Mark Thompson has called on the British government to intervene in News Corp’s bid to take full control of BSkyB. Speaking on PBS’s Charlie Rose Show in New York, he agreed there was potential for an abuse of power by the Murdoch media group if BSkyB, the UK’s biggest broadcaster in terms of its £5.4 billion revenue, comes under the same ownership as News International, the UK’s largest newspaper group. Combining BSkyB with News International, owner of The Sun, The Times and The Sunday Times, raised issues of “how you ensure plurality in the system”, Thompson warned. He said that the UK government should look at those issues – although he stopped short of calling for the deal to be blocked. “If the two were combined, there might be a significant loss of plurality in our media market,” Thompson said. News Corp is bidding to buy the 61% of Sky it does not already own in a move that would compound its status as the overwhelming player in British media. Vince Cable, the government business secretary, does have the power to veto the deal on media plurality grounds. But there’s scepticism that the government will act, given that Rupert Murdoch was spotted going into the back entrance of 10 Downing Street for a secret meeting with Prime Minister David Cameron shortly after May’s general election. Culture secretary Jeremy Hunt has wondered what all the fuss is about given that News Corp already gives the outward appearance of owning Sky. Rival newspaper groups though are worried about the potential to cross-sell newspapers and cut-price pay-TV subscriptions. In any case, there’s nothing Cable can do until News Corp formally notifies the European Commission in Brussels about its plan to buy Sky outright. That’s at least a couple of weeks away, if not more, I’m told. Brussels has to make sure it has all the relevant information. Thompson did the interview during a series of meetings he was having in New York and Washington DC, as well as giving a speech on public service broadcasting. What’s interesting is that Thompson felt so strongly about what Murdoch is attempting to do that agreed to the interview in New York, the seat of real power for News Corp, given that it’s where Rupert Murdoch lives.


Unlike the BBC’s current abuse of its power?
Whether you agree with Murdoch’s politics or not, a Murdoch-owned BskyB would provide real competition to the BBC. This is a good thing.
I can fully understand why the BBC are afraid of this. However, they have brought it on themselves. They are complacent, arrogant and have been phoning-in their jobs for decades.
We need more competition, not less.
this BBC guy is just afraid of competition.
They’re pissed that ole’ Rupert will use “News Corp” money for programing not the governments money. That means the leftys in the Brit media can’t do whatever they please. God forbid if the Labour Partys whores in the Brit media lose TOTAL control.
Of course it’s not like the BBC would ever abuse their power. A state funded media outlet would never stoop so low.
(Is the sarcasm a little too heavy?)
It seems to me that most of the comments here have already bought into Murdoch’s propaganda machine, his politically slanted news and media, and his corporation’s clear intent to bully a publically owned TV station out of the market. Hang on…wait all the stories about how terrible and wasteful the BBC are run in newspapers….. wait……. owned by…… surely not…….Rupert Murdoch!
Mark Thompson walking through the front door of 10 downing street on the day Cameron is elected and Murdoch walking through the back door say’s it all
Pull back and take in the big picture.
Consolidation in the media is a threat to freedom. You’ve got vertical integration gone global, where a startling chunk of the information being promoted (yes, promoted–not simply reported) across the world is increasingly falling under the control of fewer and fewer hands.
And where does it end?
You’re looking at incredible, essentially unchecked power.
Power that can be brought to bear in unsavory ways upon the individuals and institutions responsible, in their respective nations or communities, to look after the public interest, that fragile concern increasingly marginalized.
What is the public interest? That shifts from community to community, nation to nation–but I’ll tell you what it’s not: the ability to control the dominant streams of information resting in a few self-serving hands.
You want Orwellian tyranny? Keep letting things slide closer and closer to that information monopoly.
(I mean, it’s not like the dominant corporate media has ever gotten anything significant wrong or ever been corrupted on behalf of insidious agendas, right?)
*ROTFLMAO* The BBC worried that someone else will “abuse power!” OMG too funny. Of course the translation is: “we will get our asses kicked, and we don’t like that. We are the elites and must have our station preserved.”
Oh this is rich.
At least one of the above comments reeks of Murdoch-employed PR person – is there a way for Nikki Finke to check when this happens? I’d certainly check who employs the first comment writer.
The BBC is conservative with its editorialising. Fox news is intentionally misleading. And the BBC is not an aggressive corporation – it’s bound by principles that newscorp simply doesn’t have – at all. Which is why they employ people to write to magazines and papers and online forums…such as this.
News Ltd already has too much power and this is just one more plank in Rupert Murdoch’s attempt to mold western society to bend to his views. Wherever he goes he puts his preferred politicians into power and brings down those he doesn’t like.
Cameron will probably give the takeover the go-ahead because Murdoch, being of the new aristocracy, is strongly right wing. Democracy? I think not. We are increasingly being ruled by our feudal lords under the guise of democracy.