound stutterer as a kid, and though we relocated to the US after the Battle of Dunkirk, it was the trauma of hearing the guns and bombs from that battle that triggered it. I could barely talk at times, but as the war progressed, we were allowed to listen to the radio and the King of England. He spoke badly, but I thought my goodness, if a king can be brave enough to speak like that on the radio, maybe there’s hope for me. He was always a hero to me.”
Years later, after Seidler finished the 1988 Francis Coppola-directed Tucker: The Man and His Dream, he began researching King George VI and stumbled upon Lionel Logue, the Australian speech therapist who helped the king conquer his stutter. Things were moving on a fast track after he located Logue’s son, Valentine, by then a retired brain surgeon. “He said, ‘come to London, I’d love to talk with you, and I have all the notebooks my father kept of working with the King of England,’” Seidler told me. “But he added, before any of this can happen, you must get written permission from the Queen Mother.” Seidler went through the proper channels, and the reply stopped him in his tracks. “I was told that she’d said, ‘Please, not in my lifetime. The memory of those events are still too painful.’ An American writer might have said to hell with it, but I hold two passports and like a good Brit, I agreed to wait. How long could it take? Well it wasn’t until 28 years later that she left us.”
By then, Logue’s son had passed away and Seidler wrote his script without the notebooks–though he got a look at them just before the picture went into production and made a couple of revisions. After writing the script, Seidler turned it into a stage play, and Hooper’s parents happened to attend a reading. They asked if they could share it with their son, but he was so busy working on the HBO miniseries John Adams, that he didn’t read it for months. “One day he shows up at my door, waving the script and calling it the best he’d been given in his life. “He said, if in two weeks we were in production on this script, I’d sleep well,” Seidler said. “Of course, we went through about 50 drafts after that.”
After waiting nearly three decades, Seidler was willing to put in the work. During those years, he wrote a lot of TV, but also served a stint in the 60s writing propaganda for the prime minister of Fiji, and was one of the authors of its constitution. “There three military coups, and so that document was redone three times by different people,” Seidler said. “So I’m used to the concept of rewriting, but was glad that on The King’s Speech, I was the one doing the rewrites.” He continues with longtime manager Jeff Aghassi.


Good for him. Too bad he had to wait for this to get the recognition I’m sure he deserved all along. I liken success to a marathon. I don’t care for supporters and groveling sycophants who show at at mile 25 just to stand next to me on the podium. F*ck em and feed em beans.
Really, is that your interpretation? Then you are wildly uniformed about this business. Thank g*d agencies are willing to represent writers of Mr. Seidler’s age. The script is a masterpiece, as is the film. Congrats to him and UTA.
@Appalled
Uninformed? I think not, and there are countless others who have agents and can’t even explain why because they do NOTHING for them. I take it this is the first time you’re hearing that one huh?
Everyone loves a winner but if I have to do the job on my own what the hell do I need an agent for who won’t return calls once the photo ops are gone? The problem today is no one likes to work but everyone wants a job. What’s really appalling is the sense of entitlement that’s rampant these days. There’s a plethora of agents, managers, lawyers, etc. who are akin to parasitic beings seeking out an unsuspecting host, and even a 73 year old man will do. Now, of course there’s the few rare individuals who can spot talent and potential BEFORE the accolades but finding them is like finding a Unicorn.
Thank you for writing this; your cliches have proven how uninformed you are.
I’m with Curtis. Well said.
Bravo. A true writer. Only hope Screw-TA will help him out.
My God, the story of getting the film made could make a terrific film on its own–it’s got everything from the Queen Mother to coups in Fiji! Thanks for a great article!
Mark my words, at some point in the next ten years, an agency will sign a dead person. Hopefully for the utmost irony, it will be a writer of an old unproduced zombie spec.
The story of HOW this got made would make a great movie!!! Congrats for that level of patience and perseverance.
Kudos to Jeff Aghassi for seeing his client through a challenging pitch to such an extraordinary outcome.
This movie tops my 2010 MUST SEE list. So wonderful to learn details of the lives of the script and its writer. Thanks, Deadline. And congratulations to Mr. Seidler and to UTA.
Big ups to Mr. Seidler.
I’d love to see an indie about a TV writer on an island nation helping draft a constitution during its coups! Well earned!
ditto. let’s see that.
and, thanks Mr. Fleming – for seeing the story behind the script, and caring enough to write about it.
According to Richard Corliss of TIME, The King’s Speech was an obvious and manipulative movie created with Oscar “lust.” Disability-check, Nazis-check, historical-check, monarchy-check.
This Deadline article shows just how deeply personal and heart-felt the story actually is – and how cynical and pompous this professional critic is. HE calls the film “self-important.” Ironic indeed.
Goes to show that someone, with a lifetime of actual experience and older than 25 can write a spectacular script. What a story and what perseverance. Mr. Seidler, kudos to you. This is one film I definitely want to see.
good for the old geezer, but uta has become kind of embarassing
talleyrand sounds like a man about town
At this stage, you sign with an agent to help build/capitalize on the momentum, which for many is a once in a lifetime occurrence. Chances are he had agents previously who didn’t hold much hope of seeing a return on their probably limited investment. Clearly his manager did. Kudos to them.
This is not the first time this story is out, is it? I know I read it in a book or saw a TV show that presented this story in the past couple of years. Can someone else recall? Wasn’t it in a BBC show, maybe “The Gathering Storm”? Whoever played the king in that treatment had more of his tentative demeanor and relatively frail physique than Firth displays. I think Firth will do a great job, he has a wonderful naturalness as an actor, but physically he is a bit too sturdy for King George.
Bravo David Seidler!